What Was the Last Grand Bond Film?

2

Comments

  • Posts: 2,483
    Hamlish's score is a bit underrated, I think.

    And as for grandeur, the scene where Bond swooshes up to the Atlantis on the wet-bike is one of the grandest. Really one of my favorite visual scenes in all of Bond.
  • Posts: 4,622
    Yes, the whole film is sensorily very appealing. It might be the best looking of all the Bond films, although Thunderball does rival.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    edited July 2013 Posts: 17,830
    timmer wrote:
    Spy has moments of silliness, no doubt, but I personally consider it an altogether more serious film than MR.
    Well no doubt, Spy is a grand sweeping Bond film, from the opening snowscape to the pyramids, beautifully shot underwater footage, the lush Mediterranean coastlines and open ocean, not to mention epic set pieces. And I do like the Marvin Hamlish score as well, especially during the Lotus-sub underwater battle.

    Indeed, TSWLM is certainly an epic Bondian adventure. All it really needed was a bit more fidelity to the works of Ian Fleming and it would surely have had it all as a James Bond film experience.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    edited July 2013 Posts: 9,117
    The Afghanistan segment--no small portion of the film, mind you--is the single grandest segment in any Bond film. The vastness of an ancient landscape, the scene of many epic clashes throughout history, the battle between the Muhajadin and the Russians, Barry's soaring score, the heroism of Bond, Kamran Shah and Kara, the intrigue, it's all just perfect.
    timmer wrote:
    Spy has moments of silliness, no doubt, but I personally consider it an altogether more serious film than MR.
    Well no doubt, Spy is a grand sweeping Bond film, from the opening snowscape to the pyramids, beautifully shot underwater footage, the lush Mediterranean coastlines and open ocean, not to mention epic set pieces. And I do like the Marvin Hamlish score as well, especially during the Lotus-sub underwater battle.
    Hamlish's score is a bit underrated, I think.

    And as for grandeur, the scene where Bond swooshes up to the Atlantis on the wet-bike is one of the grandest. Really one of my favorite visual scenes in all of Bond.

    As Partridge said to Tony Le Mesmer 'Thats just more vague. be more specific.'

    Call me thick if you like but are we saying that 'grand' = some nicely shot scenery (preferably it seems in a desert environment) in a couple of scenes or a combination of a nicely shot scene backed by some nice music with a little bit of drama and intrigue thrown in?

    By those criteria I give you exhibit A - SF.

    The moment the bikes ride out onto the grand bazaar the music goes up a notch and there's a lovely shot of the mosques, Bonds arrival at the casino with an orchestral rendition of Adeles theme song is lush and later the scene on the Chimera is beautifully shot (CGI island aside) and backed with Newmans most evocative and dare I say Bondish sounding track. Also Bond and Severine are on their way into the unknown so we also have intrigue.
    Then theres the phenomenal Tennyson scene.

    Surely all this is 'grandeur' by the criteria you mention above?
  • Posts: 2,483
    Fair points, WoI.

    My personal disqualifier for SF is its general darkness. No, it is certainly nowhere near as dark as QoS or even CR, but it's certainly dark in the 21st-century vein. To me, a true old school epic is generally open and bright, while still maintaining an air of seriousness if not dourness. TLD has that; SF, IMO, does not.

    Also, SF does not possess the requisite romance for a truly grand film. Nothing serious has the chance to develop between Bond and Severine, while the relationship between Bond and Kara is arguably the most consistently romantic ever put to film in a Bond picture.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    So what is it? The story or the scenery?

    It seems to me from all this that this idea of 'grand' actually means 'the film that feels closest to Lawrence of Arabia'.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,504
    So what is it? The story or the scenery?

    It seems to me from all this that this idea of 'grand' actually means 'the film that feels closest to Lawrence of Arabia'.

    Scope, majesty, and a great score is what I'm getting from it.
  • Posts: 2,483
    So what is it? The story or the scenery?

    It seems to me from all this that this idea of 'grand' actually means 'the film that feels closest to Lawrence of Arabia'.

    Check the Wikipedia entry for "epic film" to see what I'm getting at.

  • Posts: 14,844
    Fair points, WoI.

    My personal disqualifier for SF is its general darkness. No, it is certainly nowhere near as dark as QoS or even CR, but it's certainly dark in the 21st-century vein. To me, a true old school epic is generally open and bright, while still maintaining an air of seriousness if not dourness. TLD has that; SF, IMO, does not.

    Also, SF does not possess the requisite romance for a truly grand film. Nothing serious has the chance to develop between Bond and Severine, while the relationship between Bond and Kara is arguably the most consistently romantic ever put to film in a Bond picture.

    I think what prevents SF to be grand is its small scale motivations: a revenge story that triggers something certainly large scale, but overall secondary and instrumental.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    Ludovico wrote:
    Fair points, WoI.

    My personal disqualifier for SF is its general darkness. No, it is certainly nowhere near as dark as QoS or even CR, but it's certainly dark in the 21st-century vein. To me, a true old school epic is generally open and bright, while still maintaining an air of seriousness if not dourness. TLD has that; SF, IMO, does not.

    Also, SF does not possess the requisite romance for a truly grand film. Nothing serious has the chance to develop between Bond and Severine, while the relationship between Bond and Kara is arguably the most consistently romantic ever put to film in a Bond picture.

    I think what prevents SF to be grand is its small scale motivations: a revenge story that triggers something certainly large scale, but overall secondary and instrumental.

    I would contend that blowing up MI6 and a terrorist attack on the tube are larger scale and more of a threat to the country than Koskov and Whittaker's pretty mundane drug dealing.

    What are Koskov's 'large scale motivations'? Ultimately just money - how much duller a motivation can you get?
  • Posts: 2,483
    Ludovico wrote:
    Fair points, WoI.

    My personal disqualifier for SF is its general darkness. No, it is certainly nowhere near as dark as QoS or even CR, but it's certainly dark in the 21st-century vein. To me, a true old school epic is generally open and bright, while still maintaining an air of seriousness if not dourness. TLD has that; SF, IMO, does not.

    Also, SF does not possess the requisite romance for a truly grand film. Nothing serious has the chance to develop between Bond and Severine, while the relationship between Bond and Kara is arguably the most consistently romantic ever put to film in a Bond picture.

    I think what prevents SF to be grand is its small scale motivations: a revenge story that triggers something certainly large scale, but overall secondary and instrumental.

    I would contend that blowing up MI6 and a terrorist attack on the tube are larger scale and more of a threat to the country than Koskov and Whittaker's pretty mundane drug dealing.

    What are Koskov's 'large scale motivations'? Ultimately just money - how much duller a motivation can you get?

    That also is a good point, but to be fair, TLD also involves large scale arms trading which could affect the outcome of the clash between the Soviets and the mujahedin. Maybe not a plot of immense global import, but hardly piceyune either.
  • Posts: 1,548
    Skyfall
  • Posts: 14,844
    Ludovico wrote:
    Fair points, WoI.

    My personal disqualifier for SF is its general darkness. No, it is certainly nowhere near as dark as QoS or even CR, but it's certainly dark in the 21st-century vein. To me, a true old school epic is generally open and bright, while still maintaining an air of seriousness if not dourness. TLD has that; SF, IMO, does not.

    Also, SF does not possess the requisite romance for a truly grand film. Nothing serious has the chance to develop between Bond and Severine, while the relationship between Bond and Kara is arguably the most consistently romantic ever put to film in a Bond picture.

    I think what prevents SF to be grand is its small scale motivations: a revenge story that triggers something certainly large scale, but overall secondary and instrumental.

    I would contend that blowing up MI6 and a terrorist attack on the tube are larger scale and more of a threat to the country than Koskov and Whittaker's pretty mundane drug dealing.

    What are Koskov's 'large scale motivations'? Ultimately just money - how much duller a motivation can you get?

    And I agree with you. I don't consider TLD "grand", it remains small scale IMO, more so than SF. That said, money can be a very large scale trigger though, it depends what you are ready to do to obtain it and what is at stake. Creating havoc in Western economy or killing a lot of people in a nuclear holocaust, well, that makes the motivation large scale. Yes, in SF Silva creates lots of havoc, but in the end it is secondary to his ultimate goal.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    No one, and I mean NO ONE loves TLD more than me, but I have to say it IS rather small in scale (comparatively speaking) and not really 'epic' (and I LIKE it for that!!!).
    TND was the last, lush & epic Bond IMO.
    And I only want an occasional epic Bond anyway, my favourites tend to be the non-epic ones.
  • Posts: 14,844
    chrisisall wrote:
    No one, and I mean NO ONE loves TLD more than me, but I have to say it IS rather small in scale (comparatively speaking) and not really 'epic' (and I LIKE it for that!!!).
    TND was the last, lush & epic Bond IMO.
    And I only want an occasional epic Bond anyway, my favourites tend to be the non-epic ones.

    Same here. I'd love to see another TB-like Bond movie soon, but only because we did not have a TB-like Bond movie since... well, TB. In general, I much prefer small-scale ones, like DN and FRWL.
  • Posts: 4,622
    On grand scale I would rank, TB, Spy, MR, TLD.

    Those are the four that jump out. All include sweeping natural vistas, rousing music, romance and intrigue.
    Sweeping natural vistas is really the clincher though. All Bond films have the other elements to varying degrees.
  • Posts: 2,483
    The "sweeping natural vistas" are important to me, too. They allow the film to breathe, and also symbolise the breadth and portentiousness of the story.
  • edited July 2013 Posts: 11,119
    By grand, I mean a film that has a broad, expansive scope. A film that has majesty, romance, glory and grandeur, preferably with a sweeping, majestic score? Think Cecil B. DeMille.

    I nominate TLD. It hits all the right notes for a truly grand Bond film. And I sincerely hope we see another grand Bond film very soon.

    I must say 'Thunderball'. In my opinion it had everything.....and was a bit more serious than the more cheesy 'Goldfinger'. The casino's, the watersports, the beaches, villain with eyepad, larger-than-life score.....it had everything if you ask me.

    Some other examples: 'Moonraker', 'The Lving Daylights' and 'Skyfall' (its cinematography is impeccable) too.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    timmer wrote:
    On grand scale I would rank, TB, Spy, MR, TLD.
    Hey- you left out YOLT!
    [-X
  • Posts: 4,622
    chrisisall wrote:
    timmer wrote:
    On grand scale I would rank, TB, Spy, MR, TLD.
    Hey- you left out YOLT!
    [-X
    I am being very strict, tending towards epic grand, showing bias towards plethora of sweeping natural outdoor beauty, and much colour.
    YOLT has lots of well shot Japanese scenery, but aside from the sweeping mountain vista we don't get much else on the grand scale.

  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    timmer wrote:
    YOLT has lots of well shot Japanese scenery, but aside from the sweeping mountain vista we don't get much else on the grand scale.
    TND has LOTS of cool outdoor vistas too...
    I conjure you are being too strict!
    Don't make me post a Youtube vid of The Wall...
  • edited July 2013 Posts: 4,622
    You don't have to sell me on the epic awesomeness of YOLT. I have it ranked alternately at #'s 2-3 with TB, on my all-time favourite Bond films listing.
    However I am isolating the above 4 as my purest epic-grand Bond films, in the Lawrence of Arabia tradition, if you will.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    timmer wrote:
    However I am isolating the above 4 as my purest epic-grand Bond films
    Too strict IMO.
    You asked for this:

  • Posts: 4,622
    Waters does some very solid, thumping bass work in that Floyd classic.
    Love the school-kid riot at the end. The burning building reminds somewhat of the SF finale.
  • Posts: 2,483
    timmer wrote:
    chrisisall wrote:
    timmer wrote:
    On grand scale I would rank, TB, Spy, MR, TLD.
    Hey- you left out YOLT!
    [-X
    I am being very strict, tending towards epic grand, showing bias towards plethora of sweeping natural outdoor beauty, and much colour.
    YOLT has lots of well shot Japanese scenery, but aside from the sweeping mountain vista we don't get much else on the grand scale.

    The plot is certainly grand, both in its scope and its global importance. Then there's Barry's soaring score, which I think is overrated, but is certainly epic. There's also the paramilitary clash in the volcano lair.
  • edited July 2013 Posts: 4,622
    OK I will include YOLT in my strict list. It is after all, one of my favourite Bonds, although it's never been the scenic vistas or its scope that's grabbed me - the whole movie takes place in only one primary locale.
    No, what grabs me about YOLT is the awesome Bond vs Spectre vibe. It's the ultimate Bond vs Blofeld and Spectre. Nothing tops the Spectre volcano for sheer glorious scale.
    It's the ultimate 007 spyfy fantasy adventure. The rest is bonus, ie the authentic Fleming touches and the Japanese scenery and culture immersion.

    Revised strict list:

    TB, YOLT,Spy,MR and TLD.
    Waters, Gilmour and their children's choir can pipe down. :)
  • Posts: 14,844
    chrisisall wrote:
    timmer wrote:
    YOLT has lots of well shot Japanese scenery, but aside from the sweeping mountain vista we don't get much else on the grand scale.
    TND has LOTS of cool outdoor vistas too...
    I conjure you are being too strict!
    Don't make me post a Youtube vid of The Wall...

    Yes, but in TND you have Bond single-handledly machine gunning the crew of a submarine in a narrow environment. It has no real large scale battle. That prevents it from grand-ness I think.
  • 00Hero00Hero Banned
    edited July 2013 Posts: 121
    Imo u are asking for it if u want me to think cecil b demile no Bond film even comes close to Im ready for my closeup so perhaps we should redefind the criterea chaps the last grand Bond to me is Skyfall because billion dollar bond remember to get out watch other movies there are more full of epicness.
  • Posts: 1,052
    The epic bond films I suppose related mainly to world domination plots, so MR would be the last in that mould, although I suppose TND has some echoes of that. Can't really remember what the actual point of TWINE and DAD were?
  • Posts: 14,844
    The epic bond films I suppose related mainly to world domination plots, so MR would be the last in that mould, although I suppose TND has some echoes of that. Can't really remember what the actual point of TWINE and DAD were?

    Only two movies were really about world domination, maybe three if you count YOLT.
Sign In or Register to comment.