› ›

What Directors Should Helm A Bond Film?

1…105106107108109111»

Comments

  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,578
    Not the guy who should be directing Bond…but I bet he’s on their short list, lol:

    https://deadline.com/2025/04/road-house-2-guy-ritchie-directing-amazon-mgm-sequel-1236381424/
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    Posts: 1,871
    peter wrote: »
    Not the guy who should be directing Bond…but I bet he’s on their short list, lol:

    https://deadline.com/2025/04/road-house-2-guy-ritchie-directing-amazon-mgm-sequel-1236381424/

    Yes, he is on the list for sure.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,504
    I expect Pascal & Heyman to be smart enough and not hire Ritchie. I don't even know which current director, Ritchie is better than.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,582
    Better than Vaughn, though only marginally.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,504
    MakeshiftPython wrote: »
    Better than Vaughn, though only marginally.

    Funnily enough, they're alike. Edgar Wright is almost in their mould too.
  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    Posts: 797
    I quite liked "The Covenant", and he's gotten good reviews for his "Gentleman" and "Mobland" shows. I think his biggest issue is he gets a little too overindulgent in terms of his own taste and characterization.
  • meshypushymeshypushy Ireland
    Posts: 181
    peter wrote: »
    Not the guy who should be directing Bond…but I bet he’s on their short list, lol:

    https://deadline.com/2025/04/road-house-2-guy-ritchie-directing-amazon-mgm-sequel-1236381424/
    This is the first ‘good news story’ that I have seen in quite a while in our media landscape. Mescal is also tied up - now we just need Theo James to sign up for Downton Abbey 2027 to ‘drain the swamp’ here ahead of getting some proper talent on board for Bond 26. Ritchie would make John Glen look like Fellini.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,509
    I would actually go with Richie if it meant getting Theo James as Bond...
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    Posts: 1,871
    MakeshiftPython wrote: »
    Better than Vaughn, though only marginally.

    And Campbell was better than Tamahori, only marginally. ;)
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,504
    DEKE_RIVERS wrote: »
    MakeshiftPython wrote: »
    Better than Vaughn, though only marginally.

    And Campbell was better than Tamahori, only marginally. ;)

    Campbell better than Tamahori marginally? Lol, wow!
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    Posts: 1,871
    SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ wrote: »
    DEKE_RIVERS wrote: »
    MakeshiftPython wrote: »
    Better than Vaughn, though only marginally.

    And Campbell was better than Tamahori, only marginally. ;)

    Campbell better than Tamahori marginally? Lol, wow!

    As much as Guy Ritchie and Vaughn.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,582
    Deke gonna be Deke.
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    Posts: 1,871
    When Vaughn makes Wrath of Man and The Covenant we'll talk.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,582
    Worthless movies. Might as well just get Marc Forster back if we’re only talking Ritchie calibre.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,504
    MakeshiftPython wrote: »
    Worthless movies. Might as well just get Marc Forster back if we’re only talking Ritchie calibre.

    Exactly.
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    edited 8:45am Posts: 1,871
    MakeshiftPython wrote: »
    Worthless movies. Might as well just get Marc Forster back if we’re only talking Ritchie calibre.

    You don't like him and that's fine but he's not Vaughn.


    And Marc Forster is at least younger than Campbell.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,582
    I wouldn’t be against Campbell, but I think new blood is called for. Folks always bring up GE and CR, but the chances of having lighting strike three times with Campbell is not high. He needs actual good material to work off of.

    I remember even in 2005 there was skepticism of him returning to Bond, because he had just delivered THE LEGEND OF ZORRO which was a significant step down from the first. It was reasonable to worry he might not do well with a second Bond at the time. Luckily his second Bond was better than his second Zorro.
  • 007HallY007HallY
    edited 8:57am Posts: 5,093
    MakeshiftPython wrote: »
    Better than Vaughn, though only marginally.

    I’d take Ritchie for Bond over Matthew Vaughn or David Yates (the latter would be a worst case scenario in my opinion). But none are right for Bond I’d say.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 1,843
    MakeshiftPython wrote: »
    I wouldn’t be against Campbell, but I think new blood is called for. Folks always bring up GE and CR, but the chances of having lighting strike three times with Campbell is not high. He needs actual good material to work off of.

    I remember even in 2005 there was skepticism of him returning to Bond, because he had just delivered THE LEGEND OF ZORRO which was a significant step down from the first. It was reasonable to worry he might not do well with a second Bond at the time. Luckily his second Bond was better than his second Zorro.

    Now that you say it, maybe hiring a guy who is a bit on the back foot with critics, but not totally a f-up, is the way to go. With Luca Guadagnino now off of Sgt. Rock and probably a little embarrassed, I bet he'd be easy to get for Bond.
Sign In or Register to comment.