Where does Bond go after Craig?

1322323325327328531

Comments

  • Posts: 1,007
    I just hope we don't fall back into generic Brosnan-esque titles.

    I liked Goldeneye and The World is Not Enough, and if they'd gone with Tomorrow Never Lies I think the titles would have been a lot more interesting.

    I re-watched The Spy Who Loved Me the other day. Crikey, that's a fun film. A lot of it just simply wouldn't work (or be tolerated!) these days, but you get the feeling that everyone making it was having a blast, it really motors along.
    I wouldn't want them to revisit the tone of TSWLM, but I'd love to see a big, fun, rattling stand-alone Bond adventure like that again.
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited August 2023 Posts: 3,392
    I just hope we don't fall back into generic Brosnan-esque titles.

    I liked Goldeneye and The World is Not Enough, and if they'd gone with Tomorrow Never Lies I think the titles would have been a lot more interesting.

    I re-watched The Spy Who Loved Me the other day. Crikey, that's a fun film. A lot of it just simply wouldn't work (or be tolerated!) these days, but you get the feeling that everyone making it was having a blast, it really motors along.
    I wouldn't want them to revisit the tone of TSWLM, but I'd love to see a big, fun, rattling stand-alone Bond adventure like that again.

    That's the thing in the classic era, because they're trying to ride on the tone of Goldfinger.

    That fun, with some iconic elements into it.

    So, there's the fun, an iconic villain, song, and etc.
  • TheSkyfallen06TheSkyfallen06 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    Posts: 991
    Finally some people who understand me, the word "Die" has been overused for Bond movie titles.
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited August 2023 Posts: 3,392
    Finally some people who understand me, the word "Die" has been overused for Bond movie titles.

    How many times that they've used 'Die'?

    Discounting Live And Let Die (since it came from a Fleming book):

    Tomorrow Never Dies
    Die Another Day
    No Time To Die
  • edited August 2023 Posts: 2,966
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    I just hope we don't fall back into generic Brosnan-esque titles.

    I liked Goldeneye and The World is Not Enough, and if they'd gone with Tomorrow Never Lies I think the titles would have been a lot more interesting.

    I re-watched The Spy Who Loved Me the other day. Crikey, that's a fun film. A lot of it just simply wouldn't work (or be tolerated!) these days, but you get the feeling that everyone making it was having a blast, it really motors along.
    I wouldn't want them to revisit the tone of TSWLM, but I'd love to see a big, fun, rattling stand-alone Bond adventure like that again.

    That's the thing in the classic era, because they're trying to ride on the tone of Goldfinger.

    That fun, with some iconic elements into it.

    So, there's the fun, an iconic villain, song, and etc.

    The thing about TSWLM is that it's got a lot of heart. More so than I think many believe. You've got this great central relationship between Anya and Bond, an almost Fleming-esque side plot about him having killed her lover, the climax where there's this tension between Bond deciding to save her at the cost of her potentially killing him, and a villain whose plan is actually quite dark when you think about it. It just happens to be packaged in a film that's much more grand in scale, light-hearted and one could say more 'family friendly' than Moore's previous instalments.

    I don't think it's just about tone necessarily (if anything until recently it's a film I dismissed as 'silly' when I was younger, and it's only recently I've rewatched and enjoyed it a lot more). There's a lot of drama in that script which for me holds up slightly better than some of the stuff in Craig's last two films. While I don't necessarily want a future Bond film that's trying to be TSWLM (I happen to prefer a bit of darkness in my Bond films to some extent) it'd be nice to have a film somewhere down the line that's a bit grander, escapist even, but still has that sense of drama. A bit like what SP was trying to be.
  • Posts: 1,007
    007HallY wrote: »
    . . . it'd be nice to have a film somewhere down the line that's a bit grander, escapist even, but still has that sense of drama. A bit like what SP was trying to be.

    Agreed. SP, in tone, had all the right elements of danger, (almost) sci-fi daftness, fun and style. If the plot actually engaged the viewer more, it'd be right up there.
    You're right about the 'heart' of TSWLM. It just feels like they were out to have the best fun and make the biggest Bond. The two recent Bond movies have technically been head and shoulders above Spy, but not nearly as much fun to watch.
    And again, a lot of that's down to Roger Moore. He really was superb in that role, and especially that film.

  • Junglist_1985Junglist_1985 Los Angeles
    edited August 2023 Posts: 1,006
    Personally, I’m really looking forward to them bringing it back down to gritty spy/espionage levels for the next 1-2 films.

    That being said, when they are ready to go big, grand, escapists again (a la TSWLM) - I want Denis Villeneuve.
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited August 2023 Posts: 3,392
    Personally, I’m really looking forward to them bringing it back down to gritty spy/espionage levels for the next 1-2 films.

    That being said, when they are ready to go big, grand, escapists again (a la TSWLM) - I want Denis Villeneuve.

    Agreed! I'm all for grounded (gritty spy) espionage thriller for the next Bond! Give me that FRWL vibes!
  • Posts: 1,531
    NTTD was a deceptive title perhaps intended to deflect rumors of Bond's impending death.

    Lyrically Property of a Lady will work better than Risico as a song.

    Die in a Bond title should be laid to rest. Live, gold, kill are better choices.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,522
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    Personally, I’m really looking forward to them bringing it back down to gritty spy/espionage levels for the next 1-2 films.

    That being said, when they are ready to go big, grand, escapists again (a la TSWLM) - I want Denis Villeneuve.

    Agreed! I'm all for grounded (gritty spy) espionage thriller for the next Bond! Give me that FRWL vibes!

    Where do I sign?
  • TheSkyfallen06TheSkyfallen06 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    edited August 2023 Posts: 991
    I'll be honest, i think that with the right amount of From Russia With Love's suspense, Casino Royale's action and the Goldfinger formula, it would be enough for Bond 26 to be a success.
  • edited August 2023 Posts: 1,708
    I arbitrarily used "Property of a Lady" because it is one of the last titles from Fleming. I'd probably look into some of Fleming's chapter titles for inspiration for an actual title. That aside, my post was really about reinventing the Bond format by using the style of Oppenheimer to create an epic slow building thriller that relies more on a layered story than relying on action scenes. Yes, I guess you could say it would be like Nolan doing FRWL.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 15,000
    Are the folks who want a breezy, non-character-lead, no continuity, adventure film for the next Bond the same folk who want Nolan to do it? Because I'm not sure the two are massively compatible.
  • Posts: 1,531
    I'll be honest, i think that with the right amount of From Russia With Love's suspense, Casino Royale's action and the Goldfinger formula, it would be enough for Bond 26 to be a success.

    A taut, breathless thriller would be a nice change. A Bond without all the gadgetry and the big set pieces would be refreshing. The world domination/destruction theme has become tiring. Instead of a From Russia With Love, how about a To Russia With Extreme Prejudice. Bond is sent on a mission to assassinate. Time to scale back the stories and get into more spying and being a secret agent who actually uses false identities.

  • TheSkyfallen06TheSkyfallen06 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    edited August 2023 Posts: 991
    mtm wrote: »
    Are the folks who want a breezy, non-character-lead, no continuity, adventure film for the next Bond the same folk who want Nolan to do it? Because I'm not sure the two are massively compatible.

    I'm sorry if i hurt anyone's feelings, but
    i think Nolan's Batman is a pretty overrated trilogy.
    Nolan is a great director, but not as what people say he is.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,554
    @TheSkyfallen06 … I don’t disagree.

    I have been avoiding the new film; I was meant to go yesterday, but… found excuses not to go.

    Hopefully I’ll be surprised and even blown away when I do see it.
  • Posts: 12,276
    Next Bond era is going to be a trilogy from Nolan. Heard it here first! I loved his take on Batman for the most part (TDKR stands out in flaws), but I would feel very iffy about him doing Bond. Not saying it’s impossible to work, but I would have a bad feeling.
  • Posts: 2,966
    007HallY wrote: »
    . . . it'd be nice to have a film somewhere down the line that's a bit grander, escapist even, but still has that sense of drama. A bit like what SP was trying to be.

    Agreed. SP, in tone, had all the right elements of danger, (almost) sci-fi daftness, fun and style. If the plot actually engaged the viewer more, it'd be right up there.
    You're right about the 'heart' of TSWLM. It just feels like they were out to have the best fun and make the biggest Bond. The two recent Bond movies have technically been head and shoulders above Spy, but not nearly as much fun to watch.
    And again, a lot of that's down to Roger Moore. He really was superb in that role, and especially that film.

    Roger's fantastic in that one. There are moments in that film where he brings a strong sense of humanity to the part (much like Connery could do), but he also has that more humorous, tongue in cheek side to him (again, much like Connery).

    SP just doesn't live up to TSWLM when you take into account those more dramatic elements. Even taking the film by itself, the idea that Bond and Blofeld seemingly knew each other as kids never really adds much to the story. There's far more compelling stuff in TSWLM, as much of a romp as it can be.
    peter wrote: »
    @TheSkyfallen06 … I don’t disagree.

    I have been avoiding the new film; I was meant to go yesterday, but… found excuses not to go.

    Hopefully I’ll be surprised and even blown away when I do see it.

    For what it's worth I thought it was miles ahead of Tenet, and was better than much of the stuff Nolan has done since TDKR. It's worth watching I'd say, even if one has issues with it.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 8,554
    Thanks @007HallY … it’s almost like I’m waiting for my gut to dictate “go, go now”… I’ll see it, but I’m waiting for my own pessimism to die down so I can give the film a fair shake. Tenet really was the worst of his creative self. And when I walk into Oppenheimer, I want to make sure that I’m not judging this new film, based off his worst. That’s not fair to Nolan, his work, and all of the creatives that made it the success it is.

  • TheSkyfallen06TheSkyfallen06 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    edited August 2023 Posts: 991
    CrabKey wrote: »
    I'll be honest, i think that with the right amount of From Russia With Love's suspense, Casino Royale's action and the Goldfinger formula, it would be enough for Bond 26 to be a success.

    A taut, breathless thriller would be a nice change. A Bond without all the gadgetry and the big set pieces would be refreshing. The world domination/destruction theme has become tiring. Instead of a From Russia With Love, how about a To Russia With Extreme Prejudice. Bond is sent on a mission to assassinate. Time to scale back the stories and get into more spying and being a secret agent who actually uses false identities.

    We already had a gadget-less Bond for most of the Craig era.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,025
    Only CR and QOS, really.
  • TheSkyfallen06TheSkyfallen06 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    Posts: 991
    Only CR and QOS, really.

    So a tiny radio and an explosive watch count as gadgets?
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    edited August 2023 Posts: 8,025
    So you mean near futuristic fantastical gadgets rather than just gadgets?
  • Posts: 1,531
    CrabKey wrote: »
    I'll be honest, i think that with the right amount of From Russia With Love's suspense, Casino Royale's action and the Goldfinger formula, it would be enough for Bond 26 to be a success.

    A taut, breathless thriller would be a nice change. A Bond without all the gadgetry and the big set pieces would be refreshing. The world domination/destruction theme has become tiring. Instead of a From Russia With Love, how about a To Russia With Extreme Prejudice. Bond is sent on a mission to assassinate. Time to scale back the stories and get into more spying and being a secret agent who actually uses false identities.

    We already had a gadget-less Bond for most of the Craig era.

    I am referring to the kinds of things that anticipate Bond's exact need in a crisis. For 26, I want Bond to be a man alone, along the lines of North by Northwest or The 39 Steps. No more smart blood or capsules shot into him. The absence of technology would force Bond to show what he's really capable of.

    I don't mind a flippant, humorous Bond. I hope we don't return to the silliness of the RM era: stepping on alligators, Tarzan yells, "Sit!" Wit is one thing; silliness quite another.

  • TheSkyfallen06TheSkyfallen06 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    edited August 2023 Posts: 991
    So you mean near futuristic fantastical gadgets rather than just gadgets?

    No, i meant that Bond should use gadgets more often, i don't mind realistic gadgets like the briefcase and the detachable sniper rifle from FRWL, just give Bond a gadget that doesn't affect on
    CrabKey wrote:
    Bond's exact need in a crisis

  • TheSkyfallen06TheSkyfallen06 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    Posts: 991
    What still surprises me is the fact that people actually want Pierce and Timothy to return as Bond even though they're both in their 70's, with Tim being almost 80.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,124
    What still surprises me is the fact that people actually want Pierce and Timothy to return as Bond even though they're both in their 70's, with Tim being almost 80.



    We’re in a Member Berries type of nostalgia right now. Both have arguably grown in popularity and ended their runs shortly, or too poor of material. In a lot of people’s eyes.
  • TheSkyfallen06TheSkyfallen06 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    edited August 2023 Posts: 991
    After reconsideration i think Bond 26 should be:
    Suspense - Dr. No & From Russia With Love
    +
    Action - Casino Royale & Quantum of Solace
    +
    Overall tone: Goldeneye

    *No Goldfinger Formula
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,063
    The thing about Dalton and Brosnan is that they look so damned good.

  • The thing about Dalton and Brosnan is that they look so damned good.

    All Bonds did.
Sign In or Register to comment.