No Time To Die Script - Alternative pitches/what would you change?

135678

Comments

  • Posts: 2,897
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    1) Give Safin more screen time and make him more of a threat by establishing early on that he’s the new leader of SPECTRE in Blofelds absence ( The idea that Blofeld was able to keep running the organisation while in custody with a bionic eye was ludicrous).

    2) Bond reluctantly teams up with Blofeld to take down the new Safin led SPECTRE.

    3) Make Primo more of a threat.I liked his look but he spent the entire film either getting strangled by Bond or being a fool.

    4) The virus ( Nanobot or otherwise ) is a SPECTRE invention.

    5) Kill off Madeline in the PTS.It makes it more necessary for Bond to team up with Blofeld to take SPECTRE down.

    6) Make Paloma the main Bond girl.Bond doesn’t have to sleep with her,as someone said earlier it can be a Mentor relationship.

    7) Make Safins plan a world domination plot along the lines of Stromberg and Drax.

    8) Bond doesn’t die.The film ends with him taking down SPECTRE and Blofeld killing Safin along with himself.

    Interesting. Not a fan of Madeline dying personally but it's definitely an alternative. I feel in order for Safin to have worked the film really needed to lean more fully into the revenge plot or just go down this sort of route (ie. he's mad and wants to destroy the world just for the sake of it). The idea of Bond having to team up with Blofeld/him killing Safin is really cool, almost like a little redemption story for the character. A different film than what we got but arguably more along the lines of TSWLM.
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited April 2022 Posts: 3,390
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    1) Give Safin more screen time and make him more of a threat by establishing early on that he’s the new leader of SPECTRE in Blofelds absence ( The idea that Blofeld was able to keep running the organisation while in custody with a bionic eye was ludicrous).

    2) Bond reluctantly teams up with Blofeld to take down the new Safin led SPECTRE.

    3) Make Primo more of a threat.I liked his look but he spent the entire film either getting strangled by Bond or being a fool.

    4) The virus ( Nanobot or otherwise ) is a SPECTRE invention.

    5) Kill off Madeline in the PTS.It makes it more necessary for Bond to team up with Blofeld to take SPECTRE down.

    6) Make Paloma the main Bond girl.Bond doesn’t have to sleep with her,as someone said earlier it can be a Mentor relationship.

    7) Make Safins plan a world domination plot along the lines of Stromberg and Drax.

    8) Bond doesn’t die.The film ends with him taking down SPECTRE and Blofeld killing Safin along with himself.


    Good ideas.

    This is my idea of how Madeleine will die in the PTS:

    Madeleine would die of Nanobots in the PTS. Have Bond still visits Vesper's grave, but when he returned back, Madeleine's already dead with red bumps and rashes on her body and a blood on her nose, then Bond saw a broken vial behind Madeleine's dead body, so Bond decided not to touch her, and went out of the hotel instead to find who's responsible for her death.

    I would have also add:

    1. Felix Leiter will not die, he will team up with Bond, Nomi and Paloma.

    2 . Blofeld will send Logan Ash to help Bond but he will be killed by Primo, who is Safin's henchman.

    3. Have Nomi be a new 00 agent who will team up with Bond, Bond will be Nomi's mentor, have Bond and Nomi be close to each other, but because of a failure, (she accidentally shot a civilian, like what happened to Moneypenny in Skyfall), M decided to put her in office work instead, but Bond was against this idea, Bond believes that Nomi has a potential to be a great 00 agent. And this is where Bond and M will argue.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,513
    I know I'm in the minority here but I don't believe Nomi served much of a purpose in NTTD, Lashana was great in it but she felt like a side character that didn't need to be there

    If Nomi would have been a traitor, that lured Bond to Safin's base and then you could have had Bond vs 007, have Bond kill her in Safin's base and it would have raised the stakes even higher. Or even have Madeline kill her

    That way it would make more sense why, she was warning Bond against capturing Waldo in Cuba, her being reluctant for Bond to come back into the service and why she was slow at tracking Logan Ash in Norway.
    It would have all served a purpose because Bond would be the one to discover she was working for Safin
  • GadgetManGadgetMan Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 4,247
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I know I'm in the minority here but I don't believe Nomi served much of a purpose in NTTD, Lashana was great in it but she felt like a side character that didn't need to be there

    If Nomi would have been a traitor, that lured Bond to Safin's base and then you could have had Bond vs 007, have Bond kill her in Safin's base and it would have raised the stakes even higher. Or even have Madeline kill her

    That way it would make more sense why, she was warning Bond against capturing Waldo in Cuba, her being reluctant for Bond to come back into the service and why she was slow at tracking Logan Ash in Norway.
    It would have all served a purpose because Bond would be the one to discover she was working for Safin

    Yeah, this works for me as well. Lynch was indeed great in the role, would have been interesting to see her dark side.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 2,928
    Yeh, I like that too. I can imagine the tedious media backlash if they'd killed a black, female 007, but yes, it would've served the story really well, I think. I like the idea of Madeleine being the one to kill her too.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited April 2022 Posts: 14,951
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I know I'm in the minority here but I don't believe Nomi served much of a purpose in NTTD, Lashana was great in it but she felt like a side character that didn't need to be there

    If Nomi would have been a traitor, that lured Bond to Safin's base and then you could have had Bond vs 007, have Bond kill her in Safin's base and it would have raised the stakes even higher. Or even have Madeline kill her

    That way it would make more sense why, she was warning Bond against capturing Waldo in Cuba, her being reluctant for Bond to come back into the service and why she was slow at tracking Logan Ash in Norway.
    It would have all served a purpose because Bond would be the one to discover she was working for Safin

    I totally agree that she had no purpose in the film but I'm not sure I'd make her the baddie as Bond and her have to start out with an antagonistic relationship: it's not much of a switch to find out that someone you think hates you is actually a baddie. That's why the Ash reveal works: he starts out as Bond's biggest fan but it turns out he wants to kill him- that's an actual reversal.
    I'd have preferred it if they'd used Nomi as a story point for Bond to realise something about himself (she is just starting out as 007 after all, just like he was in Casino Royale), or even if she'd actually got one up on him a few times so that it meant something when they agreed to join forces- as it is she 'loses' every single encounter they have in the film.
    Or maybe partner them up for a while, with Nomi as M's man on the ground, holding Bond back and going by the book, creating a bit of tension until she realises that Bond's way is sometimes the best way. I don't know, she needed some role in the story.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,513
    mtm wrote: »
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I know I'm in the minority here but I don't believe Nomi served much of a purpose in NTTD, Lashana was great in it but she felt like a side character that didn't need to be there

    If Nomi would have been a traitor, that lured Bond to Safin's base and then you could have had Bond vs 007, have Bond kill her in Safin's base and it would have raised the stakes even higher. Or even have Madeline kill her

    That way it would make more sense why, she was warning Bond against capturing Waldo in Cuba, her being reluctant for Bond to come back into the service and why she was slow at tracking Logan Ash in Norway.
    It would have all served a purpose because Bond would be the one to discover she was working for Safin

    I totally agree that she had no purpose in the film but I'm not sure I'd make her the baddie as Bond and her have to start out with an antagonistic relationship: it's not much of a switch to find out that someone you think hates you is actually a baddie. That's why the Ash reveal works: he starts out as Bond's biggest fan but it turns out he wants to kill him- that's an actual reversal.
    I'd have preferred it if they'd used Nomi as a story point for Bond to realise something about himself (she is just starting out as 007 after all, just like he was in Casino Royale), or even if she'd actually got one up on him a few times so that it meant something when they agreed to join forces- as it is she 'loses' every single encounter they have in the film.
    Or maybe partner them up for a while, with Nomi as M's man on the ground, holding Bond back and going by the book, creating a bit of tension until she realises that Bond's way is sometimes the best way. I don't know, she needed some role in the story.

    Yeah that's a fair point mate. I think you're right she did need some role in the story, as it is she just drives Bond around and the takes his family to safety.

    I felt for Lashana, she acted well in the film but given how much they pushed her out in front, in the trailers, interviews and promo I thought she would have had more of a part in the film

    Perhaps if Bond and Madeline's love story had been better written and more convincing in Spectre, they could have spent more time fleshing out Nomi's character in NTTD
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,951
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I felt for Lashana, she acted well in the film but given how much they pushed her out in front, in the trailers, interviews and promo I thought she would have had more of a part in the film

    Yes I was surprised how pointless she was; it almost felt like she'd been in an earlier draft of the script and they'd forgotten why they'd put her in in the first place.
  • edited April 2022 Posts: 4,600
    I started drafting a reply and then, perhaps like others?, realised that the end result is a completely different film. There were key decisions made re the theme/plot and, once those were made IMHO, it made it so much harder to produce a great script. The whole thing as fatally compromised (sadly). Even sadder when one considers what a great cast, director, composer, etc etc worked on the film. Can you have a great Bond movie without a great script? I don't think so.
  • Agent_Zero_OneAgent_Zero_One Ireland
    Posts: 554
    Change the ending to make whether Bond died or not just a little ambiguous and I can forgive everything else in the film.
  • Agent_Zero_OneAgent_Zero_One Ireland
    Posts: 554
    Venutius wrote: »
    One thing I'd've done would've been to have Heracles originate as one of C's projects, with M having been ordered to maintain it after SP and doing so out of duty, despite him having personal objections. The idea that M would've developed Heracles after what he'd said in SP about the importance of agents in the field is a bit jarring, really.
    This is a damn good change, though.
  • MalloryMallory Do mosquitoes have friends?
    Posts: 2,056
    mtm wrote: »
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I felt for Lashana, she acted well in the film but given how much they pushed her out in front, in the trailers, interviews and promo I thought she would have had more of a part in the film

    Yes I was surprised how pointless she was; it almost felt like she'd been in an earlier draft of the script and they'd forgotten why they'd put her in in the first place.

    My take on it is they filmed the ending (i.e. from when they go to Safin's base) early on in the shooting schedule, and they hadnt quite worked out Nomi's character. Hence is is quite present in the film up until the third act, but which point they basically dump her off on the boat with Maddie/Mini-Bond and off she goes.

    I dont think any of the MI6 regulars actually talk to her during the third act. Which is amusing.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,513
    Mallory wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I felt for Lashana, she acted well in the film but given how much they pushed her out in front, in the trailers, interviews and promo I thought she would have had more of a part in the film

    Yes I was surprised how pointless she was; it almost felt like she'd been in an earlier draft of the script and they'd forgotten why they'd put her in in the first place.

    My take on it is they filmed the ending (i.e. from when they go to Safin's base) early on in the shooting schedule, and they hadnt quite worked out Nomi's character. Hence is is quite present in the film up until the third act, but which point they basically dump her off on the boat with Maddie/Mini-Bond and off she goes.

    I dont think any of the MI6 regulars actually talk to her during the third act. Which is amusing.

    I think it was revealed in the James Bond Archives book, someone on here posted some tidbits about NTTD, one was they filmed the death of Bond on October 5th (global James Bond day) not sure when the rest of the climax was filmed though, I would assume around the same time?

    @Venutius the idea of making Heracles C's project is brilliant mate. It would have been better than making M responsible
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 5,979
    I like M's hands dirty.
  • Posts: 1,571
    Change the ending to make whether Bond died or not just a little ambiguous and I can forgive everything else in the film.

    As clear as the ending of the 3rd C Nolan Batman - where it is darn clear - or more ambiguous, like the ending of Inception - did the top wobble ? much ? With the children outside in the same positions and same clothes and same ages as seen throughout the film, it's pretty clear to many folks that he's still down there in dreamland...

    I had thought of an ending for NTTP whereby Bond sees a weather balloon - they ARE using a great deal of YOLT, after all - and it's vague...until the Aston with Madeline and little Mathilde rounds a turn in Italy and they both look up and smile broadly. That would mean he'd apparently made it, though not shown to the audience. Of course, for this to work, Bond would have had to have made a switch with the corrupt scientist, and Safin would think he'd succeeded in scratching Bond with the deadly broken vial, until Bond turns his hand, revealing he'd switch the vials, and has the deadly one in his hand, such that Bond was scratched with a vial containing merely colored water. (Use different colors to make it obvious, and allow Bond to keep them straight). However, the point was that Craig - reportedly - said he'd come back only if Bond got the full-on tragic hero treatment. Still, had this been presented to him perhaps he'd have liked it ? Perhaps it was...
  • Agent_Zero_OneAgent_Zero_One Ireland
    Posts: 554
    Since62 wrote: »
    Change the ending to make whether Bond died or not just a little ambiguous and I can forgive everything else in the film.

    As clear as the ending of the 3rd C Nolan Batman - where it is darn clear - or more ambiguous, like the ending of Inception - did the top wobble ? much ? With the children outside in the same positions and same clothes and same ages as seen throughout the film, it's pretty clear to many folks that he's still down there in dreamland...

    I had thought of an ending for NTTP whereby Bond sees a weather balloon - they ARE using a great deal of YOLT, after all - and it's vague...until the Aston with Madeline and little Mathilde rounds a turn in Italy and they both look up and smile broadly. That would mean he'd apparently made it, though not shown to the audience. Of course, for this to work, Bond would have had to have made a switch with the corrupt scientist, and Safin would think he'd succeeded in scratching Bond with the deadly broken vial, until Bond turns his hand, revealing he'd switch the vials, and has the deadly one in his hand, such that Bond was scratched with a vial containing merely colored water. (Use different colors to make it obvious, and allow Bond to keep them straight). However, the point was that Craig - reportedly - said he'd come back only if Bond got the full-on tragic hero treatment. Still, had this been presented to him perhaps he'd have liked it ? Perhaps it was...
    An Inception style thing probably, because I do recognise there's thematic worth to what they did.

    The air balloon idea would play too campy, I worry.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,894
    Since62 wrote: »
    Change the ending to make whether Bond died or not just a little ambiguous and I can forgive everything else in the film.

    As clear as the ending of the 3rd C Nolan Batman - where it is darn clear - or more ambiguous, like the ending of Inception - did the top wobble ? much ? With the children outside in the same positions and same clothes and same ages as seen throughout the film, it's pretty clear to many folks that he's still down there in dreamland...

    I had thought of an ending for NTTP whereby Bond sees a weather balloon - they ARE using a great deal of YOLT, after all - and it's vague...until the Aston with Madeline and little Mathilde rounds a turn in Italy and they both look up and smile broadly. That would mean he'd apparently made it, though not shown to the audience. Of course, for this to work, Bond would have had to have made a switch with the corrupt scientist, and Safin would think he'd succeeded in scratching Bond with the deadly broken vial, until Bond turns his hand, revealing he'd switch the vials, and has the deadly one in his hand, such that Bond was scratched with a vial containing merely colored water. (Use different colors to make it obvious, and allow Bond to keep them straight). However, the point was that Craig - reportedly - said he'd come back only if Bond got the full-on tragic hero treatment. Still, had this been presented to him perhaps he'd have liked it ? Perhaps it was...
    An Inception style thing probably, because I do recognise there's thematic worth to what they did.

    The air balloon idea would play too campy, I worry.

    NTTD was tonally all over the place, I don’t think lifting the weather balloon escape from YOLT and placing it in NTTD would have made much difference to the tone of the film.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    edited May 2022 Posts: 5,979
    In my opinion, NTTD has a much stronger ending than either of those Nolan films, because Eon actually made a decision.

    In some ways, that NTTD ending is as brave as the end of OHMSS the film. Some people may not like it, but it is definitive.
    NTTD was tonally all over the place, I don’t think lifting the weather balloon escape from YOLT and placing it in NTTD would have made much difference to the tone of the film.

    I agree with this. Personally I would have preferred the tone of the Norway scenes in the PTS, but that would mean toning down the Cuba scenes (giving them more of a sense of actual danger) and Waldo.

    I also think I would have put Felix (and possibly Ash) at the birthday party, to give Felix's death more punch.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,513
    I think had NTTD ended on a cliffhanger it may have been a bit disappointing or anticlimactic, but given the ending we got I would have preferred that.

    On my last viewing, I really disliked the moment of impact (the shot from behind Bond) it felt a bit gratuitous to me. Seeing Bond obliterated felt a bit over the top in my mind.
    It felt like it was done to leave no doubt he died
  • edited May 2022 Posts: 2,897
    Since62 wrote: »
    Change the ending to make whether Bond died or not just a little ambiguous and I can forgive everything else in the film.

    As clear as the ending of the 3rd C Nolan Batman - where it is darn clear - or more ambiguous, like the ending of Inception - did the top wobble ? much ? With the children outside in the same positions and same clothes and same ages as seen throughout the film, it's pretty clear to many folks that he's still down there in dreamland...

    I had thought of an ending for NTTP whereby Bond sees a weather balloon - they ARE using a great deal of YOLT, after all - and it's vague...until the Aston with Madeline and little Mathilde rounds a turn in Italy and they both look up and smile broadly. That would mean he'd apparently made it, though not shown to the audience. Of course, for this to work, Bond would have had to have made a switch with the corrupt scientist, and Safin would think he'd succeeded in scratching Bond with the deadly broken vial, until Bond turns his hand, revealing he'd switch the vials, and has the deadly one in his hand, such that Bond was scratched with a vial containing merely colored water. (Use different colors to make it obvious, and allow Bond to keep them straight). However, the point was that Craig - reportedly - said he'd come back only if Bond got the full-on tragic hero treatment. Still, had this been presented to him perhaps he'd have liked it ? Perhaps it was...
    An Inception style thing probably, because I do recognise there's thematic worth to what they did.

    The air balloon idea would play too campy, I worry.

    A lot of YOLT already exists in NTTD, so perhaps it would have been fitting to have seen a bit more of it in there. The air balloon could have worked but only insofar as the set design and feel of Safin's Garden of Death was closer to that of Blofeld's (ie. a more dark, otherworldly quality to it, lots of Japanese masks and samurai suits about to really hit home the villain's odd fixation with this culture/the nature of power etc.) I wrote about this in my opening post but I'd have liked to have seen more of Safin's personality reflected in the lair - have the garden (the only living memory of his family) preserved in these oddly shaped domes, a mixture of lush green plants inside cold looking glass spheres, more influence from Japanese design etc. An idea as odd as Bond trying to jump at an air balloon feels a bit more justified in tandem with that more surreal presentation, provided it was taken seriously.

    I don't like the idea of Bond switching vials, however. Again, as per my first post I would have liked a fight within the Garden of Death itself which could have ultimately caused Bond and Safin's death. It would have been a more fitting death for Safin as in this version he's ultimately killed by the embodiment of his obsession. The air ballon idea could have worked too in this scenario perhaps, but I do feel we needed the goodbye between Bond and Madeline rather than Bond trying to save himself by running up to the balloon. I suppose it negates the theme of self-sacrifice that is inherently there within the end of NTTD. Maybe if he'd have blown up the base himself as in the novel?
  • Agent_Zero_OneAgent_Zero_One Ireland
    edited May 2022 Posts: 554
    echo wrote: »
    In my opinion, NTTD has a much stronger ending than either of those Nolan films, because Eon actually made a decision.

    In some ways, that NTTD ending is as brave as the end of OHMSS the film. Some people may not like it, but it is definitive.

    Yeah, I absolutely respect the filmmakers for committing to killing Bond, and not comprising with that. I can't bring myself to like it, but I respect it.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited May 2022 Posts: 2,928
    Danny Boyle's apparently confirmed in a Radio Times interview that Bond's death was part of the deal that Craig made with EON as a condition of making NTTD. Boyle says that Bond's death was built in to the Hodge script 'but what led up to it was obviously very different'. I've not read the full interview, just the teaser snippets, but what's the betting that the interviewer didn't have the wit to ask 'so what did lead up to it?'
  • Posts: 2,897
    Venutius wrote: »
    Danny Boyle's apparently confirmed in a Radio Times interview that Bond's death was part of the deal that Craig made with EON as a condition of making NTTD. Boyle says that Bond's death was built in to the Hodge script 'but what led up to it was obviously very different'. I've not read the full interview, just the teaser snippets, but what's the betting that the interviewer didn't have the wit to ask 'so what did lead up to it?'

    Something about Russia, Bond's past and him being in a modern gulag for a chunk of it from what I understand. At least from what I've read from other posters on here.
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    Posts: 3,390
    007HallY wrote: »
    Venutius wrote: »
    Danny Boyle's apparently confirmed in a Radio Times interview that Bond's death was part of the deal that Craig made with EON as a condition of making NTTD. Boyle says that Bond's death was built in to the Hodge script 'but what led up to it was obviously very different'. I've not read the full interview, just the teaser snippets, but what's the betting that the interviewer didn't have the wit to ask 'so what did lead up to it?'

    Something about Russia, Bond's past and him being in a modern gulag for a chunk of it from what I understand. At least from what I've read from other posters on here.

    And there's Tomasz Kot that's intended to be the Bond Villain.
  • Posts: 338
    Venutius wrote: »
    Yeh, I like that too. I can imagine the tedious media backlash if they'd killed a black, female 007, but yes, it would've served the story really well, I think. I like the idea of Madeleine being the one to kill her too.

    This is why I dislike the idea of a female 00. Female 00 has no real credibility in fighting a serious villain (like seeing female footballers taking on male footballers, or a female boxer in the ring with a male boxer), and there something unpleasant (at least, for me) at seeing her being beaten up

    Yes, I know dear old Roger Moore had no credibility in AVTAK, but he had earned it in the early films and was RM - he wouldn’t have got away with it if AVTAK in 1985 had been his first.
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited May 2022 Posts: 3,390
    I think it would be a great idea to what happened to Moneypenny in Skyfall also happened to Nomi, like Nomi made a mistake by accidentally shooting one of the civilians in Cuba, and this would made M decided to put her in office work instead or transfer her to GCHQ.

    Then about Madeleine, it would be good to have her and Bond just break up, like what happened to Bond and Tiffany at the start of From Russia With Love (Novel), no more reconciling, it just didn't worked out, and that would be unique for the franchise instead of just killing her off.

    And Safin should just be a villain with no personal connections, just a standalone villain that Bond needs to defeat.

    Have Bond died because he didn't give up but he ran out of time, he got stuck inside of Safin's lair and there's no way out, and since Safin shot him he's now weakening and can't move that fast and the missiles was already destroying the island, so he ran out of time. That's heroic because instead of his personal reasons that he can't touch Madeleine and Mathilde, he dies because it's the destiny who have decided to kill him, he went there, defeated Safin and died for Queen and Country, he tried to find a way out, but he's really destined to die (He's shot and weak, and the missiles are destroying the island).
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 2,928
    007HallY wrote: »
    Something about Russia, Bond's past and him being in a modern gulag for a chunk of it from what I understand. At least from what I've read from other posters on here.

    Yes, Boyle said in that Esquire piece that 'it was all set in Russia and...went back to his origins' and the Cold War. Also, that it was Hodge who had the idea for Bond to have a child that he hadn't known about. Presumably, not Madeleine's if the kid was in Russia. But we knew this already - it's frustrating when the Radio Times interviewer had the chance to ask for more details and, in all likelihood, didn't.
  • Posts: 4,600
    so what do we think about an actor insisting on crucial plot/endings and the writers/producers fitting in with these "demands" ? To me , it's "the cart pushing the horse."
  • MalloryMallory Do mosquitoes have friends?
    Posts: 2,056
    patb wrote: »
    so what do we think about an actor insisting on crucial plot/endings and the writers/producers fitting in with these "demands" ? To me , it's "the cart pushing the horse."

    All actors will want an input into their characters and the script, its a balancing act on the producer's part to balance that with all the other opinions on the script - the studio, director, financiers, themselves etc.

    I think it was Saltzman, around YOLT time and the departure of Connery, who commented "007 is bigger than any one actor". I think it was in the Everything or Nothing documentary.

    Clearly with the Craig-era, that dynamic had changed.
  • Posts: 2,897
    Mallory wrote: »
    patb wrote: »
    so what do we think about an actor insisting on crucial plot/endings and the writers/producers fitting in with these "demands" ? To me , it's "the cart pushing the horse."

    All actors will want an input into their characters and the script, its a balancing act on the producer's part to balance that with all the other opinions on the script - the studio, director, financiers, themselves etc.

    I think it was Saltzman, around YOLT time and the departure of Connery, who commented "007 is bigger than any one actor". I think it was in the Everything or Nothing documentary.

    Clearly with the Craig-era, that dynamic had changed.

    Craig did have an unprecedented amount of official control to be fair, given that he was a co-Producer on SP and NTTD. Actors having a say in the script/creative decisions actually isn't a bad thing for something like Bond, although whether their involvement should be the same as Craig's is debatable.
Sign In or Register to comment.