It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I agree. I think this unknown guy should be given serious consideration....
I find it humorous that many call for an “ unknown “ but when actors who fit that description are suggested, it’s often followed by ‘ well, he really hasn’t done anything’. or ‘ he hasn’t proven that he can carry a film.
That's just logic really, I don't see them giving a role this big to someone who has never starred in a film or large screen production before. They did it once with Bond and it ended badly, and it matters even more now. You just have to listen to Craig talk about the experience of shooting one of these.
I think some folks hope for an unknown because they want to believe there's a guy out there who looks just like Tim Dalton and has the experience of/acts like Craig or Connery who we've all somehow never seen before, but it's going to be a compromise.
He was in a film called Those Who Wish Me Dead with Angelina Jolie, he played a menacing assassin and he just wasn't convincing at all
It would depend on the unknown. I think it's very unlikely we're going to get such an actor who has all those qualities though - not just the looks but charisma, talent, screen presence. Generally to be a very good actor (or even just to hone that charisma/screen presence) you need a level of experience, and I think it's fair to say more established actors have a leg up here.
I think, for example, we're just not likely to get a good Bond from a 30 year old, little known model who looks like the incarnation of a young Gregory Peck, but hasn't been in anything. Unfortunately, much like poor George Lazenby I think they'd struggle with the performance. As good as the film might be, a lacklustre Bond will be front and centre for the audience. I just don't think they can get away with a bad lead (and incidentally, I don't think we'd get a bad Bond from Turner, ATJ, Suter, or even James or Hould. Some might be stronger picks than others, but I think all would put in competent performances).
I know a guy that was dead set on Rich Little taking over from Roger Moore. Today a suggestion like that would be embraced with open arms. :D
Yes, although to be fair I'm pretty sure Pattinson was the main choice anyway. In fact Hoult's even spoken about listening to the radio in his car and hearing about how Pattinson had definitely been cast as Batman a week before he was meant to audition. Not the best sign! It doesn't say anything about Hoult's talents as an actor though (he's a very good one). When it comes to Bond it's probably the same situation with Superman and Batman though - he's just probably not quite the right fit for that role. I'd be very surprised if it's him. The guy's clearly got some great roles ahead of him though, and I think he's more interesting when he's playing supporting parts or villain roles.
The overwhelming majority of the prospects we mention here are relatively unknown. The majority of the movie going audience are not locked in and paying attention to casting rumors and things like that they way we as bond fanatics do.