Callbacks: The good, the bad, and the ugly.

in Bond Movies Posts: 1,518
No shortage of callbacks in Bond films. Are they necessary? A good thing? Which ones succeed? Which fail? What purpose do they serve? NTTD is heavily criticized for the callbacks to OHMSS. But OHMSS recalls the Connery films with the memorabilia in Bond's office, and of course there's the man sweeping the floor while whistling Goldfinger. Opinions?

Comments

  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited August 2023 Posts: 3,390
    I'm a fan of all the references and callbacks to the Bond Franchise, no problems with them, it depends upon the execution, how it's used and the concept behind the use of those references.

    I liked the Goldfinger whistling theme in OHMSS and Lazenby Bond gathering up mementos from the Connery Era in his drawer, even the Bullion Trade talks between Draco and M.

    Tracy/Marriage reference in LTK, it fits the most because it also happened in the wedding and there's the trigger.

    Elektra's reference for Paris Carver from TND in TWINE (have you ever lost a loved one?), And all of the DAD callbacks like the jetpack for example or Jinx' Honey Ryder impression, I liked all of that.

    And even the DB5 appearance in both Skyfall and SPECTRE, no problem with me, because it's not representing any significance, just an icon.

    I even liked the Dr. No dots in NTTD, it's a way of giving tribute to Dr. No (1962).


    But the only references I'm not a fan of are the:

    1. OHMSS references in NTTD - there's the significance of Bond and Tracy, that song signifies their relationship.
    But the way NTTD used this song was like: 'This song represents the tragic romances in Bond's life'.
    It removed the real meaning of the song which was about the relationship of Bond and Tracy.
    NTTD put a bad mark on the song, so instead of people hearing WHATTIW and reminds them of Bond and Tracy romance, everytime they would hear it, they would be having some thoughts of "oh, something's tragic is happening to Bond's life again".
    They've made the song full of misery, depressing and dark, instead of sweet and tender like what it really represented before.
    It's a part of OHMSS' romance identity.


    2. Bond visiting Tracy's grave in FYEO (and everything in the PTS of FYEO) - for me, it's a bad retconning, it's the scene that should've happened right after OHMSS, with Bond avenging Tracy's death and killing off Blofeld once and for all, but since they've put it under the rug for a campy version of DAF, now after many films, they've decided to retcon it there, and badly played for the sake of embarrassing McClory, I have no problem with the TSWLM reference, but the FYEO PTS felt like a long forgotten sequel to OHMSS and it's very disappointing.

    3. The Aston Martin V8 1987 from Dalton/TLD appearance in NTTD - Underused, underutilized, just put in the film like a product placement or a design or a prop.
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    edited August 2023 Posts: 4,443
    Losing a friend (Alec Death) and Fight trow Time (fighting in silence room in TMND) in maintitle of CR. Together: Losing a friend in upcoming years (Mathis, Judi Dench M and Felix)

    Dench-M007-death.jpg
    Judi Dench name in a star be atacked. This together with ''next in line'' lyric, be one of first moment expect Dench M going to die. Because of NTTD we know now where those black/red things and fire works in Skyfall stands for. Later in NTTD we see Bond get his Star Spot light fall of fame.

    No-Time-to-Die-0724.jpg

    Skyfall-0530.jpg

    embedded262916184.jpg

    More death of Judi Dench M:

    Quantum-of-Solace-0121.jpg
    Judi Dench name with tricker sound in maintitle, She looking trow window with cross of death and Missing bullet/Bond looking to empty chair (also refer to Mr White death) and I Never left comment from Bond to her in QOS.

    Skyfall-0137.jpg
    M looking to falling rain (Skyfall!) / Judi Dench name over graveyard / Bell of Death whyle she in the car / She behind coffins (Next in Line) / Missing bullet (Wrong M) in Skyfall.

    Table of death:

    Casino-Royale-0535.jpg
    Table of death in CR. Already discus before, but since NTTD that we been fooled with Bond sitting at bar.. We should known as you must first turn picture as i have done before too:
    Casino-Royale-0532.jpgSkyfall-0345.jpg
    CRflipt.jpg
    Casino Royale Original vs Skyfall vs Casino Royale flipt

    No-Time-to-Die-0528.jpg
    Table of death in NTTD

    Other favorite:

    Quantum-of-Solace-0085.jpgSkyfall-1668.jpgSpectre-0058.jpg
    Walk a way from a rainbow (QOS vs Skyfall) vs Spectre ?

    Skyfall-0157.jpgNo-Time-to-Die-0295.jpg
    CR Lyric in Skyfall (The coldest blood runs through my veins) vs CR Lyric in NTTD (Life is Gone with the spin of the wheel)

    inception-erin-brockovich-maps-to-the-stars
    Inception
  • Posts: 1,518
    Now we're getting into it. Breaking down shots into imagery and symbolism. Love it.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 4,974
    There are hamfisted callbacks and then there are subtle ones that work well.

    The first type of callbacks in the series were in OHMSS where the film-makers were trying way to hard to show that this fella was the same fella, but then not the same fella.

    I cringe when Bond opens the desk drawer and begins pulling out all the gadgets from the other films. But honestly how does Bond end up with Honey's rusted knife, a re-breather from TB? Grant's garrote watch is the only one that makes some marginal sense as I believe he is seen taking it from Grants body on the train. The whole thing plays like a trophy drawer in his desk. What would Bond need from these assorted items?

    The callback to his wife in Spy was well done and well acted between Moore and Bach. I enjoyed the wince of Moore's Bond. It is a tender moment well acted. I don't even mind Moore visiting the grave of Tracy. Though somehow I think it would play better with a new Bond actor. However it's well acted and executed.

    The more recent callbacks have been a mixed bag. I enjoy the grape eating bit from DAD that Brosnan does as an homage to TB. The walk through to the clinic that echoes Golden Gun is also well done.

    I am not a fan of the Skyfall interplay between M and Bond and the Aston. How does Bond have a car with gadgets sitting in the garage. Was this the same car he won in Casino Royale? Which is another ham fisted call back. But lets stay focused on SF. Bond and the DB5 trends on the connective tissue to the series and yet, this characterization is not that Bond. So why get all bothered when Silva blows up the car? What emotional attachment does this Bond have to that car?

    I will finally state that the OHMSS call backs littered within NTTD was not required. It feel cheap to take a Bond film and "echo" it in this film. The choice of a song! Like they couldn't get someone to write a theme for this film? We must take a previous song that is so identified with another timeframe and shoe horn it in? Now when I hear that song I think of the two films and it bugs me. Should have let Louis stay attached to OHMSS and let a new artist and song attach to NTTD. The producers knew the emotional arc of the current Bond didn't compare to the previous one, so they took a lazy way out and just re-purposed a song. I wonder if a future film will see a Bond film use Goldfinger, or Nobody Does it Better.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited August 2023 Posts: 2,928
    Apparently, even P & W wanted the SF DB5 to be the one from CR, but Mendes overruled them. Bad decision, for me. I also really dislike the lame 'Go on, then, eject me' gag in SF - it's so out of place and really highlights the drop in the standard of the humour between QOS and SF. If I could cut only one thing from SF, it'd be that gag.
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited August 2023 Posts: 3,390
    Venutius wrote: »
    Apparently, even P & W wanted the SF DB5 to be the one from CR, but Mendes overruled them. Bad decision, for me. I also really dislike the lame 'Go on, then, eject me' gag in SF - it's so out of place and really highlights the drop in the standard of the humour between QOS and SF. If I could cut only one thing from SF, it'd be that gag.

    Yes, if my memory serves, it's a reference to TND, where Judi Dench M said the same phrase: "Go, and eject me, see if I care?".
    I cringe when Bond opens the desk drawer and begins pulling out all the gadgets from the other films. But honestly how does Bond end up with Honey's rusted knife, a re-breather from TB? Grant's garrote watch is the only one that makes some marginal sense as I believe he is seen taking it from Grants body on the train. The whole thing plays like a trophy drawer in his desk. What would Bond need from these assorted items?

    The re-breather from TB, I think was a gadget handed to him by Q, so, it kinda makes sense a bit that it would be in his office, or in the MI6.

    Maybe we could safely say that Honey Ryder gave him her knife, as a remembrance, maybe because after the events happened in the Crab Key Island, Honey Ryder would quit shell hunting and opt for a new job.

    I think those callbacks often makes a bit sense, it's the scene where Bond was in the midst of resigning from the service, it's a part of him reminiscing to his service life, the long time he'd dedicated to his service, there's even a picture of Queen Elizabeth which made the scene a bit poignant.

    I dunno, I kinda liked it.

    What I think didn't makes sense was the Bullion Trade talk between M and Draco at the wedding scene, now it's a bit questionable, because it pointed out to Goldfinger, so was Draco involved in the Goldfinger business? And how did M knew that Draco was a part of that considering that he didn't met Draco before?

    But even that didn't makes sense, I still liked it, because it's showed a good relationship between M and Draco, like M having a good time with someone else, like this was M outside of MI6 life.
  • BennyBenny In the shadowsAdministrator, Moderator
    edited August 2023 Posts: 14,879
    The callbacks in OHMSS with the knife, re-breather and the watch are merely to show the audience that this is the same Bond.
    Different actor, but the same Bond.

    Would a reference to TSWLM worked in MR, when Bond and Jaws meet again for the first time?
    Maybe a line from Bond about escaping Atlantis?
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Not a red herring
    Posts: 565
    The occasional one is fine and can be fun. I have less of a problem with the references themselves (whether subtle or not so subtle) and more with the frequency of them. I just get the sense that too much reliance on familiar iconography robs the film of its own identity.
  • Posts: 5,809
    The "Gold Bullion Affair" was probably what TVTropes call a "Noodle Incident", that is something that heppened earlier in the career of both M and Draco, and that we were not privy to, unlike the operation Grand Slam of GF fame. So, not a callback.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,957
    Venutius wrote: »
    Apparently, even P & W wanted the SF DB5 to be the one from CR, but Mendes overruled them. Bad decision, for me. I also really dislike the lame 'Go on, then, eject me' gag in SF - it's so out of place and really highlights the drop in the standard of the humour between QOS and SF. If I could cut only one thing from SF, it'd be that gag.

    I loved the choice of car and the ‘eject’ gag. For Bond and M to share a joke was a really nice character moment that allowed us to see the affection under the surface.

    As a fan I enjoyed most of the callbacks; with a new Bond on the way it’s time to ditch them again though. As with CR, GE, TLD etc. a new actor needs to be allowed to stand on his own two feet. I think it’s time for everything save the gunbarrel and Bond theme to be stripped away in fact.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,513
    I love the little callbacks, Bond eating a grape in DAD, going under cover as an ornithologist, or "don't touch your ear" making a reappearance (he should have said that to Paloma too by the way)

    I like those callbacks, because they feel like they're there for us die hard fans, like them seeing we know you and we know our series. But when Bond is wearing replica suits from past films, driving old cars (DB5 not included) and they reuse old pieces of musical scores, it just feels overkill.

    It leads more to comparison than it does to a nod of the cap, and it always seems to fall short in comparison (Fields covered on oil in QOS for example)
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited August 2023 Posts: 13,935
    Perhaps I was the only who noticed Madeleine Swann's voice recorder (from the Hoffler Klinik scene) sitting on Moneypenny's desk in NTTD. You could see this as 1) a hint that Swann is still in the picture/has been in contact with MI6 prior to Bonds' return, or 2) a nod to AVTAK where Bond's voice recorder (from the château bug sweeping scene with Tibbett) is also seen sitting on Moneypenny's desk in AVTAK. I like very subtle details like that which keep you wondering whether it's a nod or not (just placed there to flesh out the set dressing).
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    Posts: 3,390
    QBranch wrote: »
    Perhaps I was the only who noticed Madeleine Swann's voice recorder (from the Hoffler Klinik scene) sitting on Moneypenny's desk in NTTD. You could see this as 1) a hint that Swann is still in the picture/has been in contact with MI6 prior to Bonds' return, or 2) a nod to AVTAK where Bond's voice recorder (from the château bug sweeping scene with Tibbett) is also seen sitting on Moneypenny's desk in AVTAK. I like very subtle details like that which keep you wondering whether it's a nod or not (just placed there to flesh out the set dressing).

    Yes, but also it became a bit of a plot hole.

    If it came from the Hoffler Klinik, how come that it it's now at Moneypenny's desk in NTTD?

    Like that's almost too unbelievable and too far, already stretching my sense of disbelief.
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Not a red herring
    edited August 2023 Posts: 565
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Perhaps I was the only who noticed Madeleine Swann's voice recorder (from the Hoffler Klinik scene) sitting on Moneypenny's desk in NTTD. You could see this as 1) a hint that Swann is still in the picture/has been in contact with MI6 prior to Bonds' return, or 2) a nod to AVTAK where Bond's voice recorder (from the château bug sweeping scene with Tibbett) is also seen sitting on Moneypenny's desk in AVTAK. I like very subtle details like that which keep you wondering whether it's a nod or not (just placed there to flesh out the set dressing).

    Yes, but also it became a bit of a plot hole.

    If it came from the Hoffler Klinik, how come that it it's now at Moneypenny's desk in NTTD?

    Like that's almost too unbelievable and too far, already stretching my sense of disbelief.

    I don't know if it's that unbelievable. I suppose we can assume it was Madeleine's personal recorder, or she just had it on her person when she was abducted by Hinx and the other Spectre agents. Or maybe she had a few just like it.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,957
    QBranch wrote: »
    Perhaps I was the only who noticed Madeleine Swann's voice recorder (from the Hoffler Klinik scene) sitting on Moneypenny's desk in NTTD. You could see this as 1) a hint that Swann is still in the picture/has been in contact with MI6 prior to Bonds' return, or 2) a nod to AVTAK where Bond's voice recorder (from the château bug sweeping scene with Tibbett) is also seen sitting on Moneypenny's desk in AVTAK. I like very subtle details like that which keep you wondering whether it's a nod or not (just placed there to flesh out the set dressing).

    That’s a great spot. Just prop recycling you think?
  • BennyBenny In the shadowsAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 14,879
    QBranch wrote: »
    Perhaps I was the only who noticed Madeleine Swann's voice recorder (from the Hoffler Klinik scene) sitting on Moneypenny's desk in NTTD. You could see this as 1) a hint that Swann is still in the picture/has been in contact with MI6 prior to Bonds' return, or 2) a nod to AVTAK where Bond's voice recorder (from the château bug sweeping scene with Tibbett) is also seen sitting on Moneypenny's desk in AVTAK. I like very subtle details like that which keep you wondering whether it's a nod or not (just placed there to flesh out the set dressing).

    Great spot @QBranch, worthy of being mentioned in this thread...
    https://www.mi6community.com/discussion/12160/ive-never-noticed-that-before
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited August 2023 Posts: 13,935
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    Yes, but also it became a bit of a plot hole.

    If it came from the Hoffler Klinik, how come that it it's now at Moneypenny's desk in NTTD?

    Like that's almost too unbelievable and too far, already stretching my sense of disbelief.
    When I say Madeleine Swann's voice recorder I do say that loosely, as in, the same brand/model appears, as @George_Kaplan says, which can still be interpreted as some kind of nod - or - just as easily, nothing more than 'prop recycling', as @mtm says. Strange though that a five year old model would appear in NTTD, as opposed to every other bit of tech in the film being the latest product.

    One can explain away anything really, through theories. I could say that Grant's garrote watch, which Bond did not take off the dead Grant's corpse, was collected by the clean-up crew, sent in an evidence bag back to MI6, analyzed, filed, sent to Q for reverse-engineering, left on the workshop table then pilfered by Bond when he needed some emergency floss for that annoying piece of grape skin stuck between his teeth. Maybe that's how the garrote watch ended up in Bond's desk drawer.
    mtm wrote: »
    That’s a great spot. Just prop recycling you think?
    Could be, it's happened many, many times throughout the series. Things as standard as furniture and telephones, to custom bomb timers and casino chips from the Dalton films appearing in Brosnan's era.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 5,979
    Gerard wrote: »
    The "Gold Bullion Affair" was probably what TVTropes call a "Noodle Incident", that is something that heppened earlier in the career of both M and Draco, and that we were not privy to, unlike the operation Grand Slam of GF fame. So, not a callback.

    They say 1964. It's pretty clear it's GF.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 2,928
    I so wanted the knife that Bond uses to peel the apple for Mathilde in NTTD to be the same one that he used to gouge out the depleted uranium bullet frags in SF. Gnarly! But apparently it's not. Ah, well.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited August 2023 Posts: 13,935
    Bond should've spread Little Scarlet jam on toast for Mathilde. And a speckled brown egg in a blue egg cup.
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited August 2023 Posts: 3,390
    echo wrote: »
    Gerard wrote: »
    The "Gold Bullion Affair" was probably what TVTropes call a "Noodle Incident", that is something that heppened earlier in the career of both M and Draco, and that we were not privy to, unlike the operation Grand Slam of GF fame. So, not a callback.

    They say 1964. It's pretty clear it's GF.

    Yes, so it definitely didn't make any sense really, and more like "have we missed something?" Or yes, "how did M knew?"

    Thank you @echo
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Not a red herring
    Posts: 565
    QBranch wrote: »
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    Yes, but also it became a bit of a plot hole.

    If it came from the Hoffler Klinik, how come that it it's now at Moneypenny's desk in NTTD?

    Like that's almost too unbelievable and too far, already stretching my sense of disbelief.
    When I say Madeleine Swann's voice recorder I do say that loosely, as in, the same brand/model appears, as @George_Kaplan says, which can still be interpreted as some kind of nod - or - just as easily, nothing more than 'prop recycling', as @mtm says. Strange though that a five year old model would appear in NTTD, as opposed to every other bit of tech in the film being the latest product.

    I thought Madeleine carrying the Nokia 3310 remake (which was already two-years old at the time of filming) in the PTS was an odd touch. A novelty remake of a phone from the early-2000s doesn't seem like the most lucrative bit of product placement. Still, I used to have that phone so it was a bit of a kick to see it on screen.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 14,957
    Was the PTS not set in the past though?
    NTTD isn’t all about the product placement: even just car-wise it features very old and no longer available models of Range Rover, Toyota and Maserati.
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Not a red herring
    edited August 2023 Posts: 565
    mtm wrote: »
    Was the PTS not set in the past though?
    NTTD isn’t all about the product placement: even just car-wise it features very old and no longer available models of Range Rover, Toyota and Maserati.

    I just thought it was unusual that they chose that particular phone over a more standard smartphone from a few years ago.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited August 2023 Posts: 14,957
    Yes that’s a good point, it was a bit of a choice. Maybe they were trying to emphasise that it was set four years previously even though smart phones had been about? I don’t know.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 13,935
    I tend to think they both used those particular Nokias to emphasize moving away from typical smart phones and therefore pursuing a simpler life. Or maybe a chance for Nokia to display more of its range. However, Q had two similar Nokia's on his desk at home in behind-the-scenes photos, yet one of them was a 3210 model from 1999.
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    edited August 2023 Posts: 4,443
    14283976632_555b4f1333_b.jpg
    Casino-Royale-0347.jpg
    maxresdefault.jpg
    And original release year for both movies is 1997 and media be inportent factor with all three. 19:12 also stand for 19 December, original release day and month in 1997 in Uk of Tomorrow Never Dies. In Casino Royale another hint to Bond death (Bond 25) or another Tomorrow Never Dies is coming ( ''Sand In Your Eyes'' moment. Daniel Craig return for Bond 26).

    Goldeneye-1497.jpg
    Die-Another-Day-0915.jpg8f1a314b60b30855-600x338.jpg IMG-20230813-121902.jpg
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    Posts: 3,390
    Does anyone know that Melina was a callback to Honey Ryder?

    It's been said in some trivia that 'Mel' was a latin word for Honey, but in Greek, the word for it was 'Mele/Meli'.

    So Melina means Honey Ryder.

    So, I may be nitpicking here, but I've found another Dr. No reference in FYEO.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 4,974
    Interesting idea @SIS_HQ on it's surface I would say it's a reach, but who knows. Jinx's rise from the sea and hunting knife on her waist was a blatant call back in DAD. Have never heard of Melina being a call back to Honey.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 17,808
    I remember reading in a Bond magazine in the late 90s that Honey Ryder was originally supposed to make a cameo or comeback in Roger Moore's first Bond film, Live and Let Die, though it ultimately never happened. I'm not sure if any of the more recent Bond film histories have referred to this or not but it's an interesting idea nonetheless.
Sign In or Register to comment.