No Time to Die production thread

15685695715735741208

Comments

  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    Posts: 3,126
    TR007 wrote: »
    The Heineken Ad.


    Nice. I like it, got a good giggle from that. The only quibble is his hair. It's so spikey! Is this the commercial that they shot two years ago?

    His hair is not right too messy
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    His hair could merely be messy due to prior action we haven't seen yet. I don't think that's the full ad.
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 3,022
    EON's new mini-plug of Lashana

  • Lots of amazing new footage in there. Thank you @Contraband

    Does anyone think they will do a video of Safin?
  • Posts: 1,680
    Not enough footage released for safin. We saw him for 7-8 seconds in Norway and 3 seconds at his lair.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,546
    I'd be happy for all of the Safin material to be hidden away until the film releases. Too much marketing deteriorates the mystery and intrigue built up for a film. I'm thinking of movies like It 2, The Grudge where the constant and relentless marketing has destroyed any mystery those films may have carried.
  • GadgetManGadgetMan Lagos, Nigeria
    edited January 2020 Posts: 4,247
    I'd be happy for all of the Safin material to be hidden away until the film releases. Too much marketing deteriorates the mystery and intrigue built up for a film. I'm thinking of movies like It 2, The Grudge where the constant and relentless marketing has destroyed any mystery those films may have carried.

    True, I even wanted Safin's reveal in the trailer to be just that Mask scene in that Room....alone. Almost feels as if that 14secs trailer had more mystery about it.
  • Cary posted a new video on his Instagram...it's in celebration of Dali Bensallah's (Primo) birthday.

    uB625Qs_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium
    It looks as thought it was taken during what is rumoured to be the Porton Down sequence....I suspect this might be where the scientist is kidnapped. I also suspect that Lashana Lynch will be introduced in this scene.

    NTTD_Trailer_22.png

    NTTD_Trailer_24.png
  • marketto007marketto007 Brazil
    Posts: 3,277
    Lots of amazing new footage in there. Thank you @Contraband

    Does anyone think they will do a video of Safin?

    New footage? :-?
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,546
    Lots of amazing new footage in there. Thank you @Contraband

    Does anyone think they will do a video of Safin?

    New footage? :-?

    No new footage, all from trailer.
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 3,022
    Lots of amazing new footage in there. Thank you @Contraband

    Does anyone think they will do a video of Safin?
    Lots of amazing new footage in there. Thank you @Contraband

    Does anyone think they will do a video of Safin?

    New footage? :-?

    @marketto007 Just to be clear. @Safin_Unmasked claims that, not me.
  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    Posts: 3,126
    Cary posted a new video on his Instagram...it's in celebration of Dali Bensallah's (Primo) birthday.

    uB625Qs_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium
    It looks as thought it was taken during what is rumoured to be the Porton Down sequence....I suspect this might be where the scientist is kidnapped. I also suspect that Lashana Lynch will be introduced in this scene.

    NTTD_Trailer_22.png

    NTTD_Trailer_24.png

    I wonder why he is hiding some faces interesting
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 3,022
    AI8V50j.jpg
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,546
    007Blofeld wrote: »
    Cary posted a new video on his Instagram...it's in celebration of Dali Bensallah's (Primo) birthday.

    uB625Qs_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium
    It looks as thought it was taken during what is rumoured to be the Porton Down sequence....I suspect this might be where the scientist is kidnapped. I also suspect that Lashana Lynch will be introduced in this scene.

    NTTD_Trailer_22.png

    NTTD_Trailer_24.png

    I wonder why he is hiding some faces interesting

    I figured that was just so everyone would know which one was Dali.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,580
    Contraband wrote: »
    9ls4oVt.jpg
    uuKvYXg.jpg
    snDtn7n.jpg
    hTTF0AU.jpg
    VNqrDTq.jpg

    giphy.gif
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    edited January 2020 Posts: 3,022
    Daniel Craig, along with some of the fellow cast members of Knives Out, attended The National Board of Review Annual Awards Gala on January 08, 2020 in NYC.

    HKJ1x8i.jpg
    Wh4Hlbt.jpg
    CA0rKtD.jpg
    WHzS5By.jpg
    wvkKQxN.jpg
    a36iBVp.jpg
    7DMyPs7.jpg
    pxlxs1I.jpg
    FV0VLf2.jpg
    img
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited January 2020 Posts: 16,322
    RC7 wrote: »
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and questions the depth of the canal. It’s too gripping.

    When there's a smilie in the post it generally means it's a joke.
    RC7 wrote: »
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and questions the depth of the canal. It’s too gripping.

    This.

    Also the building collapses. It doesn't just sink.

    No, it sinks, it doesn't collapse.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited January 2020 Posts: 16,322
    Red_Snow wrote: »


    Corgi's new NTTD range. No Valhalla or Superleggera.

    Bit of a shame it's not a new sculpt of the Vantage: that one was never very accurate looking. It's not even accurate to NTTD: the car in that doesn't have a fabric sunroof. I guess Corgi haven't got bags of cash so it's fair enough.
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,755
    Great photos of Craig. I swear the man doesn’t age.
  • Posts: 92
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    Great photos of Craig. I swear the man doesn’t age.

    I don't know what people who say that are looking at....

    He quite clearly ages, and quite a lot too.

    (As per nature dictates).

  • Posts: 5,767
    mtm wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and questions the depth of the canal. It’s too gripping.

    When there's a smilie in the post it generally means it's a joke.
    RC7 wrote: »
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and questions the depth of the canal. It’s too gripping.

    This.

    Also the building collapses. It doesn't just sink.

    No, it sinks, it doesn't collapse.
    Maybe the part under water collapses and the part above sinks ;-).
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited January 2020 Posts: 8,205
    mtm wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and questions the depth of the canal. It’s too gripping.

    This.

    Also the building collapses. It doesn't just sink.

    No, it sinks, it doesn't collapse.

    Nah. It collapses as well as sinks. As most things do when put under such pressure, I'd imagine!
  • Red_SnowRed_Snow Australia
    edited January 2020 Posts: 2,536


    A brief mention of working with Rami on NTTD. And I think he handled the female Bond question quite well.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,641
    I'm looking forward to seeing the Heineken ad, the small clip they showed looked decent.

    I would love them to keep the more over the top camp humour in the adverts, the one for Spectre was great
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited January 2020 Posts: 16,322
    mtm wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and questions the depth of the canal. It’s too gripping.

    This.

    Also the building collapses. It doesn't just sink.

    No, it sinks, it doesn't collapse.

    Nah. It collapses as well as sinks. As most things do when put under such pressure, I'd imagine!

    It's not shown to collapse, no. Otherwise where does Vesper's lift shaft lead to? It goes all the way to the bottom floor. The roof is intact when Bond tries to resuscitate her. A bit of plaster falls off the outside but that's not quite a collapse ;)
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and suggests that it doesn't just sink ;)
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,205
    mtm wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and questions the depth of the canal. It’s too gripping.

    This.

    Also the building collapses. It doesn't just sink.

    No, it sinks, it doesn't collapse.

    Nah. It collapses as well as sinks. As most things do when put under such pressure, I'd imagine!

    It's not shown to collapse, no. Otherwise where does Vesper's lift shaft lead to? It goes all the way to the bottom floor. The roof is intact when Bond tries to resuscitate her. A bit of plaster falls off the outside but that's not quite a collapse ;)
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and suggests that it doesn't just sink ;)

    "a bit of plaster falls off".

    Amazing.

    Okay. You've convinced me. ;)
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited January 2020 Posts: 16,322
    mtm wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and questions the depth of the canal. It’s too gripping.

    This.

    Also the building collapses. It doesn't just sink.

    No, it sinks, it doesn't collapse.

    Nah. It collapses as well as sinks. As most things do when put under such pressure, I'd imagine!

    It's not shown to collapse, no. Otherwise where does Vesper's lift shaft lead to? It goes all the way to the bottom floor. The roof is intact when Bond tries to resuscitate her. A bit of plaster falls off the outside but that's not quite a collapse ;)
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and suggests that it doesn't just sink ;)

    "a bit of plaster falls off".

    Amazing.

    Not really sure what that means. Which shot were you thinking of that shows the building collapsing? Maybe I missed it.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited January 2020 Posts: 8,205
    mtm wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and questions the depth of the canal. It’s too gripping.

    This.

    Also the building collapses. It doesn't just sink.

    No, it sinks, it doesn't collapse.

    Nah. It collapses as well as sinks. As most things do when put under such pressure, I'd imagine!

    It's not shown to collapse, no. Otherwise where does Vesper's lift shaft lead to? It goes all the way to the bottom floor. The roof is intact when Bond tries to resuscitate her. A bit of plaster falls off the outside but that's not quite a collapse ;)
    No one other than a pedant watches that sequence and suggests that it doesn't just sink ;)

    "a bit of plaster falls off".

    Amazing.

    Not really sure what that means. Which shot were you thinking of that shows the building collapsing? Maybe I missed it.

    I'll respond first on the terms set out in my original comment, if that's good with you - which was a general physics response to a general physics observation ("not a realistic sequence", "a house couldn't possibly sink in Venice " etc). Not really in reference to anything shown in the film, but if you insist upon that I'd say that there was more than a bit of plaster shown to be falling down.

    The walls of your average building in Venice aren't the thickest things in the world. So when the floatation devices become null and void as supports for the structure of the building and the weight of said building becomes a full load on the wooden stilts that almost all of Venice is built on, the walls will - at least partially - collapse in on themselves and increase the rate at which the structure will come down. The building obviously doesn't come down as one piece. The roof being intact means little to what has happened underneath it.

    The only thing that the scene really takes liberties with is the speed of which the building goes down. It would really happen a lot faster in reality. Also, I'm not 100% sure, but I think I remember someone saying that the floatation devices would be a bit bigger than what were essentially barrels in the film. But yes, the main point is that house will also collapse on itself as well as sink. And if you want a specific visual reference, I think they convey it pretty well in the film during the wide shots without overdoing it. Yes, for dramatic reasons the elevator shaft needed to act a certain way - otherwise we wouldn't get our big moment with Vesper; but likewise the internal damage isn't a million miles away otherwise, considering that it's a big budget mainstream vision of it.

    There's a couple of neat videos online about it, if it's something you're interested in following up on! The SFX guys did a great job on the scene.

    1498219091590.jpg
    Red_Snow wrote: »


    A brief mention of working with Rami on NTTD. And I think he handled the female Bond question quite well.

    Most of the time it's the interviewers that are the problems in Craig's media appearances, not him. That being said, he seems to be getting better at it, regardless. He looks like he's having fun.
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I'm looking forward to seeing the Heineken ad, the small clip they showed looked decent.

    I would love them to keep the more over the top camp humour in the adverts, the one for Spectre was great

    Yeah, me too. I'm looking forward to seeing them on the telly. That's when it really kicks in that we're close to a new Bond. Very exciting.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited January 2020 Posts: 16,322
    I didn't refer to any shot, I'm afraid. You did!

    Erm, what..? I'm just asking if you can think of a shot where it collapses...? You said it does so you must've thought you'd seen it happen in a shot in the film...? I'm not sure why you think I'm referring to any previous comment. How odd.
    I'll continue on the terms set out in my original comment, if that's good with you - which was a general physics response to a general physics observation ("not a realistic sequence", "a house couldn't possibly sink in Venice " etc). Not really in reference to anything shown in the film, but if you insist upon that I'd say that there was more than a bit of plaster shown to be falling down.

    The walls of your average building in Venice aren't the thickest things in the world. So when the floatation devices become null and void as supports for the structure of the building and the weight of said building becomes a full load on the wooden stilts that almost all of Venice is built on, the walls will - at least partially - collapse in on themselves and increase the rate at which the structure will come down. The building obviously doesn't come down as one piece. The roof being intact means little to what has happened underneath it.

    It does come down as one piece though: I just watched it again- none of the exterior walls collapse. Some external chimneys fall, some plaster tumbles, some internal floors give way. But the whole thing comes down as a straight and rigid box. I know you think general physics mean it should collapse, and in the real world it certainly would, but I may return to my original point if that's okay with you: not a single storey or wall of the building is shown to collapse in the film.
    I think you're confusing what should happen with what the film shows as happening. Watch it again: screengrab the bit where the structure collapses if you can.

    Here's a collapse:
    collapse.jpg

    Here are the last two shots of the building:
    Casinosink.jpg

    Notice how one has collapsed and the other is in one piece and has just sunk ;)
  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    Posts: 3,126
    Does it really matter what does this have to do with NTTD?
Sign In or Register to comment.