Peter Hunt - An Appreciation (the former Peter Hunt Auteur thread)

135

Comments

  • I still don’t understand what the ridiculous sped-up finale aboard the Disco Volante have to do with not having enough time to edit. Surely playing that finale at normal speed might have helped. Did they have too much footage and instead of just cutting parts of it Hunt decided to “fast-forward” through it at high speed? Because that’s what the finished product looks like. Why not just let it play at normal speed and have the film run for 2 or 3 minutes longer instead? Sure would have made the final product look more professional. I mean that finale just screams “unfinished film”. Surely that could have been fixed, even with the tight deadline. Hunt must have had assistants working under him. Was he really alone in the editing room having to go through the entire film on his own with no one to assist him?
  • I still don’t understand what the ridiculous sped-up finale aboard the Disco Volante have to do with not having enough time to edit. Surely playing that finale at normal speed might have helped. Did they have too much footage and instead of just cutting parts of it Hunt decided to “fast-forward” through it at high speed? Because that’s what the finished product looks like. Why not just let it play at normal speed and have the film run for 2 or 3 minutes longer instead? Sure would have made the final product look more professional. I mean that finale just screams “unfinished film”. Surely that could have been fixed, even with the tight deadline. Hunt must have had assistants working under him. Was he really alone in the editing room having to go through the entire film on his own with no one to assist him?

    Neither do I honestly. To me it just feels like they thought speeding up the footage would make the action flow better, and having actually watched Thunderball yesterday, it comes across as dreadful. I’m not sure which Bond film it was (either TB or YOLT), but there was another editor in place before Hunt came back aboard, it might’ve been TB, if anyone knows, please correct me!
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    edited December 2020 Posts: 5,979
    Hunt was definitely ahead of his time the way OHMSS was shot and edited. When Hunt was on form he was brilliant. If you look at the way the FRWL train fight is edited together, it stands up today against modern filmmaking.

    When Hunt was bad, or sloppy, the editing and direction showed itself up. TB has quite a few errors. Connery face flipped over in a helicopter scene, the shocking speeded up boat scene ending. The beach fight in OHMSS is speeded up in parts and looks slightly silly now. The overdubbed Hilary Bray voice for me is the biggest error in OHMSS. I don't think it was necessary.

    Other than that OHMSS still resides in my top 5 film, and is still my favourite Fleming novel that the film is accurately based on. I would have loved to see Hunt direct a few more Fleming adapted movies. No doubt Glen learned a lot from him, which is why the majority of his films adapt Fleming material.

    I love the Hillary Bray dubbing. Hunt cleverly figured out how to improve his actor's acting.

    Also, give me the sped-up Disco Volante sequence in TB over the langourous LALD boat chase any day!
  • echo wrote: »
    Hunt was definitely ahead of his time the way OHMSS was shot and edited. When Hunt was on form he was brilliant. If you look at the way the FRWL train fight is edited together, it stands up today against modern filmmaking.

    When Hunt was bad, or sloppy, the editing and direction showed itself up. TB has quite a few errors. Connery face flipped over in a helicopter scene, the shocking speeded up boat scene ending. The beach fight in OHMSS is speeded up in parts and looks slightly silly now. The overdubbed Hilary Bray voice for me is the biggest error in OHMSS. I don't think it was necessary.

    Other than that OHMSS still resides in my top 5 film, and is still my favourite Fleming novel that the film is accurately based on. I would have loved to see Hunt direct a few more Fleming adapted movies. No doubt Glen learned a lot from him, which is why the majority of his films adapt Fleming material.

    I love the Hillary Bray dubbing. Hunt cleverly figured out how to improve his actor's acting.

    Also, give me the sped-up Disco Volante sequence in TB over the langourous LALD boat chase any day!

    But...But the boat chase has Sheriff Pepper, Louisiana State Pooooliceee
  • Posts: 2,896
    I’m not sure which Bond film it was (either TB or YOLT), but there was another editor in place before Hunt came back aboard, it might’ve been TB, if anyone knows, please correct me!

    It was YOLT.

  • Revelator wrote: »
    I’m not sure which Bond film it was (either TB or YOLT), but there was another editor in place before Hunt came back aboard, it might’ve been TB, if anyone knows, please correct me!

    It was YOLT.

    Thank you!!! Any idea as to the name? And why they ditched that editor?
  • edited December 2020 Posts: 3,279
    echo wrote: »
    Hunt was definitely ahead of his time the way OHMSS was shot and edited. When Hunt was on form he was brilliant. If you look at the way the FRWL train fight is edited together, it stands up today against modern filmmaking.

    When Hunt was bad, or sloppy, the editing and direction showed itself up. TB has quite a few errors. Connery face flipped over in a helicopter scene, the shocking speeded up boat scene ending. The beach fight in OHMSS is speeded up in parts and looks slightly silly now. The overdubbed Hilary Bray voice for me is the biggest error in OHMSS. I don't think it was necessary.

    Other than that OHMSS still resides in my top 5 film, and is still my favourite Fleming novel that the film is accurately based on. I would have loved to see Hunt direct a few more Fleming adapted movies. No doubt Glen learned a lot from him, which is why the majority of his films adapt Fleming material.

    I love the Hillary Bray dubbing. Hunt cleverly figured out how to improve his actor's acting.

    Also, give me the sped-up Disco Volante sequence in TB over the langourous LALD boat chase any day!

    Well, there's always someone who will like these things.... ;)

  • Posts: 1,707
    Speaking of Young walking off TB, it took YEARS before we heard that story but.........................with today's social media it would have been an INSTANT SCANDAL!
  • Posts: 113
    I never minded the footage in the TB finale. It’s a bit jarring here and there but what it’s doing is creating the sense of out of control to heighten the interior fight on rollers.

    On YOLT Hunt had left because he felt he should have been given the directors chair. Eventually when they met up in Japan he came back to do the second unit (which the producers should have done in the first place) but the editing was being handled by the editor of Gilbert’s choosing. Eventually Peter wanted to get back in the editing room because the film wasn’t being cut with his established rhythms and the first editor seemingly felt the pressure and left.
  • edited December 2020 Posts: 3,279
    I never minded the footage in the TB finale. It’s a bit jarring here and there but what it’s doing is creating the sense of out of control to heighten the interior fight on rollers.

    Unfortunately it comes across as nothing more than a spoof, Naked Gun style. Its difficult to watch that scene with a straight face. It was the first of a few lowest points in the franchise for me. Over the years we would later endure double taking pigeons, slide whistle car stunts, Tarzan yells, invisible cars and ZX Spectrum rendered CGI surfing, but TB will always be remembered for being the first of these ridiculous moments.
  • Posts: 2,896
    It's a stylistic error, but I don't think the sped-up Disco Volante ranks as one of the lowest points in the series. Unlike the slide whistle and related goofs, it's not meant to add braindead humor that destroys the credibility of a stunt (even when sped-up the boat is still going fast). My guess is that Hunt (or the producers) wanted the raise the tempo of the climax after the longeurs of the underwater battle, by providing the contrast of ultra-fast motion coming on the heels of slow action. It doesn't work today, but audiences in the mid-60s were more used to sped-up footage.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,034
    Revelator wrote: »
    It's a stylistic error, but I don't think the sped-up Disco Volante ranks as one of the lowest points in the series. Unlike the slide whistle and related goofs, it's not meant to add braindead humor that destroys the credibility of a stunt (even when sped-up the boat is still going fast). My guess is that Hunt (or the producers) wanted the raise the tempo of the climax after the longeurs of the underwater battle, by providing the contrast of ultra-fast motion coming on the heels of slow action. It doesn't work today, but audiences in the mid-60s were more used to sped-up footage.

    Yep. It looks rubbish now, but then most rear projection does. If they had made more of an effort to match the movements of the actors to the direction the boat is supposed to be going on the screen behind (i.e. Largo steers one way, but the boat goes the other in one shot), it would be less jarring.
  • Posts: 1,707
    The problem with the Disco fight in TB may have been the directors lack of coverage that would have allowed the editor to change the pacing of the scene. Without the footage to cut back and forth with, the sped up film may have truly been their only option.
  • Posts: 2,896
    delfloria wrote: »
    The problem with the Disco fight in TB may have been the directors lack of coverage that would have allowed the editor to change the pacing of the scene. Without the footage to cut back and forth with, the sped up film may have truly been their only option.

    Good point. And this goes back to Young abandoning the film and the producers dumping the footage into Hunt's lap to hurriedly assemble before the premiere. As I recall even John Barry was pressed for time, as the incomplete soundtrack album demonstrates.
  • edited December 2020 Posts: 646
    Yep it’s not just the sped-up thing but also the fact that what we’re seeing is all over the place. There’s no logic. Largo steers left, boat goes right. First you see a strip of land outside the window, then it disappears, then it’s back again, then it’s really close, then it’s far away. I know the boat is out of control but it can’t be close to land and then suddenly zip back in reverse and be far from said land. It’s like the film roll came loose off the spool/wheel and we’re watching a random jumbling of frames.

    Lack of coverage by director might be true but the editing is not even done in a logical sequence as I mentioned above. Show us land far away, then cut to fisticuffs, then show us land closer, cut to fisticuffs,......
  • All this TB controversy makes me think that’s it must be one of the reasons why they implemented the Bond film every 2 years minimum rule, even if TMWTGG was the only exception to that rule.
  • Posts: 2,896
    Lack of coverage by director might be true but the editing is not even done in a logical sequence as I mentioned above.

    Yes, but again the most likely explanation for that is lack of coverage. Considering what a masterly job Hunt did of editing the three prior Bond films and the two succeeding ones, the most plausible case for the uncharacteristic editing defects in TB are that he was working with insufficient material, thanks to a director who jumped ship early and a production schedule that didn't allow for reshoots.
  • edited December 2020 Posts: 646
    I don’t understand why they had to rush the film into theaters by Christmas 1965. Why not wait a few months? What’s the difference? Isn’t it worth it to get a quality finished product ? Instead of rushing it and releasing a film with an unfinished sloppy ending. They basically spent 9 million on the film and ended up releasing an unfinished film. What a waste!! When a few extra days or weeks would have probably made a world of difference. Even a few pickup shots could have helped Hunt in the editing room.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    edited December 2020 Posts: 17,804
    I seem to have forgotten the fact that Terence Young walked out on Thunderball early. That's pretty shocking and no doubt explains a few things about the finished film.
  • Posts: 1,707
    I know this thread is really about Hunt but I do get a kick out of all the continuity flubs throughout the film. More than any film I know of. The trunk on Aston does not close when they put the jet pack in, The Irrigator sign at Shublands changes between the time Bond goes in and then comes out, there are two entirely different Disco Volantes (one is twice as tall), The radioactive capsule's color changes from being horizontally divided to vertically divided, A crew man pops up in Dominoes speed boat once Bond and Domino walk away from it on the beach, the door beside th pool goes from open to closed just before 007 gets everyone to shoot at each other, Bonds wound, during the Junkanoo chase, changes legs, When swimming up barefoot to the backside of Palmyra he suddenly has sneakers once he gets out of the water (he also does not have flare gun with him either), of course the famous black to blue mask during the underwater fight, Black rubber float inside Bond's mask in harbor chase below the disco when it floats up to the SPECTRE agents, Bond is missing from shots as he climbs aboard the Disco's hyrofoil fin. I'd have to watch the film again to remember them all..........oh yeah what happened to the scientist who jumped off the boat with them?????????????????? OH yeah, when Bond activates the ARROW ballon system, Connery accidentally puts it UNDER his arm which would have ripped his arm out of it's socket when the got yanked out of the raft by the plane.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,111
    I view Peter Hunt as the Kingsley Amis of Bond directors: it would have been interesting to see if he could do more, as he had some ideas planned it sounds like.
  • Posts: 113
    I think the idea was to quickly capitalize on GF’s worldwide success as fast as possible. IIRC the original release date was several months before in 1965.
    Again I don’t think Young walked off. He already had lined up Poppy is Also a Flower which being a film for the UN also had quite a bit of importance attached. The only thing I’ve ever found about his leaving was Hunt saying in one interview something to the effect of: Oh and Terence was off on something else. He left and said oh I think you can finish dear boy.

    I do think Young was tired of the pressures and probably felt like others that the atmosphere had changed. TB is often labeled the “and the kitchen sink” film with good reason and it became the first time the success influenced the films negatively. Young had already had a bit of a falling out with the producers over money which is pretty much why he didn’t do GF and regretted it. (One of the great what if’s is a Young directed GF) Apparently he was having some of the same issues that Sean started to have where their salaries weren’t adjusted with the increasing successes.
    Adding in McClory as another voice on the production probably didn’t help matters.

    The more you look the more you find errors and goofs. I even found a few more dialogue differences in the mixes that aren’t in the official featurette. All this is because the post process was severely rushed and there was so much material to sift through from three units.

    And to top this off Hunt tried a different style of editing which moves more slowly.
  • For all this talk about the continuity errors in Thunderball. I have to admit that I didn’t notice any of them, save for that one scene where the voice of Pinder appears in the Helicopter with Bond and Lieter, even if he’s physically not in it. Strange moment.

    What makes me curious is are there any evidence of the original “James Bond will return in OHMSS” text that was apparently cut from the film? I haven’t been able to find any.
  • Posts: 113
    No source exists without the massive hard cut wipe on the end titles followed by the cutting off at the end. You’d think somebody would try and find that uncut in the archives.
    (If anyone could ever help me confirm the audio mix versions as being UK and US editions that would solve a longstanding mystery.)
    The end credit edit was done apparently to remove the OHMSS credit which had also been put on the earliest GF versions before being removed.
    It is possible but highly unlikely that it made it out to a few locations. (as I was shocked a year or two ago to find that the GF 003 bomb timer did make it into the early UK original release prints.)

    Apparently the negative was cut because like the edit to FRWL’s ending on the gondola it is nowhere to be found.
  • edited December 2020 Posts: 3,279
    I think the idea was to quickly capitalize on GF’s worldwide success as fast as possible. IIRC the original release date was several months before in 1965.
    Again I don’t think Young walked off. He already had lined up Poppy is Also a Flower which being a film for the UN also had quite a bit of importance attached. The only thing I’ve ever found about his leaving was Hunt saying in one interview something to the effect of: Oh and Terence was off on something else. He left and said oh I think you can finish dear boy.

    I do think Young was tired of the pressures and probably felt like others that the atmosphere had changed. TB is often labeled the “and the kitchen sink” film with good reason and it became the first time the success influenced the films negatively. Young had already had a bit of a falling out with the producers over money which is pretty much why he didn’t do GF and regretted it. (One of the great what if’s is a Young directed GF) Apparently he was having some of the same issues that Sean started to have where their salaries weren’t adjusted with the increasing successes.
    Adding in McClory as another voice on the production probably didn’t help matters.

    The more you look the more you find errors and goofs. I even found a few more dialogue differences in the mixes that aren’t in the official featurette. All this is because the post process was severely rushed and there was so much material to sift through from three units.

    And to top this off Hunt tried a different style of editing which moves more slowly.

    Kevin McClory may have had an overall negative impact on the film production too, with his initial legal threats before EON got the rights to TB. The fact that Cubby and Harry had to concede and allow Kevin to be producer may have caused friction among the team. Maybe there were a few clashes between him and Young.

    From all I've learned about McClory over the years, the guy sounded like nothing but a complete tosser, so having him suddenly lauding it as the producer may have ruffled a few feathers behind the scenes.

    Apparently he was a dab hand with underwater photography, which is the why the film is massively dominated by these slow, dull, lethargic lengthy underwater scenes, which ruins most of the film, IMO.
  • RoadphillRoadphill United Kingdom
    Posts: 984
    I'm not sure if I would use the word "auteur" but he was a fantastic director, and by far the best editor in the Bond series. It's a real shame that he never came back.
    Amongst other things, he made George Lazenby look like a million quid in the fight scenes.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 5,979
    Yep it’s not just the sped-up thing but also the fact that what we’re seeing is all over the place. There’s no logic. Largo steers left, boat goes right. First you see a strip of land outside the window, then it disappears, then it’s back again, then it’s really close, then it’s far away. I know the boat is out of control but it can’t be close to land and then suddenly zip back in reverse and be far from said land. It’s like the film roll came loose off the spool/wheel and we’re watching a random jumbling of frames.

    Lack of coverage by director might be true but the editing is not even done in a logical sequence as I mentioned above. Show us land far away, then cut to fisticuffs, then show us land closer, cut to fisticuffs,......

    It's funny because I am far from a TB defender and rank it as the lowest of the '60s films.

    But I like the sped-up climax (ridiculousness and all) because it's a welcome change of pace from the preceding, ponderous half hour.

    And I like Hunt's other (continuity?) fixes in the film. The endless wipes, etc. They give the film kind of a groovy vibe that I think Barry's score also enhances.
  • Posts: 3,279
    echo wrote: »
    Yep it’s not just the sped-up thing but also the fact that what we’re seeing is all over the place. There’s no logic. Largo steers left, boat goes right. First you see a strip of land outside the window, then it disappears, then it’s back again, then it’s really close, then it’s far away. I know the boat is out of control but it can’t be close to land and then suddenly zip back in reverse and be far from said land. It’s like the film roll came loose off the spool/wheel and we’re watching a random jumbling of frames.

    Lack of coverage by director might be true but the editing is not even done in a logical sequence as I mentioned above. Show us land far away, then cut to fisticuffs, then show us land closer, cut to fisticuffs,......

    It's funny because I am far from a TB defender and rank it as the lowest of the '60s films.

    But I like the sped-up climax (ridiculousness and all) because it's a welcome change of pace from the preceding, ponderous half hour.

    And I like Hunt's other (continuity?) fixes in the film. The endless wipes, etc. They give the film kind of a groovy vibe that I think Barry's score also enhances.

    The Star Wars wipes I don't mind, but Barry's score once underwater is almost as monotonous as the scenes themselves, and I say this as Barry's No. 1 fan.

    The groovy vibe I get when Connery is above sea level. Strolling around in camp collar shirts and Fred Perry polos, this is without doubt the coolest casual Bond wardrobe until Craig came along in CR 40 years later.
  • echo wrote: »
    Yep it’s not just the sped-up thing but also the fact that what we’re seeing is all over the place. There’s no logic. Largo steers left, boat goes right. First you see a strip of land outside the window, then it disappears, then it’s back again, then it’s really close, then it’s far away. I know the boat is out of control but it can’t be close to land and then suddenly zip back in reverse and be far from said land. It’s like the film roll came loose off the spool/wheel and we’re watching a random jumbling of frames.

    Lack of coverage by director might be true but the editing is not even done in a logical sequence as I mentioned above. Show us land far away, then cut to fisticuffs, then show us land closer, cut to fisticuffs,......

    It's funny because I am far from a TB defender and rank it as the lowest of the '60s films.

    But I like the sped-up climax (ridiculousness and all) because it's a welcome change of pace from the preceding, ponderous half hour.

    And I like Hunt's other (continuity?) fixes in the film. The endless wipes, etc. They give the film kind of a groovy vibe that I think Barry's score also enhances.
    Yes the left to right screen wipes I do love in TB, especially when transitioning from one location to another and being accompanied by that wonderful sumptuous John Barry score. It really gives the film a rich and opulent feeling, a true travelogue of a film!

  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    echo wrote: »
    Yep it’s not just the sped-up thing but also the fact that what we’re seeing is all over the place. There’s no logic. Largo steers left, boat goes right. First you see a strip of land outside the window, then it disappears, then it’s back again, then it’s really close, then it’s far away. I know the boat is out of control but it can’t be close to land and then suddenly zip back in reverse and be far from said land. It’s like the film roll came loose off the spool/wheel and we’re watching a random jumbling of frames.

    Lack of coverage by director might be true but the editing is not even done in a logical sequence as I mentioned above. Show us land far away, then cut to fisticuffs, then show us land closer, cut to fisticuffs,......

    It's funny because I am far from a TB defender and rank it as the lowest of the '60s films.

    But I like the sped-up climax (ridiculousness and all) because it's a welcome change of pace from the preceding, ponderous half hour.

    And I like Hunt's other (continuity?) fixes in the film. The endless wipes, etc. They give the film kind of a groovy vibe that I think Barry's score also enhances.
    Yes the left to right screen wipes I do love in TB, especially when transitioning from one location to another and being accompanied by that wonderful sumptuous John Barry score. It really gives the film a rich and opulent feeling, a true travelogue of a film!

    Agreed on all counts.
Sign In or Register to comment.