Does Bond appeal to our darker side?

chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
edited March 2014 in General Discussion Posts: 17,691
Does our fascination with Bond appeal to the dark, disconnected side of ourselves that flings off the idea of a loving God, spirituality in general, and the good in humanity for a world of greys and indeterminate causes for conflict & human suffering? Do we enjoy Bond's sometimes easy-to-comprehend exploits as a catharsis for the more complex and troublesome world in which we live? Is Bond himself a symbol of Nietzscheian philosophy? An existentialist, postmodernist and post-structuralist construct of modern day man?

Or is Bond just great entertainment? :))

Comments

  • Posts: 12,274
    Back up bro... Bond is just great entertainment :)>-
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    I'm digging too deep then... b-(
  • Posts: 12,274
    Well that's just my opinion. I mean you bring up a few good points like the escapism bit, and some of the films are darker than others. Some of them certainly aren't for the faint of heart (see Licence to Kill) though.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    edited March 2014 Posts: 17,691
    So, the Apollonian and Dionysian dichotomy has no bearing on Bond's behaviour, is that what you're saying? I suppose that's possible, but the evidence for it is rather compelling IMO.
  • edited March 2014 Posts: 12,274
    Kind of I suppose. Bond at least is a tragic hero in several cases I must admit. I wouldn't say though that it throws me away from my belief God and good humanity though :P
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    I see the character of Bond being somewhat in tune with Heraclitus in that ever present change occurs, yet a persistent measurable homoeostasis is observable.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    edited March 2014 Posts: 16,333
    I think Bond appeals more to our imaginative side. Men want to be Bond. Not necessarily the Killer side, more of the suave gentlemen side. While I'd like to enjoy the finer things Bond did, I wouldn't want to do what he does on a day to day basis.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    Murdock wrote:
    I think Bond appears more to our imaginative side.

    Dreams as wish-fulfillments? How very Freudian of you, @Murdock!
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,333
    It depends on what aspect of 007 appeals the most to you.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    Murdock wrote:
    It depends on what aspect of 007 appeals the most to you.
    Like Arthur Pendragon, Bond would slay foes of his SPECTRE, yet never keep in his arms the love of his life...
    8-|
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,333
    chrisisall wrote:
    Murdock wrote:
    It depends on what aspect of 007 appeals the most to you.
    Like Arthur Pendragon, Bond would slay foes of his SPECTRE, yet never keep in his arms the love of his life...
    8-|

    Some people never find love. Take Paul Kersey for instance.

  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    Murdock wrote:
    Some people never find love. Take Paul Kersey for instance.

    He found it and it was taken away, like Hera took it from Hercules. Much wrath ensued.
  • edited March 2014 Posts: 4
    Bond taught me it was OK not to shave for a day or two.
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    Murdock wrote:
    It depends on what aspect of 007 appeals the most to you.
    Agreed. As a kid it was because he was a larger than life hero. As I got older it became enjoying the finer things in life, sleeping with all the beautiful women, etc.. Now, while I certainly don't strive to be an alcoholic or to kill anyone, I do appreciate the character's darker side and human flaws. It's what makes him unique and still interesting after all these years.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    The Jungian archetypes are projected onto the recipients in a dualistic manner, so I see what you are saying, Chris. I will be having what you are having by the way.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    The Jungian archetypes are projected onto the recipients in a dualistic manner
    This, umm, doesn't seem to mean anything... no more of whatever you're having for you!
  • Posts: 12,506
    I just the love the whole entertaining escapism of it all! Pure and simple!
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    I like the juxtaposition of the dark icy assassin and the man with a moral compass. In this seeming dichotomy we have the tensions in flux that bring Bond's character to life in an interesting way.
  • Posts: 908
    chrisisall wrote:
    I like the juxtaposition of the dark icy assassin and the man with a moral compass. In this seeming dichotomy we have the tensions in flux that bring Bond's character to life in an interesting way.

    That's EXACTLY the way I see it!

  • Posts: 315
    I don't know how much of a 'moral compass' he has, after all he's personally killed almost 380 people in the movies. No moral compass or memory, which keeps him going it seems. If that body count seems high, I seem to recall an article about the 60's tv show 'The Rifleman' in which Lucas polished off 120+ bad guys.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    FLeiter wrote:
    I don't know how much of a 'moral compass' he has, after all he's personally killed almost 380 people in the movies.

    [Arnold voice]
    Yeah, but dey were all bad.
  • Posts: 6,396
    chrisisall wrote:
    FLeiter wrote:
    I don't know how much of a 'moral compass' he has, after all he's personally killed almost 380 people in the movies.

    [Arnold voice]
    Yeah, but dey were all bad.

    I want to watch True Lies again now :-)
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 17,816
    chrisisall wrote:
    Does our fascination with Bond appeal to the dark, disconnected side of ourselves that flings off the idea of a loving God, spirituality in general, and the good in humanity for a world of greys and indeterminate causes for conflict & human suffering? Do we enjoy Bond's sometimes easy-to-comprehend exploits as a catharsis for the more complex and troublesome world in which we live? Is Bond himself a symbol of Nietzscheian philosophy? An existentialist, postmodernist and post-structuralist construct of modern day man?

    Or is Bond just great entertainment? :))

    Good idea for a thread there, @chrisisall. I think you may be on to something there, at least in terms of why some general film fans and Bond fans more specifically enjoy watching the James Bond films. There is indeed no doubt the acting out vicariously of violent urges in at least some percentage of the James Bond film audiences, although I would argue that the James Bond computer games where the player can kill as many of the enemy (or even innocents) as they so wish. So, with that health warning on your thesis I would say "yes".
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    "Do I look like I give a damn?"
  • The most interesting aspects of Bond for me are his internal contradictions. He is a sinner on the side of the saints; a killer with a self-destructive streak who nonetheless chooses life. Yes, he does indeed have a moral compass, one that enables him to counsel Melina Havelock against choosing the path of revenge even while he travels that path himself. So yes, he DOES give a damn; and no, it wasn't just a waste of good scotch. If I may second @Dragonpol's opinion: nice topic, @chris!
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Great, though-provoking opening question, @chrisisall.

    I do sometimes wonder to myself why, out of all the spies in the world that propagate the worlds of literature, cinema, television and gaming, Bond is the man I am most infatuated with. My love affair with Bond probably first came from the wide-eyed reactions I had to his exploits, where he was constantly putting himself in the line of fire for the beliefs he held in England, MI6 and M, collectively. As I have matured I love him more for who he is as a man: his concrete beliefs, his beautiful flaws, and everything that makes him who he is. He certainly has his tragic elements. He is at the bottom of the barrel, a puppet, some would say, of his government who does the dirty work nobody else will. And yet he does so with determination and dutifulness, never compromising those of a higher power, and always being the man to count on when things need to get done.

    He's contradictory: a lover, but also a brutal fighter, a good samaritan and a hell-raiser, a loving husband and vengeful widower. He's everything I find interesting in characters because he connects so clearly to our reality. He lives a hypocritical life, makes mistakes, and sometimes handles situations in ways you wouldn't deem popular. He is human like us, and that's probably why he has and always will feel so real to me. He is a man who understands his line of work and doesn't make excuses when things inevitably cock-up. He works in a world of grays where "good" and "bad" are often synonymous. He's been beaten, shot, cut, thrown, tortured and physically wrecked to the point of collapse, and yet he still keeps going for some reason. Who is this man, and why does he have such a high opinion of his government and the foundations of domestic and international security that he will face every obstacle in his way without pause, no matter how serious the consequences to his health?

    Bond's a great mystery no matter how much we think we know of him. His character connects to the core humanity we all live with each day and caters to our fetishistic desires for thrills, escapism, titillation, exotic imagery from foreign lands, and a spy who never lays down and dies. It's very hard for me to explain what or who Bond is as either a symbol or flesh and blood man in text, yet one scene in Skyfall sums up all my love for Bond that I've ever had in just a small scene, and made me see just why he is such a big part of my life. The first time I saw the scene of Bond running to M's recitation of Tennyson, the lines echoing both of them so gloriously, my eyes instantly filled with tears. They were natural and unforced, coming directly from the emotional connection I had to Bond in that moment as he once again curbed his own interests and safety and went to save the day. I was witnessing on that day, in his 50th year on screen the perfect tribute to who Bond is and why, no matter all his faults, he is a man to be cherished and looked up to. No matter how hard he suffers and no matter how much his dissenters want him to just drop-dead and give up, Bond will always disappoint them and keep on going. For all his flaws he is the man who will come running to the aid of the people and ideals he has nothing but staunch belief in, shoot his way to sanctuary when there's no bullets left to fire, keep fighting when the round was already won and battle on with everything he has though his victory has already been assured.

    In many ways, he's everything we'd like to think we would be in that situation: determined, loyal, self-sacrificing and always taking the path less desired if it was the right thing to do in the end. Much like the bulldog M passes on to him, Bond is stubborn and will survive even the most devastating of trials, through both the loss of blood and love (Tracy, Vesper). In a world of changes, Bond is and always will be the constant, the one thing that remains when all hope is lost. Yeah, I'd say that's why I love him...
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,691
    Wow Brady, that was really heartfelt!
Sign In or Register to comment.