It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I really think this should have been in the film.
That scene was bloody interesting :)
Now actually is a general Bond's "Deleted Scenes" Thread lol
The scene that i thought really useless, actually.. was the CR, where Bond is being taken to the Hospital Wouldn't add nothin to the film, But drama.
I would have liked a much quicker version of that scene, personally. That way, it would have added something. You could then trim the film - or better just remove the final action scene - altogether.
You are correct sir. And not the cool kind of drama either. #:-S
No worries, @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 :)>-
:))
No, they are supposed to be invisible. I'm just giving my opinion on the film's deleted scene, and I'm glad that one was cut. It doesn't fit and GE is better starting with the dam jump.
Sure, we'd get there eventually, but I don't want any change to the sequence as we have it now:
1) GB
2) Opening shot over the dam
3) Gate opening, thunderous score playing, Bond running
This sequence builds momentum, its kinetic energy is what makes it so great. The guard house scene would not have managed to do that.
If you have to be stealthy at a point in time that means you are doing so because you are making the effort to avoid being found, while if you are invisible you have no need to be stealthy for none will search you out. Again, pointless to even argue over this.
<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T8oqRGxcC4A?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/T8oqRGxcC4A?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
Yep! Why the arguement? lol! If you cannot have a differing view on a DELETED scene which the film makers decided was not right either? What's this forum coming too? :))
The reference to FRWL in the police house was a little tacky but i did laugh with the lighter gag!
*I do rather like the deleted opening of GoldenEye, with Bond in the shadows. If Dalton was still Bond, that would have felt right at home! But as it stands, I rather like the pacing of the GoldenEye PTS. I like how it just opens with Bond running to the dam- we know he's about to kick some ass and do an incredible stunt; the perfect opening for a Bond movie!
John Glen, James Bond director
seperated at birth?
There was an ending shot for Quantum, where Bond attacks Guy Haines' estate, kills Mr. White, and questions Haines. You think this will come back as the PTS to B24?
I think it'd be interesting. A great torture scene to start the film, Mr White's death, and staying in line with the events of Quantum. Its already been shot, and for some reason the PRODUCERS chose not to use it. You think they're saving it? Or do you think Mr White will ever return, after Jesper Christensen comments that were supposedly 'misquoted'.
The only time (if at all) we'll see this will be on a future release of the film on Blu-ray after Craig has departed the role.
To answer your question, if Quantum were to return (highly unlikely in my opinion) my belief is that they'd take on a new angle and reference but not feature White.