› ›

Indiana Jones

1…199200201202203205»

Comments

  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,759
    DEKE_RIVERS wrote: »
    bondywondy wrote: »
    A rebooted Indiana Jones film is extremely risky. Solo - the 2016 Han Solo Star Wars spin off film - did very poor box office compared to the other Disney Star Wars films. People weren't interested enough in paying to see a new actor, Alden Ehrenreich, play Solo. The same thing could happen if Disney reboot Indiana Jones.

    If they make it, I suppose it would be a series or a cheaper movie. Which would be good news because you don't need 250 million to make something like Raiders.

    To bring down the budge shoot the entire thing on green screen, even normal scenes like in an office or restaurant. Indiana Jones and the Screen of Doom...ok, go for the rhyme: Indiana Jones and the Screen of Green
  • DEKE_RIVERSDEKE_RIVERS
    edited July 10 Posts: 2,211
    Since62 wrote: »
    DEKE_RIVERS wrote: »
    bondywondy wrote: »
    A rebooted Indiana Jones film is extremely risky. Solo - the 2016 Han Solo Star Wars spin off film - did very poor box office compared to the other Disney Star Wars films. People weren't interested enough in paying to see a new actor, Alden Ehrenreich, play Solo. The same thing could happen if Disney reboot Indiana Jones.

    If they make it, I suppose it would be a series or a cheaper movie. Which would be good news because you don't need 250 million to make something like Raiders.

    To bring down the budge shoot the entire thing on green screen, even normal scenes like in an office or restaurant. Indiana Jones and the Screen of Doom...ok, go for the rhyme: Indiana Jones and the Screen of Green

    I don't know. A bigger budget means more spectacle and therefore more CGI. And we have the latest ones as an example.

    An old-school movie doesn't have to be expensive. I guess an Alien Romulus type movie is too much to ask. They'll surely find new ways to mess things up.

Sign In or Register to comment.