Tell us all about your BONDATHON

1192022242593

Comments

  • Posts: 12,281
    Fairly young yeah. Younger than you two I'm sure - I just never got around to it. Should do that sometime :))
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,333
    I got it in a 3 pack that came with Cuba and A Bridge too Far.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    FoxRox wrote: »
    I just never got around to it. Should do that sometime :))
    Everyone should see it at least once. Perhaps you could include it in your next Bondathon and tell us what you think?
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,333
    Tomorrow I think I shall watch NSNA and CR67 and 54 and write my thoughts on them.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    That's quite an undertaking. I'd be curious to see what you'd have to say about them.
  • Posts: 12,281
    I'll watch the Casino Royale films and Never Say Never Again FIRST (since the main course is the Eon Bond films for the marathon), sometime in the next few days, and post my thoughts over them. Then once September comes I'll be going over the main Bond films.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    edited August 2015 Posts: 7,571
    In viewing order..

    The World Is Not Enough
    The Spy Who Loved Me
    Dr No
    Octopussy
    You Only Live Twice
    Casino Royale
    Moonraker
    The Living Daylights
    Die Another Day
    From Russia With Love
    For Your Eyes Only
    Diamonds Are Forever
    A View To A Kill
    Quantum Of Solace
    Thunderball
    GoldenEye
    The Man With The Golden Gun
    Goldfinger
    On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    Live And Let Die
    Licence To Kill
    Tomorrow Never Dies
    Skyfall
    ____________________________________________________________________

    It seems an age since I watched TND and since then many people here have begun their Bondathons in readiness for the new kid on the block to arrive. Mine started at Christmas so has taken 8 months to reach this point.

    I'm abandoning any idea of ranking the films. They can stay in this order of viewing. It takes me years to decide how much I like a Bond film, and even now I'm re-evaluating some of the 'lesser' films like DAF and TMWTGG, and finding less to enjoy in the ones I have always liked such as TLD. So it's a hopeless task to rank them.

    Skyfall still sweeps me along in a way OP and TLD always did. Yet both of these films seem a little less grand now. Maybe SF will feel the same in 20 years time, if I'm still alive.

    Next up.....SPECTRE
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    FoxRox wrote: »
    Fairly young yeah. Younger than you two I'm sure - I just never got around to it. Should do that sometime :))

    It's not as bad as many think really.

    Back then people were upset because there was no gun-barrel, different Moneypenny, and Q, no proper Bond theme etc.
    If only people would have known then, that 20 odd years later EON itself would do all this to Bond when starting the Craig era they probably wouldn't have minded so much
    :))

    Connery really looks bloody fantastic in NSNA.

    If you compare it to other Bond movies of that time it holds up pretty well in my opinion. Just keep in mind they didn't have that big a budget, but they did the best with it.
  • w2bondw2bond is indeed a very rare breed
    Posts: 2,252
    Licence to Kill

    I've always liked watching this movie....as a crime movie. It fails as a Bond movie, lacks that spark, that magic that the other films have, and it is certainly the most violent. I've always felt emotionally attached throughout, starting at Della's murder and get a sweet satisfaction from all the revenge killings.

    The main criticisms are that it is one of the cheapest looking films, the wardrobe is ridiculous, and the score takes me right out of the Bond experience. The best parts are the excellent stuntwork throughout as is normal for the Glen films.

    Dalton definitely gives a more comfortable performance as Bond than in TLD, but none of the charm that would have fans clamoring to see the film - definitely not the family fun affair of the 70s.

    I will have to sadly place it below DAF, but anything from LTK upwards I can easily rewatch.

    1. TLD
    2. OP
    3. FRWL
    4. OHMSS
    5. FYEO
    6. TSWLM
    7. DN
    8. MR
    9. DAF
    10. LTK
    11. GF
    12. YOLT
    13. AVTAK
    14. TMWTGG
    15. TB
    16. LALD
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Excellent review of NSNA, @Birdleson. But Ben Casey is a comic strip character. You mean Bernie, of course.
  • edited August 2015 Posts: 12,281
    Well, as a prelude to my official Bondathon, I watched Climax! Casino Royale (1954) for the first time. I thought it was decent for an old-timey TV movie. It's hard to compare it to the other Bond films, being a black-and-white picture and also not even an hour in length. I'm not going to bother ranking it, Casino Royale 1967, and Never Say Never Again (unless I get requested) with the Eon Bond films.

    Basically I was indifferent about Barry Nelson as James Bond. I prefer all the Eon actors by a considerable margin, but I didn't think he was bad necessarily. Le Chiffre was a lame villain though in this version, and I wasn't a fan of Valerie Mathis either (far too stereotypical). It's hilarious to compare the torture scene in this one to the 2006 version :)) how the times change... Still, it held my attention through its short length, so it was alright. Just not anything special to me. I suppose though it will always have the honor of being the first to portray James Bond on screen, for better or worse.
  • Posts: 12,281
    Really? I thought he was too silly.
  • eddychaputeddychaput Montreal, Canada
    Posts: 364
    FoxRox wrote: »
    Fairly young yeah. Younger than you two I'm sure - I just never got around to it. Should do that sometime :))


    Connery really looks bloody fantastic in NSNA.

    He's looks more fit and up for the part in NSNA than he does in DAF.

  • Posts: 12,281
    I sure had fun following your Bondathon @Birdleson. I also really enjoyed that Olympics thing - very amusing. I can't believe though you're holding off until Bond 25 to see the first 23 again! That would be tough on me - good goal though. I'm over here having a hard time watching Casino Royale '67 right now :(
  • Posts: 12,281
    Well, I just finished Casino Royale (1967), and boy was it a doozy. I've never been a fan of parody films to begin with, so I knew it would be a chore to watch. There's no doubt if I were ranking it with the official films, it would be at the very bottom. I mean, for people who enjoy parody films, it's probably a semi-fun ride, but it's just not my kind of thing.

    One thing I'll give the movie is that the casting was spot-on for the most part. Also, I have to admit there were a few scenes that made me laugh, namely the trippy torture Le Chiffre gives Tremble. I have to emphasize the last few minutes were some of the most wild and ridiculous I've ever seen in a movie (I mean that in a kind of good and kind of bad way). The few things I enjoyed from it aren't enough to warrant another watch - at least not for a long time. Most of the film just drags for me; I was just waiting for the whole thing to be over. It's totally crazy and silly, but of course, that was the point. It simply doesn't work for me most of the time.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    edited August 2015 Posts: 9,020
    @Birdleson

    Very good contribution from you, everything really. I have read it all :)
    I too don't watch the Bond movies too often, every 2-3 years only, usually all of them chronologically.
    Except the newer ones which I pop in every now and then.
    I have seen CR about 10 times since 2006.

    But I must admit since owning 55" to 65" TV Sets (65" since February) and nice bombastic soundbars I'm tempted to watch my favourite movies more often.
    Luckily there are quite a lot of them (I am a Trekkie and a DC Fan (DC Comics) too).
    So I always have something to choose from that I haven't seen in a while :)

    By the way I'm doing the unthinkable next time I re-watch the Bond movies. I will view them in 3D, my new TV can up convert 2D to 3D and it really works! and even does look good.
    I'm not a fan at all of 3D in the cinema, but nowadays with the new TV sets 3D actually looks quite good.
    If only it would work without glasses :))
  • edited August 2015 Posts: 12,281
    I finally got around to watching Never Say Never Again (1983), and just in time for Sean Connery's birthday! While I wasn't too impressed, I thought it was a decent film. You simply have to temper your expectations knowing it's a non-Eon film, and you get an okay enough result.

    Though not quite as awesome as his first four performances, Connery is still great to watch, and he carries the movie the whole way through for me. I have to say that I did enjoy Felix Leiter in this version. I didn't care too much for Largo or Blofeld, but they weren't bad either. The soundtrack wasn't the best, and the plot we've seen before. Still, I enjoy the film more than a few Eon ones (at least above AVTAK and MR), and I'm glad I got around to seeing it at last. With that, my official Bondathon starts next Tuesday with Dr. No! I must close though by saying: Happy Birthday Sean Connery, and thank you for all your contributions as 007!

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    If NSNA was never made, it would have been one of those great missed opportunities. People would long for that alternate reality we are so lucky to live in, and dream about what it would be like to have another Connery film in 1983.
  • Posts: 11,189
    I have about as much admiration for NSNA as Connery does [-(
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,513
    I'm already missing my Bondathon, there's something really fun about doing one. I think I may do another one soon (is that sad?), picking the movies at random and out of order, and writing a proper review for each and every one.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I'm already missing my Bondathon, there's something really fun about doing one. I think I may do another one soon (is that sad?), picking the movies at random and out of order, and writing a proper review for each and every one.

    Why sad? I'm pretty sure you have a nice life besides Bond :)

    I'm only left with Skyfall which ends my Bondathon and I already want to start anew :))

    And my wife even wants to re-watch some of them already again too!
  • Posts: 12,281
    Some of them I re-watch plenty outside of Bondathons, such as DN, GF, OHMSS, TSWLM, GE, CR, and SF (to name my most-watched). I might even double dip with the Craig films leading right up to Spectre if I'm up to it.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,513
    @BondJasonBond006, I meant "sad" as in "Is it too sad to do another Bondathon again so soon?" But that's a dumb question. ;)

    That's good that your wife is interested in them! She's a keeper!
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    @BondJasonBond006, I meant "sad" as in "Is it too sad to do another Bondathon again so soon?" But that's a dumb question. ;)

    That's good that your wife is interested in them! She's a keeper!

    Which team does she play ?
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    @BondJasonBond006, I meant "sad" as in "Is it too sad to do another Bondathon again so soon?" But that's a dumb question. ;)

    That's good that your wife is interested in them! She's a keeper!

    Which team does she play ?

    Her favourite Bond movies are: in roughly this order:

    Licence To Kill
    Casino Royale
    Skyfall
    Die Another Day*
    Goldeneye
    Quantum Of Solace
    The Living Daylights

    She's of the Brosnan generation like me (40 years old) but her favourite actor nowadays is DANIEL CRAIG by far, Brosnan and Dalton.

    The awesome thing is, she was born November 7th, and we always go and see the latest Bond movie at that date!! This year we will do that too.

    *She absolutely loves the first half of the movie, the PTS, Cuba. So much it doesn't hurt the viewing experience for her that she hates Madonna and finds the last third of the movie rather silly.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    edited August 2015 Posts: 9,020
    Today in my chronologically done Bondathon QANTUM OF SOLACE

    Haven't seen this in quite some time. I was looking forward to this one as I thought it will probably climb up in my ranking as I enjoyed Casino Royale (once more) that much.

    Sadly, QOS in many ways is the worst Bond movie ever.
    It's not only the insane editing that ruins every action scene, but there is almost never really any Bond feeling to this movie. Additionally I found it to be very low-budget looking compared to CR. Sure, the production quality is brilliant but there aren't really too many impressive sets (if any) and the only thing that looked "expensive" was the opera sequence.
    I found QOS oddly to be similar to the Transporter movie, even Matthis' house looked exactly like Frank's house in Transporter and Mathis' character seemed to be copied from Inspector Tarconi.
    QOS has no memorable characters at all, even Camille was boring. And Felix Leiter was wasted in that movie. Opportunity missed.
    Up until now I suspected I was treating QOS unfairly and ranked it too low.
    But actually this movie belongs to the bottom.
    The only reason DAF stays at the bottom is because it's more of a parody of Bond than anything else.
    Having said this, once more I want to stress that there is no "bad" Bond movie. QOS works well as a fast-paced action movie without any depth and for pure mindless entertainment. It's just unworthy of Bond.

    PS: The very last sequence in QOS when Bond finds Vesper's boyfriend and delivers him to MI6 is absolutely stunning and perfect and it could very well be the last scene in CR. It should have been. The gun-barrel at the end is nice but odd, it belongs to the beginning.

    My ranking of the Bond movies

    1. Goldeneye
    2. The Living Daylights
    3. OHMSS
    4. Casino Royale
    5. Octopussy
    6. From Russia With Love
    7. Goldfinger
    8. Licence To Kill
    9. Tomorrow Never Dies
    10. Die Another Day

    11. The Spy Who Loved Me
    12. Moonraker
    13. Dr. No
    14. For Your Eyes Only
    15. The World Is Not Enough
    16. Thunderball
    17. You Only Live Twice
    18. A View To A Kill
    19. Live And Let Die
    20. TMWTGG
    21. Quantum Of Solace (was No 19, now No 21, sad that after CR they made such an unworthy successor)
    22. Diamonds Are Forever
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Birdleson wrote: »
    My highest ranked Brosnan film seems to be the one that you don't care for too much.

    True, but then, we both have it on No. 15! So we seem to agree on that

    :)
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    2015 Bondathon Ranking:
    1.) GE
    2.) FYEO
    3.) CR
    4.) DN
    5.) QoS
    6.) LALD
    7.) FRWL
    8.) TSWLM
    9.) OP
    10.) OHMSS
    11.) LTK
    12.) TWINE
    13.) AVTAK
    14.) TB
    15.) TLD
    16.) GF
    17.) TND
    18.) DAF
    19.) YOLT
    20.) SF
    21.) DAD
    22.) TMWTGG
    23.) MR
    Hey @Creasy47, sorry I missed it earlier but I really like your ranking. We disagree on some things of course but it's great to see FYEO and LALD in the top 10!

    FoxRox wrote: »
    I finally got around to watching Never Say Never Again (1983), and just in time for Sean Connery's birthday! While I wasn't too impressed, I thought it was a decent film. You simply have to temper your expectations knowing it's a non-Eon film, and you get an okay enough result.

    Though not quite as awesome as his first four performances, Connery is still great to watch, and he carries the movie the whole way through for me. I have to say that I did enjoy Felix Leiter in this version. I didn't care too much for Largo or Blofeld, but they weren't bad either. The soundtrack wasn't the best, and the plot we've seen before. Still, I enjoy the film more than a few Eon ones (at least above AVTAK and MR), and I'm glad I got around to seeing it at last. With that, my official Bondathon starts next Tuesday with Dr. No! I must close though by saying: Happy Birthday Sean Connery, and thank you for all your contributions as 007!
    I'm glad that you finally watched it @FoxRox! Kudos on a job well done.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,513
    @pachazo, thank you very much! And same, those two are excellent Bond entries.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Birdleson wrote: »
    At it's core, NSNA is a well-constructed film. The basic story is fundamentally sound (as I would hope given it's pedigree) and Lorenzo Semple JR.'s script is sharp, smart and funny. Not surprising given that he penned many of the great thrillers of the '70s (PAPILLON, THE PARALLAX VIEW and THE THREE DAYS OF THE CONDOR). He also wrote the script for BATMAN THE MOVIE (1966) and head up the creation of the associated television show, as well. If that doesn't illustrate the craft of deftly balancing the thrill with humor, I don't know what does. There is a maturity and an earthiness to the dialogue that was absent from the official franchise from the 70s-90s. The humor, innuendo and puns are not so obvious or loaded (with a few glaring exceptions, admittedly, like Bond's urine and a few other groaners). It made for a nice change in 1983. A few questions continue to eat at me as I watch this film to this day; Like, he couldn't have written out all of the stupid grand coincidences move the action and plot forward in the original? Or he couldn't have done something a little fresh with the finale? He certainly wasn't legally tied all that strongly to the source material, looking at the final product. But, again, I give him credit for an overall strong script.

    The major problems this film has are in production and post-production. Beginning with the titles and theme song. Big mistake running the credits and music over the action. That scene in and of itself, before it is seriously cheapened by turning out to be a training exercise, is magnificent and a fine way to reintroduce us to Sean Connery as 007. Without the crappy music and titles serving as a distraction, that would not only be my pick for the strongest section of the picture, but I would place it on my short list of greatest Connery moments post-1965.

    The song itself is weak and, even if placed over appropriate Main Titles, is an irritating distraction. I am a fairly big Herb Alpert fan, but Mccrory, or whomever, should never have empowered him to give the vocal chores to his wife, Lani Hall. I saw Alpert and Hall in concert in Silicon Valley last year. Surprisingly, they did two Bond songs, NSNA and THE LOOK OF LOVE form CASINO ROYALE (1967), which was originally recorded for the film by Dusty Springfield and featured Herb on trumpet.

    The sets are poorly designed and constructed in comparison to the masterwork of the great Ken Adams. But one hardly notices thanks to the superb cinematography of Douglas Slocombe (he also photographed the original INDIANA JONES TRILOGY). I will go so far as to say that, aside form SKYFALL, NSNA has the boasts the best cinematography of any Bond film (TOMORROW NEVER DIES looks pretty good too, though). Focus on that aspect of the film in your next screening. Little tricks like applying a red filter over the shot where the nukes are being moved through the bay. They really are cheap plastic proper, and that set is for shit, but the red lighting produces a nice effect and hides the shoddiness. In the commentary, director Irvin Kershner acknowledges that the underwater cave, with the statues and pool, looks like shit. He claims that he was not given enough time to light is properly. I don't know where ether real blame lies. Kershner had directed the monolithic THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK three years earlier, which looked as slick, beautiful and grand as anything of that ilk that had come before, and it flowed like water, nary a hiccup. In comparison, his work seems second rate here. I think that is an indicator as to how much of a controlling hand George Lucas had in all of the STAR WARS films, even those he did not direct. Maybe he had some major limitations and fallibility's in the director's chair, and as a writer, but Lucas sure knew how to produce a first class production like no one's business.

    Back to Connery. He looks more fit and engaged here than he did 12 years earlier in DIAMONDS ARE FORVER, and even 16 years prior in YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE, an observation that I am certainly not the first to make. Maybe it was the joy he felt at having the opportunity to really stick it to Broccoli in the ass. I do wish that the studio had allowed him to play the part without the toupee, as was his wish. He plays the character as he should. It makes complete sense to me that the James Bond of the '60s would be this man, with this disposition, at the point in his life. Far preferable to the Bond that Roger Moore gave us in MOONRAKER and A VIEW TO A KILL (and about half of OCTOPUSSY).

    Following that point, I enjoy the whole set-up. Bernard Lee's M, we assume, has recently retired or died, and in comes the gifted actor Edward Fox as the new M to lead MI6 into a new world that does not seem to have a place for Bond. I like the idea of this alternative timeline, picking up from DAF, I suppose (the only hitch in that scenario is that Bond will have gone through the same adventure with like-named characters 18 years prior, but hey, in the same timeline he's already met Blofeld for the first time something like 34 times, so no big deal). I enjoy the humorous and combative dynamic between Connery's Bond an this M.

    In fact, the humor works most of the time in this film. I actually fine myself laughing out loud at several points, something that almost never occurs with any any EON effort from the '80s or '90s. That is probably because for the most part (MOST part) the humor her is more adult oriented, not so sophomoric. Yes, there are points that the dialogue takes a turn toward the juvenile and I wince, but it's not every minute or two as in the Moore and Brosnan films. And there are is no place for Margaret Thatcher impersonators, or Tarzan yells here. The one exception, and the one nod to lunacy, is the inclusion of Rowan Atkinson as Nigel Small-Facet. He is absurd and could have walked directly out of a Monty Python sketch (yes, I know, wrong show, but it fits my point), yet I don't mind his presence one bit. He doesn't suck the world around him into his cartoon world. He is self-contained. Like J.W. Pepper, I not only forgive his inclusion, I embrace it. I also enjoy Alec McCowen's take turn as Algernon, in charge of Q branch. It's a nice twist on what we are used to.

    We have one pathetically lousy Bond Girl in Kim Basinger, and one of the great Bond femme fatales in Barbara Carrera. I have never liked Kim Basinger, and I have certainly never considered her an even moderately successful talent, and it all begins here. She has no screen presence. the film stops dead whenever she speaks or tries to convey any emotion of any kind. And who the Hell thought that it was a good idea to have her dancing all of the goddamned time!?! She can't dance for shit, yet she has no less than three dance scenes. Oy. Also, maybe it's because I'm a kid of the '60s and '70s, but I like that Bond snuck in some peeks and feel ups while posing as her masseuse. We only used the now ubiquitous term "creepy" in conjunction with scary movies, haunted houses and deformities.

    I first became aware of Barbara Carrera in 1975 when she landed her first major film role in THE MASTER GUNFIGHTER. In retrospect that was a bad movie, no nice way to wrap it, but, being a huge BILLY JACK and Tom Laughlin fan in my early teens, I saw it seven time sat least in the theatre. She played such a subdued and uninteresting character in that film that I didn't think much about or of her. What a surprise to see what she could do with the right role eight years hence. There are times where she takes the character of Fatima a bit too far of the top, maybe a bit too campy, but for most of her screen time she is wonderful to watch. My favorite scene involving her is where she is controlling Jack Petachi (like the added element of using heroin as a leash and an incentive) in his room at Scrublands. She is frightening, sexy and funny all at once. sadly she will always fall miles short of Luciana Paluzzi's Fiona Volpe, on who her character is based. Fiona is by far the greatest Femme Fatale in the history of Bondom, it's hard to see that ever changing.

    I was and am greatly Klaus Maria Brandauer's portrayal of Maximilian Largo (I don't understand the slight name changes in this adaptation), I just wish that he could have had a more interesting demise, and that he had worn an eye patch (though it is not in the book). He and Connery work fairly well together, but his main strength is the sine line between insanity and cold reason that he assumes. When called upon, he brings an authentic threat to the screen. It is a shame that their major confrontation takes place at an arcade game table. It came off as cheesy and lame in '83, it comes off the same now. What a momentum killer, and what a non-Bond face-to-face to through into a movie that, up until that point, contained no major missteps. And why the Hell would you load up a party with arcade games to begin with? Aren't parties social gatherings? Some wall to wall bullshit in that scene.

    The villain being the villain, on the other hand, is a great disappointment. Max von Sydow is indisputably one of the finest screen actors of the 20th Century. He does nothing of interest here. Screen time is not the issue, an actor of his caliber should have taken those scant pieces of dialogue and turned them into gold. Even if it was just a quick paycheck gig, he should have given us something to remember him by. Maybe there was some calculation involved in his decision as to how to play Blofeld, some artistic intent, but if so it is lost on me.

    Bernie Casey has given us one of the best, maybe THE best, interpretations of Felix Leiter thus far. As I have recently brought up on the Felix Leiter Elimination Game thread, the Felix of the novels is not a buffoon, or a dullard waiting at Bond's beck and call, as he is often portrayed in the films. Fleming's Felix is funnier than Bond. He's also clever and generally the quicker of the two, in terms of humor. That is how Casey's Felix is written and played. He's the one with the quips, he's the fast talker. In the novels, Bond is the better spy and leader, and he is the one that will pull a solution out of his ass at the last moment, but one gets the sense that Leiter may just be a tad more intelligent. And I'm glad that this time he is involved in the final battle. Rik Van Nutter didn't get to Jack in TB, in the novel, Leiter insists on joining in the fray, even though he is missing an arm and a leg (he puts a flipper over his hook). I certainly wish that Ben had made a return to the role.

    In comparison to it's grandfather, TB, it definitely falls short. But that is to be expected. 1965 saw Connery in his prime and EON at it's most innovative and unstoppable. Some changes were made in the story and characters, but they weren't changes I would have liked to have seen or that were, maybe, needed. The scope is missing, mainly due to budgetary constraints, or the allocation thereof. SPECTRE headquarters in NSNA looks like a library's reading room, with some cheap-ass chairs. But, it is an acceptable attempt. More than that, it is an enjoyable diversion.


    When I saw NSNA at the movie theatre in 1989 I was 15 years old. It was re-shown at our local cinema and the funny thing is, I even didn't know or realise that it wasn't an unofficial Bond movie. I just thought, ok there's another one. I had only seen OP, AVTAK and TLD up to that point and only discovered all the Bond movies after LTK.

    I was immediately a fan of NSNA, Barbara Carrera made me drool...and at some point my right wrist hurt quite a bit :)) Fatima Blush is still one of my favourite Bond girls.

    I like some of those things that seem to be disliked in general, like Rowan Atkinson's part or the dreaded theme song which was then even for some time my favourite song, I guess a 15 year old is easy to impress :)) but I can see now why it is bad.

    By the way I discovered Herb Alpert in 1987 thanks to Janet Jackson which I was a big fan of, when she released Diamonds with Herb Alpert. Been a fan of him ever since.

    Nowadays I can re-watch NSNA easily, it is one of my guilty pleasure Bond movies.
    I see its flaws but they are not that many.
    Brandauer, I feel, is one of the most underrated Bond villains. As a Swiss I of course know him very well, he was probably the most famous and popular German talking actor of the 80's and early 90's in Switzerland/Germany/Austria.
    He is so much better as Largo than Adolfo Celi.

    To compare Thunderball and NSNA: I would prefer NSNA over TB if it had had a bigger budget, sadly it looks quite cheap here and there. As it is I'd rate TB over NSNA but only by a bit.
    Edward Fox and Max von Sydow are perfect and I'd go so far to say, Fox was the best M ever. I didn't know those actors then of course, but since the mid-nineties I'm a big fan of Fox and discovered many films of him. And von Sydow is even one of my favourite actors!

Sign In or Register to comment.