Controversial opinions about Bond films

1622623625627628705

Comments

  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    Posts: 1,664
    With that in mind - I suppose this one might be controversial enough, but I'm not sure:

    Kara is one of the very best Bond girls on paper, but D'Abo is pretty awful and her performance doesn't bring out any of her potentially interesting qualities beyond her naivety and turns one of the better characters into one of the worst.

    Lowell leaves her for dust, both as a character and in terms of chemistry with Dalton.

    Yeah, I'm torn. I honestly think the Bond-Kara romance is the best in the series: better than OHMSS, better than CR. But having said that, and as oxymoronic as it is, I think their chemistry is almost entirely down to Dalton's performance! She does overdo the naivety, and I don't think the accent did her a lot of favors.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,861
    I tend to think a lot of why it's seen as one of the stronger romances is just that they have more screen time together than most Bond/leading lady partnerships. I don't really think they have chemistry (I'm not saying they're not bad together though) nor am I hugely convinced that Bond would fall for her.
  • Posts: 787
    With that in mind - I suppose this one might be controversial enough, but I'm not sure:

    Kara is one of the very best Bond girls on paper, but D'Abo is pretty awful and her performance doesn't bring out any of her potentially interesting qualities beyond her naivety and turns one of the better characters into one of the worst.

    Lowell leaves her for dust, both as a character and in terms of chemistry with Dalton.

    Yeah, I think I'm with you. I'll admit I'm biased in terms of liking Pam as a character and Lowell as an actress, though. But Kara just constantly comes across as bumbling and naive and helpless to the extent that I lose patience with her and wonder why James doesn't too.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,861
    The bit where he's silently swearing to himself at her stupidity in the plane has always tickled me :)
  • j_w_pepperj_w_pepper Born on the bayou. I can still hear my old hound dog barkin'.
    Posts: 8,655
    Just for the record, I like both Pam and Kara. I think they're great Bond girls and do a decent job acting (come on, people, this doesn't have to be Helen Mirren and Meryl Streep material, actingwise). Lupe, not so much.
  • Posts: 1,545
    WHAT ? Kara was good at playing music and that was it. Never found her believable as someone in whom Bond would genuinely be personally interested. As for Pam -- that ridiculous teen-movie jealousy bit did NOT belong in a Bond film !
  • Posts: 6,726
    Count me as a fan of both Pam and Kara.
    Two very different Bond girls, but both playing superbly alongside Dalton!
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 7,999
    I thought d'Abo worked really well for what's supposed to be the role of an ordinary woman being thrust into the world of international intrigue. That said, Pam is the stronger character that plays off really well with Dalton's Bond. I don't quite buy her being so smitten with Bond, that's the only ding I have on her writing.

    Ultimately, I think what LTK needed the most was a stronger director. Glen does seem to try, and his heart is in the right place, but I don't think he ever had what it took to have LTK reach its true potential. I think that was the instance Cubby should have considered an American director that had a better understanding of the type of film LTK tried to be.

    And it needed a much better DOP. Jan de Bont would have been PERFECT. If there's any film that he would have been most suited for, it was LTK.
  • edited March 2021 Posts: 7,500
    I thought d'Abo worked really well for what's supposed to be the role of an ordinary woman being thrust into the world of international intrigue. That said, Pam is the stronger character that plays off really well with Dalton's Bond. I don't quite buy her being so smitten with Bond, that's the only ding I have on her writing.

    Ultimately, I think what LTK needed the most was a stronger director. Glen does seem to try, and his heart is in the right place, but I don't think he ever had what it took to have LTK reach its true potential. I think that was the instance Cubby should have considered an American director that had a better understanding of the type of film LTK tried to be.

    And it needed a much better DOP. Jan de Bont would have been PERFECT. If there's any film that he would have been most suited for, it was LTK.

    I think Glen does a fine job to be honest. It might be that LTK would have had slightly more visual flair and perhaps marginaly stronger acting performances with another director. On the other hand, very few or anyone could direct action like Glen and one of the things that excite me so much with LTK every time I watch it is the incredible quality of all the action scenes. It's of course pure speculation how the film would have turned out with another director at the helm, but I think the film is very enjoyable as it is, one of my favorites. I wouldn't sacrifice the action scenes for any hypothetical improvement elsewhere.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,861
    I thought d'Abo worked really well for what's supposed to be the role of an ordinary woman being thrust into the world of international intrigue. That said, Pam is the stronger character that plays off really well with Dalton's Bond. I don't quite buy her being so smitten with Bond, that's the only ding I have on her writing.

    Ultimately, I think what LTK needed the most was a stronger director. Glen does seem to try, and his heart is in the right place, but I don't think he ever had what it took to have LTK reach its true potential. I think that was the instance Cubby should have considered an American director that had a better understanding of the type of film LTK tried to be.

    And it needed a much better DOP. Jan de Bont would have been PERFECT. If there's any film that he would have been most suited for, it was LTK.

    Yes I agree there. I said it on another thread, but the Kamen score just makes me think how punchy it would have been with someone like McTiernan directing it.
  • And it needed a much better DOP. Jan de Bont would have been PERFECT. If there's any film that he would have been most suited for, it was LTK.

    Agree. While de Bont would have been perfect for Dalton's third Bond located in Hong Kong, he would have done wonders with a Latin American setting. I also think he would have greatly improved one of the flaws of the film for my taste: the visual interchangeability between Key West and Isthmus.

    While ideally the first act of the story should have taken place in a place further north, in my opinion, in order to visually contrast with the main location, the movie makes no effort to really differentiate the locations. Something that could have been greatly improved by someone like de Bont.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,861
    And it needed a much better DOP. Jan de Bont would have been PERFECT. If there's any film that he would have been most suited for, it was LTK.

    Agree. While de Bont would have been perfect for Dalton's third Bond located in Hong Kong, he would have done wonders with a Latin American setting. I also think he would have greatly improved one of the flaws of the film for my taste: the visual interchangeability between Key West and Isthmus.

    Agree with that too; I think as a kid I had a bit of trouble understanding they were different places. A bit like in NSNA where the Bahamas and the French Riveria aren't really hugely different to each other: going from one sunny beach resort to another is kind of pointless onscreen.

    While ideally the first act of the story should have taken place in a place further north, in my opinion, in order to visually contrast with the main location, the movie makes no effort to really differentiate the locations. Something that could have been greatly improved by someone like de Bont.

    Hopefully a bit better than that Soderbergh film Traffic where they stuck different colour filters over the lens depending on which side of the border the camera was :D
  • mtm wrote: »
    Hopefully a bit better than that Soderbergh film Traffic where they stuck different colour filters over the lens depending on which side of the border the camera was :D
    Here's something that reminds me of Spectre! Although lazy, this technique remains nonetheless an effective means if well used, in my opinion. I know it's not to everyone's liking, but Spectre's PTS created an atmosphere which differentiated both the location from the film's other settings, while also fitting in well with the dreary aura that runs through the movie.

    Regarding LTK, different color filters would at least have allowed to create more contrast between Key West and Isthmus.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited March 2021 Posts: 14,861
    Yes I'm only teasing really: Traffic's one was very obviously a choice that it wanted the viewer to notice (it would even switch in the middle of some scenes) so I don't want to say it's completely bad. I wouldn't call it lazy; I'm sure they thought about that for a long time.
    I'm also not as down on Spectre's grading as some people are.

    It could be quite interesting to see a graded version of LTK. The colour work on NTTD looks rather nicely done to me.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited March 2021 Posts: 23,447
    What I love about Dalton's Bond is that he treats funny one-liners as corrosive: he spits them out with contempt rather than enjoy them the way Moore's Bond did. But when he's with Kara, you can see Dalton's Bond soften up a little. "Why didn't you learn to play the violin?" "You're calling me a horse's arse?" You can see those two grow closer to each other, organically and convincingly. There's a playfulness between them that is rarely seen in any of the Bonds, in my opinion at least. Bond and Vesper come close, though. But when Kara fails to understand Bond's signals for getting on the plane, and he shows his frustration, it's almost like two lovers bickering over who forgot to feed the dog. Even the final scene of the film stands out as one of the most romantic moments in the series, enhanced by Barry's sweet strings playing ever so gently in the background. This moment is honest; there's true love between those two, not just sexual attraction. Comparing this scene to the final moments in say DAF, MR, FYEO or OP, I can only wish that Bond retires after this movie with Kara at his side. It helps, of course, that both of these British actors are giving great performances overall.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 5,921
    jobo wrote: »
    I thought d'Abo worked really well for what's supposed to be the role of an ordinary woman being thrust into the world of international intrigue. That said, Pam is the stronger character that plays off really well with Dalton's Bond. I don't quite buy her being so smitten with Bond, that's the only ding I have on her writing.

    Ultimately, I think what LTK needed the most was a stronger director. Glen does seem to try, and his heart is in the right place, but I don't think he ever had what it took to have LTK reach its true potential. I think that was the instance Cubby should have considered an American director that had a better understanding of the type of film LTK tried to be.

    And it needed a much better DOP. Jan de Bont would have been PERFECT. If there's any film that he would have been most suited for, it was LTK.

    I think Glen does a fine job to be honest. It might be that LTK would have had slightly more visual flair and perhaps marginaly stronger acting performances with another director. On the other hand, very few or anyone could direct action like Glen and one of the things that excite me so much with LTK every time I watch it is the incredible quality of all the action scenes. It's of course pure speculation how the film would have turned out with another director at the helm, but I think the film is very enjoyable as it is, one of my favorites. I wouldn't sacrifice the action scenes for any hypothetical improvement elsewhere.

    This is spot on. If you had to choose between the sea plane/tanker truck sequences and the acting/visual style, what Bond fan wouldn't choose the action sequences and therefore Glen?

    And FWIW, I think the nighttime warehouse scenes are also well-handled.

    It's probably Glen's most cohesive film, tonally.
  • edited March 2021 Posts: 6,726
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    What I love about Dalton's Bond is that he treats funny one-liners as corrosive: he spits them out with contempt rather than enjoy them the way Moore's Bond did. But when he's with Kara, you can see Dalton's Bond soften up a little. "Why didn't you learn to play the violin?" "You're calling me a horse's arse?" You can see those two grow closer to each other, organically and convincingly. There's a playfulness between them that is rarely seen in any of the Bonds, in my opinion at least. Bond and Vesper come close, though. But when Kara fails to understand Bond's signals for getting on the plane, and he shows his frustration, it's almost like two lovers bickering over who forgot to feed the dog. Even the final scene of the film stands out as one of the most romantic moments in the series, enhanced by Barry's sweet strings playing ever so gently in the background. This moment is honest; there's true love between those two, not just sexual attraction. Comparing this scene to the final moments in say DAF, MR, FYEO or OP, I can only wish that Bond retires after this movie with Kara at his side. It helps, of course, that both of these British actors are giving great performances overall.

    Very well said!
    And I will also back John Glen as Director, yes, the action is superb, but he handles the story element very well. Also, and I'm not sure if this was down to Glen, or the casting, but I find the minor characters in LTK whether its the Bank Manager elated at Bonds suitcases full of money, or the Casino head,or Sanchez men, they all have their moment to shine!
  • edited March 2021 Posts: 532
    echo wrote: »
    It's probably Glen's most cohesive film, tonally.

    I dunno, I think LTK is a lot more tonally uneven than TLD’s because its serious moments are so much more serious and its silly moments are if not sillier, then at least seem sillier because of how dark the dark moments are. One second it’s super gritty and the next there are ninjas and Wayne Newton and truck wheelies. TLD’s tonal peaks aren’t nearly as sharp so I find it to be a much more even experience.

    I will echo the sentiments that Glen is a fantastic action director though.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,757
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    What I love about Dalton's Bond is that he treats funny one-liners as corrosive: he spits them out with contempt rather than enjoy them the way Moore's Bond did. But when he's with Kara, you can see Dalton's Bond soften up a little. "Why didn't you learn to play the violin?" "You're calling me a horse's arse?" You can see those two grow closer to each other, organically and convincingly. There's a playfulness between them that is rarely seen in any of the Bonds, in my opinion at least. Bond and Vesper come close, though. But when Kara fails to understand Bond's signals for getting on the plane, and he shows his frustration, it's almost like two lovers bickering over who forgot to feed the dog. Even the final scene of the film stands out as one of the most romantic moments in the series, enhanced by Barry's sweet strings playing ever so gently in the background. This moment is honest; there's true love between those two, not just sexual attraction. Comparing this scene to the final moments in say DAF, MR, FYEO or OP, I can only wish that Bond retires after this movie with Kara at his side. It helps, of course, that both of these British actors are giving great performances overall.

    Excellently put. Dalton-d'Abo for me is the best couple of the franchise. A believable romance if there ever was one.
  • Posts: 7,500
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    What I love about Dalton's Bond is that he treats funny one-liners as corrosive: he spits them out with contempt rather than enjoy them the way Moore's Bond did. But when he's with Kara, you can see Dalton's Bond soften up a little. "Why didn't you learn to play the violin?" "You're calling me a horse's arse?" You can see those two grow closer to each other, organically and convincingly. There's a playfulness between them that is rarely seen in any of the Bonds, in my opinion at least. Bond and Vesper come close, though. But when Kara fails to understand Bond's signals for getting on the plane, and he shows his frustration, it's almost like two lovers bickering over who forgot to feed the dog. Even the final scene of the film stands out as one of the most romantic moments in the series, enhanced by Barry's sweet strings playing ever so gently in the background. This moment is honest; there's true love between those two, not just sexual attraction. Comparing this scene to the final moments in say DAF, MR, FYEO or OP, I can only wish that Bond retires after this movie with Kara at his side. It helps, of course, that both of these British actors are giving great performances overall.

    Excellently put. Dalton-d'Abo for me is the best couple of the franchise. A believable romance if there ever was one.

    Having just watched TLD this evening I can't say I disagree. Kara is extremely likeable in every. It's a shame she has some stupid and annoying moments like when she has to steer the plane... But on the whole a great character and a convincing performance.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited March 2021 Posts: 8,008
    I wish I saw those moments the way you folks do. She's a weaklink in an otherwise superb film for me and one of the lesser Bond girls. I could never see what Bond saw in her beyond practical use. Though, admittedly, once you have an actress in a part who just doesn't do anything for you, the faults always stick out further like everything else!
    octofinger wrote: »
    With that in mind - I suppose this one might be controversial enough, but I'm not sure:

    Kara is one of the very best Bond girls on paper, but D'Abo is pretty awful and her performance doesn't bring out any of her potentially interesting qualities beyond her naivety and turns one of the better characters into one of the worst.

    Lowell leaves her for dust, both as a character and in terms of chemistry with Dalton.

    Yeah, I think I'm with you. I'll admit I'm biased in terms of liking Pam as a character and Lowell as an actress, though. But Kara just constantly comes across as bumbling and naive and helpless to the extent that I lose patience with her and wonder why James doesn't too.

    That is where I'm at with her, too. I'd be inclined to agree. One moment from her I really like is when she kicks off after the Russian convoy, ahead of Shah's men. Ballsy, but the effect is somewhat diluted for me by the dimness displayed later.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,861
    echo wrote: »
    It's probably Glen's most cohesive film, tonally.

    I dunno, I think LTK is a lot more tonally uneven than TLD’s because its serious moments are so much more serious and its silly moments are if not sillier, then at least seem sillier because of how dark the dark moments are. One second it’s super gritty and the next there are ninjas and Wayne Newton and truck wheelies. TLD’s tonal peaks aren’t nearly as sharp so I find it to be a much more even experience.

    I will echo the sentiments that Glen is a fantastic action director though.

    The tanker chase is a highlight, but I always wonder why the seaplane sequence isn't really remembered as one of the all time best. He escapes an underwater fight by harpooning onto a seaplane and waterskiing his way out of there: that's a superb idea. Plus it's actually an action scene upon which the whole movie pivots- without that Bond can't do anything that he does in the next half of the film. And yet... it's good, but it's not great. I feel like that should be one of the all time best Bond moments (and I'm sure some people do consider it one of their favourites) but it's not really up there as one of the classics and I think the execution must be letting it down somehow.
  • CommanderRossCommanderRoss The bottom of a pitch lake in Eastern Trinidad, place called La Brea
    Posts: 7,946
    mtm wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    It's probably Glen's most cohesive film, tonally.

    I dunno, I think LTK is a lot more tonally uneven than TLD’s because its serious moments are so much more serious and its silly moments are if not sillier, then at least seem sillier because of how dark the dark moments are. One second it’s super gritty and the next there are ninjas and Wayne Newton and truck wheelies. TLD’s tonal peaks aren’t nearly as sharp so I find it to be a much more even experience.

    I will echo the sentiments that Glen is a fantastic action director though.

    The tanker chase is a highlight, but I always wonder why the seaplane sequence isn't really remembered as one of the all time best. He escapes an underwater fight by harpooning onto a seaplane and waterskiing his way out of there: that's a superb idea. Plus it's actually an action scene upon which the whole movie pivots- without that Bond can't do anything that he does in the next half of the film. And yet... it's good, but it's not great. I feel like that should be one of the all time best Bond moments (and I'm sure some people do consider it one of their favourites) but it's not really up there as one of the classics and I think the execution must be letting it down somehow.

    I love the seaplane escape! Agree thatit should be higher on the action-radar.
  • Posts: 7,500
    mtm wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    It's probably Glen's most cohesive film, tonally.

    I dunno, I think LTK is a lot more tonally uneven than TLD’s because its serious moments are so much more serious and its silly moments are if not sillier, then at least seem sillier because of how dark the dark moments are. One second it’s super gritty and the next there are ninjas and Wayne Newton and truck wheelies. TLD’s tonal peaks aren’t nearly as sharp so I find it to be a much more even experience.

    I will echo the sentiments that Glen is a fantastic action director though.

    The tanker chase is a highlight, but I always wonder why the seaplane sequence isn't really remembered as one of the all time best. He escapes an underwater fight by harpooning onto a seaplane and waterskiing his way out of there: that's a superb idea. Plus it's actually an action scene upon which the whole movie pivots- without that Bond can't do anything that he does in the next half of the film. And yet... it's good, but it's not great. I feel like that should be one of the all time best Bond moments (and I'm sure some people do consider it one of their favourites) but it's not really up there as one of the classics and I think the execution must be letting it down somehow.

    The scene is underrated for sure. And I don't think the problem is the execution, but rather the audience ;)
  • mtm wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    It's probably Glen's most cohesive film, tonally.

    I dunno, I think LTK is a lot more tonally uneven than TLD’s because its serious moments are so much more serious and its silly moments are if not sillier, then at least seem sillier because of how dark the dark moments are. One second it’s super gritty and the next there are ninjas and Wayne Newton and truck wheelies. TLD’s tonal peaks aren’t nearly as sharp so I find it to be a much more even experience.

    I will echo the sentiments that Glen is a fantastic action director though.

    The tanker chase is a highlight, but I always wonder why the seaplane sequence isn't really remembered as one of the all time best. He escapes an underwater fight by harpooning onto a seaplane and waterskiing his way out of there: that's a superb idea. Plus it's actually an action scene upon which the whole movie pivots- without that Bond can't do anything that he does in the next half of the film. And yet... it's good, but it's not great. I feel like that should be one of the all time best Bond moments (and I'm sure some people do consider it one of their favourites) but it's not really up there as one of the classics and I think the execution must be letting it down somehow.

    Yeah something has held back that sequence for me as well despite all the great stunt work going on. But LTK grows more and more on me every time I watch so maybe next time that sequence will do more for me? The tanker chase is an all-timer though, maybe the best third act action sequence in the series?
  • Posts: 1,879
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    What I love about Dalton's Bond is that he treats funny one-liners as corrosive: he spits them out with contempt rather than enjoy them the way Moore's Bond did. But when he's with Kara, you can see Dalton's Bond soften up a little. "Why didn't you learn to play the violin?" "You're calling me a horse's arse?" You can see those two grow closer to each other, organically and convincingly. There's a playfulness between them that is rarely seen in any of the Bonds, in my opinion at least. Bond and Vesper come close, though. But when Kara fails to understand Bond's signals for getting on the plane, and he shows his frustration, it's almost like two lovers bickering over who forgot to feed the dog. Even the final scene of the film stands out as one of the most romantic moments in the series, enhanced by Barry's sweet strings playing ever so gently in the background. This moment is honest; there's true love between those two, not just sexual attraction. Comparing this scene to the final moments in say DAF, MR, FYEO or OP, I can only wish that Bond retires after this movie with Kara at his side. It helps, of course, that both of these British actors are giving great performances overall.

    Nice post. I'll add the smaller moments when Dalton lets his face express things - the look he gives after the living daylights line; the way he flirts with Moneypenny; the look of not buying Koskov's story at the safe house; and I could go on and on.

    It may not be apparent to some fans just how refreshing TLD was back in 1987. After the stale horrid double-entendres, unsexy scenes and raised eyebrows of AVTAK, TLD was what was needed to refresh the series. A big deal was also made of the monogamous relationship between Bond and Kara, as the AIDS crisis was in the headlines at the time. But it really made for a closer experience to the novels and was also refreshing, even if I find Kara to be possibly the least attractive of the main Bond women.

    TLD's ending was also the polar opposite of AVTAK - a genuine romantic moment opposed to the shower scene with lines like "That is not the soap."

    I'm also a fan of the seaplane escape and also find it underrated among the most inventive and fun action scenes of the series. I think it's forgotten simply because it's LTK whereas an overblown bore like GE's tank chase gets recalled easily.
  • edited March 2021 Posts: 2,887
    The seaplane sequence also gets overlooked because it's in the middle of the film and there's an even more spectacular sequence at the film's climax. The best way to make people talk about an action sequence is to place it at the beginning of a film or near its end.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,757
    Firmly in the camp of the seaplane chase too. One of the strongest action scenes in Bond

    The tanker truck chase has the emotional stakes though, I think it's a very powerful moment when Dalton sits on that rock and sighs to himself overlooking the battlefield when it's all over. Really subtle but fine acting there.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,447
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    Firmly in the camp of the seaplane chase too. One of the strongest action scenes in Bond

    The tanker truck chase has the emotional stakes though, I think it's a very powerful moment when Dalton sits on that rock and sighs to himself overlooking the battlefield when it's all over. Really subtle but fine acting there.

    Couldn't agree more. Bond has an unusual fire burning in him in LTK and I absolutely love the revenge plot! You can tell a story about anyone who's out for some payback, but what will happen when you cross paths with 007 and get on his bad side? He's not going to just barge in with guns blazing; he will work out strategies, concoct clever plans, infiltrate, seduce, dig himself in, and all of that to see the enemy slowly cripple, corrupt and destroy his own organization. Bond has fought baddies before, and he knows what he's doing. This is the one professional you do not want to lock horns with. So when you make things personal besides just being a supervillain--to quote Lex Luthor's nephew--boy, are you gonna GET it! That's one of the reasons why I like LTK so much. Bond is maximizing his efforts for himself this time, and it's serious. (It's also the reason I don't need any of the Q scenes in this film, as discussed last week.)
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 5,921
    jobo wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    It's probably Glen's most cohesive film, tonally.

    I dunno, I think LTK is a lot more tonally uneven than TLD’s because its serious moments are so much more serious and its silly moments are if not sillier, then at least seem sillier because of how dark the dark moments are. One second it’s super gritty and the next there are ninjas and Wayne Newton and truck wheelies. TLD’s tonal peaks aren’t nearly as sharp so I find it to be a much more even experience.

    I will echo the sentiments that Glen is a fantastic action director though.

    The tanker chase is a highlight, but I always wonder why the seaplane sequence isn't really remembered as one of the all time best. He escapes an underwater fight by harpooning onto a seaplane and waterskiing his way out of there: that's a superb idea. Plus it's actually an action scene upon which the whole movie pivots- without that Bond can't do anything that he does in the next half of the film. And yet... it's good, but it's not great. I feel like that should be one of the all time best Bond moments (and I'm sure some people do consider it one of their favourites) but it's not really up there as one of the classics and I think the execution must be letting it down somehow.

    The scene is underrated for sure. And I don't think the problem is the execution, but rather the audience ;)

    Agreed. I think the audience's rejection of Dalton is similar to that of Lazenby, causing their films to fade a bit. And in all three of those films, the action sequences tend to be overlooked by the general public (plane fight in TLD anyone?).
Sign In or Register to comment.