It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
An actor's idea of Hell, probably.
I don't see it for Armitage either, to be honest. That said I always thought that he's had so far a smaller career than he could have had.
I suppose most actors won’t have those A-List careers. He’s making money at any rate. He’s successful compared to most actors.
But even taking a bigger actor like Michael Fassbender I never believed he had that same charisma to break through to Bond (I acknowledge he never really had the chance incidentally, but despite being a good character actor I never thought he had what it took to do Bond, and his attempts to lead bigger blockbusters never quite worked - in part for reasons slightly beyond his control).
To be fair you could probably say the same of most actors who actually did play Bond, outside of the Bond films themselves that is, and Fassbender has arguably had a bigger career than many of them. I think he'd have been able to do a very decent job, I don't think he was a massive missed opportunity or anything, but I think it was in his wheelhouse. Unlike, as you say, Turner or Armitage (both Hobbits, incidentally!) who I don't think would have made the switch to the big screen.
I suppose. I think his sexual assault allegations (regardless of how much they amount to/are truthful) would have come back up more to haunt him with that lead a role. And I agree he wouldn’t have exactly been an upgrade from Craig. And ultimately he never would have had that opportunity.
He was unlucky (if he had wanted it) as he was likely too young when Brosnan got it and then a bit too old when Craig got it. Sometimes when an actor has been born has ruled them out.
True, but I always thought he seemed to be heading for something bigger, a bit like Eric Bana.
Then thank God you weren't one of the producers.
It could've all went West very quickly.
Well done, @Dragonpol , 😂…you know how to hit the funny-bone 😂!
Thanks @peter. I just can't help myself sometimes! :))
Please never stop— the chuckle has high value and it didn’t cost anyone a thing, lol!
Yes, I'll keep going. I don't know why other way! Laughter is good medicine.
No doubt about that.
Terence Stamp would have made a brilliant Bond. Had he stepped in to replace Connery in '69, wow. Imagine OHMSS exactly as was but with him in the role. Plus a gritty revenge follow up!
I can also picture him as a great adversary; Scaramanga, Hugo Drax, Elliot Carver , he would have been excellent as any of them …
I can too, probably more so than him being Bond, but he was a striking/good looking guy, especially in that late 60s/early 70s period. Apparently he frightened Harry Saltzman with his suggestions for what he'd do with the role when approached about it! He was probably not even 30 then and may not have been the best fit for it. But I do wish he would have gotten the opportunity to play a villain, even later on.
Guy had a great career though. One of those really distinctive British actors.
I don't think any cinematic Superman villain got it right since Terence Stamp. Oh and he was criminally underused as an ineffective goodie in The Phantom Menace.