Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny (30th June 2023)

1149150152154155196

Comments

  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,113
    thedove wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    I assume everyone on this thread is a big Indiana Jones fan (otherwise why would you be here?). So can we take a minute to stop thinking about angry YouTubers and take a deep breath and remind ourselves that a new Indy movie is coming out in less than a month? This is a time for celebration. Maybe you won't like the movie. But I guarantee there will be something in the film that you DO like (I'm pretty sure the tuk tuk chase is going to be a showstopper). So please don't get bogged down in negativity and try to enjoy the moment. We're seeing Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones one last time!

    Great post @PDJamesBond I couldn't agree more.

    Thanks, @Benny It's pretty sad that there are some places on the Internet where I couldn't even have posted this without being accused of being a Disney shill. I've seen people attacked (verbally, of course) just for being passionate and excited about the movie. Which is so strange to me because, if you're a true fan, wouldn't you be passionate and excited too? Or, at the VERY least, not begrudge someone else being excited? It's so strange.

    I've said it many times and I'll keep saying it: The Internet is the best and worst thing that ever happened to the movies.

    There are places where if you dare suggest Kathleen Kennedy is a negative force on Lucas Film you will be attacked. LOL! I love how we are so insular that we feel our way is best and can't see it from a more detached perspective. If you think Kathleen is the best film producer ever and that everything she has produced is gold, more power to you. If you think she is a terrible producer that's fine too. One side shouldn't be allowed to trump others. Free speech.

    Bottom line you throw out an opinion be prepared for some to like it and some to dislike it. That's fine and should be encouraged. The people on here saying that people shouldn't be voice their opinions is ludicrous.

    In my days as a youth you would write letters to the editor, now one need only create their post and publish. Today we can all publish or shout out our thoughts and opinions. Engage or don't engage, watch or don't watch. I am reminded of certain radio personalities where they wanted listeners and didn't care if the listener liked them or agreed with them. They just wanted listeners. Often someone would say I can't stand (insert DJ name) did you hear that bit where he... or "I never listen to him. Did you hear his story the other day." LOL!

    You definitely make some good points @thedove I am all for back and forth, debate, differences of opinion, etc. That's part of what makes a fandom fun - we can argue all day. But I think the difference is that I hate the toxic atmosphere of people who WANT to hate things just because they're miserable. There are so-called "fans" who are just SO happy to say that the reviews of DoD are crap and "this movie is going to go down in flames!" Why would you do that if you're a fan? Similarly, it's like being a Bond fan and actively wanting to hate the next Bond movie.

    Bottom line for me: Be a fan. Enjoy the ride. Be excited, even if that excitement is tempered. And then if you don't like the movie, that's cool. We'll dissect it to death afterwards with level heads and without extreme toxicity or hyperbole.

    Good points everyone. Even George Lucas said that Indy 4 and the Prequels were too overhyped for everyone to enjoy.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,957
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    thedove wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    I assume everyone on this thread is a big Indiana Jones fan (otherwise why would you be here?). So can we take a minute to stop thinking about angry YouTubers and take a deep breath and remind ourselves that a new Indy movie is coming out in less than a month? This is a time for celebration. Maybe you won't like the movie. But I guarantee there will be something in the film that you DO like (I'm pretty sure the tuk tuk chase is going to be a showstopper). So please don't get bogged down in negativity and try to enjoy the moment. We're seeing Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones one last time!

    Great post @PDJamesBond I couldn't agree more.

    Thanks, @Benny It's pretty sad that there are some places on the Internet where I couldn't even have posted this without being accused of being a Disney shill. I've seen people attacked (verbally, of course) just for being passionate and excited about the movie. Which is so strange to me because, if you're a true fan, wouldn't you be passionate and excited too? Or, at the VERY least, not begrudge someone else being excited? It's so strange.

    I've said it many times and I'll keep saying it: The Internet is the best and worst thing that ever happened to the movies.

    There are places where if you dare suggest Kathleen Kennedy is a negative force on Lucas Film you will be attacked. LOL! I love how we are so insular that we feel our way is best and can't see it from a more detached perspective. If you think Kathleen is the best film producer ever and that everything she has produced is gold, more power to you. If you think she is a terrible producer that's fine too. One side shouldn't be allowed to trump others. Free speech.

    Bottom line you throw out an opinion be prepared for some to like it and some to dislike it. That's fine and should be encouraged. The people on here saying that people shouldn't be voice their opinions is ludicrous.

    In my days as a youth you would write letters to the editor, now one need only create their post and publish. Today we can all publish or shout out our thoughts and opinions. Engage or don't engage, watch or don't watch. I am reminded of certain radio personalities where they wanted listeners and didn't care if the listener liked them or agreed with them. They just wanted listeners. Often someone would say I can't stand (insert DJ name) did you hear that bit where he... or "I never listen to him. Did you hear his story the other day." LOL!

    You definitely make some good points @thedove I am all for back and forth, debate, differences of opinion, etc. That's part of what makes a fandom fun - we can argue all day. But I think the difference is that I hate the toxic atmosphere of people who WANT to hate things just because they're miserable. There are so-called "fans" who are just SO happy to say that the reviews of DoD are crap and "this movie is going to go down in flames!" Why would you do that if you're a fan? Similarly, it's like being a Bond fan and actively wanting to hate the next Bond movie.

    Bottom line for me: Be a fan. Enjoy the ride. Be excited, even if that excitement is tempered. And then if you don't like the movie, that's cool. We'll dissect it to death afterwards with level heads and without extreme toxicity or hyperbole.

    Good points everyone. Even George Lucas said that Indy 4 and the Prequels were too overhyped for everyone to enjoy.

    The reviews have really dampened my enthusiasm for this film, I must admit (and I was really excited): but that might be exactly what I needed, funnily enough. I don't feel overhyped now, so maybe there's less risk of disappointment.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 4,974
    Who decides what is TOXIC? It is usually someone you don't agree with. Society has always enjoyed building people up and then ripping them down. I am reminded of Dan Henley's Dirty Laundry song. Kick them when they are up, kick them when they are down.

    Look at all the big stars they have a flash, then they get ripped and then they get their comeback. Eddie Murphy springs to mind. Everything he touched turned to gold in the 80's and 90's. Then he goes into the wilderness for a bit. Lately we are hearing more good things about him. Who knows how Beverly Cop 4 will turn out I guarantee some will go out of their way to proclaim him a comedic genius again.

    I thought DoD would receive this treatment. Somewhat surprised by the reviews and the scores. Although they are taking pains to single out Ford for a terrific performance and really isn't that what we all want?

    It shall be interesting to see once the movie releases how it is received. I am going to watch it and will take my sons. I am sure we will enjoy it for what it is. I am not expecting Raiders or even Doom, or even Skull. I am expecting an entertaining popcorn movie with some good characters and story.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,025
    thedove wrote: »
    Who decides what is TOXIC? It is usually someone you don't agree with.

    Tell that to Jake Lloyd.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    The latest installment is tracking at a $60 million domestic opening:

    https://deadline.com/2023/06/indiana-jones-and-the-dial-of-destiny-box-office-projection-1235412010/
  • Posts: 669
    9/10 review from this YouTuber. Do we know anything about him? He has a lot of content and seems to be a pretty positive guy, so maybe he's the type of fan who's more generous upon first seeing a movie than they should be (cough cough, me when I gave Die Another Day 3 stars out of 4 coming out of the theater). But it's nice to hear something positive from the fanbase.

  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,980
    Encouraging…
  • Posts: 1,453
    9/10 review from this YouTuber. Do we know anything about him? He has a lot of content and seems to be a pretty positive guy, so maybe he's the type of fan who's more generous upon first seeing a movie than they should be (cough cough, me when I gave Die Another Day 3 stars out of 4 coming out of the theater). But it's nice to hear something positive from the fanbase.


    Hey, that's what we want to hear.
  • Posts: 669
    Also a great review from Germain Lussier, a pretty reputable critic:

    https://gizmodo.com/indiana-jones-5-review-harrison-ford-dial-of-destiny-1850518708
  • j_w_pepperj_w_pepper Born on the bayou. I can still hear my old hound dog barkin'.
    Posts: 8,695
    I'm getting continually more stubborn in my conviction that I am going to like it. And want to see it ASAP.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    I want to love it but it's hard for me to make assumptions when I loathed KOTCS as much as I did and this one is somehow picking up even worse reviews. I'll still hold onto any optimism I might have and give it a fair chance. Not much longer to go now.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,957
    Not sure even the weak reviews have been worse than Skull..? Reading the three-star ones the papers gave it, the actual body of the review sounded like they enjoyed it fine but it wasn't reflected in the star rating.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 4,974
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I want to love it but it's hard for me to make assumptions when I loathed KOTCS as much as I did and this one is somehow picking up even worse reviews. I'll still hold onto any optimism I might have and give it a fair chance. Not much longer to go now.

    Was surprised to learn that Doom was the lowest ranked Indy movie based on Rotten Tomatoes. Skull was actually ahead of it in RT score. I do remember when Doom came out everyone was expecting another Raiders. I applaud the creative team for attempting something different, one could argue too much different. I wasn't a fan as a kid, it has grown on me since.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    TTOD gets too much hate, I feel. Then again, I'm super biased because it's my favorite in the series and won't be topped.
  • j_w_pepperj_w_pepper Born on the bayou. I can still hear my old hound dog barkin'.
    Posts: 8,695
    In my view, KOTCS was definitely the weakest of the first four. But I still think it stood up nicely, with a few reservations, in transferring the Indy saga to post-war/Cold War times. Some of it is sheer genius, and at least Octopussy fans shouldn't even complain about the jungle vine-swinging CGI scene. And hey, I even loved the refrigerator scene. As I probably said before, if DOD is about as good as KOTCS, I'll be delighted. Bring it on!
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    I really do love the refrigerator scene and never had a problem with it, from my release day viewing of it in theaters to another rewatch I had last year. It's great. My biggest issue is definitely the entire jungle sequence. It looks awful in virtually every way.
  • Posts: 12,269
    Mutt swinging with the CG monkeys to me represents the series’ nadir.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,980
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I really do love the refrigerator scene and never had a problem with it, from my release day viewing of it in theaters to another rewatch I had last year. It's great. My biggest issue is definitely the entire jungle sequence. It looks awful in virtually every way.

    Wow, I loathe the refrigerator scene to my core; it was the first warning sign that there was going to be trouble with the film.

  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    FoxRox wrote: »
    Mutt swinging with the CG monkeys to me represents the series’ nadir.

    100%. That refrigerator scene is such a throwaway moment compared to how absolutely horrible the entirety of the jungle sequence looks and how long it goes on for. Terrible stuff.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,034
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I really do love the refrigerator scene and never had a problem with it, from my release day viewing of it in theaters to another rewatch I had last year. It's great. My biggest issue is definitely the entire jungle sequence. It looks awful in virtually every way.

    I actually think the refrigerator scene is one of the few "peak Indy" moments that the film has. It would fit in perfectly with the trilogies most escapist moments, like falling out of a plane in a dinghy!

    The criticism of it as an individual moment has always confused me a bit. It's executed very well and the shot of Indy looking up at the mushroom cloud is superb.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited June 2023 Posts: 14,957
    I've never had a problem with the fridge either: the whole opening section is probably the high point of the film for me, although it does show some of the film's problems i.e it's way too talky.

    The problems the film have for me are that there's no real story for the main characters (Indy and Mutt go from getting on pretty well to getting on pretty well), there's little motivation for Indy (why does he go on the trip? Some kid he doesn't know says that some guy he used to know but never really liked much has maybe gone missing whilst looking for something he doesn't believe exists- this is low stakes stuff), and just in general the film has a lack of peril or the heightened danger I want from an adventure movie. At the climax of ToD look how dangerous and extreme everything feels: they're barely staying alive, and then there's the extreme tension of the bridge etc. - it's hugely exciting. Compared to Skull where you never really feel they're in much danger.. it's all a bit gas mark 3 on a lower simmer, whereas the first three were all at boiling point.

    As long as DOD gives Indy a damned good reason to go, and it feels like he's in real danger and peril and there are some good jokes, then I'll be happy.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I really do love the refrigerator scene and never had a problem with it, from my release day viewing of it in theaters to another rewatch I had last year. It's great. My biggest issue is definitely the entire jungle sequence. It looks awful in virtually every way.

    I actually think the refrigerator scene is one of the few "peak Indy" moments that the film has. It would fit in perfectly with the trilogies most escapist moments, like falling out of a plane in a dinghy!

    The criticism of it as an individual moment has always confused me a bit. It's executed very well and the shot of Indy looking up at the mushroom cloud is superb.

    Couldn't agree more. I'd say each film has one or two of those "impossible, ludicrous, yet awesome" moments, and the refrigerator scene is certainly one of those for me.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Kicking: Impossible
    edited June 2023 Posts: 6,730
    For me the best parts of the film are the opening up until the nuclear explosion (although I find certain bits grating-- too much of the gophers and "don't get clever Boris, you don't know him!") and the section when Indy and Mutt arrive in Peru, then they go to the sanatorium, and the cemetery, ending with "hello, Jonesy"... "hello, Mac." I find the latter stretch to be the most consistenly excellent in quality.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,957
    I'm pleased that the trailers for DoD actually have a little montage of people crying out 'Indy!' - one thing that did irritate about Skull was that everyone was calling him Prof, Henry, Jonesy... anything but Indy! His name is Indiana Jones, you may also call him Indy or Dr Jones, and that's it :D
    He most certainly is not Henry.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,034
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I really do love the refrigerator scene and never had a problem with it, from my release day viewing of it in theaters to another rewatch I had last year. It's great. My biggest issue is definitely the entire jungle sequence. It looks awful in virtually every way.

    I actually think the refrigerator scene is one of the few "peak Indy" moments that the film has. It would fit in perfectly with the trilogies most escapist moments, like falling out of a plane in a dinghy!

    The criticism of it as an individual moment has always confused me a bit. It's executed very well and the shot of Indy looking up at the mushroom cloud is superb.

    Couldn't agree more. I'd say each film has one or two of those "impossible, ludicrous, yet awesome" moments, and the refrigerator scene is certainly one of those for me.

    100%. Those are the moments that linger for me. Perhaps one of the reasons why people dislike it so much is because it didn't have the same emphasis on practical effects (not that it possibly could!).

    This ties in with my confusion of people's criticism of DoD, and that Tuk-Tuk chase in particular. I don't see the bad effects that they are seeing. It looks like Mangold has tried very hard to be as practical as he could.

    It genuinely feels like a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" style scenario with many franchises now, not just Indy. People are so incensed by the potential for their heroes to not be done justice thematically, that they literally attack every single detail of the filmmaking.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,957
    Indy always had way more special effects than Bond ever did: ToD has a whole chase scene which is entirely done with modelwork and VFX- Bond would never have done that (not least because they couldn't have afforded it!).
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,034
    I was referring to CGI there, mainly. I'd count model work especially as being practical.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited June 2023 Posts: 14,957
    Oh gosh, I wouldn't: it's VFX. If they're doing a stunt or a chase on set I'd say it's practical, if it's with effects done later by ILM or whoever then it isn't. Models are models, whether they're on a table or in a computer.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited June 2023 Posts: 8,034
    mtm wrote: »
    Oh gosh, I wouldn't: it's VFX. If they're doing a stunt or a chase on set I'd say it's practical, if it's with effects done later by ILM or whoever then it isn't. Models are models, whether they're on a table or in a computer.

    Fair enough. I'd say there's quite a few in the film world who would disagree with you though! :)
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,473
    I'll always view model work as a practical effect - it's real and tangible. If it's made through a computer, purely as a CGI creation, then it's VFX. That's how I see it.
Sign In or Register to comment.