The 'Definitive Bond Movie' cannot exist.

RC7RC7
edited March 2012 in Bond Movies Posts: 10,512
For as long as I can remember I've always been fascinated with the notion of something being 'Bondian'. A general term that is commonplace, worldwide.

What I find even more intriguing is the fact that it is not derived from anything specific but from an amalgamation of sounds, images, actions, aesthetics and many more subtle elements.

As a very contemporary example I'll use the opening sequence of the upcoming 'The Dark Knight Rises' - described in many reviews as being either 'Bond-esque' or 'Bondian'. While it is in no way comparable to any specific scene, it evokes the notion of what a Bond movie 'is'.

For me this helps to reinforce the fact that people see 'Bond' as something more than a movie, something more than a car chase, a quip, an explosion or a white cat. It's a 'feeling' and a 'context'. It's also the reason I don't think there ever has been or ever can be a 'definitive Bond movie' and also why ironically, there isn't a single Bond movie I dislike. I think there is something to admire in every entry. Whether it be the screenplay, direction, production design, locations, performance, score, costume design, editing etc etc. Each and every movie contributes to the overall 'Bond' sensibility while none will ever cover all bases.

If this comes across as pessimistic that is not my intention. In fact I feel this is a virtue of the series. With each passing year new elements are added to the canon, some work, some don't. It's unlike any other film series in this respect and with each consecutive film expectations change. For this reason I don't think there can be a truly definitive Bond movie.

But, if there were to be a universally accepted 'definitive Bond' would there be any point in making any more? Skyfall looks to be shaping up superbly but as with all Bond films some people will love it and some will not.

I personally wouldn't have it any other way. Would you?

«1

Comments

  • Posts: 5,634
    If we can take the authors original question into consideration he may well have a point

    Is there such a thing as a perfect Bond movie ?, only Connerys two openers can come close for me

    Yes there's been some mighty fine Bond adventures since 1962 that we have all enjoyed in their own way, but to say - 'A flawless, superlative, 100 per cent effective James Bond movie?', well say what you want but I haven't yet seen one although there have been one or two releases that do come near

    Suppose for arguments sake that Skyfall is the overwhelming success and all round brilliance some are making out before it's even been seen, would that be such a bad think in regard to subsequent releases?, I say no.

    Yes, it may be hard for future releases to surpass or better but that is all. Hitherto we have yet see what a 100 per cent superb or flawless Bond movie is, but that's not to say that one day in our lifetimes we will not witness such a thing



  • tqbtqb
    Posts: 1,022
    perfection doesn't exist.
  • Posts: 5,634
    Who would want to be perfect or flawless anyway. I wouldn't mind trying it out for a week or so in whatever way, but not indefinitely
  • Posts: 562
    Yes, it is impossible to make the 'perfect' Bond film. Although, I suppose it could be done on an individual basis with the help of an infinite budget and Doc Brown's DeLorean...
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Perhaps I should change the title to 'definitive' as it's what I was insinuating. Clearly perfection is an absolute that cannot be achieved. This is merely asking can all the best elements be brought together as a cohesive whole or is it impossible?
  • Posts: 5,634
    We could in an ideal world of had a Timothy Dalton of 1987 in every Bond release since Doctor No to QOS and seen how it would of shaped up. Maybe not quite what we seek here but I think we'd be pleasantly surprised at the results

    Can all the best elements be packaged together in one unit though, or even be successful? Tricky one this, although somewhere you think it just could work. It certainly would be something to see though
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,350
    RC7 wrote:
    This is merely asking can all the best elements be brought together as a cohesive whole or is it impossible?

    No, of course they can be. The public see that film to be Goldfinger, it's got everything you want in it.

    As for the fans, I don't think it can be done as some elements being left out can add to a film due to others being there.

    I'd start by asking what are the needed elements. If we said the often featured gun barrel at the start, for those who rank Casino Royale as the best film, that statement would already not hold true.

    It's very tricky indeed.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    The perfect Bond movie really's not possible, but we can make one close to that. (or not)
  • Posts: 5,634
    @X3MSonicX It's already been done

    Doctor No and From Russia With Love
  • tqbtqb
    Posts: 1,022
    a "definitive" bond film would be extremely cliche.
  • 002002
    Posts: 581
    simple Goldeneye
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    FRWL is the closest we've gotten, but even Sean's brilliance and Terence Young's direction can't form true perfection. Hell, if everything could be perfect, why try? The rarity of even coming close is the real prize.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited March 2012 Posts: 13,946
    IMO FRWL, GF, TB, TSWLM, TLD and GE were all definitive, or ultimate Bond films. Perhaps each of these films were missing one small element that makes the '#1 definitive Bond film' ranking, but they are definitely the top contenders. Oh, and soon I'll add Skyfall to that list. ;)
  • Posts: 5,745
    If I'm honest, Thunderball and You Only Live Twice are the closest. The big, memorable set pieces, iconic villains, iconic allies, iconic locations, humor, and seriousness.

    Those films contain probably what people think of as 'Bondian'. Like something so crazy, it could never work, but you believe it in the film.
  • I think we all have a definitive "idea" of Bond in our minds, and that idea will never be realized simply because it's rather impossible. Films in general will never surpass our imaginations. There's always going to be other places the mind will want to travel to. But what good films do in my opinion, is provide a firm and strong diving board from which to leap off of and dive into the pool of our imagination. The reflection is what we see in a particular movie, and is not what the movie wants us to see necessarily. Films are after all an art form and people will see what they choose to see. So the "definitive Bond movie" will always exist, but only in our minds.
  • 002002
    Posts: 581
    Definitive Bond:

    Great Set Pieces, Tons of Action, Lots of Gadgets, Memoriable Badass Bond Villian and Henchman, Good Story, Great One Liners, Sexy Bond Women who are inteligent and goodlooking, a Bond which is both Charming, Irresistable and likeable

    the answer is Goldeneye or Goldfinger
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited March 2012 Posts: 15,690
    My definition of definitive Bond would be a Bond film that pleases the entire fanbase... and we all know that its physically impossible to please the Moore fans, the Dalton fans, the Connery fans, the Craig fans, the camp fans, the gadget fans, the DAD fans, the MR fans the FRWL fans, the QOS fans, the OHMSS fans, the LTK fans, the serious/realistic fans in the same movie.
  • Posts: 5,745
    My definition of definitive Bond would be a Bond film that pleases the entire fanbase... and we all know that its physically impossible to please the Moore fans, the Dalton fans, the Connery fans, the Craig fans, the camp fans, the gadget fans, the DAD fans, the MR fans the FRWL fans, the QOS fans, the OHMSS fans, the LTK fans, the serious/realistic fans in the same movie.

    Though I think Thunderball is pretty neutral in all those categories. It has a bit of all the characteristics of each Bond actor, the gadgets, the set pieces (the underwater fight!), and definitely some camp. Bond beats a cross-dresser for the first time! Its not one of my favorites but it appeals to any mood I'm in.
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    tqb wrote:
    perfection doesn't exist.
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    The perfect Bond movie really's not possible, but we can make one close to that. (or not)

    Both of these statements mean exactly what it is I needed to say.

    We all have too many ideas for a "definitive" Bond movie, and so we'll never actually reach that.

    That doesn't mean we can't splice together a bunch of random clips that we love and post them on YouTube, however.
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    edited March 2012 Posts: 4,399
    as close to definitive Bond as we will ever get, is just basically polling everyone's opinion - and not just dedicated fans, but average people as well... and most people would probably rate "Goldfinger" as the definitive Bond experience...

    truth is, there is no such thing when it comes to art - because no matter what, a piece of art will meaning something different to everyone... a lot of people might think it's terrific, and a couple might think it's rubbish.....

    because i am myself an artist (graphically and visually) - and from experience, you cannot please everyone, and trying to do so will only drive you insane... no matter what, 100% of the people will never be satisfied.... you just gotta do what you feel is right, and what you like - and hope that you can reach even just one person....

    for example... my definitive Bond film is and has been "From Russia With Love".. in my opinion, it's the perfect Bond film - it's got everything you could ask for....... but there are a lot here who would disagree... to others, definitive Bond might be Moonraker, or The Living Daylights, or On Her Majesty's Secret Service..

    in this case, definitive = perfection, and neither exist... and thus, I don't expect it.
  • Posts: 774
    Every single Bond actor and Bond film brings something new or different to the idea of a Bond film. There can be no definitive Bond film, but there sure are films that include typical Bond elements the most. TB, GF, FRWL, TSWLM would probably be the most 'Bondian'.
  • PrinceKamalKhanPrinceKamalKhan Monsoon Palace, Udaipur
    Posts: 3,262
    JWESTBROOK wrote:
    My definition of definitive Bond would be a Bond film that pleases the entire fanbase... and we all know that its physically impossible to please the Moore fans, the Dalton fans, the Connery fans, the Craig fans, the camp fans, the gadget fans, the DAD fans, the MR fans the FRWL fans, the QOS fans, the OHMSS fans, the LTK fans, the serious/realistic fans in the same movie.

    Though I think Thunderball is pretty neutral in all those categories. It has a bit of all the characteristics of each Bond actor, the gadgets, the set pieces (the underwater fight!), and definitely some camp. Bond beats a cross-dresser for the first time! Its not one of my favorites but it appeals to any mood I'm in.

    That's a major reason I tend to consider TB the "definitive" Bond film and my personal favorite. It combines the Young style/Fleming fidelity of the first two with the widescreen, big-budget epic feel of the later films. It's both faithful to Fleming and a fair level of fantasy(not as much as the Gilbert and Hamilton films, but it's there nonetheless). Plus, the best Bond actor at the top of his form before boredom would start to show and the best looking gallery of Bond girls to appear in a single Bond film. There are individual elements I prefer in other Bond films but TB does provide a good smorgasbord of classic Bondian elements in one film.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 5,984
    I'd say the first three are all definitive Bond films. Each builds on the mystique, style, and pacing of the one before it. By the time Eon got to TB, excess and bloat began to set in.
  • Posts: 5,634
    Apologies and all but I don't understand how some can see Goldfinger as a 'definitive Bond adventure', many people are in agreement that Connery actually seems wasted in this and spends half the duration of film just sitting around looking bored

    Any more flawless examples though after 1962 / 63 ?, not really if I think about it, I automatically thought of Brosnan's TWINE as somewhere near and maybe Goldeneye has a case but the last third is a real letdown for me. Casino Royale must be added too as it's at least 75 per cent efficient and Craig does really well in his debut it has to be said
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,690
    Apologies and all but I don't understand how some can see Goldfinger as a 'definitive Bond adventure', many people are in agreement that Connery actually seems wasted in this and spends half the duration of film just sitting around looking bored

    I think they meant that GF was the definitive Bond film for their own taste. Evidently if you look at the entire fanbase, there is no definitive Bond film as no Bond film will ever satisfy the entire Bond fanbase.
  • Posts: 5,634
    Yes I can understand why some see Goldfinger as perhaps the best ever but I merely don't see all the fuss about it sometimes

    I think it is true that there is no such thing as a flawless Bond film as we've said before simply because even though Connery's two first releases were arguably the nearest to such a thing, there will always be a minority who feel different or take issue with it

    That's one (good) thing about Bond, we all have different tastes, we can say 'Oh look that film was superb, can't say a bad thing against it' and next up will be 'No, it was awful, I didn't like it at all'. That's all very well and good

    Maybe we will never see a definitive or 100 per cent immaculate Bond movie in our lifetimes, but that's not to say such a thing may never occur, maybe one day it just could happen and I think Craig has a good chance of being a part of that if it occurs sooner rather than later

  • One could ask if there has been a perfect film let alone a Bond film. Maybe the Godfather.
  • Posts: 4,622
    I think the Bondian elements that people like to cite are all rooted in the first 5 films. YOLT kind of peaked the series with the massive Spectre volcano set, and then the series sorta settled in after that with continued variations on the same established themes.
    I heard a guy on the radio today talking about a big couch that he happened across backstage at a concert hall. He described it as something so big and long ( it was a kinda wrap around job by the sounds of it) that it might be something you would find in a Bond villain lair. It's like when he mentioned the Bond villain lair, that suddenly we might be able to get a good idea of what he was describing.
  • Posts: 5,634
    timmer wrote:
    I think the Bondian elements that people like to cite are all rooted in the first 5 films. YOLT kind of peaked the series with the massive Spectre volcano set, and then the series sorta settled in after that with continued variations on the same established themes.
    I heard a guy on the radio today talking about a big couch that he happened across backstage at a concert hall. He described it as something so big and long( it was a kinda wrap around job by the sounds of it) that it might be something you would find in a Bond villain lair. It's like when he mentioned the Bond villain lair, that suddenly we might be able to get a good idea of what he was describing.

    excuse me?! :O

    In all seriousness, was it anything like what we saw in Live and Let Die when Kananga blows up one with Whisper on it ?
  • edited March 2012 Posts: 12,506
    When it is down to your own personal ideals? I am sure there is one official film that is your definitive Bond movie! But a movie to satisfy all Bond fans? Thats a holy grail! Unless you count CR67? Thats really has got abit of everything! lol!
Sign In or Register to comment.