›

Controversial opinions about Bond films

1…728729730731732734»

Comments

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited 9:41am Posts: 18,809
    Agree on Auger, but I don't know if I'd say Chiles is terrible; I think she gives a perfectly decent, professional performance. It's just not very memorable. It might be the character in part- this is probably just me(!) but I actually find Stacey Sutton more endearing (I'm willing to be on my own on this one! :D )
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    edited 9:47am Posts: 6,921
    Sutton has grown on me, as has May Day. Those characters are not the issue with that film, which has a so-crazy-it-works cast. It's more like Moore fatigue.

    I never thought AVTAK would have been a good launching pad for Dalton (maybe Brosnan?) but it's intriguing to think what Dalton would have done with Grace Jones and Christopher Walken.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 7,743
    Auger for me is another highlight of TB, a top 5 Bond girl for me. But perhaps I have soft spot for future giallo-starlets like her. Speaking of which Barbara Bach also appeared in a few gialli.
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,488
    The problem with Stacey Sutton, is she’s not well written as a character, and Tanya Robert’s line delivery is sub par.
    She is however stunning to look at (imo) but I think Moore needed an older actress to be paired with.
  • Reflsin2bourbonsReflsin2bourbons
    Posts: 492
    Saying Auger is terrible is a bit unfair. She isn't exactly a standout but her character was stripped of a lot of interesting bits and left as a boring shell.
Sign In or Register to comment.