Is 'For Your Eyes Only' the most boring James Bond film?

1111214161724

Comments

  • Posts: 11,425
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    STLCards3 wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    I'd also agree that it is not a very sexy Bond film, mainly because Bond is depicted more than in any other movie as an ageing man. From the beginning we're reminded that he's a widower. And Moore at this point, more than any Bond since or after, looks believable as a widower.

    Yup. And he turns down the sexual advances of a much younger female. It was obviously the right thing to do, but telling her he would buy her an ice cream pushes the idea of Bond-as-paternal. Even the rendezvous with Cassandra Harris looks like two old retired people on a Florida beach.

    Moore is at his least sexual Bond here. And it a stark contrast with what came before and after. That said, I really enjoyed his performance overall.

    A large part of the problem is no chemistry with Melina. And I believe Bouquet said, "He reminds me of my father."

    It worked much better in OP, where the leading lady was much closer to his own age. The romance with Melina seems to have come as an afterthought.

    Even though Melina is a stronger character, and is portrayed by a much better actress, she does share that weird chemistry with Bond where the romance is only there in the final scene with Stacey.

    I'm glad in OP that's done much better. I would even say that his romance with Octopussy is Rog's most convincing one.

    Definitely. It's the only convincing love match in the whole Rog era tbh.
  • Posts: 230
    BT3366 wrote: »
    When I think of FYEO being kind of drab and boring, my mind immediately goes to Bond mountain climbing. Though I appreciate the actual stunts, it's not very suspenseful. Doesn't help that it just looks like Roger Moore is dangling in a soundstage whether it's rear projection or just a fake background plate.
    On my recent viewing, I did notice a lot of the shots that were done in studio as there was a definite change in the lighting of those shots. It wasn't too distracting, just things such as placing a piton into the rock and occasional shots of Moore along with some outdoors too.

    It worked fine as I recognize that back 40 years ago when this was filmed they never anticipated home video that would expose such practices. I still think something like GE's Bond freefall into the plane thing looks worse and it was done nearly 15 years later. We won't mention CGI.

    I remember thinking how preposterously awful the GE plane dive looked when I saw it in the theater.

  • edited March 2020 Posts: 1,394
    [/quote]A large part of the problem is no chemistry with Melina. And I believe Bouquet said, "He reminds me of my father." [/quote]

    The final scene where Bouquet derobes comes across kinda gross and creepy. This is when people should have known Moore needed to be replaced. Maybe somebody with foresight placed Moore with Adams in the next film - somebody who was looking about as old as him.[/quote]

    Why is it gross and creepy? Its not uncommon that young women find older men attractive.And Moore wasnt THAT old at the time.Heck, today 50 is the new 40.Tom Cruise is in his late fifties and hes doing highly dangerous stunts for REAL and his love interest is at least 20 years younger than him and doesnt come across as creepy or unbelievable at all.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,423
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    A large part of the problem is no chemistry with Melina. And I believe Bouquet said, "He reminds me of my father." [/quote]

    The final scene where Bouquet derobes comes across kinda gross and creepy. This is when people should have known Moore needed to be replaced. Maybe somebody with foresight placed Moore with Adams in the next film - somebody who was looking about as old as him.[/quote]

    Why is it gross and creepy? Its not uncommon that young women find older men attractive.And Moore wasnt THAT old at the time.Heck, today 50 is the new 40.Tom Cruise is in his late fifties and hes doing highly dangerous stunts for REAL and his love interest is at least 20 years younger than him and doesnt come across as creepy or unbelievable at all.
    [/quote]

    Cruise looks at least 10 years younger than his age.
  • FYEO is in my the bottom half of Bond films in terms of excitement, but I'd never call it the most boring. That honour would go to AVTAK! Albeit, I'll shamefully admit that the only Bond film I've fallen asleep on is Goldfinger... during the Kentucky scenes.
  • edited March 2020 Posts: 230
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    A large part of the problem is no chemistry with Melina. And I believe Bouquet said, "He reminds me of my father." [/quote]

    The final scene where Bouquet derobes comes across kinda gross and creepy. This is when people should have known Moore needed to be replaced. Maybe somebody with foresight placed Moore with Adams in the next film - somebody who was looking about as old as him.[/quote]

    Why is it gross and creepy? Its not uncommon that young women find older men attractive.And Moore wasnt THAT old at the time.Heck, today 50 is the new 40.Tom Cruise is in his late fifties and hes doing highly dangerous stunts for REAL and his love interest is at least 20 years younger than him and doesnt come across as creepy or unbelievable at all.
    [/quote]

    Of course. But it looked weird for THOSE two, who shared ZERO romantic chemistry for two hours. The issue isn't the age - smarmy Moore worked fine when he was younger, but smarmy Moore twice the age of the leading ladies in a bit off.
  • edited March 2020 Posts: 230
    FYEO is in my the bottom half of Bond films in terms of excitement, but I'd never call it the most boring. That honour would go to AVTAK! Albeit, I'll shamefully admit that the only Bond film I've fallen asleep on is Goldfinger... during the Kentucky scenes.

    I am also in the tiny minority that finds a few stretches of GF a bit boring. That is why GF is usually around 10th for me instead of at the VERY top.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,791
    STLCards3 wrote: »
    FYEO is in my the bottom half of Bond films in terms of excitement, but I'd never call it the most boring. That honour would go to AVTAK! Albeit, I'll shamefully admit that the only Bond film I've fallen asleep on is Goldfinger... during the Kentucky scenes.

    I am also in the tiny minority that finds a few stretches of GF a bit boring. That is why GF is usually around 10th for me instead of at the VERY top.

    It's only at 17 for me, because I find those Kentucky scenes extremely dull. I don't have that feeling with any of the 16 films preceding it.
  • Posts: 11,425
    This bizarre GF backlash in recent years is just perverse.

    Having said this, Guy Hamilton was probably the most inconsistent of the early Bond directors.
  • edited March 2020 Posts: 1,469
    I just watched GF less than a week ago. Among the most memorable things this time were the music and theme--it still comes to mind at times. It used to be my favorite Bond film, but now it's somewhere between 5 and 10. Probably because I've seen it so many times, perhaps less because of the direction and because it can seem a little dated or stiff, as with the casting of Cec Linder as Felix, though he was probably like the CIA of old. Some scenes that stand out are the ones with Jill Masterson, the golf game, and the climax in the vault at Fort Knox. Some I rank higher are DN, FRWL and CR--TB is close. But FYEO is at least a notch or more below all these.
  • ThunderballThunderball playing Chemin de Fer in a casino, downing Vespers
    edited March 2020 Posts: 776
    Getafix wrote: »
    This bizarre GF backlash in recent years is just perverse.

    Having said this, Guy Hamilton was probably the most inconsistent of the early Bond directors.

    I absolutely adore Goldfinger. It’s one of my six desert island Bond movies, alongside CR, DN, FRWL, TB and OHMSS. Most of us love GF. It’s just that it’s been built up by the public and the media as the end-all, be-all, Greatest Ever Bond Movie Ever, and while we more hardcore Bond fans tend to love it too, most of us have a different pick for number one, whether it’s OHMSS, DN, FRWL, TSWLM, TB, and speaking personally here, CR.
    While I agree that it has gotten out of hand, the backlash is only natural after the general agreement of GF’s untouchable greatness has been so hammered in for so long.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited March 2020 Posts: 14,986
    echo wrote: »
    I think more boring Moore films are LALD (the muddled middle--didn't Cubby once say "Bond should only travel to each location once"? LALD violates that) and especially TMWTGG (throughout).

    That's interesting: I haven't heard that. Makes complete sense as that's what I've been saying my problem with LALD is- it's very static and Bond goes back and forth for a long stretch of it. Bond films aren't murder mysteries: they're really long chases.
    STLCards3 wrote: »
    Of course. But it looked weird for THOSE two, who shared ZERO romantic chemistry for two hours. The issue isn't the age - smarmy Moore worked fine when he was younger, but smarmy Moore twice the age of the leading ladies in a bit off.

    See I actually prefer it when he's a bit older because, well, it's funnier. I don't believe it for a second, but that's part of the fun, isn't it? :) I love Roger in these movies because I feel like I'm having a laugh with him- it's all very silly and we both know it but that doesn't stop it being fun.
  • Posts: 7,500
    Getafix wrote: »
    This bizarre GF backlash in recent years is just perverse.

    Having said this, Guy Hamilton was probably the most inconsistent of the early Bond directors.

    I absolutely adore Goldfinger. It’s one of my six desert island Bond movies, alongside CR, DN, FRWL, TB and OHMSS. Most of us love GF. It’s just that it’s been built up by the public and the media as the end-all, be-all, Greatest Ever Bond Movie Ever, and while we more hardcore Bond fans tend to love it too, most of us have a different pick for number one, whether it’s OHMSS, DN, FRWL, TSWLM, TB, and speaking personally here, CR.
    While I agree that it has gotten out of hand, the backlash is only natural after the general agreement of GF’s untouchable greatness has been so hammered in for so long.

    Exactly. A good film no doubt and nobody can deny it's iconic status, but there are other great Bond Films, arguably better ones, from the era that seem to be overlooked in its shadow.
  • Posts: 230
    jobo wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    This bizarre GF backlash in recent years is just perverse.

    Having said this, Guy Hamilton was probably the most inconsistent of the early Bond directors.

    I absolutely adore Goldfinger. It’s one of my six desert island Bond movies, alongside CR, DN, FRWL, TB and OHMSS. Most of us love GF. It’s just that it’s been built up by the public and the media as the end-all, be-all, Greatest Ever Bond Movie Ever, and while we more hardcore Bond fans tend to love it too, most of us have a different pick for number one, whether it’s OHMSS, DN, FRWL, TSWLM, TB, and speaking personally here, CR.
    While I agree that it has gotten out of hand, the backlash is only natural after the general agreement of GF’s untouchable greatness has been so hammered in for so long.

    Exactly. A good film no doubt and nobody can deny it's iconic status, but there are other great Bond Films, arguably better ones, from the era that seem to be overlooked in its shadow.

    Agreed. I like it a lot. Just like 8-9 more.
  • Posts: 230
    mtm wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    I think more boring Moore films are LALD (the muddled middle--didn't Cubby once say "Bond should only travel to each location once"? LALD violates that) and especially TMWTGG (throughout).

    That's interesting: I haven't heard that. Makes complete sense as that's what I've been saying my problem with LALD is- it's very static and Bond goes back and forth for a long stretch of it. Bond films aren't murder mysteries: they're really long chases.
    STLCards3 wrote: »
    Of course. But it looked weird for THOSE two, who shared ZERO romantic chemistry for two hours. The issue isn't the age - smarmy Moore worked fine when he was younger, but smarmy Moore twice the age of the leading ladies in a bit off.

    See I actually prefer it when he's a bit older because, well, it's funnier. I don't believe it for a second, but that's part of the fun, isn't it? :) I love Roger in these movies because I feel like I'm having a laugh with him- it's all very silly and we both know it but that doesn't stop it being fun.

    I like the Moore films in general. I don't mind light-hearted-Bond at all.
  • Posts: 1,595
    The action sequences in FYEO are pretty damn astounding. I can understand the complaints against the film. It is a bit more aesthetically "flat" than some of the other entries (certainly the prior two Gilbert movies). But I think that's done with a fair amount of intent.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,986
    The action sequences in FYEO are pretty damn astounding.

    Yeah I've always put them up with the car chase and opening sequence of Tomorrow Never Dies as being the best action in the series. I guess I'd add the opening foot chase from Casino Royale to that, maybe the opening of Skyfall possibly.
  • Posts: 4,602
    I was lucky enough to see FYEO on the big screen as a double bill after poor RM passed away. The comments here are broadly fair IMHO, there is some great action but the sexual chemistry/relationship is handled very badly.
    Also, is this the only Bond movie where Bond rejects a sexual encounter on the basis of age gap? ("I'll buy you an ice cream" puts Bond himself in the "Uncle" context and makes the whole audience aware of his age (and we are aware that he is aware) but not in a creative/character arc way. (back to SF)

    Its a shame as FYEO had the chance to be an all time classic but I can't overlook these issues.
  • OctopussyOctopussy Piz Gloria, Schilthorn, Switzerland.
    Posts: 1,081
    Another highlight of FYEO has to be the dinner between Bond and Kristatos. While admittedly I haven't read the short stories yet, that scene feels straight out of the pages of Fleming. I'm also in the minority of people who actually like Conti's score for the film.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    edited March 2020 Posts: 7,314
    I don't have any issues with the Bond/Melina romance. They don't jump into bed together right away. It's built up throughout the course of the film with Bond being very protective of her. After what they went through together, I could see two people wanting to experience that closeness with each other. It's certainly handled better than AVTAK's final scene.
  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,398
    I read the last two pages and habe a few comments:
    The climbing scene boring? I think I mentioned it before that it is (imo) one of the most thrilling scenes in the series, definitely in the Moore era.

    I don't have issues with the fact that Bond is/looks much older than Melina. My problem is that Bouquet shows one of the weakest performances of all the bondgirls. During the car chase Bond says something like he's sorry for what happened to her parents. There, Melina doesn't answer but gives me a look that says: “sorry I can't act but I try to stare a bit different now“'.

    And I didn't know that Moore's Bond asks for information so often. That's great trivia.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,791
    I don't have issues with the fact that Bond is/looks much older than Melina. My problem is that Bouquet shows one of the weakest performances of all the bondgirls. During the car chase Bond says something like he's sorry for what happened to her parents. There, Melina doesn't answer but gives me a look that says: “sorry I can't act but I try to stare a bit different now“'.
    Hold on, claiming Bouquet can' t act is a bit of a stretch in my opinion, you should she her in the Luis Buñuel masterpiece Cet obscur objet du désir (aka That Obscure Object of Desire). She later also went on to win a César Award (basically the French film industry Oscars) for another film.
  • edited March 2020 Posts: 1,469
    I don't have issues with the fact that Bond is/looks much older than Melina. My problem is that Bouquet shows one of the weakest performances of all the bondgirls. During the car chase Bond says something like he's sorry for what happened to her parents. There, Melina doesn't answer but gives me a look that says: “sorry I can't act but I try to stare a bit different now“'.
    Ha ha! I guess she did the best she could, though an article I just read said she played against type. Also 'In The James Bond Archives, director John Glen recounts how he cast Carole Bouquet in the role: “We flew into Rome and met Carole. She was absolutely gorgeous. The thing that impressed me most was her hair. She had the most gorgeous hair. I could immediately see the girl with the crossbow as Fleming had described her, which was really the only Fleming element that was in the movie.”' So perhaps more a case of her look, rather than chemistry with Moore. There's also an Independent article from 2008 in which she says she found the Bond film and another film, New York Stories, "No fun".

    I just started watching the film, and I'll say the editing (and no doubt direction too) during the car chase near Gonzales' home is excellent. They keep things moving along at a good clip, keep your attention. Nice suit, shirt and tie Moore wears meeting with the Chief of Staff and Defense Minister, though I would've left the vest out of the three-piece. I also think some of the appeal in the film comes from all the Greek locale scenery--Bond wasn't there in any previous film, was he?-- though I really love the Cortina segment too, and on the yacht and at the Albania wearhouse! (yet to come)--and the dinner, as Octopussy mentioned.
    https://classiq.me/this-summer-were-chanelling-carole-bouquet-in-for-your-eyes-only
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,986
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    I don't have issues with the fact that Bond is/looks much older than Melina. My problem is that Bouquet shows one of the weakest performances of all the bondgirls. During the car chase Bond says something like he's sorry for what happened to her parents. There, Melina doesn't answer but gives me a look that says: “sorry I can't act but I try to stare a bit different now“'.
    Hold on, claiming Bouquet can' t act is a bit of a stretch in my opinion, you should she her in the Luis Buñuel masterpiece Cet obscur objet du désir (aka That Obscure Object of Desire). She later also went on to win a César Award (basically the French film industry Oscars) for another film.

    It does make me laugh a bit when Melina says she’s half-Greek though.
    “Hee keeled ma parontz”
    :D
  • edited March 2020 Posts: 1,469
    Ha ha mtm! Makes me think, there must've been some good Greek or "half-Greek" actresses that could've played the part and naturally added that "Greek fire" (passion), even if they didn't have Bouquet's long dark hair...and maybe such an actress might've had better chemistry with Moore. Actually though I haven't read the novel, I see the character Judy Havelock's hair color is pale blonde, nationality British, born in Jamaica. Described as "beautiful, unkempt"... "Her face was wild and rather animal..." I picture someone other than Bouquet. But some of us know how it works with higher-ups--they want what they want, regardless of who we might think is best for the part, or the job.
  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,398
    @GoldenGun I haven't seen her in any other movies and maybe my judgement isn't appropriate. I can only say that she looks very “cold“ and emotionless to me during the whole Bond movie. Great to hear that she succeded in other films.
    Thanks @Thrasos for that interesting comment. I also own theBond Archives but didn't remember the hair comment. Her hair is fine, indeed.
  • edited March 2020 Posts: 1,469
    @goldenswissroyale I saw her in the 1989 film Too Beautiful For You (Gerard Depardieu co-stars), and if memory serves, she struck me that way in that film too, as you describe her. Not sure if that's her acting niche or mode, or the way she is in life. But she won the Cesar Award for that film.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,422
    I suppose I get the fact that FYEO is a bit vanilla, but personally I'm a sucker for vanilla sundaes.
  • Posts: 1,883
    @GoldenGun I haven't seen her in any other movies and maybe my judgement isn't appropriate. I can only say that she looks very “cold“ and emotionless to me during the whole Bond movie. Great to hear that she succeded in other films.
    Thanks @Thrasos for that interesting comment. I also own theBond Archives but didn't remember the hair comment. Her hair is fine, indeed.

    On that subject, here's one to seek out if you can find it: Bouquet starred in a movie with 2 Bond villains, Christopher Walken and Jonathan Pryce in a movie called A Business Affair from 1994. Pryce is Bouquet's husband and Walken is a literary agent who is trying to bed her when she tries to put out a book.

    It's a comedy from what I remember. I watched it just because of that connection. Walken is in classic Walken mode and I think he and Pryce have a punch-up. Bouquet is very attractive in it.
  • j_w_pepperj_w_pepper Born on the bayou. I can still hear my old hound dog barkin'.
    Posts: 8,700
    mtm wrote: »
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    I don't have issues with the fact that Bond is/looks much older than Melina. My problem is that Bouquet shows one of the weakest performances of all the bondgirls. During the car chase Bond says something like he's sorry for what happened to her parents. There, Melina doesn't answer but gives me a look that says: “sorry I can't act but I try to stare a bit different now“'.
    Hold on, claiming Bouquet can' t act is a bit of a stretch in my opinion, you should she her in the Luis Buñuel masterpiece Cet obscur objet du désir (aka That Obscure Object of Desire). She later also went on to win a César Award (basically the French film industry Oscars) for another film.

    It does make me laugh a bit when Melina says she’s half-Greek though.
    “Hee keeled ma parontz”
    :D
    But that is not a Bouquet problem, since she was dubbed in FYEO (while dubbing herself for the French version, same as Gert Fröbe did for the German version of GF). Nobody seems to know who gave her the English voice, only that she was in fact dubbed.

    See https://supposedlyfun.com/2014/08/28/the-bond-movie-series-for-your-eyes-only/ and the earlier discussion here: Did Nikki van der Zyl dub Carole Bouquet in For Your Eyes Only?
Sign In or Register to comment.