Who should/could be a Bond actor?

1112211231125112711281193

Comments

  • Posts: 701
    I watched The Capture years ago when @Denbigh was suggesting. And here we are now, he's turning 34 next month. Seems like a really good professional guy.
  • Posts: 14,844
    Denbigh wrote: »
    Just found this article where Callum Turner is asked about rumours surrounding him in the role. I didn't even think there was rumours? As we all know, I'm down for him to get a screentest, it's just interesting to consider what PEOPLE were basing this information on because again I've not seen anything in terms of rumours, just suggestions from people on here and some on Twitter.

    https://people.com/callum-turner-jokes-his-mom-behind-james-bond-casting-rumors-exclusive-8418677

    ATJ is also mentioned in the article. It's kinda strange but interesting to hear two of my top contenders being asked about it to be honest.

    "Will Callum Turner fill Daniel Craig’s stylish shoes as the next James Bond? His mom sure hopes so, he says.

    Talking with PEOPLE about the online rumors and oddsmakers who say he’s under consideration to play the secret agent on screen, Turner, 33, quips, “I think that's my mum. She just puts that out there. So when my odds get higher, it's all her putting the money on.”

    Though Callum, who stars in the new historical sports drama The Boys in the Boat and the upcoming World War II series Masters of the Air, claims he’s had no meetings about playing the suave spy, he notes he’s a fan of “amazing producer” Barbara Broccoli.

    “She makes incredible films,” he says. “I'd love to work with her in any capacity.


    Other actors whose names have been floated include Euphoria and Saltburn star Jacob Elordi and Bullet Train actor Aaron Taylor-Johnson.

    Taylor-Johnson demurred when asked by Esquire earlier this year about the Bond rumors. “As I’ve already told you, I have to go by the beat of my own drum," he said. "It’s my own path, what feels intuitive to me. I’ve never made a decision based on other people’s perspectives, or their judgments, or their expectations.”

    So far I'm not convinced however I say someone starring in from what I understand fairly obscure sports dramas and historical series has more chances to be noticed by the people that matter than some car advert.
  • BennyBenny In the shadowsAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 14,888
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.
  • Posts: 747
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.

  • Posts: 701
    Yeah we're gonna need a lot of sex appeal.
  • Posts: 14,844
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.
  • Posts: 2,970
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    Let’s be honest though, the next Bond will get some sort of initial criticism about their looks regardless of who they are and what they look like!
  • Posts: 747
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    Let’s be honest though, the next Bond will get some sort of initial criticism about their looks regardless of who they are and what they look like!

    That's not an excuse for bad casting.

  • Posts: 334
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.

    Are you an authority on that?
  • Posts: 2,970
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    Let’s be honest though, the next Bond will get some sort of initial criticism about their looks regardless of who they are and what they look like!

    That's not an excuse for bad casting.

    True. But I think that’s not necessarily something we here can truly get a sense of before we’ve actually seen these actors play Bond. But ultimately yes, you need to get the right actor (obvious as it sounds).
  • edited January 3 Posts: 305
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    I don't think the general public will care. I honestly don't think they care. I could be wrong but history would suggest I'm correct. The 'Craig not Bond' 2005/2006 fraternity were small in number and didn't galvanise enough support to wreck Craig's Bond career. People went to see his Bond films. Skyfall made over a billion dollars and Craig looked kinda rough in some scenes:

    sddefault.jpg

    ...but people accepted his appearance. I doubt the next actor's appearance will be a problem for film goers. Fans argue over the look of Bond but the average Joe doesn't care. Barbara Broccoli took a calculated gamble people wouldn't be too bothered by a shorter, less good looking Bond actor and her gamble paid off. If it worked for Craig it can work for any actor that may seem too blokeish or unconventional for the role (assuming he is a decent actor and can act the part to an acceptable standard).
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,991
    A quote from Henry Cavill when asked if his role in Argylle hurts his chances of being cast as Bond.

    “It’s a fun character. Whether I’m ruled out of Bond because of this or not is up to Barbara Broccoli and Mr. Wilson.”
  • edited January 3 Posts: 2,970
    talos7 wrote: »
    A quote from Henry Cavill when asked if his role in Argylle hurts his chances of being cast as Bond.

    “It’s a fun character. Whether I’m ruled out of Bond because of this or not is up to Barbara Broccoli and Mr. Wilson.”

    He needn’t worry. There are many other reasons why he’ll be ruled out.
    bondywondy wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    I don't think the general public will care. I honestly don't think they care. I could be wrong but history would suggest I'm correct. The 'Craig not Bond' 2005/2006 fraternity were small in number and didn't galvanise enough support to wreck Craig's Bond career. People went to see his Bond films. Skyfall made over a billion dollars and Craig looked kinda rough in some scenes:

    sddefault.jpg

    ...but people accepted his appearance. I doubt the next actor's appearance will be a problem for film goers. Fans argue over the look of Bond but the average Joe doesn't care. Barbara Broccoli took a calculated gamble people wouldn't be too bothered by a shorter, less good looking Bond actor and her gamble paid off. If it worked for Craig it can work for any actor that may seem too blokeish or unconventional for the role (assuming he is a decent actor and can act the part to an acceptable standard).

    I do vaguely remember when Craig was first announced back in 2005. It did come as a bit of a shock seeing someone who looks-wise came across as very different to Brosnan (the craggy face, being under 6’2 and blonde etc.)

    I do remember his eyes really being the thing that sold me on him initially though (I honestly don’t think you can get closer to the novel Bond’s ‘cold grey blue’ eyes than Craig’s) and then later when the trailer came out it was his voice. It all fell into place by the time I saw the film, even if on first glance/when those initial publicity photos came out it wasn’t something I could see. For me when he was onscreen he was James Bond. I’d even argue it was that ‘rough around the edges’ quality to him mixed with that natural suaveness/charisma which helped sell me on him (I’d argue it’s the same story with Connery).

    No doubt there’s always an element of the actor needing to be distinctive looking in some way, and they’ll always need to ‘win over’ audiences with their performance. Still though, it’s not something we always can see initially.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,991
    I’m not particularly keen on Cavill being cast, but I do think they will return to a more traditionally handsome actor; yes I know what constitutes that is subjective.
  • Posts: 747
    007HallY wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    A quote from Henry Cavill when asked if his role in Argylle hurts his chances of being cast as Bond.

    “It’s a fun character. Whether I’m ruled out of Bond because of this or not is up to Barbara Broccoli and Mr. Wilson.”

    He needn’t worry. There are many other reasons why he’ll be ruled out.
    bondywondy wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    I don't think the general public will care. I honestly don't think they care. I could be wrong but history would suggest I'm correct. The 'Craig not Bond' 2005/2006 fraternity were small in number and didn't galvanise enough support to wreck Craig's Bond career. People went to see his Bond films. Skyfall made over a billion dollars and Craig looked kinda rough in some scenes:

    sddefault.jpg

    ...but people accepted his appearance. I doubt the next actor's appearance will be a problem for film goers. Fans argue over the look of Bond but the average Joe doesn't care. Barbara Broccoli took a calculated gamble people wouldn't be too bothered by a shorter, less good looking Bond actor and her gamble paid off. If it worked for Craig it can work for any actor that may seem too blokeish or unconventional for the role (assuming he is a decent actor and can act the part to an acceptable standard).

    I do vaguely remember when Craig was first announced back in 2005. It did come as a bit of a shock seeing someone who looks-wise came across as very different to Brosnan (the craggy face, being under 6’2 and blonde etc.)

    I do remember his eyes really being the thing that sold me on him initially though (I honestly don’t think you can get closer to the novel Bond’s ‘cold grey blue’ eyes than Craig’s) and then later when the trailer came out it was his voice. It all fell into place by the time I saw the film, even if on first glance/when those initial publicity photos came out it wasn’t something I could see. For me when he was onscreen he was James Bond. I’d even argue it was that ‘rough around the edges’ quality to him mixed with that natural suaveness/charisma which helped sell me on him (I’d argue it’s the same story with Connery).

    No doubt there’s always an element of the actor needing to be distinctive looking in some way, and they’ll always need to ‘win over’ audiences with their performance. Still though, it’s not something we always can see initially.

    I think Bond became monogamous because of Craig's ugliness.You can see the difference between Casino Royale and the rest of his movies.

    They were playing to his strengths.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,571
    007HallY wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    A quote from Henry Cavill when asked if his role in Argylle hurts his chances of being cast as Bond.

    “It’s a fun character. Whether I’m ruled out of Bond because of this or not is up to Barbara Broccoli and Mr. Wilson.”

    He needn’t worry. There are many other reasons why he’ll be ruled out.
    bondywondy wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    I don't think the general public will care. I honestly don't think they care. I could be wrong but history would suggest I'm correct. The 'Craig not Bond' 2005/2006 fraternity were small in number and didn't galvanise enough support to wreck Craig's Bond career. People went to see his Bond films. Skyfall made over a billion dollars and Craig looked kinda rough in some scenes:

    sddefault.jpg

    ...but people accepted his appearance. I doubt the next actor's appearance will be a problem for film goers. Fans argue over the look of Bond but the average Joe doesn't care. Barbara Broccoli took a calculated gamble people wouldn't be too bothered by a shorter, less good looking Bond actor and her gamble paid off. If it worked for Craig it can work for any actor that may seem too blokeish or unconventional for the role (assuming he is a decent actor and can act the part to an acceptable standard).

    I do vaguely remember when Craig was first announced back in 2005. It did come as a bit of a shock seeing someone who looks-wise came across as very different to Brosnan (the craggy face, being under 6’2 and blonde etc.)

    I do remember his eyes really being the thing that sold me on him initially though (I honestly don’t think you can get closer to the novel Bond’s ‘cold grey blue’ eyes than Craig’s) and then later when the trailer came out it was his voice. It all fell into place by the time I saw the film, even if on first glance/when those initial publicity photos came out it wasn’t something I could see. For me when he was onscreen he was James Bond. I’d even argue it was that ‘rough around the edges’ quality to him mixed with that natural suaveness/charisma which helped sell me on him (I’d argue it’s the same story with Connery).

    No doubt there’s always an element of the actor needing to be distinctive looking in some way, and they’ll always need to ‘win over’ audiences with their performance. Still though, it’s not something we always can see initially.

    I think Bond became monogamous because of Craig's ugliness.You can see the difference between Casino Royale and the rest of his movies.

    They were playing to his strengths.

    How old are you Deke? I'm guessing under 25? The age where the brain is hopefully still developing?
  • Posts: 747
    peter wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    A quote from Henry Cavill when asked if his role in Argylle hurts his chances of being cast as Bond.

    “It’s a fun character. Whether I’m ruled out of Bond because of this or not is up to Barbara Broccoli and Mr. Wilson.”

    He needn’t worry. There are many other reasons why he’ll be ruled out.
    bondywondy wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    I don't think the general public will care. I honestly don't think they care. I could be wrong but history would suggest I'm correct. The 'Craig not Bond' 2005/2006 fraternity were small in number and didn't galvanise enough support to wreck Craig's Bond career. People went to see his Bond films. Skyfall made over a billion dollars and Craig looked kinda rough in some scenes:

    sddefault.jpg

    ...but people accepted his appearance. I doubt the next actor's appearance will be a problem for film goers. Fans argue over the look of Bond but the average Joe doesn't care. Barbara Broccoli took a calculated gamble people wouldn't be too bothered by a shorter, less good looking Bond actor and her gamble paid off. If it worked for Craig it can work for any actor that may seem too blokeish or unconventional for the role (assuming he is a decent actor and can act the part to an acceptable standard).

    I do vaguely remember when Craig was first announced back in 2005. It did come as a bit of a shock seeing someone who looks-wise came across as very different to Brosnan (the craggy face, being under 6’2 and blonde etc.)

    I do remember his eyes really being the thing that sold me on him initially though (I honestly don’t think you can get closer to the novel Bond’s ‘cold grey blue’ eyes than Craig’s) and then later when the trailer came out it was his voice. It all fell into place by the time I saw the film, even if on first glance/when those initial publicity photos came out it wasn’t something I could see. For me when he was onscreen he was James Bond. I’d even argue it was that ‘rough around the edges’ quality to him mixed with that natural suaveness/charisma which helped sell me on him (I’d argue it’s the same story with Connery).

    No doubt there’s always an element of the actor needing to be distinctive looking in some way, and they’ll always need to ‘win over’ audiences with their performance. Still though, it’s not something we always can see initially.

    I think Bond became monogamous because of Craig's ugliness.You can see the difference between Casino Royale and the rest of his movies.

    They were playing to his strengths.

    How old are you Deke? I'm guessing under 25? The age where the brain is hopefully still developing?

    Older than you, I guess.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,571
    peter wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    A quote from Henry Cavill when asked if his role in Argylle hurts his chances of being cast as Bond.

    “It’s a fun character. Whether I’m ruled out of Bond because of this or not is up to Barbara Broccoli and Mr. Wilson.”

    He needn’t worry. There are many other reasons why he’ll be ruled out.
    bondywondy wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    I don't think the general public will care. I honestly don't think they care. I could be wrong but history would suggest I'm correct. The 'Craig not Bond' 2005/2006 fraternity were small in number and didn't galvanise enough support to wreck Craig's Bond career. People went to see his Bond films. Skyfall made over a billion dollars and Craig looked kinda rough in some scenes:

    sddefault.jpg

    ...but people accepted his appearance. I doubt the next actor's appearance will be a problem for film goers. Fans argue over the look of Bond but the average Joe doesn't care. Barbara Broccoli took a calculated gamble people wouldn't be too bothered by a shorter, less good looking Bond actor and her gamble paid off. If it worked for Craig it can work for any actor that may seem too blokeish or unconventional for the role (assuming he is a decent actor and can act the part to an acceptable standard).

    I do vaguely remember when Craig was first announced back in 2005. It did come as a bit of a shock seeing someone who looks-wise came across as very different to Brosnan (the craggy face, being under 6’2 and blonde etc.)

    I do remember his eyes really being the thing that sold me on him initially though (I honestly don’t think you can get closer to the novel Bond’s ‘cold grey blue’ eyes than Craig’s) and then later when the trailer came out it was his voice. It all fell into place by the time I saw the film, even if on first glance/when those initial publicity photos came out it wasn’t something I could see. For me when he was onscreen he was James Bond. I’d even argue it was that ‘rough around the edges’ quality to him mixed with that natural suaveness/charisma which helped sell me on him (I’d argue it’s the same story with Connery).

    No doubt there’s always an element of the actor needing to be distinctive looking in some way, and they’ll always need to ‘win over’ audiences with their performance. Still though, it’s not something we always can see initially.

    I think Bond became monogamous because of Craig's ugliness.You can see the difference between Casino Royale and the rest of his movies.

    They were playing to his strengths.

    How old are you Deke? I'm guessing under 25? The age where the brain is hopefully still developing?

    Older than you, I guess.

    Then that makes me weep.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    edited January 3 Posts: 7,991
    peter wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    A quote from Henry Cavill when asked if his role in Argylle hurts his chances of being cast as Bond.

    “It’s a fun character. Whether I’m ruled out of Bond because of this or not is up to Barbara Broccoli and Mr. Wilson.”

    He needn’t worry. There are many other reasons why he’ll be ruled out.
    bondywondy wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    I don't think the general public will care. I honestly don't think they care. I could be wrong but history would suggest I'm correct. The 'Craig not Bond' 2005/2006 fraternity were small in number and didn't galvanise enough support to wreck Craig's Bond career. People went to see his Bond films. Skyfall made over a billion dollars and Craig looked kinda rough in some scenes:

    sddefault.jpg

    ...but people accepted his appearance. I doubt the next actor's appearance will be a problem for film goers. Fans argue over the look of Bond but the average Joe doesn't care. Barbara Broccoli took a calculated gamble people wouldn't be too bothered by a shorter, less good looking Bond actor and her gamble paid off. If it worked for Craig it can work for any actor that may seem too blokeish or unconventional for the role (assuming he is a decent actor and can act the part to an acceptable standard).

    I do vaguely remember when Craig was first announced back in 2005. It did come as a bit of a shock seeing someone who looks-wise came across as very different to Brosnan (the craggy face, being under 6’2 and blonde etc.)

    I do remember his eyes really being the thing that sold me on him initially though (I honestly don’t think you can get closer to the novel Bond’s ‘cold grey blue’ eyes than Craig’s) and then later when the trailer came out it was his voice. It all fell into place by the time I saw the film, even if on first glance/when those initial publicity photos came out it wasn’t something I could see. For me when he was onscreen he was James Bond. I’d even argue it was that ‘rough around the edges’ quality to him mixed with that natural suaveness/charisma which helped sell me on him (I’d argue it’s the same story with Connery).

    No doubt there’s always an element of the actor needing to be distinctive looking in some way, and they’ll always need to ‘win over’ audiences with their performance. Still though, it’s not something we always can see initially.

    I think Bond became monogamous because of Craig's ugliness.You can see the difference between Casino Royale and the rest of his movies.

    They were playing to his strengths.

    How old are you Deke? I'm guessing under 25? The age where the brain is hopefully still developing?

    I have been wondering the same…

    “ Bond became monogamous because of Craig's ugliness”? What a bizarre thought.
  • Posts: 2,970
    007HallY wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    A quote from Henry Cavill when asked if his role in Argylle hurts his chances of being cast as Bond.

    “It’s a fun character. Whether I’m ruled out of Bond because of this or not is up to Barbara Broccoli and Mr. Wilson.”

    He needn’t worry. There are many other reasons why he’ll be ruled out.
    bondywondy wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    I don't think the general public will care. I honestly don't think they care. I could be wrong but history would suggest I'm correct. The 'Craig not Bond' 2005/2006 fraternity were small in number and didn't galvanise enough support to wreck Craig's Bond career. People went to see his Bond films. Skyfall made over a billion dollars and Craig looked kinda rough in some scenes:

    sddefault.jpg

    ...but people accepted his appearance. I doubt the next actor's appearance will be a problem for film goers. Fans argue over the look of Bond but the average Joe doesn't care. Barbara Broccoli took a calculated gamble people wouldn't be too bothered by a shorter, less good looking Bond actor and her gamble paid off. If it worked for Craig it can work for any actor that may seem too blokeish or unconventional for the role (assuming he is a decent actor and can act the part to an acceptable standard).

    I do vaguely remember when Craig was first announced back in 2005. It did come as a bit of a shock seeing someone who looks-wise came across as very different to Brosnan (the craggy face, being under 6’2 and blonde etc.)

    I do remember his eyes really being the thing that sold me on him initially though (I honestly don’t think you can get closer to the novel Bond’s ‘cold grey blue’ eyes than Craig’s) and then later when the trailer came out it was his voice. It all fell into place by the time I saw the film, even if on first glance/when those initial publicity photos came out it wasn’t something I could see. For me when he was onscreen he was James Bond. I’d even argue it was that ‘rough around the edges’ quality to him mixed with that natural suaveness/charisma which helped sell me on him (I’d argue it’s the same story with Connery).

    No doubt there’s always an element of the actor needing to be distinctive looking in some way, and they’ll always need to ‘win over’ audiences with their performance. Still though, it’s not something we always can see initially.

    I think Bond became monogamous because of Craig's ugliness.You can see the difference between Casino Royale and the rest of his movies.

    They were playing to his strengths.

    Ok 😂
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 1,383
    When I first saw Craig's Bond, my first thought was, he reminds me of Timothy Dalton, only difference is, he's a blonde.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,525
    When I first saw Craig's Bond, my first thought was, he reminds me of Timothy Dalton, only difference is, he's a blonde.

    Weirdly I thought that too mate
    The-Living-Daylights-842.jpg
    Casino-Royale-0460.jpg
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 7,991
    Too funny, that is the one shot in CR that has always bugged me. Something was off; I always felt Craig looked awkward
  • Posts: 14,844
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    Callum Turner is a fine actor, I just don't see him as James Bond.
    He lacks something, that I can't put my finger on.

    He is ugly.
    I don't think he's ugly, he's just blokeish. People complained about Craig's appearance when he was cast,,they'd have a field trip with this one.

    Let’s be honest though, the next Bond will get some sort of initial criticism about their looks regardless of who they are and what they look like!

    True. And maybe from me too. I wasn't sold on Daniel Craig when he was cast. But this time I don't think there's many presumptive heirs. There were none either when Craig became Bond, but some actors had a rather important fanbase: Clive Owen, James Purefoy, Gerard Butler, etc. We don't have the same phenomenon now, at least I don't think so.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 1,383
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    When I first saw Craig's Bond, my first thought was, he reminds me of Timothy Dalton, only difference is, he's a blonde.

    Weirdly I thought that too mate
    The-Living-Daylights-842.jpg
    Casino-Royale-0460.jpg

    Exactly!!! You've got it!
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,525
    talos7 wrote: »
    Too funny, that is the one shot in CR that has always bugged me. Something was off; I always felt Craig looked awkward

    It's funny you should say that mate, because it always reminds me of that James Bond illustration commissioned while Fleming was still alive.

    220px-Fleming007impression.jpg
  • edited January 3 Posts: 747
    talos7 wrote: »
    Too funny, that is the one shot in CR that has always bugged me. Something was off; I always felt Craig looked awkward

    Yes, he looked awkward. I noticed this too.

    He was the grumpy Bond for a reason.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    edited January 3 Posts: 1,383
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Too funny, that is the one shot in CR that has always bugged me. Something was off; I always felt Craig looked awkward

    It's funny you should say that mate, because it always reminds me of that James Bond illustration commissioned while Fleming was still alive.

    220px-Fleming007impression.jpg

    Yes! True! There's also a certain shot of Dalton in TLD that also looks like this.
  • Posts: 334
    talos7 wrote: »
    Too funny, that is the one shot in CR that has always bugged me. Something was off; I always felt Craig looked awkward

    Yes, he looked awkward. I noticed this too.

    He was the grumpy Bond for a reason.

    Are you saying he looked grumpy in that shot? How?
  • BennyBenny In the shadowsAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 14,888
    9ob5b4687l2j.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.