Mission: Impossible - films and tv series

1235236238240241301

Comments

  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,034
    TR007 wrote: »
    Does anyone think the motorbike stunt and train looks a little too CGI heavy?

    They both look great to me. The only thing that struck me as odd were the close up shots of Czerny and Cruise. They almost look ungraded - they're very flat and washed out. But, they are in a white room that I'm guessing has had some sort of smoke attack or something like that. You can kind of see the wisps in the air.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,969
    TR007 wrote: »
    Does anyone think the motorbike stunt and train looks a little too CGI heavy?

    They both look great to me. The only thing that struck me as odd were the close up shots of Czerny and Cruise. They almost look ungraded - they're very flat and washed out. But, they are in a white room that I'm guessing has had some sort of smoke attack or something like that. You can kind of see the wisps in the air.

    I do agree that the train closeups are dodgy, possibly a homage to the first MI. Lol.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited May 2022 Posts: 14,945
    Ethan performing some sleight of hand, a possible reference to the first film?

    I love all of Ethan's ridiculous skills, like the perfect drawings of peoples' faces, lip reading, magic tricks, photographic memory etc. They should definitely lean into that; it's sort of his thing to match Bond's gadgets.
    But that also made it quite fun in Fallout where it turned out the one thing he didn't know how to do was fly a helicopter :)
    TR007 wrote: »
    Does anyone think the motorbike stunt and train looks a little too CGI heavy?

    They both look great to me. The only thing that struck me as odd were the close up shots of Czerny and Cruise. They almost look ungraded - they're very flat and washed out. But, they are in a white room that I'm guessing has had some sort of smoke attack or something like that. You can kind of see the wisps in the air.

    Yes, not really superb shots to open a trailer on, cinematography-wise. Very flat lighting, like a Marvel film.
  • edited May 2022 Posts: 4,600
    A huge office/warehouse with rows and rows of people using type writers? Thoughts ? a dream? fascinating
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,465
    patb wrote: »
    A huge office/warehouse with rows and rows of people using type writers? Thoughts ? f dream? fascinating

    Could be some old school, secret setup that's totally disconnected from modern day tech.
  • Posts: 4,600
    all the typists are wearing the same clothes - something almost "Prisoneresque"? love it.
  • Posts: 1,395
    That trailer looks amazing , better than recent Bond I would say . Whatever Direction Bond goes in next , there will at least be these films to look forward to the next couple years !
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,945
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    patb wrote: »
    A huge office/warehouse with rows and rows of people using type writers? Thoughts ? f dream? fascinating

    Could be some old school, secret setup that's totally disconnected from modern day tech.

    Which is, funnily enough for such a hi-tech series like MI, something that Cruise and McQuarrie do like: all of those vinyl, reel-to-reel bits of tech popping up; now there's a steam train and biplanes in the next one- whilst Bond goes to the future, MI goes oddly retro :)
  • Posts: 4,600
    McQ is a huge fan of the glory days of Hollywood. You can see that clearly
  • matt_umatt_u better known as Mr. Roark
    edited May 2022 Posts: 4,343
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    Haley Atwell :x

    +1. She is underrated, hopefully this will get her more exposure. I just wish we could have gotten her in Bond.

    Ana and Lea are way more beautiful and classy, imo.
    patb wrote: »
    McQ is a huge fan of the glory days of Hollywood. You can see that clearly

    A friend of mine keep saying he’s a modern Alfred Hitchcock. I get his point but I don’t think that’s correct. Anyway he’s a very good director even tho he’s not that great with actors, which is unusual for a former screenwriter.
  • Posts: 4,600
    He's a fan of Hitchcock and many of that era but his directing style is nothing like Hitchcock. The Stearman in Part 2 and THE best hollywood runner leads us directly to North by Northwest.
    A couple of years ago he was tweeting aboout his love of The Train and how Lancaster did all his own stunts and we may see that in Part 1.
  • matt_umatt_u better known as Mr. Roark
    Posts: 4,343
    Random thought: if it wasn't for Cruise running and jumping around that could’have easily been a JB film trailer. It feels like SP meets the Mummy starring the Ethan Hunt family.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited May 2022 Posts: 8,034
    matt_u wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    Haley Atwell :x

    +1. She is underrated, hopefully this will get her more exposure. I just wish we could have gotten her in Bond.

    Ana and Lea are way more beautiful and classy, imo.

    Agreed on Ana, at least.
    mtm wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    patb wrote: »
    A huge office/warehouse with rows and rows of people using type writers? Thoughts ? f dream? fascinating

    Could be some old school, secret setup that's totally disconnected from modern day tech.

    Which is, funnily enough for such a hi-tech series like MI, something that Cruise and McQuarrie do like: all of those vinyl, reel-to-reel bits of tech popping up; now there's a steam train and biplanes in the next one- whilst Bond goes to the future, MI goes oddly retro :)

    I get a giggle out of these things in the John Wick films, too. High tech, shiny assassin movies that also feature old, spectacled women in musky rooms typing kill orders on typewriters and then using fax machines! :)
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,969
    For the last 3 MI films, as well as this one, I’ve said to myself,” this would have made a great Bond film.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,034
    talos7 wrote: »
    For the last 3 MI films, as well as this one, I’ve said to myself,” this would have made a great Bond film.

    This is a big part of why they've managed to do quite well for themselves. A lot of people will simply dismiss them as an ego trip on the part of the main star, but the truth is that they do well because they are well-made, entertaining action films with a great cast across the board.
  • matt_umatt_u better known as Mr. Roark
    Posts: 4,343
    This trailer is basically a nod to the Bond saga.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,465
    For me, the action in this series has been trumping Bond for quite some time.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,894
    mtm wrote: »
    Ethan performing some sleight of hand, a possible reference to the first film?

    I love all of Ethan's ridiculous skills, like the perfect drawings of peoples' faces, lip reading, magic tricks, photographic memory etc. They should definitely lean into that; it's sort of his thing to match Bond's gadgets.
    But that also made it quite fun in Fallout where it turned out the one thing he didn't know how to do was fly a helicopter :)

    Knowing that Cruise learned to fly a helicopter just to make it look like Ethan can't, makes that sequence more impressive.
  • Junglist_1985Junglist_1985 Los Angeles
    Posts: 1,006
    The yellow car chase looks clearly like an homage to FYEO. Love that.
  • Posts: 727
    The cinematography is breathtaking. It’s like NTTD but even more vibrant. The use of such lush colours is something one rarely sees in Hollywood.
  • Posts: 1,567
    If you can't beat them, hire their personnel ? McQuarrie ? Writers ? Cinematographers ? Editors ?
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,465
    I'd be all for McQuarrie helming a future installment.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,945
    Much as I'd love him to - I'm not sure anyone else around at the moment quite knows their way around a blockbuster like he does- I don't think he ever would. I think it's a bit of a loyalty thing, and he's a Mission guy. He is Mission.
  • matt_umatt_u better known as Mr. Roark
    Posts: 4,343
    McQuarry is a great action director but let’s not forget that what makes the M:I’s action so wonderful is Tom doing all his stuff without any stuntman, and there’s only one Tom Cruise.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,894
    matt_u wrote: »
    McQuarry is a great action director but let’s not forget that what makes the M:I’s action so wonderful is Tom doing all his stuff without any stuntman, and there’s only one Tom Cruise.

    I think with a physically active Bond, a Gareth Evans directed Bond could raise the bar when it comes to action. The Raid had some unbelievable fight sequences.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,969
    The series is a product of a very strong writer/director and a dynamic actor/ producer who gives 100%, expects the same from the rest of the creative team and values the importance of a film being seen in a theater.
  • Posts: 727
    mtm wrote: »
    Much as I'd love him to - I'm not sure anyone else around at the moment quite knows their way around a blockbuster like he does- I don't think he ever would. I think it's a bit of a loyalty thing, and he's a Mission guy. He is Mission.

    Um, Denis Villeneuve?
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,465
    matt_u wrote: »
    McQuarry is a great action director but let’s not forget that what makes the M:I’s action so wonderful is Tom doing all his stuff without any stuntman, and there’s only one Tom Cruise.

    I think with a physically active Bond, a Gareth Evans directed Bond could raise the bar when it comes to action. The Raid had some unbelievable fight sequences.

    Sign me up for this too. If only.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited May 2022 Posts: 14,945
    mtm wrote: »
    Much as I'd love him to - I'm not sure anyone else around at the moment quite knows their way around a blockbuster like he does- I don't think he ever would. I think it's a bit of a loyalty thing, and he's a Mission guy. He is Mission.

    Um, Denis Villeneuve?

    I don't know if I'd call his stuff blockbusters exactly, although I know he's done a couple of big budgeters now. But they're not really the Friday night, popcorn munchers like the M:I films.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited May 2022 Posts: 8,034
    mtm wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Much as I'd love him to - I'm not sure anyone else around at the moment quite knows their way around a blockbuster like he does- I don't think he ever would. I think it's a bit of a loyalty thing, and he's a Mission guy. He is Mission.

    Um, Denis Villeneuve?

    I don't know if I'd call his stuff blockbusters exactly, although I know he's done a couple of big budgeters now. But they're not really the Friday night, popcorn munchers like the M:I films.

    If I had to pick a day, I'd say they're more suited to Sunday evenings. Can't quite put my finger on why.
Sign In or Register to comment.