Where does Bond go after Craig?

1746747748749751

Comments

  • slide_99slide_99 USA
    edited June 5 Posts: 788
    If Amazon is intent on giving us a Zoomer Bond who's at the start of his career, it seems like us Millennials are the only ones who aren't going to get our own Bond.
    Silent generation: Connery, Lazeneby, Moore
    Boomer: Dalton, Brosnan
    Gen X'er: Craig
  • Posts: 5,392
    slide_99 wrote: »
    If Amazon is intent on giving us a Zoomer Bond who's at the start of his career, it seems like us Millennials are the only ones who aren't going to get our own Bond.
    Silent generation: Connery, Lazeneby, Moore
    Boomer: Dalton, Brosnan
    Gen X'er: Craig

    Depends on who the next Bond is. I suspect they'll be in their mid 30s though, so I guess a millennial. Not that it matters at any rate. Bond isn't a generational character in that way. He can be a 'younger' or 'older' Bond but I don't think we'll get a 'Gen z' or 'Gen x' Bond etc. in the same way.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,013
    As Calvin pointed out in his vid, Patrick Gibson should now be considered one of the favourites to become Bond. He's just turned 30 which means by the time the film releases he should be in the sweet spot, and could go on to play the character for 15+ years, Amazon will be salivating at that. Plus he's someone the general public doesn't really know, thus he'll be known as "James Bond" first and not just a famous face playing the character.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    Posts: 1,046
    As Calvin pointed out in his vid, Patrick Gibson should now be considered one of the favourites to become Bond. He's just turned 30 which means by the time the film releases he should be in the sweet spot, and could go on to play the character for 15+ years, Amazon will be salivating at that. Plus he's someone the general public doesn't really know, thus he'll be known as "James Bond" first and not just a famous face playing the character.

    I know him from The OA. I think he’s good, but I never really considered him for Bond. The game makes him look more rugged and a bit taller (not to mention giving him dark hair). I’ve not seen Dexter: Original Sin, so maybe he’s more obviously Bond material in that, but I still think deciding he should be one of the favourites based on an idealised computer rendering of him is perhaps jumping the gun (obviously if you’ve seen him in live-action shows and still think he’s ideal then my point is irrelevant).
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,013
    As Calvin pointed out in his vid, Patrick Gibson should now be considered one of the favourites to become Bond. He's just turned 30 which means by the time the film releases he should be in the sweet spot, and could go on to play the character for 15+ years, Amazon will be salivating at that. Plus he's someone the general public doesn't really know, thus he'll be known as "James Bond" first and not just a famous face playing the character.

    I know him from The OA. I think he’s good, but I never really considered him for Bond. The game makes him look more rugged and a bit taller (not to mention giving him dark hair). I’ve not seen Dexter: Original Sin, so maybe he’s more obviously Bond material in that, but I still think deciding he should be one of the favourites based on an idealised computer rendering of him is perhaps jumping the gun (obviously if you’ve seen him in live-action shows and still think he’s ideal then my point is irrelevant).

    No, and I did look up his height after posting and yeah 5 9 is a bit hard to see as Bond. A shame, because he has it in quite a few other areas.
  • Posts: 2,198
    I don't look at Bond as a generation Bond. If you like him, you identify with him. So you can be in your seventies and like a thirty something Bond.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited June 6 Posts: 18,235
    As Calvin pointed out in his vid, Patrick Gibson should now be considered one of the favourites to become Bond. He's just turned 30 which means by the time the film releases he should be in the sweet spot, and could go on to play the character for 15+ years, Amazon will be salivating at that. Plus he's someone the general public doesn't really know, thus he'll be known as "James Bond" first and not just a famous face playing the character.

    He certainly shows there are candidates out there we haven't spotted before, but I think it kind of makes him certain not to be the film 007 to be honest; there's no kind of big announcement of excitement when the new 007 gets launched if he's already played Bond kind of but-not-really. And no drive to go to the cinema to see what the new Bond is like if we've already had him in our homes.
    They'll want to pick their Bond, not someone else's.

    I guess he does show again that someone who isn't British can play Bond. Accent sounds flawless to me so far.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,013
    mtm wrote: »
    As Calvin pointed out in his vid, Patrick Gibson should now be considered one of the favourites to become Bond. He's just turned 30 which means by the time the film releases he should be in the sweet spot, and could go on to play the character for 15+ years, Amazon will be salivating at that. Plus he's someone the general public doesn't really know, thus he'll be known as "James Bond" first and not just a famous face playing the character.

    He certainly shows there are candidates out there we haven't spotted before, but I think it kind of makes him certain not to be the film 007 to be honest; there's no kind of big announcement of excitement when the new 007 gets launched if he's already played Bond kind of but-not-really. And no drive to go to the cinema to see what the new Bond is like if we've already had him in our homes.

    Good point, although not everyone's a gamer I suppose.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    Posts: 1,046
    mtm wrote: »
    As Calvin pointed out in his vid, Patrick Gibson should now be considered one of the favourites to become Bond. He's just turned 30 which means by the time the film releases he should be in the sweet spot, and could go on to play the character for 15+ years, Amazon will be salivating at that. Plus he's someone the general public doesn't really know, thus he'll be known as "James Bond" first and not just a famous face playing the character.

    He certainly shows there are candidates out there we haven't spotted before, but I think it kind of makes him certain not to be the film 007 to be honest; there's no kind of big announcement of excitement when the new 007 gets launched if he's already played Bond kind of but-not-really. And no drive to go to the cinema to see what the new Bond is like if we've already had him in our homes.
    They'll want to pick their Bond, not someone else's.

    I guess he does show again that someone who isn't British can play Bond. Accent sounds flawless to me so far.

    Irish actors normally can do English accents. I’m not sure we’ve ever questioned an Irish actor’s candidacy based on their nationality - I believe Aidan Turner is a name that has been mentioned more than once on these forums, and he is also Irish.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 1,969
    I still think this Bond looks, acts, and sounds American.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,632
    LucknFate wrote: »
    I still think this Bond looks, acts, and sounds American.

    Thankfully I’m not alone.

    But I’m also not a gamer. I don’t understand gaming. I’m not a boomer, but in this medium I guess I’m boomer-adjacent.

    I can see the effort that went into this project.

    I liked hearing the background story.

    But Bond seemed like a wise ass who is more akin to the character in Carry On, or Young Kirk in JJ’s first Star Trek…

    But then again, this wasn’t made for a person who doesn’t play these games.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,768
    I'm not a gamer either.

    Still, I wouldn't mind seeing Bond's parents die on screen, and young Bond being there and involved. It's a clever way to work Fleming into the story. If his parents performed some heroic act to save him, it could be a reason why he is so devil-may-care with his own stunts.

    I also love the OP short story (I think it's Fleming's best) and hate the way it was bastardized for SP. I think it can be adapted better.

    If I were Amazon and I were thinking about a younger Bond, I'd think long and hard incorporating the little bit of background that Fleming gave Bond into Bond 26. I wouldn't mind a true origin story as opposed to the made-up SF one.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,235
    Had to look Carry On up there, that has quite a different association in the UK! :D
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,716
    slide_99 wrote: »
    If Amazon is intent on giving us a Zoomer Bond who's at the start of his career, it seems like us Millennials are the only ones who aren't going to get our own Bond.
    Silent generation: Connery, Lazeneby, Moore
    Boomer: Dalton, Brosnan
    Gen X'er: Craig

    Patrick Gibson was born in 1995, which puts him near the tail end of Millennials (1981-1996)
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,689
    Surely none of that has any real meaning to it. These popular generation theories are pretty silly, if you ask me, and I believe most of them are constantly being debunked. I also think the Bond one grows up seeing in the movie theatre is more one's Bond than the one played by an actor of a shared generation. For purely anecdotal evidence: Connery and Moore never were of any interest to my grandma, who was born in 1926, but they were to my parents, aunts and uncles, who were born between 1950 and 1960.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,716
    Even the “Bond you grew up with” doesn’t always hold up. Brosnan was Bond in my childhood and is the first Bond I ever saw, but I never really thought of him as “my Bond”. Granted, I only got into Bond when I was 13, so I wasn’t as impressionable as say a 8 year old going to see GE in 1995, or an 8 year old seeing GF in 1964.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,689
    Even the “Bond you grew up with” doesn’t always hold up. Brosnan was Bond in my childhood and is the first Bond I ever saw, but I never really thought of him as “my Bond”. Granted, I only got into Bond when I was 13, so I wasn’t as impressionable as say a 8 year old going to see GE in 1995, or an 8 year old seeing GF in 1964.

    Exactly. That's why I don't care what club I belong to -- Millennials or whatever -- nor what generation this or that Bond are a part of. I simply want an actor whom I feel does a good job as Bond, and so far, I've had no reason to complain. ;-)
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,235
    slide_99 wrote: »
    If Amazon is intent on giving us a Zoomer Bond who's at the start of his career, it seems like us Millennials are the only ones who aren't going to get our own Bond.
    Silent generation: Connery, Lazeneby, Moore
    Boomer: Dalton, Brosnan
    Gen X'er: Craig

    Patrick Gibson was born in 1995, which puts him near the tail end of Millennials (1981-1996)

    But Bond in the game is 26, which makes him Gen Z.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,716
    Ah, news to me.
  • Posts: 2,589
    I have to admit it feels quite weird having a Bond two years younger than I am.
  • Posts: 2,198
    Is there narrative and a plot in a Bond game, or does Bond run around shooting things?
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,716
    I would hope we’re way past GOLDENEYE being a mindless shoot em up. As much as I love that game, it’s not a faithful adaptation of Bond for video games.
  • Posts: 2,589
    CrabKey wrote: »
    Is there narrative and a plot in a Bond game, or does Bond run around shooting things?

    It depends on the game really. As mentioned, Goldeneye really is just a mindless shoot em up game (fun though) but other titles like NightFire (an original story) allow you to take a more stealth-based approach to your objectives if you choose. You can sneak up behind enemies and force them to surrender - incapacitate enemies (and civilians if you so choose) using gadgets from Bond's arsenal - plus excellent driving sections as well.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited June 7 Posts: 15,170
    The 1998 game was great in that besides shooting and collecting items, a lot of focus was put on speaking to locals and trading items for information.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,716
    1998 game?
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 15,170
    Yeah the game 'James Bond 007', exclusive to the Game Boy. A very good and overlooked sort of top-down view game. Bought it the week it came out. Lots of trading and even casino action here.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 5,059
    QBranch wrote: »
    Yeah the game 'James Bond 007', exclusive to the Game Boy. A very good and overlooked sort of top-down view game. Bought it the week it came out. Lots of trading and even casino action here.

    It saddens me that James Bond 007 never got released for N64 or PS1.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 15,170
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    It saddens me that James Bond 007 never got released for N64 or PS1.
    I know, that would've been amazing. How would you go about the Sahara level in a 3D environment?
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 5,059
    QBranch wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    It saddens me that James Bond 007 never got released for N64 or PS1.
    I know, that would've been amazing. How would you go about the Sahara level in a 3D environment?

    I’m not sure. I honestly haven’t played the game! That’s why I wished for it to be on bigger consoles.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited June 7 Posts: 15,170
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    I’m not sure. I honestly haven’t played the game! That’s why I wished for it to be on bigger consoles.
    Ah, well if you have a Super Nintendo you can play it with the Super Game Boy adapter, which gives you four colour palettes to select from rather than the typical monochrome Game Boy graphics.

    In the Sahara level, you have a 'satellite relay' device that shows your location on a grid and where you have to go (military base), and you have to figure out how to get there by moving from screen to screen (up/down/left or right). The catch is you have only enough water in your canteen bottle to move a few screens before dying of thirst, and there are scorpions too! You can fill up your canteen at an oasis - the canteen given to you by a traveler on camel back.
Sign In or Register to comment.