Who should/could be a Bond actor?

113141315131613171319

Comments

  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,220
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Dickinson is the actor to beat. His age, his level of fame, his prestige—everything fits together. The only thing against him is that he might become more famous in a year.

    Villeneuve didn't shy away from casting Timothy Chalamet, Josh Brolin, Emily Blunt, Hugh Jackman, Jason Mamoa, Dave Batista, Amy Adams or Ryan Gosling because they were "too famous".

    Chalamet was famous before Dune?

    As famous as Dickinson is now? yes absolutely!
  • edited September 28 Posts: 6,013
    I don’t think Villeneuve’s past casting record will matter with Bond specifically. He’s ultimately been hired as one of the many lead creatives, but he’s more the tenant than the landlord in this instance. It might impact the casting around Bond, and we might see someone connected to him making an appearance, but Bond himself is another matter.

    That said, I can easily imagine Amazon wanting an ‘unknown’ being very much an early days plan. Something conceptual almost. A bit like in ‘62 where some model was chosen from a Bond casting competition EON ran, and they realised the guy couldn’t act. They might strike gold and have a situation like when Chris Hemsworth (who then was relatively unknown from what I understand) was cast as Thor, or Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, but it requires the right actor. In practice if a more established actor came along and stood out (in the mould of Craig’s pre Bond career anyway) I don’t think they’d say no.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,883
    I think Dickinson is the best of the "young actors" for the role. Is there any of his films that he's Bondian in, anyone would recommend?
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,220
    Dickinson is the heir apparent at this stage, in that he's a Potential A list star who hasn't quite become a household name just yet, similar to Timothee Chalamet before Dune.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,644
    I know some challenge the term “ “Alpha “, but Harris isn’t one, and the next Bond needs to be one.
  • Posts: 6,013
    My gut instinct (whatever that’s worth) says it won’t be him, although he’s a good actor and I’m sure he could hypothetically do something cool with the role.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 19,209
    I know what you mean: I tend to think anyone who’s becoming a favourite now isn’t the one who it’ll turn out to be! I’d be happy with Dickinson though, he’s a very good actor and I think he’d do something good with it.

    As an aside, I really wish someone would tell Josh Horowitz that a good interviewer shuts up when your interviewee is talking, they don’t constantly say “yeah… yeah… yeah” all the way though. He’s annoyed me for a while with that! :)
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 648
    Best what they can do is find much as possible potential actors and next stage test all of them.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,220
    The filming of the four Beatles biopics is said to take 15 months, and cameras have yet to roll, that means that were Harris Dickinson to become Bond the earliest he would be available would be early to mid 2027. Maybe there's a reason they are deliberately taking things slow with this one? :-?
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 648
    The filming of the four Beatles biopics is said to take 15 months, and cameras have yet to roll, that means that were Harris Dickinson to become Bond the earliest he would be available would be early to mid 2027. Maybe there's a reason they are deliberately taking things slow with this one? :-?

    What you think is the reason that he is one of the contenders?
  • Posts: 2,412
    The filming of the four Beatles biopics is said to take 15 months, and cameras have yet to roll, that means that were Harris Dickinson to become Bond the earliest he would be available would be early to mid 2027. Maybe there's a reason they are deliberately taking things slow with this one? :-?


    Villeneuve is making Dune 3. They can't rush things without the director.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,220
    The filming of the four Beatles biopics is said to take 15 months, and cameras have yet to roll, that means that were Harris Dickinson to become Bond the earliest he would be available would be early to mid 2027. Maybe there's a reason they are deliberately taking things slow with this one? :-?


    Villeneuve is making Dune 3. They can't rush things without the director.

    Yep, it's time for Bond fans to strap in, we're in it for the long haul. There's multiple factors pointing to the fact that progress is going to be slow and tedious. They are better off waiting until the usual October/November 2028 release at this point.
  • The filming of the four Beatles biopics is said to take 15 months, and cameras have yet to roll, that means that were Harris Dickinson to become Bond the earliest he would be available would be early to mid 2027. Maybe there's a reason they are deliberately taking things slow with this one? :-?


    Villeneuve is making Dune 3. They can't rush things without the director.

    Yep, it's time for Bond fans to strap in, we're in it for the long haul. There's multiple factors pointing to the fact that progress is going to be slow and tedious. They are better off waiting until the usual October/November 2028 release at this point.

    That’s hyperbole in the extreme, chill out. This isn’t an Eon film anymore, so the old Eon “rules” don’t apply. Eon had a tradition of cranking these huge tentpole blockbusters through on a time-crunch: as little as 11 months from the start of principal photography to cinema release. That came from one of Cubby Broccoli’s old rules about fast, instinctual editing; which meant filmmakers had maybe six weeks to cut the film and another four to finish sound and lock picture. Pretty much every director in the modern Bond era hated that pressure cooker schedule.

    Amazon is operating on a different model, basically the same production timelines as other contemporary blockbusters. Look at their own The Thomas Crown Affair reboot: principal photography started July 2025 and it’s scheduled for March 2027. Or Masters of the Universe: shooting began January 2025, releasing June 2026. That’s an 18 to 24 month cycle, which is totally standard for action, superhero fare.

    So no, waiting until late 2028 isn’t comfortable. If Bond is aiming for a 2027 release, filming would need to start in spring 2026 and since they’ve only just locked a writer and haven’t officially unveiled Bond yet, that’s clearly not happening. A spring 2027 shoot makes much more sense. Which means we’ll probably find out who the new 007 is sometime in the next 6–9 months as they need that element locked in early 2026. I’d bet by the Oscars or CinemaCon next year the name’s out.

    Things are moving quickly just not on the old Eon crash-schedule. They’re moving at the normal pace for blockbuster filmmaking today. In the meantime, watch the trailer for Amy Pascal and David Heyman's next film. Imagine the trailer of Bond 26 saying: "FROM THE PRODUCERS OF JAY KELLY" Lol.



    Also, another shout out to Jacob Elordi

    tiff-2025-frankenstein-17-copy-2.jpg
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited September 29 Posts: 19,209

    Things are moving quickly just not on the old Eon crash-schedule. They’re moving at the normal pace for blockbuster filmmaking today. In the meantime, watch the trailer for Amy Pascal and David Heyman's next film. Imagine the trailer of Bond 26 saying: "FROM THE PRODUCERS OF JAY KELLY" Lol.


    That looks like it could be good, thank you. I had heard about it but didn't realise it was like that. Heyman's worked with Baumbach before, fingers crossed it's as good as it looks (feels like it could go either way).
  • Posts: 16,135
    mtm wrote: »
    I know what you mean: I tend to think anyone who’s becoming a favourite now isn’t the one who it’ll turn out to be! I’d be happy with Dickinson though, he’s a very good actor and I think he’d do something good with it.

    As an aside, I really wish someone would tell Josh Horowitz that a good interviewer shuts up when your interviewee is talking, they don’t constantly say “yeah… yeah… yeah” all the way though. He’s annoyed me for a while with that! :)

    A bit like the pope: whoever enters the Conclave as pope leaves as cardinal.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 19,209
    Ludovico wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I know what you mean: I tend to think anyone who’s becoming a favourite now isn’t the one who it’ll turn out to be! I’d be happy with Dickinson though, he’s a very good actor and I think he’d do something good with it.

    As an aside, I really wish someone would tell Josh Horowitz that a good interviewer shuts up when your interviewee is talking, they don’t constantly say “yeah… yeah… yeah” all the way though. He’s annoyed me for a while with that! :)

    A bit like the pope: whoever enters the Conclave as pope leaves as cardinal.

    Heh! I've not heard that before, that's a good one.
  • edited September 29 Posts: 829
    The filming of the four Beatles biopics is said to take 15 months, and cameras have yet to roll, that means that were Harris Dickinson to become Bond the earliest he would be available would be early to mid 2027. Maybe there's a reason they are deliberately taking things slow with this one? :-?


    Villeneuve is making Dune 3. They can't rush things without the director.

    Yep, it's time for Bond fans to strap in, we're in it for the long haul. There's multiple factors pointing to the fact that progress is going to be slow and tedious. They are better off waiting until the usual October/November 2028 release at this point.

    I don't know why you get so worked up about release dates. At least we know for certain now it's coming.

    Then it will finally come out, and you'll hate it so much you won't be able to call it by its name.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,911
    The filming of the four Beatles biopics is said to take 15 months, and cameras have yet to roll, that means that were Harris Dickinson to become Bond the earliest he would be available would be early to mid 2027. Maybe there's a reason they are deliberately taking things slow with this one? :-?


    Villeneuve is making Dune 3. They can't rush things without the director.

    Yep, it's time for Bond fans to strap in, we're in it for the long haul. There's multiple factors pointing to the fact that progress is going to be slow and tedious. They are better off waiting until the usual October/November 2028 release at this point.

    I don't know why you get so worked up about release dates. At least we know for certain now it's coming.

    Then it will finally come out, and you'll hate it so much you won't be able to call it by its name.

    Lol. This is true @Mendes4Lyfe I'm afraid @George_Kaplan is spot on! You might end up calling it Bond 26 forever :D
  • Posts: 743
    Dickinson is the actor to beat. His age, his level of fame, his prestige—everything fits together. The only thing against him is that he might become more famous in a year.

    Villeneuve didn't shy away from casting Timothy Chalamet, Josh Brolin, Emily Blunt, Hugh Jackman, Jason Mamoa, Dave Batista, Amy Adams or Ryan Gosling because they were "too famous".
    Paul Atreides is not the same as James Bond, there was only one other notable film version and it wasn't a particularly well regarded movie.

    There is simply more baggage to the role when casting James Bond. I don't buy that Villenueve would just tap any movie star to play the role, nor the producers.
  • Posts: 2,412
    Ludovico wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I know what you mean: I tend to think anyone who’s becoming a favourite now isn’t the one who it’ll turn out to be! I’d be happy with Dickinson though, he’s a very good actor and I think he’d do something good with it.

    As an aside, I really wish someone would tell Josh Horowitz that a good interviewer shuts up when your interviewee is talking, they don’t constantly say “yeah… yeah… yeah” all the way though. He’s annoyed me for a while with that! :)

    A bit like the pope: whoever enters the Conclave as pope leaves as cardinal.

    I think they're in a Craig-type situation where the other actors have to compete against Dickinson.

    He's not my favorite, but I can't imagine there will be many surprises.

    Sometimes what's meant to happen happens.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,220
    Ludovico wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I know what you mean: I tend to think anyone who’s becoming a favourite now isn’t the one who it’ll turn out to be! I’d be happy with Dickinson though, he’s a very good actor and I think he’d do something good with it.

    As an aside, I really wish someone would tell Josh Horowitz that a good interviewer shuts up when your interviewee is talking, they don’t constantly say “yeah… yeah… yeah” all the way though. He’s annoyed me for a while with that! :)

    A bit like the pope: whoever enters the Conclave as pope leaves as cardinal.

    I think they're in a Craig-type situation where the other actors have to compete against Dickinson.

    He's not my favorite, but I can't imagine there will be many surprises.

    Sometimes what's meant to happen happens.

    Yes, he's the frontrunner and now it's just a process of making sure there is no diamond in the rough. Villeneuve picked the obvious choice for Dune, we're headed for a similar situation. People think that because Craig wasn't the obvious choice, that Amazon are somehow compelled to do the same thing again, but in reality most of the Bond actors were quite obvious choice before they were picked.
  • Posts: 2,682
    but in reality most of the Bond actors were quite obvious choice before they were picked.

    I’m not sure that’s accurate. Connery, Lazenby, Dalton, and Craig didn’t really stick out as “obvious choices” - only Moore and Brosnan fit that criteria.
  • edited 10:46am Posts: 2,412
    Ludovico wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I know what you mean: I tend to think anyone who’s becoming a favourite now isn’t the one who it’ll turn out to be! I’d be happy with Dickinson though, he’s a very good actor and I think he’d do something good with it.

    As an aside, I really wish someone would tell Josh Horowitz that a good interviewer shuts up when your interviewee is talking, they don’t constantly say “yeah… yeah… yeah” all the way though. He’s annoyed me for a while with that! :)

    A bit like the pope: whoever enters the Conclave as pope leaves as cardinal.

    I think they're in a Craig-type situation where the other actors have to compete against Dickinson.

    He's not my favorite, but I can't imagine there will be many surprises.

    Sometimes what's meant to happen happens.

    Yes, he's the frontrunner and now it's just a process of making sure there is no diamond in the rough. Villeneuve picked the obvious choice for Dune, we're headed for a similar situation. People think that because Craig wasn't the obvious choice, that Amazon are somehow compelled to do the same thing again, but in reality most of the Bond actors were quite obvious choice before they were picked.


    EON was so opaque that now Amazon tells us what they're looking for and we don't believe it.
  • Posts: 6,013
    Ludovico wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I know what you mean: I tend to think anyone who’s becoming a favourite now isn’t the one who it’ll turn out to be! I’d be happy with Dickinson though, he’s a very good actor and I think he’d do something good with it.

    As an aside, I really wish someone would tell Josh Horowitz that a good interviewer shuts up when your interviewee is talking, they don’t constantly say “yeah… yeah… yeah” all the way though. He’s annoyed me for a while with that! :)

    A bit like the pope: whoever enters the Conclave as pope leaves as cardinal.

    I think they're in a Craig-type situation where the other actors have to compete against Dickinson.

    He's not my favorite, but I can't imagine there will be many surprises.

    Sometimes what's meant to happen happens.

    Yes, he's the frontrunner and now it's just a process of making sure there is no diamond in the rough. Villeneuve picked the obvious choice for Dune, we're headed for a similar situation. People think that because Craig wasn't the obvious choice, that Amazon are somehow compelled to do the same thing again, but in reality most of the Bond actors were quite obvious choice before they were picked.


    EON was so opaque that now Amazon tells us what they're looking for and we don't believe it.

    Well, they've not said anything about it publicly from what I understand, and it's all being conveyed second hand through journalists and Dealine articles. We actually have contradicting information at the current time (neither Dickinson, Elordi, nor Holland are unknowns, and yet they're apparently on Amazon's wishlist.... but they want an unknown... hmm...)

    We don't know anything. We won't know anything until later.
  • edited 11:20am Posts: 2,412
    They may change their minds over time, but I think what we know is pretty consistent.

    They want a young actor, about 30 years old and British.

  • edited 11:20am Posts: 6,013
    They may change their minds over time, but I think what we know is pretty consistent.

    I just don't think we know anything honestly. I'd guess not even the people making this film know fully who the next Bond will be at the current time.
  • Posts: 829
    I suppose although Dickinson and Elordi aren't unknowns, neither are strongly associated with a particular role or IP, so they're still viable candidates for the time being. This isn't true for Holland, which is why he seems most unlikely. That, and the fact he's totally wrong for it (in my opinion).
  • edited 11:31am Posts: 2,412
    007HallY wrote: »
    They may change their minds over time, but I think what we know is pretty consistent.

    I just don't think we know anything honestly. I'd guess not even the people making this film know fully who the next Bond will be at the current time.

    Nah, we pretend we don't know because we don't like what we know. :D

    I suppose although Dickinson and Elordi aren't unknowns, neither are strongly associated with a particular role or IP, so they're still viable candidates for the time being. This isn't true for Holland, which is why he seems most unlikely. That, and the fact he's totally wrong for it (in my opinion).

    Except for Holland, none of them are really Tom Hardy, Henry Cavill, or Idris Elba.
  • edited 11:34am Posts: 6,013
    007HallY wrote: »
    They may change their minds over time, but I think what we know is pretty consistent.

    I just don't think we know anything honestly. I'd guess not even the people making this film know fully who the next Bond will be at the current time.

    Nah, we pretend we don't know because we don't like what we know. :D

    Ok :)) I can only speak for myself but I'd be interested if Harris Dickinson were the next Bond. I just don't think it's a given at all. It's in the realm of possibility, but I wouldn't say it's a certainty.
    I suppose although Dickinson and Elordi aren't unknowns, neither are strongly associated with a particular role or IP, so they're still viable candidates for the time being. This isn't true for Holland, which is why he seems most unlikely. That, and the fact he's totally wrong for it (in my opinion).

    I think Dickinson and Elordi have the right level of fame and experience for Bond. I think it's a given the Bond actor can't be connected simultaneously to another big IP, but that leaves a lot of scope for many potential actors. I'm personally unsure they can find some wonderful early 30s unknown (ie who's only done a couple of supporting movie roles prior but maybe has a theatrical career) but even that's not impossible either.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 648
    but in reality most of the Bond actors were quite obvious choice before they were picked.

    I’m not sure that’s accurate. Connery, Lazenby, Dalton, and Craig didn’t really stick out as “obvious choices” - only Moore and Brosnan fit that criteria.

    I still would put Dalton in that Moore and Brosnan list.
Sign In or Register to comment.