Dynamite's Bond comics and graphic novels

1115116118120121138

Comments

  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    edited April 2019 Posts: 2,061


    Not trying to start a political debate, but Van Jensen sharing the text of Moonraker might be a sign that he may be studying up for his next novel adaptation.

    Also, LALD's cover has been released!

    https://prodimage.images-bn.com/pimages/9781524112721_p0_v1_s600x595.jpg
  • Posts: 1,113
    Oh wow. That’s a beautiful cover. Great find, thank you so much for sharing! I’m very excited for this release.
  • edited April 2019 Posts: 3,923
    Yes, thanks for the share.

    Do we know well how Casino Royale sold?
  • Posts: 650
    Love the cover! But why is there still a 1 on the spine? Shouldn't it be a 2. Oh well still excited!
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited April 2019 Posts: 5,172
    Great cover, do we know the artist? It certainly is not Fay Dalton.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 2,061
    https://www.adventuresinpoortaste.com/2019/04/09/james-bond-origin-8-review/

    Boy, AIPT is really giving these Dynamite stories glowing reviews!
  • Posts: 650
    The more this series goes on the more excited I get. Can't wait for the hardcover
  • ggl007ggl007 www.archivo007.com Spain, España
    Posts: 2,476
    00Agent wrote: »
    Great cover, do we know the artist? It certainly is not Fay Dalton.

    It is Fay Dalton's:

    5RCeZ7L.jpg
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    Posts: 5,172
    Oh interesting. Thanks @ggl007
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 2,061
    https://popculthq.com/2019/04/15/comic-book-review-james-bond-007-6-from-dynamite-entertainment/

    Last story before the Graphic Novel hardcover story comes out in August.
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited April 2019 Posts: 5,172
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    https://popculthq.com/2019/04/15/comic-book-review-james-bond-007-6-from-dynamite-entertainment/

    Last story before the Graphic Novel hardcover story comes out in August.

    "Greg Pak’s take on Bond has everything the modern incarnation should. Twists, turns, heavy on espionage and action, light on the dated womanizing."
    td%2Bfrustrated.gif

    Not gonna take a reviewer like that any serious.

    I trully hope that the ending of this arc will be good (as the beginning was) and that the continuation in #7 and beyond will finally start focusing more on Bond and less on the other fella. Then this series has real potential.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    edited April 2019 Posts: 15,423
    That's why reviews don't mean a rat's back end of the rear to me. When someone said Hammerhead is a perfect Craig type story to begin with, I tuned out. That's as inaccurate as one can get. I hardly trust anyone who "reviews" anything. ;)
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    Posts: 5,172
    That's why reviews don't mean a rat's back end of the rear to me. When someone said Hammerhead is a perfect Craig type story to begin with, I tuned out. I hardly trust anyone who "reviews" anything. ;)

    Yeah me neither. The internet is completely oversaturated with clueless people who think they are Roger Ebert or something.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    00Agent wrote: »
    That's why reviews don't mean a rat's back end of the rear to me. When someone said Hammerhead is a perfect Craig type story to begin with, I tuned out. I hardly trust anyone who "reviews" anything. ;)
    Yeah me neither. The internet is completely oversaturated with clueless people who think they are Roger Ebert or something.
    They can certainly dream. :))
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 2,061
    https://www.adventuresinpoortaste.com/2019/04/16/james-bond-007-6-review/

    I can see why your criticisms of reviewers and the Oddjob storyline are becoming an eye opener for me.
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited April 2019 Posts: 5,172
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    https://www.adventuresinpoortaste.com/2019/04/16/james-bond-007-6-review/

    I can see why your criticisms of reviewers and the Oddjob storyline are becoming an eye opener for me.

    I do agree with this reviewers only negative point unfortunately. This dragged the whole issue down for me. I am starting to loose my patience with this series. Pak needs to make a decision about who the friggin lead character here is.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    00Agent wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    https://www.adventuresinpoortaste.com/2019/04/16/james-bond-007-6-review/

    I can see why your criticisms of reviewers and the Oddjob storyline are becoming an eye opener for me.
    I do agree with this reviewers only negative point unfortunately. This dragged the whole issue down for me. I am starting to loose my patience with this series. Pak needs to make a decision about who the friggin lead character here is.
    It's taking its inspirations from the time-span of short internet miniseries episodes.
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited April 2019 Posts: 5,172
    00Agent wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    https://www.adventuresinpoortaste.com/2019/04/16/james-bond-007-6-review/

    I can see why your criticisms of reviewers and the Oddjob storyline are becoming an eye opener for me.
    I do agree with this reviewers only negative point unfortunately. This dragged the whole issue down for me. I am starting to loose my patience with this series. Pak needs to make a decision about who the friggin lead character here is.
    It's taking its inspirations from the time-span of short internet miniseries episodes.

    I am not even saying it's bad, i just can't grasp where this is supposed to be going. The characters are not clearly definied in terms of motivation, and repeating the same scenario over and over. Lee is starting to get annyoing as hell.
    I have not given up hope yet, and want for the next issues to move things forward more rapidly. Let Bond be at the centre again, and do his thing.
    And i hope he
    get's to kill Lee, but i am pretty sure Pak will find some BS excuse to keep him.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    edited April 2019 Posts: 15,423
    Agreed. John Lee/Oddjob has gotten quite annoying, I just don't like him at all. I really don't know what Pak is planning or what is his aim in the story because there hardly is any point to it or a punchline even. Sure, I love the artwork provided by Stephen Mooney immensely and I hope he stays on board for as long as possible, but the story isn't going anywhere at all. And even if they resurrected Goldfinger just for the hell of it, I don't see any point in his stay. I feel like they're making up as they're going with each issue.

    Also, what was the point of keeping Bond in prison for two issues when he was going to be freed just as easily? Something that wouldn't even warrant the containment of two pages. But, I digress.

    Still... I'll be reading the next issue. At least we won't be getting toilet paper like The Body and the child-like minded idiocy on steroids that Kot spewed. Anything would be better than that balderdash.
  • Posts: 4,783
    Thanks do Diamond Comics, here's what's scheduled for july :
    JAMES BOND 007 # 9

    (W) Greg Pak (A) Eric Gapstur (CA) Dave Johnson
    "THE HEIST": Plan is set. Clock gets tight. Goldfinger bets big. The modern 007 epic continues from GREG PAK (Batman/Superman, Hulkverines) and ERIC GAPSTUR (The Flash: Season Zero).
    In Shops: Jul 17, 2019
    SRP: $3.99

    STL123674?type=1

    STL123675?type=1

    STL123676?type=1

    STL123677?type=1
    JAMES BOND ORIGIN # 11

    (W) Jeff Parker (A) Ibrahim Moustafa (CA) Dan Panosian
    "The Debt" continues. Lieutenant James Bond learns a new skill. A former friend helps atone for the death of another. And Bond descends into a part of war-torn London that few fresh faces emerge from unscathed. By JEFF PARKER (Aquaman, Fantastic Four) and IBRAHIM MOUSTAFA (Mother Panic).
    In Shops: Jul 10, 2019
    SRP: $3.99

    STL123679?type=1

    STL123680?type=1

    STL123681?type=1

    STL123682?type=1

    STL123683?type=1
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Spectacular covers!

    Although, I have to say I will miss Mooney.
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited April 2019 Posts: 5,172
    Covers look great, i think the last 3 issues of Origin that Moustafa is writing (and drawing) will be spectacular.

    Still... I'll be reading the next issue. At least we won't be getting toilet paper like The Body and the child-like minded idiocy on steroids that Kot spewed. Anything would be better than that balderdash.

    Oh for sure. Nothing will be ever as offensively bad as The Body. It's easily the worst piece of Bond entertainment in the history of the franchise, as far as i'm concerned.

    Oddjob on the other hand gets a lot of stuff right. The art is great, Bond characterization is good for the most part, good action and globetrotting, so it has the potential to be really great but Pak focuses too much on the wrong things.
    Bond should not be used to boost an irrelevant side character as the lead. Should have just called it 'Oddjob' from the start.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 2,061
    00Agent wrote: »
    Covers look great, i think the last 3 issues of Origin that Moustafa is writing (and drawing) will be spectacular.

    Still... I'll be reading the next issue. At least we won't be getting toilet paper like The Body and the child-like minded idiocy on steroids that Kot spewed. Anything would be better than that balderdash.

    Oh for sure. Nothing will be ever as offensively bad as The Body. It's easily the worst piece of Bond entertainment in the history of the franchise, as far as i'm concerned.

    Oddjob on the other hand gets a lot of stuff right. The art is great, Bond characterization is good for the most part, good action and globetrotting, so it has the potential to be really great but Pak focuses too much on the wrong things.
    Bond should not be used to boost an irrelevant side character as the lead. Should have just called it 'Oddjob' from the start.

    I've been calling it Oddjob from the start. Let's see when the hardcover collection is released in August.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    00Agent wrote: »
    Covers look great, i think the last 3 issues of Origin that Moustafa is writing (and drawing) will be spectacular.

    Still... I'll be reading the next issue. At least we won't be getting toilet paper like The Body and the child-like minded idiocy on steroids that Kot spewed. Anything would be better than that balderdash.

    Oh for sure. Nothing will be ever as offensively bad as The Body. It's easily the worst piece of Bond entertainment in the history of the franchise, as far as i'm concerned.

    Oddjob on the other hand gets a lot of stuff right. The art is great, Bond characterization is good for the most part, good action and globetrotting, so it has the potential to be really great but Pak focuses too much on the wrong things.
    Bond should not be used to boost an irrelevant side character as the lead. Should have just called it 'Oddjob' from the start.

    I've been calling it Oddjob from the start. Let's see when the hardcover collection is released in August.
    I bet they call it something confusing like Vol. 3, Vol. 2 or something. They did something similar with the VARGR/Eidolon run, followed by Black Box which didn’t make sense at all.
  • Posts: 650
    Sorry this might have been mentioned before, but what timeline does Oddjob take place in?
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Modern. Contemporary.
  • Posts: 40
    About the use of Goldfinger in the Pak run
    anyone thinking that it will turn out to be his twin Brother as in the discarded Diamonds Are Forever movie idea?
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 2,061
    About the use of Goldfinger in the Pak run
    anyone thinking that it will turn out to be his twin Brother as in the discarded Diamonds Are Forever movie idea?

    That's what I thought.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 2,061
    http://www.adventuresinpoortaste.com/2019/05/07/james-bond-origin-9-review/

    Looks like James Bond Origins has another winner!
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited May 2019 Posts: 5,172
    It's good. Origins keeps the quality up, and i think the next three issues, written by Moustafa, will be a highlight.
Sign In or Register to comment.