Last Movie you Watched?

1806807809811812965

Comments

  • Posts: 9,771
    Rolling Stones Gimmie Shelter

    A documentary on the aldemon speedway performance a really good concert film and behind the scenes look at one of the best and scariest moment in Rolling Stones history ... how is there not a major motion picture about this seriously!!!

    Ronin

    Man what a great film honestly De Niro is great the film works there is very little to complain about hell my wife enjoyed it to plus Michael Lonsdale and Jonathan Pryce was in it the film works so well

    Shame Jean Reno was never in a bond film

    Films in 2020
    1. Ronin
    2. Rolling stone gimmie shelter
    3. Octopussy
    4. Rise of skywalker
    5. Casino Royale 1954
    6. Little women
    7. Journey greatest hits live
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Shame Jean Reno was never in a bond film

    He still could.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,690
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Shame Jean Reno was never in a bond film

    He still could.

    And he should. Legendary actor.
  • edited January 2020 Posts: 1,639
    Bruce super hero 3/6 , imitator Le after ww2 treasure , usual Bolo appearance. Not really exciting and Le's buddy not much of a fighter

    Millionær for en aften 3.5/6 , comedy about ship tycoon after a woman , i couldnt really get into it for some reason. Based on danish movie.

    Way of Tiger 4/6 , japanese villain after ginseng crops , first half not that exciting but gets better
  • Posts: 1,639
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    LADY SNOWBLOOD

    MV5BZmNmMmIyMWEtNDE2My00MDRmLWE1YWQtMTVlZTJiNzBkZWQzXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNDMwNDYzMDc@._V1_.jpg

    A deliciously violent Japanese classic. Imagine Sergio Leone filming the final chapter of Kill Bill Vol.1 in the '70s, except better.

    Imitated by HK : Broken Oath (its pretty good from what i remember......watch out for scorpions :p
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,894
    Revelator wrote: »
    Stacy Keach also starred with Roger Moore in Street People (1976).

    That's right. There's a good chase in it (also known as The Sicillian Cross), where Roger looks like he's shitting a brick. How much of the driving was done by a professional, I don't know, but from what I remember, it at least looks like Keach is really behind the wheel, which would explain Roger's face.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,551
    DOCTOR SLEEP

    DoctorSueno_ES_Moviestill1.jpg?itok=dAPrQicz

    Guys, I'm not going to lie: I love this movie. Been a fan of Flanagan's works since the start of his career and this movie shows he's not merely a prolific filmmaker but a really good one too. The fact that he, once again, directed, wrote and edited the film, only increases my respect for Flanagan.

    I've never read the novels--The Shining or Doctor Sleep. There, had to get that out of my system.

    But I absolutely adore the Kubrick film, which I have devoured, contemplated and experienced religiously since I first discovered it around 2000. A sequel frightened me, especially when based on a book written by King who, notoriously, hates Kubrick's adaptation. Flanagan, who rewrote Akiva Goldsman's script, perfectly stays "tuned in" with THE SHINING (1980) while--as I understand it--taking the parts that work from the novel Doctor Sleep to tell the story of Danny in his adulthood. What looks like an impossible task, Flanagan has navigated with considerable ease.

    The Director's Cut takes its time--3 hours!--to get the characters set up well and build tension while allowing itself to breathe and us to pause and take in every moment. The cast does a marvellous job, with big points for Kyliegh Curran, Rebecca Ferguson and, of course, Ewan McGregor. The latter is not only charming as usual but also very convincing as a man who battles the bottle--one of King's personal struggles in real life. In fact, the full 3 hours fly by, in a sense, because despite the slower pace, there's so much detail in the visual language of the film, so much quality in the acting and so many great moments in the story that I'm never doctored to sleep--pun intended. The film is contemplative rather than cheaply scary, a fusion of sorts between X-Men and THE SHINING with powerful, introspective moments. It never insults, neither the adult nor the fan of THE SHINING in me.

    This isn't THE SHINING 2; it's really not. Though it does, in no uncertain ways, chase the most memorable moments of the Kubrick film, it adds so much more to the "world" of THE SHINING; in fact, some critics have already called THE SHINING something of a prequel to a more expansive story told in DOCTOR SLEEP. It goes without saying that none of this makes THE SHINING any lesser a movie--it is still one of the true horror greats. But DOCTOR SLEEP is not some weak cash grab in an era when everything gets branded out by wealth-seeking suits. It's a bona fide good film, delivered by what seems to be King's next "Frank Darabont". I've seen the film twice now in under three days and I can honestly say that I'm a huge fan.
  • Bombshell (2019)- it is very much a movie made in the Me Too/Time's Up era, but I liked that about it. Great acting, and a very fast pace make this a blast to watch, however I found the first 30 minutes highly politicized in the way the rest of the film wasn't, and do wish we got deeper into some of the characters struggles. Overall good film, 7/10. And I got to watch the NTTD trailer beforehand, first time I've seen it in a theatre!
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,551
    2Wint2Kidd wrote: »
    Bombshell (2019)- it is very much a movie made in the Me Too/Time's Up era, but I liked that about it. Great acting, and a very fast pace make this a blast to watch, however I found the first 30 minutes highly politicized in the way the rest of the film wasn't, and do wish we got deeper into some of the characters struggles. Overall good film, 7/10. And I got to watch the NTTD trailer beforehand, first time I've seen it in a theatre!

    I completely agree. Saw the film yesterday; left quite impressed, more with the acting, though, than with anything else.
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 3,985
    Blade Runner

    Wow. Has barely aged at all. 38 years old!

    Probably my favourite film of all time! 👍
  • Posts: 7,653
    M by Fritz Lang - what amazing movie visually and its theme certainly annoyed th heck out of a certain Goring and Hitler. A nice EUREKA release.

    Fright Night (1985) - I have not seen this movie since it release in cinema and it was a hoot and a half, can certainly considered a camp movie, I enjoyed it.
  • Posts: 12,269
    Mandy (2018). I can't believe just how much I enjoyed this film. It's absolutely fantastic - the cast, the cinematography (my goodness, the colors), the direction, the music - it's all awesome. One of the best revenge films I've ever seen.
  • Posts: 6,819
    Blade Runner

    Wow. Has barely aged at all. 38 years old!

    Probably my favourite film of all time! 👍

    Which version did you watch?. Saw it in the cinema when it was originally released, and loved it, but hated the narration and the happy ending. When Scott removed both for his 'Directors cut' , and put the unicorn dream sequence back in, he had his masterpiece! Rutger Hauer is amazing in it!
    Great visuals, great dialogue ("if only you'd seen, what I've seen, with your eyes!") And of course the the superb score by Vangelis!
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    THE NEON DEMON (Nicolas Winding Refn, 2016)

    Remarkable film. Visually stunning, but also some really unpleasant scenes. Glad I saw it, but won t see it again.


  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    edited January 2020 Posts: 23,376
    THE NEON DEMON (Nicolas Winding Refn, 2016)

    Remarkable film. Visually stunning, but also some really unpleasant scenes. Glad I saw it, but won t see it again.


    Caught it on Netflix a while back, it illustrates the superficial world of fame well, there is some interesting imagery in the film.
    --
    22.jpg
    JOKER brilliant film worthy of further viewings and analysis.
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    edited January 2020 Posts: 3,985
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Blade Runner

    Wow. Has barely aged at all. 38 years old!

    Probably my favourite film of all time! 👍

    Which version did you watch?. Saw it in the cinema when it was originally released, and loved it, but hated the narration and the happy ending. When Scott removed both for his 'Directors cut' , and put the unicorn dream sequence back in, he had his masterpiece! Rutger Hauer is amazing in it!
    Great visuals, great dialogue ("if only you'd seen, what I've seen, with your eyes!") And of course the the superb score by Vangelis!

    The Final Cut version.

    I saw it on release in 82 and I loved it then, even with the narration and happy ending. Funny, it was practically ignored by mainstream critics back in the day. Only a select few science fiction magazines heralded the masterpiece I knew it was.

    Obviously the Final Cut version is my favourite, but I love all the versions. Even the 'Dangerous Days' version.

    There was nothing else like it when it was released. A gritty all too viable vision of the future.

    The sequel was a good effort, but it doesn't touch the original.
  • Posts: 6,819
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Blade Runner

    Wow. Has barely aged at all. 38 years old!

    Probably my favourite film of all time! 👍

    Which version did you watch?. Saw it in the cinema when it was originally released, and loved it, but hated the narration and the happy ending. When Scott removed both for his 'Directors cut' , and put the unicorn dream sequence back in, he had his masterpiece! Rutger Hauer is amazing in it!
    Great visuals, great dialogue ("if only you'd seen, what I've seen, with your eyes!") And of course the the superb score by Vangelis!

    The Final Cut version.

    I saw it on release in 82 and I loved it then, even with the narration and happy ending. Funny, it was practically ignored by mainstream critics back in the day. Only a select few science fiction magazines heralded the masterpiece I knew it was.

    Obviously the Final Cut version is my favourite, but I love all the versions. Even the 'Dangerous Days' version.

    There was nothing else like it when it was released. A gritty all too viable vision of the future.

    The sequel was a good effort, but it doesn't touch the original.

    Certainly agree with your last statement. I was very disappointed with the follow up!
    Yes, the critics were very unkind to it, I remember the late John Brosnan in Starburst magazine giving it a good review, stating it was probably down to Fords casting and that people were probably expecting a Star Wars type of movie with flying car chases etc.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    BRIGHTBURN (David Yarovesky, 2019)
    Will-Brightburn-be-coming-to-Netflix.jpg
    Interesting idea: A Superboy who turns bad in his formative years. They could have done so much with that, but this was just a silly horror movie. Feels like Shyamalan in his lesser period.
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    edited February 2020 Posts: 3,985
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Blade Runner

    Wow. Has barely aged at all. 38 years old!

    Probably my favourite film of all time! 👍

    Which version did you watch?. Saw it in the cinema when it was originally released, and loved it, but hated the narration and the happy ending. When Scott removed both for his 'Directors cut' , and put the unicorn dream sequence back in, he had his masterpiece! Rutger Hauer is amazing in it!
    Great visuals, great dialogue ("if only you'd seen, what I've seen, with your eyes!") And of course the the superb score by Vangelis!

    The Final Cut version.

    I saw it on release in 82 and I loved it then, even with the narration and happy ending. Funny, it was practically ignored by mainstream critics back in the day. Only a select few science fiction magazines heralded the masterpiece I knew it was.

    Obviously the Final Cut version is my favourite, but I love all the versions. Even the 'Dangerous Days' version.

    There was nothing else like it when it was released. A gritty all too viable vision of the future.

    The sequel was a good effort, but it doesn't touch the original.

    Certainly agree with your last statement. I was very disappointed with the follow up!
    Yes, the critics were very unkind to it, I remember the late John Brosnan in Starburst magazine giving it a good review, stating it was probably down to Fords casting and that people were probably expecting a Star Wars type of movie with flying car chases etc.

    That's where I got my ticket for the film... Starburst magazine! My Bible back in the 80's.

    Loved John Brosnan's column. Was lucky to meet him once. He saw the first preview when there was no voiceover or tacked on ending.

    Starburst were the first champions of the film.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    DEFENDOR (Peter Stebbings, 2009)
    image.jpg?w=1920&h=1080
    Pretty entertaing, in the vein of Kick-Ass.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,504
    Uncut Gems-- very difficult film to watch about addiction. Addiction to gambling and the adrenalin and danger it brings. It's a chaotic subject, shot chaotically. Brilliant film, and yes, The Sandman, Adam Sandler, does get lost in his greasy portrayal of Howard Ratner. It will keep your attention the same way a train-wreck would keep your attention.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,551
    BRIGHTBURN (David Yarovesky, 2019)
    Will-Brightburn-be-coming-to-Netflix.jpg
    Interesting idea: A Superboy who turns bad in his formative years. They could have done so much with that, but this was just a silly horror movie. Feels like Shyamalan in his lesser period.

    This is the movie that introduced me to Billie Eilish. :)
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,894
    81knRLfkkrL._SR500,500_.jpg
    I havne't seen this film in what must be about 25 years. It has held up due to some infectious tunes (I had 'Prince Ali' stuck in my head) and Robin Williams' unrestrained performance as the Genie.

    I image Disney must have, loked away in a vault, hours upon hours of Williams' unused ad-libbed material.
  • PrinceKamalKhanPrinceKamalKhan Monsoon Palace, Udaipur
    Posts: 3,262
    The_Man_From_the_Alamo-674933109-large.jpg
  • Posts: 2,896
    On Friday I watched a program of animated shorts nominated for the Oscars. Amusingly, the films conformed to national stereotypes: the American entries (Hair Love and Kitbull) were slick and sentimental, the Czech film (Daughter) was gloomy, the Chinese film (Sister) was about a very Chinese social problem, and the French film (Memorable) was arty and cerebral. All were enjoyable and stylish but Memorable was the best of the lot and took the most advantage of the medium with several dazzling sequences.

    Also on the program were several "Highly Commended" shorts. Of these, Maestro was extremely short but featured superb computer animation, while The Bird and the Whale had lovely hand-painted colors.The only one of the bunch that definitely shoyld have received a nomination was Hors Piste, a very funny comedy with superb sight-gags that's intentionally made-to-look like a cheesy 80s action show.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    BRIGHTBURN (David Yarovesky, 2019)
    Will-Brightburn-be-coming-to-Netflix.jpg
    Interesting idea: A Superboy who turns bad in his formative years. They could have done so much with that, but this was just a silly horror movie. Feels like Shyamalan in his lesser period.

    This is the movie that introduced me to Billie Eilish. :)

    I did notice her end credits song. Not very good.
  • edited February 2020 Posts: 2,896
    Last night I attended a double-bill of Parasite and Love and Glory. The movies have noting in common, but it was a great night at the movies nevertheless.

    Parasite is the rare example of a film that addresses a pressing real world issue (class) but manages to be a first-rate satire and nail-biting thriller as well. Superbly entertaining and well-done--my only criticism is that the end is too prolonged. Korean films often have three or four endings!

    During the first half-hour of Love and Glory I wasn't sure if the film was going to go anywhere. Little did I know! By the end I was very moved, as the remembered pieces of the main character's life came back together, and he rediscovered the beauty and sensuality that had made his life worth living.
  • edited February 2020 Posts: 2,896
    Continuing my efforts to catch up on the best films of 2019, I finally viewed Knives Out. Great fun, with a diabolically ingenious plot, killer cast, and atmospheric and energetic direction. I always admire a truly intricate mystery plot, but I tend to be hard on the genre, because in many cases the solutions are either anticlimaxes or strain so hard for unpredictability they become contrived and wildly implausible. Knives Out avoids those pitfalls and Rian Johnson's script would be worthy of an Edgar Award, if they were given out for films. It's a successful update of the country house whodunnit that avoids the sub-genre's usual insularity and smuggles in some social comment. As for Daniel Craig, he obviously had a good time with this role. His outrageous cornpone accent wanders a bit, but that's all part of the fun.
  • I finished watching Midsommar (2019) a few hours ago, and it is still getting under my skin. Ari Aster made a beautiful film with colour and perfect framing of characters, haunting imagery, and proves that good horror can also be in daylight. Florence Pugh is fantastic and it might be my favourite performance from the whole of last year. Similar to Hereditary this film highlights with how we deal with grief and who and how we seek solace from grief as well as other themes. I also enjoyed Hereditary, but I think I may prefer Midsommar and it is definitely in my top 10 movies of 2019, maybe even top 5.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited February 2020 Posts: 15,690
    2Wint2Kidd wrote: »
    I finished watching Midsommar (2019) a few hours ago, and it is still getting under my skin. Ari Aster made a beautiful film with colour and perfect framing of characters, haunting imagery, and proves that good horror can also be in daylight. Florence Pugh is fantastic and it might be my favourite performance from the whole of last year. Similar to Hereditary this film highlights with how we deal with grief and who and how we seek solace from grief as well as other themes. I also enjoyed Hereditary, but I think I may prefer Midsommar and it is definitely in my top 10 movies of 2019, maybe even top 5.

    I agree with everything, except on one point: I prefer Hereditary to Midsommar. Both are amongst my favorite horror films of the past decade.
Sign In or Register to comment.