Denis Villeneuve Announced as Bond 26 Director

1235

Comments

  • Posts: 9,973
    Univex wrote: »
    These last few pages are a perfect example of what makes me go away from these forums from time to time. Bond fans are a bunch of entitled, unhappy people.

    So, we've got fabulous new producers, one of the best directors ever, the promise of they continuing our beloved films, and we what? Complain? What a sad bunch.

    Denis Villeneuve is an incredible filmmaker. Knowledgeable and respectful, who works with only the best people in the business.

    So, we get the producer of Harry Potter, the director of Arrival, Sicario, Dune, 2049, ... And we get to complain? Cmon people, grow up.

    If it were Nolan, we would complain about the lack of sexiness, if it were Cuaron, we'd complain about his lack of consistence, if it is Villeneuve, we'll complain about the pace, ... Cmon...

    These are all brilliant filmmakers. This shows Amazon is willing to make all the right choices.

    BE HAPPY, damn it.

    I, for one, am. Very, very happy. The director I've been championing for years has been chosen. Quality will be very much a given. So, so happy. What a lovely day to be a Bond fan.

    In this world we're in, there are fewer chances of happiness. So, this is great news. Be happy, Bond fans.

    Now...for Bond himself.

    As for producers they also the producers of Barbie and Ghostbusters 2016 so excuse me for having a bit of fear...


    I am happy with Denis but only because Babs was looking at him back in january

    Again Good enough for EON good enough for me
  • Posts: 236
    Not a popular opinion but I thought BR 2049 and his Dunes were boring dirges. Just don't think he has the right temperament for Bond. Could see him doing a good original spy movie but I think he's going to past even Craig territory and make something too dark for Bond.

    Also not sure when this will even get finished given his schedule.
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Posts: 4,630
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited 3:03pm Posts: 6,030
    I think one thing about Villeneuve, among many others, that I appreciate is that I feel he respects genre, but also transcends it.
  • edited 3:03pm Posts: 6,874
    Denbigh wrote: »
    I think one thing about Villeneuve, among many others, that I appreciate is that I feel he respects genre, but also transcends it.

    Nicely put. I agree. That is the main reason I'm so excited about him being the director.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    Posts: 1,063
    Feyador wrote: »
    I've seen several clips of Villeneuve speaking of his Bond love but never in any detail and only once, I think, even name-checking a film [Casino Royale].

    I don't think he's ever publicly addressed what his Bond would be like ... but on the basis of BR49 & Dune [two other subjects carried forward from child/teen-hood] I'd guess it'll be quite reverent and maybe a little portentous ....

    He mentioned growing up with Connery’s Bond in the PR blurb, but he’s also expressed an admiration for Craig’s Bond in the past:
    I would deeply love one day to make a James Bond movie,” Villeneuve said. “It’s a character that I’ve been with since my childhood. I have massive affection for Bond. It would be a big challenge to try and reboot it after what Daniel did. What Daniel Craig brought to Bond was so unique and strong and honestly unmatchable. He’s the ultimate James Bond.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    edited 3:11pm Posts: 2,721
    Villeneuve also said James Bond films, helped get him through difficult times.
  • FeyadorFeyador Montreal, Canada
    edited 3:20pm Posts: 781
    Feyador wrote: »
    I've seen several clips of Villeneuve speaking of his Bond love but never in any detail and only once, I think, even name-checking a film [Casino Royale].

    I don't think he's ever publicly addressed what his Bond would be like ... but on the basis of BR49 & Dune [two other subjects carried forward from child/teen-hood] I'd guess it'll be quite reverent and maybe a little portentous ....

    He mentioned growing up with Connery’s Bond in the PR blurb, but he’s also expressed an admiration for Craig’s Bond in the past:
    I would deeply love one day to make a James Bond movie,” Villeneuve said. “It’s a character that I’ve been with since my childhood. I have massive affection for Bond. It would be a big challenge to try and reboot it after what Daniel did. What Daniel Craig brought to Bond was so unique and strong and honestly unmatchable. He’s the ultimate James Bond.

    A continuity choice, of sorts; but also an ambitious one ... he definitely fits the auteur vibes of the Craig era. In fact, they've doubled down on that ... which is unusual for this franchise.

    The Denbigh comment above is right on, "respects genre, but also transcends it."

    Where and who they go to for a script is probably the next big choice, but I'd guess on past history that Villeneuve will be heavily involved and receive screen credit.
  • edited 3:20pm Posts: 146
    Still really sad about this news. What's even worse, it will be the first film from a new era, which means further films will likely go in a similar direction.
    Almost all of Villeneuves films are slow and depressing. Pretty sure we also will get an overlong movie, once again.
    After the First Light trailer I was kinda optimistic the movies may bring back some fun again too, looks like I was wrong.
  • morcarvicmorcarvic france
    Posts: 103
    if pascal,villneuve and co end up giving us turgid slow thespian rewarding woke overlong tripe like spectre and nttd they may as well let bond r.i.p.
  • Posts: 591
    Excellent news. I haven't been this optimistic about the future of the Bond franchise since 2012.
  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    Posts: 836
    Univex wrote: »
    These last few pages are a perfect example of what makes me go away from these forums from time to time. Bond fans are a bunch of entitled, unhappy people.

    So, we've got fabulous new producers, one of the best directors ever, the promise of they continuing our beloved films, and we what? Complain? What a sad bunch.

    Denis Villeneuve is an incredible filmmaker. Knowledgeable and respectful, who works with only the best people in the business.

    So, we get the producer of Harry Potter, the director of Arrival, Sicario, Dune, 2049, ... And we get to complain? Cmon people, grow up.

    If it were Nolan, we would complain about the lack of sexiness, if it were Cuaron, we'd complain about his lack of consistence, if it is Villeneuve, we'll complain about the pace, ... Cmon...

    These are all brilliant filmmakers. This shows Amazon is willing to make all the right choices.

    BE HAPPY, damn it.

    I, for one, am. Very, very happy. The director I've been championing for years has been chosen. Quality will be very much a given. So, so happy. What a lovely day to be a Bond fan.

    In this world we're in, there are fewer chances of happiness. So, this is great news. Be happy, Bond fans.

    Now...for Bond himself.

    The problem with this forum is some members insisting you must have the same opinions and emotions as them or you must take the highway.
  • edited 3:43pm Posts: 3,306
    Univex wrote: »
    These last few pages are a perfect example of what makes me go away from these forums from time to time. Bond fans are a bunch of entitled, unhappy people. Complain? What a sad bunch.

    Complaining about other members opinions and calling them things is certainly what makes me tune out. This is a forum, and people should be allowed to voice their opinion and concerns, without being shamed!

    Jordo007 wrote: »
    Can someone explain the idea of "fun Bond" to me.?
    For me: memorable one-liners, witty/great dialogue (CR train sequence for example), action setpieces where Bond uses his wit, gadgets or some sort of untraditional vehicle. A Bond movie which isn't too serious, like NTTD. More escapism, less soap opera drama.

    I hope Villeneuve can adapt. He is a great director. But so was Michael Apted.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited 3:53pm Posts: 18,327
    Univex wrote: »
    These last few pages are a perfect example of what makes me go away from these forums from time to time. Bond fans are a bunch of entitled, unhappy people.

    So, we've got fabulous new producers, one of the best directors ever, the promise of they continuing our beloved films, and we what? Complain? What a sad bunch.

    Denis Villeneuve is an incredible filmmaker. Knowledgeable and respectful, who works with only the best people in the business.

    So, we get the producer of Harry Potter, the director of Arrival, Sicario, Dune, 2049, ... And we get to complain? Cmon people, grow up.

    If it were Nolan, we would complain about the lack of sexiness, if it were Cuaron, we'd complain about his lack of consistence, if it is Villeneuve, we'll complain about the pace, ... Cmon...

    These are all brilliant filmmakers. This shows Amazon is willing to make all the right choices.

    BE HAPPY, damn it.

    I, for one, am. Very, very happy. The director I've been championing for years has been chosen. Quality will be very much a given. So, so happy. What a lovely day to be a Bond fan.

    In this world we're in, there are fewer chances of happiness. So, this is great news. Be happy, Bond fans.

    Now...for Bond himself.

    The problem with this forum is some members insisting you must have the same opinions and emotions as them or you must take the highway.

    Agreed, I don't think there's anything wrong with people having different reactions to this news.

    Zekidk wrote: »
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    Can someone explain the idea of "fun Bond" to me.?
    For me: memorable one-liners, witty/great dialogue (CR train sequence for example), action setpieces where Bond uses his wit, gadgets or some sort of untraditional vehicle. A Bond movie which isn't too serious, like NTTD. More escapism, less soap opera drama.

    I guess a fun Bond for me is one which leaves you happy, probably. You've been excited and you exit the cinema with a smile on your face. I don't think we're getting or were likely to ever get a new Moonraker, but GE or even Skyfall for me, left me pretty happy and kind of bouncing. A fun one is different things to different people.
    I guess I'd say that Rogue Nation is a fun MI movie, whereas Fallout is a more intense one, but to be honest I probably enjoyed them equally and might even say Fallout is the better film- I remember being so excited watched that. So if B26 is more towards the Fallout end of the scale I don't think I'd be upset.
  • It's a shame that Danny Boyle ruled himself out of the running for Bond 26. It would have been interesting to see the film he was planning with writer John Hodge in 2018. Hopefully Villeneuve and his writing team won't face the same obstacles as Boyle and Hodge did when working with Broccoli and Wilson. He should be given the opportunity to see his vision through to the end. I certainly don't want a return to Bond films being made by committee and Purvis and Wade being called to rescue the script.
  • edited 4:07pm Posts: 3,306
    @mtm
    I have never really been upset about any Bond movie, even the ones who I found slightly underwhelming. There are so many ways B26 can go. There's the "let's exploit the dark side of Craig's Bond further", "let's get back to formula", "let's make it fresh and hip for a younger audience", etc. We have no clue. We can all take a look at Villeneuve's resumé on IMDB, and see that he isn't exactly known for light hearted stuff, but that doesn't really mean anything. There were some reservations about hiring Mendes for Skyfall, too. And Villeneuve isn't going to pen B26. The only thing that will truly worry me is if they bring Purvis and Wade back, which is hopefully unlikely.
  • edited 4:06pm Posts: 443
    Chalamet WILL be James Bond. There's no question about it, they want someone who will play the role for 20 years and will appeal to the Gen Z public. There's no one else better, he's already know by the GZ who love Dune.

    That means it's going to be Soy Boy beta male James Bond, a guy with sensitivity and no muscles.

    The new game is clear testing ground. If you have seen Anora, the son of the Russian magnate character is proto new James Bond, that's the kind of characters, like in the forthcoming game, that appeals to GZ.
  • fadetoblack7fadetoblack7 Chicago IL
    Posts: 61
    I’m very excited about this!! DV is one of the best in the business and I’m sure he’ll be faithful to it!

    Also, does this mean Greig Fraser will be the DoP?
  • Posts: 409
    Just to make a point, Dune Part Two actually did have a fair amount of humour, mostly from Javier Bardem.
  • Posts: 3,306
    Stamper wrote: »
    Chalamet WILL be James Bond. That means it's going to be Soy Boy beta male James Bond, a guy with sensitivity and no muscles.
    No, that would be Tom Holland. But of course the bookies are all over this, like cheese on pizza. The rumour mill because they see a connection, This comes a year after it was pretty much established in the press, that Aaron Taylor-Johnson would be it!
  • Posts: 591
    Jeff Sneider just now on the Hot Mic podcast: Edward Berger was the runner-up.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    Posts: 1,063
    I don’t see why Bond 26 and Rendezvous with Rama have to be separate projects, he could just combine the two and have an undercover 007 join an international team of scientists in order to thwart SPECTRE double-agents. It could be gritty, but in space! We’d even get a more satisfying ending than in Clarke’s novel, with Bond shagging some hot scientist and making a double-entendre whilst the ship exits our solar-system.

    I want to see Bond kill an extraterrestrial. Make it happen. But GRITTY.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited 4:25pm Posts: 6,030
    The idea that Timothée Chalamet will be James Bond just because Denis Villeneuve is directing is honestly baffling. Whether you're floating it seriously or using it as a snide comment about the direction Amazon might take the franchise, it doesn't hold up to any logical scrutiny.

    This trend of assuming directors will automatically cast actors they’ve worked with before, regardless of whether they actually fit the role, is increasingly absurd. Villeneuve is not some director who plugs in his favorites out of convenience. He understands genre, but he also understands character. He casts with purpose, not popularity. Chalamet wasn't cast in Dune for his popularity, he was cast because he was right for the role of Paul Atreides.

    He would know, just as much as anyone, how crucial the casting of Bond is, not just to the success of the film but to the legacy of the character. The idea that Villeneuve would compromise that by picking someone just because “Gen Z likes them” is completely at odds with how Villeneuve operates. He doesn’t chase trends. He crafts stories with weight and integrity.
  • Posts: 181
    Tres bien Denis Villeneuve on landing the director gig! From sand to sea.
  • Posts: 647
    I’m very excited about this!! DV is one of the best in the business and I’m sure he’ll be faithful to it!

    Also, does this mean Greig Fraser will be the DoP?

    Fraser doing Bond would continue their trend of having some of the most famous DPs of this era do Bond (Deakins, Hoytema, Sandgren).
  • FeyadorFeyador Montreal, Canada
    Posts: 781
    BMB007 wrote: »
    I’m very excited about this!! DV is one of the best in the business and I’m sure he’ll be faithful to it!

    Also, does this mean Greig Fraser will be the DoP?

    Fraser doing Bond would continue their trend of having some of the most famous DPs of this era do Bond (Deakins, Hoytema, Sandgren).

    Deakins x 3 already with DV [Sicario; Prisoners; BR49] ... though he's really getting up there age-wise and has slowed down considerably in recent years. Maybe even retired as DP?
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,739
    007HallY wrote: »
    I must say Amazon have surprised us with all the right decisions. I think they've secretly looked at all of EON's Bond films and said "We'll top EON by hiring the very best talents in the world".


    It's early days, but it's a decision I can imagine EON making (from what I understand they'd considered Villeneuve in the past and if rumours are to be believed had spoken to him about directing when they were still at the helm).

    I do wonder how much influence EON had over the decisions of producer and, to a lesser extent, who was approached to direct. BB and MGW would have had to have some reassurance that Bond was in the right hands before relinquishing the creative rights. Obviously Heyman's a top British producer and Pascal worked with them in the past/has that creative and personal connection to them. They were announced very quickly after the deal went through so it'd obviously been negotiated months in advance. And a lot of the rumoured director names had been mentioned when EON were in control.

    Not saying EON are pulling the strings behind the scenes or whatever, but there's every much a 'picking up where they left off' feeling. I suspect their influence will have a bit of resonance in the short term. Or at least for this film.

    I do strongly suspect Broccoli has some influence. Not in terms of calling the shots on the films, but it appears that before stepping down as producer she had things worked out as part of the deal. First was getting rid of Jennifer Salke, who she thought was unsuitable with running the film business. Second was assuring that Amazon would actually set up a theatrical distribution system that would be worthy of a Bond release. Then there’s the appointment of new producers, one of who Broccoli worked and trusted. Even before Denis Villeneuve was announced, the shortlist of directors were names we had heard were under consideration by Eon in the past.

    More importantly, she had been a Bond producer for over 30 years. She has all the experience and knowledge that makes her a valuable asset for those who will work on the next Bond. If she’s not calling the shots she’s definitely being seen as an influential consultant. Closest comparison is Cubby stepping down after LTK, but still being around to give advice to Michael and Barbara during the production of GE.

    None of this is factual, it’s just the sense I get from seeing how things are transpiring.
  • edited 4:44pm Posts: 443
    Villeneuve will work with Hans Zimmer, chances are 75% he will score this.
    So it makes sense Chalamet will be James Bond.
    I've been saying Chalamet will be Bond ever since NTTD came out on these boards, and I had no idea then that Villeneuve would direct.
    So my take still stand, and I cannot wait for the Thimothe Chalamet Appreciation thread - Discuss His Life, His Career, His Bond Films.
    It's a new era. With new definitions of manhood. And new threats.
    But you can still depend on one man.
    sOyO7!
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,739
    Stamper wrote: »
    Villeneuve will work with Hans Zimmer, chances are 75% he will score this.
    So it makes sense Chalamet will be James Bond.
    I've been saying Chalamet will be Bond ever since NTTD came out on these boards, and I had no idea then that Villeneuve would direct.
    So my take still stand, and I cannot wait for the Thimothe Chalamet Appreciation thread - Discuss His Life, His Career, His Bond Films.
    It's a new era. With new definitions of manhood. And new threats.
    But you can still depend on one man.
    sOyO7!

    No one takes you seriously.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited 4:50pm Posts: 6,030
    I’d love nothing more than to see Greig Fraser as the cinematographer for Bond 26. His eye for visual storytelling is second to none, and he’d bring a grounded yet elevated style that fits James Bond perfectly.

    Now, I know he’s not returning for Dune: Messiah, but he is signed on for The Batman Part II, which is set to start filming after Dune wraps, apparently around January 2026. Funnily enough, Robert Pattinson will be starring in both, moving straight from Dune into The Batman, so Fraser’s schedule could potentially align with Bond 26.
Sign In or Register to comment.