The James Bond Questions Thread

1209210211212213215»

Comments

  • Archangel007Archangel007 United States
    Posts: 31
    Here is a question I have that may have been answered before somewhere on this forum so forgive my ignorance.

    Why haven't we seen the screentests for the previous actors who tried out for Bond? This applies to those who were cast as Bond and those who weren't. I know some may not have screen tested, for others we've seen snippets (like James Brolin and Sam Neill).

    For Brosnan we've seen a few pics from the first time he was up for it. With Craig, we've seen quick glimpses of his test.

    However, it seems like EON has been sitting on all the footage of these tests but they've never been released. Why? Is it a rights issue?
  • Posts: 2,308
    Here is a question I have that may have been answered before somewhere on this forum so forgive my ignorance.

    Why haven't we seen the screentests for the previous actors who tried out for Bond? This applies to those who were cast as Bond and those who weren't. I know some may not have screen tested, for others we've seen snippets (like James Brolin and Sam Neill).

    For Brosnan we've seen a few pics from the first time he was up for it. With Craig, we've seen quick glimpses of his test.

    However, it seems like EON has been sitting on all the footage of these tests but they've never been released. Why? Is it a rights issue?

    Usually the actors don't want these screen tests out there - if its a poor screen test for example. Plus I suspect EoN didnt want to find themselves in a position where their pick for Bond was potentially being unfavorably compared to someone on a screen test.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited July 21 Posts: 18,594
    Yeah I think it might be seen as bad form in a way; folks don't necessarily want their failures out there.

    I think it's interesting that we've never seen any of the winning actors' tests apart from photos, I guess the closest is the quick behind the scenes clips of Craig's one we saw on that doco. I wonder if it's because they were early sketches of the character and might jar a bit with the versions we saw in the films? Or maybe it's just a pure contractual thing: they'd need to be paid for their performances to be released and their film contracts are already quite complicated and it might not be worth the legal hassle?
  • edited July 21 Posts: 5,616
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah I think it might be seen as bad form in a way; folks don't necessarily want their failures out there.

    I think it's interesting that we've never seen any of the winning actors' tests apart from photos, I guess the closest is the quick behind the scenes clips of Craig's one we saw on that doco. I wonder if it's because they were early sketches of the character and might jar a bit with the versions we saw in the films? Or maybe it's just a pure contractual thing: they'd need to be paid for their performances to be released and their film contracts are already quite complicated and it might not be worth the legal hassle?

    I’m pretty sure Connery and Moore didn’t audition so that’ll be the reason we didn’t get anything from them. Maybe there’s a chance any test footage with Lazenby, Dalton, or Brosnan doesn’t actually exist anymore beyond set photos? There would have been little reason to actually show them publicly before DVDs anyway. These bits of film are easy to lose and even if archived they may have been destroyed to make space before the late 90s/2000s. Or they were just misplaced or deteriorated or whatever.

    Generally though I guess it’s a combination of all those. If these screencasts do get released it’s generally many years after, and either it’s a case where they’ve survived/been preserved out of cinematic interest, or they’ve been found/were held by a third party and released by them (as seems to be the case with the 2005 auditions).
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,594
    I guess it's possible, but Eon always seemed to be pretty efficient with their archiving of that stuff (not least it's handy to check if you need to hire the same actor for the next film), I feel like it's more likely a choice that Sam Neill's is out there whilst Brosnan and Dalton's have only been seen in photo form.
  • edited July 21 Posts: 5,616
    mtm wrote: »
    I guess it's possible, but Eon always seemed to be pretty efficient with their archiving of that stuff (not least it's handy to check if you need to hire the same actor for the next film), I feel like it's more likely a choice that Sam Neill's is out there whilst Brosnan and Dalton's have only been seen in photo form.

    I’m guessing when they did those earlier screen-tests the idea of archiving them specifically for cinematic or public interest wouldn’t have been as major a factor as it is today. So I can easily imagine not everything surviving, or at least fully. I guess it’s also worth asking where the footage for, say, that Neill audition came from (was it archived directly by/at EON as a policy, or was it found through an individual who’d kept it maybe even by chance? ie - maybe it was kept by the casting director or one of the producers and acquired that way? Or even a third party. Might not be the case but it happens). But ultimately I don’t know and obviously some of these Bond auditions still exist or have been preserved. I’d be surprised if EON had an archive with every potential Bond audition from 1962 to now. Past a point I’m sure they have a lot though. But yeah, I think it’s a combination of all those things.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,959
    Interesting that we see a whole lot of the Brolin screen tests for OP. One wonders if the Gavin tests exist somewhere as he was also hired for the role before Connery was coaxed back.

    I can see why the actors wouldn't want them released. That being said I just saw a whole lot of Luke screen tests for Star Wars. The Office released screen tests for Dwight and Jim (US version).
  • Archangel007Archangel007 United States
    Posts: 31
    Thank you all for giving possible reasons.
    thedove wrote: »
    That being said I just saw a whole lot of Luke screen tests for Star Wars. The Office released screen tests for Dwight and Jim (US version).

    I think mtm may be correct that, if the footage is out there, the contracts at the time of the tests meant that the actor(s) had final say whether it could be released. Maybe Neill's agreement for his screentest didn't include this verbiage.

    I think the productions during the DVD era and beyond have probably included contracts that largely allow the studios to release the footage. One thing's for sure, we've been able to see a bunch of auditions for Bond that took place in the mid 2000s before Craig was chosen. I don't know the source of those or if those came out on a DVD somewhere.
Sign In or Register to comment.