It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
As I've said in the past I hope they go into this with the intention of making the best Bond film they can, if not the best James Bond film ever, regardless of what we get. Playing it too safe will satisfy no one fully. I think they can afford to take risks - not to the extent it's unrecognisable as a James Bond film, and ultimately this film will be starting a new era in terms of story so we'll certainly be defaulting to some of the more recognisable Bond tropes. But I hope they don't feel the need to make Bond or the story less interesting than they could be.
Same
I agree. There are far more of less headier names than the likes of Nolan (either brother), Curón, Berger or Villeneuve from which Amazon MGM could pick to direct Bond 26. And yet every rumor of who wil tells the same story: The relaunch of James Bond will be one of the most ambitious blockbusters this decade.
This message even extends to the choice of producers in Pascal and Heyman. As far as who’s writing, if the filmmaker's feel so inclined, maybe see whether or not Tony Gilroy is available. Or Alex Garland?