› ›

The incredible potential of Artificial Intelligence Bond films. Video samples.

2»

Comments

  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,296
    delfloria wrote: »
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    delfloria wrote: »
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    delfloria wrote: »
    Because he see the future it will bring. As new generations get used to AI it will become more mundane and be accepted as just one more form of entertainment. As I said earlier, there were a LOT of people who said Toy Story CGI animated films would never catch on.

    It was a false equivalence before and it remains as such now. CGI actually requires work.

    No it's not, CGI was deemed to cold and autonomous during the release of Toy Story by many critics. Today CGI requires a lot less work now because of AI and it will continue to make inroads into Visual Effects work. Right now rotoscoping is headed for the chopping block and the jobs that go with it. As AI continues to progress and it's ability to analyze artists input it's use will continue to grow. I was recently able to create a proof of concept creature with full animation by simply drawing a black and white sketch to start with. Also a friend recently produced a commercial featuring dolphins and other animals for Google completely using AI and was it was approved.

    Yes it is, and you've proved it with your elaboration. CGI requires work, regardless of whether it was deemed cold and autonomous by critics. There was still a lot of people working on it regardless of the final result.

    You've just sold us here on the fact that AI requires minimal work, if any at all.

    It's a losing battle admittedly: it's going to be implemented. I have come to accept it on a certain level. But I don't and will likely never respect it, as it strips authenticity away and reduces human elements and craft. It's a shortcut tool, and I hope audiences reject its use if (as the hypothesis of this thread suggests) it worms its way further into mainstream film-making.

    When did the amount of people or time become a criteria for art?

    Amount of people ≠ strong human element. Beyond that, my answer to this question as written would be the dawn of time.
Sign In or Register to comment.