It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Sorry, I'll try to improve next time. But as you see, it just burst out, and starting a PM is much too complicated to vent feelings immediately.
To those that wish DAF was a revenge type thriller. The producers were nervous. In their mind when the film was being developed it was going to star a third actor in the role in the last 3 films.
The audiences hadn't responded to OHMSS as well as YOLT. They felt the need to go opposite in tone and feel to OHMSS and so they brought back Hamilton. Looking for his golden touch for lightness.
I shudder to think how John Gavin would have performed in this film instead of Connery. Say what you will but Connery did play it with a certain confidence of having been the character for a 5 films. He has an air about him. Someone said he was playing himself, which of course he was not James Bond. This is why he wanted to break away from the role.
The DAF template showed the producers the way forward and when it was obvious that Connery was only willing to do this one they ran back the creative team and got a Bond actor who could play it lighter.
No doubt following the old saying, "Laugh and grow fat."