Would you rather Jaws only appears in one film OR Hinx returns for another adventure?

1198199200201202204»

Comments

  • Junglist_1985Junglist_1985 Los Angeles
    Posts: 1,060
    Longer, better paced QOS is the only correct answer.
  • Posts: 16,021
    Longer QOS. It definitely didn't help that it was so short.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    edited August 18 Posts: 8,570
    Longer, most importantly the parachute sequence; that needed a few more seconds… 😂
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,549
    I love QOS so I'll happily take 10-15 more minutes of it.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited August 17 Posts: 3,330
    Longer QOS. No doubt, no hesitation. Including the rumoured plan for the plane scene, with Mathis telling Bond the story of Rhoda and Masters from the QoS short story.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,869
    Longer QOS, no question about it. I wouldn't shave a minute from NTTD, but I'd love to spend more time in the world of QOS.
  • Posts: 8,491
    Longer QoS! Love it and would like to have seen more of it, not down on NTTD as some are, but would always prefer QoS , gets better with every viewing!
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,852
    Longer Quantum. I really enjoy the film, it just feels like it's missing some Bondian elements because of the shorter run time
  • Posts: 16,021
    Venutius wrote: »
    Longer QOS. No doubt, no hesitation. Including the rumoured plan for the plane scene, with Mathis telling Bond the story of Rhoda and Masters from the QoS short story.

    Yeah they definitely needed that one.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,617
    I'll go against the grain and say a shorter NTTD. I love QoS (I love both), but QoS is the film that it is because of all of it's characteristics, including it's runtime. As the shortest film, it's quick, dynamic, compact, things that I appreciate about it. NTTD could use a few fewer minutes right at the end, IMO. But like I said, I love both.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 6,061
    Amazing to see this play out. I thought for sure that we would see a more even battle or at least some equal thoughts. Seems like people think QOS can benefit from some additional moments while NTTD doesn't need to be trimmed to make it better.

    I can think of two henchmen that made strong impressions in their films. Jaws and Hinx.

    It got me to thinking...

    Would you rather Jaws is only in one film OR Hinx returns for another?

    Jaws was a terrifying character and one that audiences loved. So it was a no-brainer he would return. Some say his character in MR was not as well executed as in Spy. That he either should have perished in Spy, as one draft had happen, or simply not come back for MR. But some see his redemption arc as a highlight of MR.

    Hinx was one of the bright spots of a movie that left many feeling cold. Hinx was a call back updated for audiences. He fought Bond with a bruising ferocity and yet had style and lethal force combined. A call back to other films in the franchise. Many have suggested he never died from being thrown from the train and could have, should have come back.

    Obviously neither will happen, but what would you rather, Jaws in one movie only? Or Hinx returns to make Bond's life hell in another film?
  • Posts: 2,332
    Jaws is too iconic, so I wouldnt remove him from Moonraker, silly as he is. Also he got an appearance in Everything or Nothing too.

    Hinx was a hugely underused and underdeveloped character. It wouldve spiced up the fourth act run around the old MI6 building if Hinx was chasing Bond down at the same time.
  • Posts: 16,021
    Not so difficult one. I never liked Jaws much, too much of a caricature at times, especially in MR, yet even in MR he had a few scary moments. But Hinx was always underused I think (his name isn't even mentioned), and far more promising overall, less of a caricature. So yeah, Hinx.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,853
    I don't want less Jaws, so I guess I'd go for another Hinx, although I'm not sure he would have worked in another film. But then I guess Bautista is very good, they could have expanded the character... I'm trying to imagine how he might have worked in NTTD. Maybe he replaces Ash as the one who kills Felix, and then Bond and him have a proper mano a mano grudgematch showdown in the Norwegian forest.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,570
    I would have liked to have seen Jaws , killed, ironically, by a shark at the end of TSWLM.

    Hinx , should have returned either, ,in Rosa Klebb like fashion, for a climactic fight with Bond at the end of SPECTRE or in NTTD . He would have been wearing a bionic, mechanical, neck collar as a result of the train encounter.
  • Posts: 5,792
    Tricky one for me, because Jaws is one of the most iconic and memorable henchmen of the series, and despite the fact I like Bautista as an actor, I don’t think Hinx plays to his strengths and is a pretty lame villain. I’ll go one more from Hinx because they could have expanded the character, but I don’t really see what they could have done with him.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,853
    Funnily enough I'm listening to an old podcast with Mendes talking about Spectre, and he does say that it is possible Hinx could return after this film.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,570
    007HallY wrote: »
    Tricky one for me, because Jaws is one of the most iconic and memorable henchmen of the series, and despite the fact I like Bautista as an actor, I don’t think Hinx plays to his strengths and is a pretty lame villain. I’ll go one more from Hinx because they could have expanded the character, but I don’t really see what they could have done with him.

    One scene that I wish they had added to SPECTRE is that following the killing during the meeting, Hinx would have taken a seat at the table and an assistant would have come over with a folding; opening it he says something like, ‘ let us discuss our Central American operations’.
    Even that would have given the character a bit more depth.
  • edited 11:18am Posts: 5,792
    talos7 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Tricky one for me, because Jaws is one of the most iconic and memorable henchmen of the series, and despite the fact I like Bautista as an actor, I don’t think Hinx plays to his strengths and is a pretty lame villain. I’ll go one more from Hinx because they could have expanded the character, but I don’t really see what they could have done with him.

    One scene that I wish they had added to SPECTRE is that following the killing during the meeting, Hinx would have taken a seat at the table and an assistant would have come over with a folding; opening it he says something like, ‘ let us discuss our Central American operations’.
    Even that would have given the character a bit more depth.

    Personally, I think it was a misstep casting an actor as charismatic as Bautista (who genuinely has a good bit of dramatic and comedic talent) and making him play this near silent, Terminator-like goon. I know some complain about how comedic Jaws was, but there’s a good bit of personality in the character even if he doesn’t speak. With Hinx they had the opportunity to give us a Bond villain with a level of personality - wise cracking perhaps, a sense of humour to rival Bond’s, or even just someone who could intimidate Bond not only through his hulking presence but how he spoke. I mean, Bautista was a pro wrestler so it would have made sense to go that route instead of giving us a rather generic strongman henchman. Just a missed opportunity.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited 11:22am Posts: 15,324
    Definitely Hinx. Like others have said, I wouldn't remove Jaws from MR or the several games he's been in. Theoretically, Hinx could return in the next era much like David Hedison's Felix did.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,853
    007HallY wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Tricky one for me, because Jaws is one of the most iconic and memorable henchmen of the series, and despite the fact I like Bautista as an actor, I don’t think Hinx plays to his strengths and is a pretty lame villain. I’ll go one more from Hinx because they could have expanded the character, but I don’t really see what they could have done with him.

    One scene that I wish they had added to SPECTRE is that following the killing during the meeting, Hinx would have taken a seat at the table and an assistant would have come over with a folding; opening it he says something like, ‘ let us discuss our Central American operations’.
    Even that would have given the character a bit more depth.

    Personally, I think it was a misstep casting an actor as charismatic as Bautista (who genuinely has a good bit of dramatic and comedic talent) and making him play this near silent, Terminator-like goon. I know some complain about how comedic Jaws was, but there’s a good bit of personality in the character even if he doesn’t speak. With Hinx they had the opportunity to give us a Bond villain with a level of personality - wise cracking perhaps, a sense of humour to rival Bond’s, or even just someone who could intimidate Bond not only through his hulking presence but how he spoke. I mean, Bautista was a pro wrestler so it would have made sense to go that route instead of giving us a rather generic strongman henchman. Just a missed opportunity.

    Yeah I'm even kind of weighing up whether he could do main villain: a sort of Bane-style big hulking main threat for Bond is slightly different to what we usually get (although I guess nothing very new in terms of action adventure movies in general).
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 466
    No less of Jaws so Hinx for another adventure.
Sign In or Register to comment.