It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Good way of breaking down the differences between these 2 film styles @thedove
I think from the Moore era I might add TSWLM to the romantic films. I think I'd also add OP even though OP story and script wise really belongs more in the action film category the strong Roger Moore/Maud Adams chemistry backed up by John Barry's lush score tends to push it more romantic for me.
Since Connery opted not to make OHMSS we never really got to see his Bond in an OHMSS/TLD/CR type romance. However I think Tatiana from FRWL and Domino from TB are the two Bond girls his 007 came the closest to falling in love with IMHO.
@Ludovico Interesting points about Bond/Tatiana in FRWL. I think Bond/Kara in TLD is like a more OHMSS/CR romantic type version of that Bond/Tatiana relationship(the girl is a defector from an iron curtain country who is being used by the defecting Soviet military intelligence official and ends up falling for and aiding Bond and switches to his side). Connery's Bond was written more as a ladykiller and Dalton's Bond was written more as a classic romantic leading man so that would explain the variation.
Yes, there's probably a lot to that. I also think that regardless of Bond's feeling towards Tatiana in FRWL, the whole film is rather cynical and merciless towards love and romantic feelings. Love is a commodity in FRWL. To be traded, used, manipulated. If they want the next Bond to be the anti CR, I think that's the route they need to take.
Lets move on I was going to do a would you rather based on the actors first film or the actors last film. In other words, would you rather watch Sean in DN or DAF. and as I went through the actors it became clear that for most the first film would be a better watch than their last. Was this a reflection of an actor staying in the role for too long? Or did the quality drop off that much? Were the plots too outlandish by the end of the actors run. For this discussion I am really focusing on Sean, Roger, Pierce and Daniel.
I then started to think about the length of an actor in the role. Which leads me to the question at hand:
Would you rather the next fella do 2-3 films OR the next fella do 5-7 films?
I am keeping this to films as the days of a predictable production schedule seem to be behind us and I am not sure if Amazon is fully committed to a series. They might be seeing what the returns are for the box office they achieve. When you think that films making $590 million are unlikely to make much profit it does shift the landscape.
Given that, what is the optimal amount of films before we move on to another actor? In the legacy or early films, the role was handed off without "rebooting" or "restarting" the series. Given todays climate and audience expectation that might not play well. Does that impact how many films an actor does?
Craig's five films took over 10 years to be brought to the screen. If rumours are true it appears that Amazon is casting a younger actor to play the role, does this mean they are looking for a long run from the actor?
3 is a minimum
But actors often seem to get bored / stale around the 5 mark, or is that just a stereotype promoted by professional critics?
Once fans get comfortable with an actor they seem happy enough to continue regardless of age. I'm sure Craig-Bond would be welcomed back with open arms if he changed his mind and said he'd do a 6th, that is, if he hadn't been obliterated in NTTD...
I would say both. We are due for a main female villain. The general concept of Elektra done right.
Having a new writer is something we waiting on for very long, but Daniel Craig era bring back some things great things back. Inspecialy QOS and NTTD. It looks like it finaly go a bit to Roger Moore level. 12 years for 5 movies. Bond 28 should be released 5 years after Bond 26. That means Bond 28 should released 2 years after Bond 27. Example: 2027 - 2030 - 2032 - 2034 - 2037. That is actually 12 years if we count 2025 as start year. But if there can make 6. Pierce Brosnan was seen in Dante Speak in 1997 and Thomas Crown Affair in 1999, The Tailor of Panama in 2001 and Evelyn in 2002. if next actor can make 2 or mabey 3 none Bond movies in between.
I hope Denise and Steven wil stay for 2 movies and then we should get at least another directer and second/3th Writer. Denise can always do another one.