It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Fair enough. Although technically it is an anti-climax. Silva is denied his big moment and the big confrontation is delayed until they all meet again at Skyfall. I just thought they could have made more of the scene though.
I understand, though it features the Tennyson moment, so imo it was great enough. I also love the confrontation of M and Silva. I really don't see what else was left to say between them.
I haven't heard a single person who saw Skyfall not mention this. We all wanted it, but at the end of the day it just wouldn't have worked with how the plot was laid out.
I have been surprised so many wanted a physical fight. I hadn't even thought about it before I read people mentioning that. Their sparring and duels were not physical at any point, but very much psychological, and to me it would have seemed wrong to change that at the end. A fist fight or some such thing sounds like a horrible idea to me. The only physical contact between them all the way through was one-way only, and extremely gentle, too, so kinda unique. Fist fights are so... ordinary. I thought it was perfect just as it was.
Well there was actually a massive fight between Bond and Silva - just with machine guns and grenades. And it was very ordinary and went on a very long time.
I think what people wanted and feel was missing was actually a face-to-face confrontation between Bond and Silva. Just something to round off the scene on the island. It didn't need to be a fist fight necessarily, but just a scene where there is a final face off - something more psychological actually.
We get one between M and Silva and in the end the "nuisance" comes back to show he is the better man.
That is true and this is where it goes a bit awry for me. In a TV series it's fine to shift the focus between different characters week to week but this is a 'Bond' film and I think it should primarily be about him, not his boss.
I agree. Odd move. And given the length of the film there was no reason that they could not have intertwined Bond's story more with Silva's. Why was Severine included in the film at all? She could have provided the perfect personal motivation for Bond's conflict with Silva. It would have just added an extra layer of interest/enjoyment. I just think the absence of these other strands to the story is simply down to bad writing. A more sophisticated screenplay and script would have made the climax into a more satisfying resolution of all the key character's story arcs. Instead Bond is treated almost as a side character.
Ok... I thought by hand-to-hand fight people meant literally a hand-to-hand fight, so I responded to that.
I never felt Bond to be a side character. He is in almost every scene and he does his job. It's just that the motivation of the bad guy is not world domination but to kill his Boss. Thus the face off meant more when it was between M and Silva. In that scene, Bond takes a step back...but rightly so imo.
I love the ending, so for me there is a satisfying resolution and I can't call it bad writing. At least not imo. It may not appeal to everyone but I don't think bad writing is right here.
I found the ending refreshing. For once they didn't try to squeeze another action scene into the end and tried to focus on the characters. For me it worked.
But there is a very long action scene with the attack on Skyfall Lodge, followed by a chase across the moors and a fight in the lake. Apart from a minute or two in the chapel, the last half hour of the film is all action.
I never felt Bond was a minor character in this story. Also, to me he had an interesting story arc with a sense of resolution. He was at a very different place at the end than he was for a considerable time after his "death". When he returned to work at the end, he did so "with pleasure". If that was meaningless or insufficient to you then I can't help.
I agree the Bond-Silva scenes on the island were great, and I wouldn't have minded more of that at all, but I don't know how it should have been done, nor am I sure the story would have needed it. Bond's biggest fight was not with Silva, but with himself. and unlike you, I felt the main character in this movie was very much Bond himself.
Well, it wasn't me but Mendes who said the film is about M.
I don't know how it should have been done either, but that's why I'm saying it's bad writing. Working those kind of satisfying scenes, character arcs and plot resolutions into the film is what you expect good screenwriters to do - something that Purvis and Wade have shown themselves to be incapable of on numerous occassions.
I like the way that people are reading so much into the film. It is indeed quite complex and does invite multiple interpretations. I think that's down to good acting though and decent direction rather than the plot/script itself. Mendes and the cast have made the most out of some very average material. May be that's enough and it's certainly all you can ask for from the actors, but I just expected more from the script.
I agree. I've said this on numerous occasions. What I can't fathom is how people seem so keen to dismiss this argument. I've not seen a single review from a critic or fan that labours over how impeccable the script is, it's just pushed to the sidelines and not really referenced.
Was one moment when being held at the interim MI6 headquarters when he shows us the effects of his botched suicide attempt, with his cyanide rotted teeth that was quite unnerving, if only for an instant, and the screen doors slide back, but apart from that, there was nothing exceptional about him. A bisexual villain with a 'mommy issue' and changing agendas that culminated in a poor ending and that was about it really. We haven't had a villain of caliber in James Bond since Davi's Sanchez, and that was over 20 years ago now
I have been quite disappointed with most of the villains of the Craig tenure. This time was no different. Got a lot to do today so will get back to this another time, but there's no sense in lying
Later M tells Bond that Silva's real name was Tiago Rodriguez
So does that mean that the name James Bond is also just a code name?
Just like in QoS Bond asks Mathis if 'Mathis' was his cover name...?
Yes, I think the cartoon performance actually detracted in some ways. I personally prefered LeChiffre althouth he wasn't very menacing either.
This is how I see it: Silva was a "shadow", living off the grid. Of course he would change his name. There's a good chance the blonde hair isn't even his natural color, and he's wearing contacts too.
When he got the prosthetic jaw, he changed his entire identity.
It all gives Javier Bardem, as the villain Raoul Silva, the freedom to overact with a zest that makes Kevin Bacon, as the campy gay hair-salon owner in Queen Latifah’s Beauty Shop, appear dignified and profoundly reserved. None of the scenes are safe from Bardem’s craving jaws (which, incidentally, he can yank from his mouth, a repulsive thing best viewed on an empty stomach, or best not viewed at all). Mendes attempts to give him a dramatic entrance—a long walk after coming out of an elevator to confront the Craig-Bond—but the camera work is so deep-focused that it’s distracting, and when we finally see him up close, we can barely look at the character without laughing. If you ask me, the Bond makers are fighting an uphill battle to present a spy thriller with a villain who resembles Stuart Smalley. Moreover, the script and direction reduce the character to a ridiculous harmless entity, and forces Bardem to spend too much time attempting to evoke sympathy when the audience is told of Silva’s suffering in the hands of the Chinese. The backstory itself is equally useless: the aforementioned ex-MI6 agent was betrayed by M for essentially being overenthusiastic in his duties during pre-handover Hong Kong days.
Bardem’s character is also a variation of the flamboyant, pansexual villain in Quantum Of Solace, Dominic Greene, and we wonder whether Silva, at one point in his Bond villain career, was ever involved with Greene’s gay group Quantum. It seems the Bond makers regard these twisted characters as the epitome of Eurocoolness. The scene where Silva amuses himself by unbuttoning the Craig-Bond’s shirt and caressing the agent’s chest and legs will live on as the most revolting display of blatant political correctness in the series. Not only is it an awkward homoerotic scene, it also serves zero purpose in the plot, forcing us to wonder if it was inserted in the movie to heighten pre-release publicity with a risque buzz. Yet Craig’s Bond is more at ease in this scene rather than in his romantic interludes with Severine and the island girl—once again, the filmmakers are implying a quasi-gay Bond, calculated to draw the widest possible demographics by appeasing feminists and, at another level, appealing to gay audiences.
This is how I see it: Silva was a "shadow", living off the grid. Of course he would change his name. There's a good chance the blonde hair isn't even his natural color, and he's wearing contacts too.
When he got the prosthetic jaw, he changed his entire identity.
[/quote]
I thought the Blond hair would have come from the fact that he ate Hydrogen cyanide? The colour is obviously not meant to be the original hair colour of the character and even his eyebrows are platinum blond, which would indicate it wasnt dyed.