›

Controversial opinions about Bond films

1…731732733734735737»

Comments

  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    Posts: 952
    I remember hearing on Zaritsky's Bond experience how he believes that the nanobots concept was originally more of an Virus type thing but that changed with the pandemic and they conducted adr. Not sure if I believe that, but it's an interesting theory.

    Perhaps could explain why Safin and his plan seem so poorly thought out. If he's just some nihilistic bloke why does he care about buyer ships?
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe Edward Berger for Bond 27
    Posts: 9,403
    John Glen is underrated, and 1983 to 1987 was overall stronger than 1962 to 1965. the mid 80's was the peak for cinematic Bond, where they had a blend of intrigue, mystery, romance, danger, action and humour on a huge scale.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,864
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    John Glen is underrated, and 1983 to 1987 was overall stronger than 1962 to 1965. the mid 80's was the peak for cinematic Bond, where they had a blend of intrigue, mystery, romance, danger, action and humour on a huge scale.

    83 and 87 yes. The only intrigue and danger from AVTAK was how Bond was able to make a quice
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe Edward Berger for Bond 27
    Posts: 9,403
    Last_Rat_Standing wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    John Glen is underrated, and 1983 to 1987 was overall stronger than 1962 to 1965. the mid 80's was the peak for cinematic Bond, where they had a blend of intrigue, mystery, romance, danger, action and humour on a huge scale.

    83 and 87 yes. The only intrigue and danger from AVTAK was how Bond was able to make a quice

    1985 is the weak link, but not weak enough to bring down the whole era.
Sign In or Register to comment.