Superman: The Man of Tomorrow

1333435363739»

Comments

  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 25,894
    I like Corenswet fire and will be happy to see a great character arc.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,789
    Lois gets to lecture Superman on the morals of rescuing or injecting himself into situations? Interesting change the Lois and Sup's dynamic. I don't recall that happening before. Superman seems...different than the Reeves version. A cockiness? Again that seems to be an interesting choice does it lead to his being overly confident for when Luthor or whoever the main baddie of the film comes for him?

    I think this movie will explore some interesting situations, though I did get a Snyder vibe to the Lois lecture.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,624
    “He’s not a man, he’s an it.”

    THAT is Lex Luthor. 100%

    I do like that this seems to be a somewhat naive Superman that looks through a simple right or wrong viewpoint. Lois is asking if he considered the consequences and his response to that is “PEOPLE WERE GOING TO DIE”. He’s not thinking in terms of politics but of lives, he comes off so frustrated like he feels as if he’s the only sane person on the planet that thinks like that.

  • edited 7:49am Posts: 1,952
    “He’s not a man, he’s an it.”

    THAT is Lex Luthor. 100%

    I do like that this seems to be a somewhat naive Superman that looks through a simple right or wrong viewpoint. Lois is asking if he considered the consequences and his response to that is “PEOPLE WERE GOING TO DIE”. He’s not thinking in terms of politics but of lives, he comes off so frustrated like he feels as if he’s the only sane person on the planet that thinks like that.

    It's sounds like Trump! :))
  • edited 4:46pm Posts: 507
    I'm not a fan of Lois aware Clark is Superman. That seems unnecessary. Why not hold that back for a second film?

    The whole point is Kal-El has a dual identity on Earth. He disguises himself as Clark Kent. To squander that 'disguise' in the first film is foolish, imho. Lois knows Clark is Superman so James Gunn/DC have cheaply thrown away a key aspect of the character. Sorry but the film has already messed up.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 1,871
    bondywondy wrote: »
    I'm not a fan of Lois aware Clark is Superman. That seems unnecessary. Why not hold that back for a second film?

    The whole point is Kal-El has a dual identity on Earth. He disguises himself as Clark Kent. To squander that 'disguise' in the first film is foolish, imho. Lois knows Clark is Superman so James Gunn/DC have cheaply thrown away a key aspect of the character. Sorry but the film has already messed up.

    Maybe she's part of his human disguise lol
Sign In or Register to comment.