› ›

The incredible potential of Artificial Intelligence Bond films. Video samples.

2»

Comments

  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,297
    delfloria wrote: »
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    delfloria wrote: »
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    delfloria wrote: »
    Because he see the future it will bring. As new generations get used to AI it will become more mundane and be accepted as just one more form of entertainment. As I said earlier, there were a LOT of people who said Toy Story CGI animated films would never catch on.

    It was a false equivalence before and it remains as such now. CGI actually requires work.

    No it's not, CGI was deemed to cold and autonomous during the release of Toy Story by many critics. Today CGI requires a lot less work now because of AI and it will continue to make inroads into Visual Effects work. Right now rotoscoping is headed for the chopping block and the jobs that go with it. As AI continues to progress and it's ability to analyze artists input it's use will continue to grow. I was recently able to create a proof of concept creature with full animation by simply drawing a black and white sketch to start with. Also a friend recently produced a commercial featuring dolphins and other animals for Google completely using AI and was it was approved.

    Yes it is, and you've proved it with your elaboration. CGI requires work, regardless of whether it was deemed cold and autonomous by critics. There was still a lot of people working on it regardless of the final result.

    You've just sold us here on the fact that AI requires minimal work, if any at all.

    It's a losing battle admittedly: it's going to be implemented. I have come to accept it on a certain level. But I don't and will likely never respect it, as it strips authenticity away and reduces human elements and craft. It's a shortcut tool, and I hope audiences reject its use if (as the hypothesis of this thread suggests) it worms its way further into mainstream film-making.

    When did the amount of people or time become a criteria for art?

    Amount of people ≠ strong human element. Beyond that, my answer to this question as written would be the dawn of time.
  • bondywondybondywondy Uk
    edited 12:59am Posts: 544
    One final clip (two versions).

    I tweaked the image quality because YouTube lowers the resolution when uploaded. This is as HD sharp as I can get the video without reducing the quality. This shows the potential of AI James Bond.

    Roger Moore as James Bond in The Spy Who Loved Me AI:

    https://m.youtube.com/shorts/cUW__xPPldg

    The AI version of Roger Moore is very realistic. His mannerisms seem realistic. 😉

    This is the same image but Bond is walking and with film grain filter to give it a 1970s look.

    https://m.youtube.com/shorts/DfnLF5NM91M





  • slide_99slide_99 USA
    edited 3:20pm Posts: 786
    Call me an optimist, but I think that no matter how good CGI and AI get, people's brains will adapt to them and be able to tell that they're fake.
    When this movie was released in 1925, some audiences thought they were watching footage of real dinosaurs simply because they weren't used to it.

    People's brains adapted to the advancement of visual effects. Jurassic Park obviously has far more advanced visuals but nobody thought those dinosaurs were real back in 1993.
    The more CGI and AI are used, the more people will get used to them. There will always be something uncanny about them. I don't think they can ever replace real actors. Audiences simply won't be able to connect to AI movies.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    edited 3:34pm Posts: 2,640
    slide_99 wrote: »
    Call me an optimist, but I think that no matter how good CGI and AI get, people's brains will adapt to them and be able to tell that they're fake.
    When this movie was released in 1925, some audiences thought they were watching footage of real dinosaurs simply because they weren't used to it.

    People's brains adapted to the advancement of visual effects. Jurassic Park obviously has far more advanced visuals but nobody thought those dinosaurs were real back in 1993.
    The more CGI and AI are used, the more people will get used to them. There will always be something uncanny about them. I don't think they can ever replace real actors. Audiences simply won't be able to connect to AI movies.

    I totally agree. Also, I know where to find cartoons/animations, when I want to watch one. Don't know why a film and arts lover would want AI to dominate. Wow! Unreal!
Sign In or Register to comment.