It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
https://x.com/acyn/status/1920499855652499706?s=46
Tariffs are a tool, not an endgame. The film industry’s global nature makes this a messy battlefield—Hollywood relies on UK talent, Pinewood Studios, and tax incentives to keep budgets viable. Slapping 100% tariffs retroactively on Bond films shot abroad? Chaos. But strategic chaos.
The goal isn’t to kill British cinema—it’s to force renegotiation of trade terms that’ve let foreign subsidies undercut U.S. crews for decades. Sean Connery’s legacy isn’t the issue; it’s about ensuring the next Bond reboot doesn’t outsource 10,000 American jobs to Buckinghamshire while LA soundstages sit empty.
Leverage first, deals second.
The stairwell fight. What really worked about CR is that its locations felt lived in.