It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Amount of people ≠ strong human element. Beyond that, my answer to this question as written would be the dawn of time.
I tweaked the image quality because YouTube lowers the resolution when uploaded. This is as HD sharp as I can get the video without reducing the quality. This shows the potential of AI James Bond.
Roger Moore as James Bond in The Spy Who Loved Me AI:
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/cUW__xPPldg
The AI version of Roger Moore is very realistic. His mannerisms seem realistic. 😉
This is the same image but Bond is walking and with film grain filter to give it a 1970s look.
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/DfnLF5NM91M
When this movie was released in 1925, some audiences thought they were watching footage of real dinosaurs simply because they weren't used to it.
People's brains adapted to the advancement of visual effects. Jurassic Park obviously has far more advanced visuals but nobody thought those dinosaurs were real back in 1993.
The more CGI and AI are used, the more people will get used to them. There will always be something uncanny about them. I don't think they can ever replace real actors. Audiences simply won't be able to connect to AI movies.
I totally agree. Also, I know where to find cartoons/animations, when I want to watch one. Don't know why a film and arts lover would want AI to dominate. Wow! Unreal!