EoN sells up - Amazon MGM to produce 007 going forwards (Heyman and Pascal confirmed as producers)

1868788899092»

Comments

  • Posts: 15,663
    That's entirely speculative from my part, mind you, but what might happen is that Blofeld is hinted at from the first film, and bit like Moriarty was in that Holmes movie. Never liked Guy Ritchie's Holmes, that said I think Moriarty is the one thing he did well, at least in terms of casting and demeanor.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 1,878
    I suspect the new Lex Luthor in Superman this year will have us not wanting our bald Blofeld back in his classic way, just guessing. I personally would like them to move on, or start with Brandt in the first film.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,640
    They’ll definitely use Blofeld again, but I hope they hold off on that. Ideally you don’t use SPECTRE at all for the next Bond. Just focus on original villains and maybe consider bringing back Blofeld for Bond #8 in like 2042.

    Of course, there’s no guarantee Amazon won’t try bringing back other villains like Dr. No.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited May 20 Posts: 8,907
    Honestly I wish they'd just bring back snooping. Some of the most atmospheric and memorable sequences of old films is when Bond is scoping out somewhere, and it's also a great way to dole out some quick stabs of exposition without it being too blatant, think about Bond infiltrating the test facility in San Fran in AVTAK, or Dalton planting the cigarette device on the windowsill in LTK.
  • Posts: 15,663
    Honestly I wish they'd just bring back snooping. Some of the most atmospheric and memorable sequences of old films is when Bond is scoping out somewhere, and it's also a great way to dole out some quick stabs of exposition without it being too blatant, think about Bond infiltrating the test facility in San Fran in AVTAK, or Dalton planting the cigarette device on the windowsill in LTK.

    I hope so too. It provides both atmosphere and suspense.
    They’ll definitely use Blofeld again, but I hope they hold off on that. Ideally you don’t use SPECTRE at all for the next Bond. Just focus on original villains and maybe consider bringing back Blofeld for Bond #8 in like 2042.

    Of course, there’s no guarantee Amazon won’t try bringing back other villains like Dr. No.

    I don't think they'll hold off that long: he's one the most recognisable villains not merely in the Bond franchise, but in all franchises.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    edited May 20 Posts: 6,713
    I think Blofeld will be back sooner than later. Again, Amazon paid $4 billion.

    If Blofeld returns, I wish they would do him with fewer of the cliches like the bald head, the scar, the white cat. Of these three, the cat is the signifier that it's Blofeld to the general audience, right? The shapeshifter of the novels would be welcome.

    One of the missed opportunities of the Craig era was that they didn't establish Jesper Christensen as Blofeld because he did something very interesting with Mr. White that he easily could have pivoted into Blofeld. I mean, he's an amazing actor.

    It is going to be tempting to Amazon to reboot a villain in any case, and Dr. No is a good choice. Frobe's GF may be too iconic to reboot, but you never know.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,640
    I think enough time has passed that there wouldn’t be skepticism over a new Goldfinger. There’s been so much recasting with Bond, it would practically be expected. I think CR would be exempt from new adaptation, just because that film is still relatively fresh in the grand scheme of things, and especially given how renowned it’s been for 20 years.

    Personally I wouldn’t want to see any new adaptations, at least on the big screen. If they did faithful adaptations they could probably function best as direct to streaming since they’re low key thrillers without insane set pieces like the Madagascar chase.
  • Posts: 2,000
    mtm wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    So many of my friends and associates, many in the film business, have lost interest in the MI franchise - too much "Cruise Control" is a comment I have heard more than once.

    I always say MI has a remarkably 'soft' fanbase for a major franchise. Not everyone who goes to see Bond movies are major fans, but there's something about them as a cinema event that gets people going to the cinema whenever a new film is released, even just out of habit. MI doesn't quite have that every time. Very much a 'if it's the only thing on I'll see it, but I can easily catch this at home' type thing.

    But to be honest, I'm really mixed on them. I really don't like Tom Cruise as an action hero (I find he works better playing slightly creepy, off putting characters like in Magnolia or even Tropic Thunder). Fallout was pretty good. I didn't enjoy Ghost Protocol or Rogue Nation, and the first three have their highs and lows.

    Of the MI franchise, I only ever watched the tv series, the first movie (which I enjoyed quite a lot) and some of the third one.

    You're missing out on some great stuff: it went from strength to strength from no.4.

    Really curious.... have you watched the original TV series? The movies really miss the core of what made the original IMF so special. As a stand alone series the MI films HAVE gotten better over the years except for this final one which is getting reamed by reviewers.
  • Posts: 469
    I think TSWLM showed that you can take aspects from previous films (YOLT) and reuse them, provided there is still unique characters and ideas mixed in. That’s as far as I’d like to see any remakes, myself. I see comparisons between AVTAK and GF, yet I think AVTAK has a different enough setup from Goldfinger that makes it feel like it isn’t an outright remake.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 18,052
    delfloria wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    So many of my friends and associates, many in the film business, have lost interest in the MI franchise - too much "Cruise Control" is a comment I have heard more than once.

    I always say MI has a remarkably 'soft' fanbase for a major franchise. Not everyone who goes to see Bond movies are major fans, but there's something about them as a cinema event that gets people going to the cinema whenever a new film is released, even just out of habit. MI doesn't quite have that every time. Very much a 'if it's the only thing on I'll see it, but I can easily catch this at home' type thing.

    But to be honest, I'm really mixed on them. I really don't like Tom Cruise as an action hero (I find he works better playing slightly creepy, off putting characters like in Magnolia or even Tropic Thunder). Fallout was pretty good. I didn't enjoy Ghost Protocol or Rogue Nation, and the first three have their highs and lows.

    Of the MI franchise, I only ever watched the tv series, the first movie (which I enjoyed quite a lot) and some of the third one.

    You're missing out on some great stuff: it went from strength to strength from no.4.

    Really curious.... have you watched the original TV series? The movies really miss the core of what made the original IMF so special. As a stand alone series the MI films HAVE gotten better over the years except for this final one which is getting reamed by reviewers.

    I have seen it, I never really loved it to be fair. I mainly saw the early seasons where everything usually went like clockwork and it was quite undramatic and sterile; I understand as it went on they introduced more of the plans going wrong and added a bit more jeopardy. I don't think the films lose the good stuff from the show, indeed stuff like the hospital bed opening to Fallout actively riffs on gags from the show, like the Submarine episode.
    Not really true it's being reamed by reviewers either, a lot are very positive, some don't like it.
  • Posts: 2,000
    Blofeld was not always bald in the original films nor in the books.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 5,023
    Ludovico wrote: »
    If Amazon are looking at doing another modern take on Blofeld, I hope they do it better....with a bit of invention as well. That's if they (Amazon) want Blofeld to appear again...so soon.

    They probably will want him to appear again, and maybe quite soon. Whether they'll do it better, that's another matter entirely.

    That's the thing. If they can do it better.

    After SP and NTTD, it'd be hard to sink the character lower.
    Ludovico wrote: »
    That's entirely speculative from my part, mind you, but what might happen is that Blofeld is hinted at from the first film, and bit like Moriarty was in that Holmes movie. Never liked Guy Ritchie's Holmes, that said I think Moriarty is the one thing he did well, at least in terms of casting and demeanor.

    Yes, I agree, with all of your viewpoints. But in today's internet leaks and rumors, it would be hard to keep Blofeld's actor a secret.
    They’ll definitely use Blofeld again, but I hope they hold off on that. Ideally you don’t use SPECTRE at all for the next Bond. Just focus on original villains and maybe consider bringing back Blofeld for Bond #8 in like 2042.

    Of course, there’s no guarantee Amazon won’t try bringing back other villains like Dr. No.
    echo wrote: »
    I think Blofeld will be back sooner than later. Again, Amazon paid $4 billion.

    If Blofeld returns, I wish they would do him with fewer of the cliches like the bald head, the scar, the white cat. Of these three, the cat is the signifier that it's Blofeld to the general audience, right? The shapeshifter of the novels would be welcome.

    One of the missed opportunities of the Craig era was that they didn't establish Jesper Christensen as Blofeld because he did something very interesting with Mr. White that he easily could have pivoted into Blofeld. I mean, he's an amazing actor.

    It is going to be tempting to Amazon to reboot a villain in any case, and Dr. No is a good choice. Frobe's GF may be too iconic to reboot, but you never know.
    I think enough time has passed that there wouldn’t be skepticism over a new Goldfinger. There’s been so much recasting with Bond, it would practically be expected. I think CR would be exempt from new adaptation, just because that film is still relatively fresh in the grand scheme of things, and especially given how renowned it’s been for 20 years.

    Personally I wouldn’t want to see any new adaptations, at least on the big screen. If they did faithful adaptations they could probably function best as direct to streaming since they’re low key thrillers without insane set pieces like the Madagascar chase.

    Blofeld is too iconic with Bond not to be used. Dr. No and Goldfinger have been brought back already, in comics, but still. There are a number of old Bond villains that could be done in a modern day. I also think that there are chances unused Fleming material and a continuation novel or two could be filmed. Jack Reacher could be an example that they use, only from a cinematic viewpoint.
  • Posts: 15,663
    echo wrote: »
    I think Blofeld will be back sooner than later. Again, Amazon paid $4 billion.

    If Blofeld returns, I wish they would do him with fewer of the cliches like the bald head, the scar, the white cat. Of these three, the cat is the signifier that it's Blofeld to the general audience, right? The shapeshifter of the novels would be welcome.

    One of the missed opportunities of the Craig era was that they didn't establish Jesper Christensen as Blofeld because he did something very interesting with Mr. White that he easily could have pivoted into Blofeld. I mean, he's an amazing actor.

    It is going to be tempting to Amazon to reboot a villain in any case, and Dr. No is a good choice. Frobe's GF may be too iconic to reboot, but you never know.
    Blofeld is Mr Blue, not Mr White. I'm joking, but I always thought the new SPECTRE (and Quantum which was always a crypto SPECTRE anyway) was somewhat colour coded instead of number coded. So you had among its key figures a Mr White, a Mr Greene, a Silva (silver?), and... and a Blofeld.
  • Posts: 5,242
    It's difficult to say whether Blofeld/SPECTRE will return immediately, and I actually don't think it's quite the given many are claiming it to be. Don't get me wrong, it could well happen. But to some extent it's easier having one off villains each time.

    Anyway, Blofeld's a tricky character to get right. Without that personal, 'our paths have crossed' element with Bond, he's just a generic villain.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,640
    delfloria wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    So many of my friends and associates, many in the film business, have lost interest in the MI franchise - too much "Cruise Control" is a comment I have heard more than once.

    I always say MI has a remarkably 'soft' fanbase for a major franchise. Not everyone who goes to see Bond movies are major fans, but there's something about them as a cinema event that gets people going to the cinema whenever a new film is released, even just out of habit. MI doesn't quite have that every time. Very much a 'if it's the only thing on I'll see it, but I can easily catch this at home' type thing.

    But to be honest, I'm really mixed on them. I really don't like Tom Cruise as an action hero (I find he works better playing slightly creepy, off putting characters like in Magnolia or even Tropic Thunder). Fallout was pretty good. I didn't enjoy Ghost Protocol or Rogue Nation, and the first three have their highs and lows.

    Of the MI franchise, I only ever watched the tv series, the first movie (which I enjoyed quite a lot) and some of the third one.

    You're missing out on some great stuff: it went from strength to strength from no.4.

    Really curious.... have you watched the original TV series? The movies really miss the core of what made the original IMF so special. As a stand alone series the MI films HAVE gotten better over the years except for this final one which is getting reamed by reviewers.

    I really hope when Cruise is done with these films that we get a revival series that brings back an emphasis on the team and mind game heists. No more big showy stunts. I become less impressed with those the more Cruise pushes for those because it’s less about entertainment and more about his inflated ego. It only got worse with people hailing him as some savior of cinema with the TOP GUN sequel.
  • Posts: 8,173
    delfloria wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    So many of my friends and associates, many in the film business, have lost interest in the MI franchise - too much "Cruise Control" is a comment I have heard more than once.

    I always say MI has a remarkably 'soft' fanbase for a major franchise. Not everyone who goes to see Bond movies are major fans, but there's something about them as a cinema event that gets people going to the cinema whenever a new film is released, even just out of habit. MI doesn't quite have that every time. Very much a 'if it's the only thing on I'll see it, but I can easily catch this at home' type thing.

    But to be honest, I'm really mixed on them. I really don't like Tom Cruise as an action hero (I find he works better playing slightly creepy, off putting characters like in Magnolia or even Tropic Thunder). Fallout was pretty good. I didn't enjoy Ghost Protocol or Rogue Nation, and the first three have their highs and lows.

    Of the MI franchise, I only ever watched the tv series, the first movie (which I enjoyed quite a lot) and some of the third one.

    You're missing out on some great stuff: it went from strength to strength from no.4.

    Really curious.... have you watched the original TV series? The movies really miss the core of what made the original IMF so special. As a stand alone series the MI films HAVE gotten better over the years except for this final one which is getting reamed by reviewers.

    I really hope when Cruise is done with these films that we get a revival series that brings back an emphasis on the team and mind game heists. No more big showy stunts. I become less impressed with those the more Cruise pushes for those because it’s less about entertainment and more about his inflated ego. It only got worse with people hailing him as some savior of cinema with the TOP GUN sequel.

    Agree totally!
    My service users have asked me to bring them to see it. After the tedious last effort, I'm not looking forward to it!
  • Posts: 15,663
    007HallY wrote: »
    It's difficult to say whether Blofeld/SPECTRE will return immediately, and I actually don't think it's quite the given many are claiming it to be. Don't get me wrong, it could well happen. But to some extent it's easier having one off villains each time.

    Anyway, Blofeld's a tricky character to get right. Without that personal, 'our paths have crossed' element with Bond, he's just a generic villain.

    It's just my gut feeling talking, which of course is always right. No, but seriously, I do think he'll be introduced fairly early on,although not as a main villain. They can still have one off villains, like they did with Connery, even though Blofeld and SPECTRE were there early on.

    I hope they develop the personal angle instead of just throwing it in. Nemesis are like any kind of relationship: they need to develop. That's why I far prefer the Batman Joker nemesis in TDK than in the Burton movie. They made it personal, they didn't force it.
Sign In or Register to comment.