› › ›

No Time to Die production thread

1…490491493495496…1208

Comments

  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,869
    I hope they're having a great time in the editing room :)
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,554
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    BondAficionado wrote: »
    So what's the likelihood for a trailer reveal while he's on Colbert? :D

    As he is there to promote Knives Out, very slim.

    True.
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 3,018
    Pretty casual interviews: First Ana with Chris Evans, followed by Craig with Jamie Lee Curtis. Then Craig again at 07:33


  • UnivexUnivex
    Posts: 6,677
    Never seen Craig so at ease. Good for him. Cool interviewer. Must have something to do with that, and with the company he's with.
  • ggl007ggl007 www.archivo007.com Spain, España
    Posts: 2,538
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7693841/Daniel-Craig-touted-return-film-series-director.html

    https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/nov/17/naomie-harris-interview-oxfam-james-bond-windrush-i-just-want-to-be-myself
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,527
    Wow, Craig is very relaxed here. Good interview!
  • boldfingerboldfinger
    edited November 2019 Posts: 5,767
    HildebrandRarity wrote: »
    I'd bet that Craig must have points on the box office for Knives Out. It's rather low budget, so to get such a cast, they offer points for the lead rather than a large fee. So, even if Craig isn't a producer, he has an interest in Knives Out getting a lot of attention, and revealing the trailer to No Time to Die could steal Knives Out's thunder. Sure, they'll mention NTTD, but not to the point that Knives Out is pushed to the side.
    Not to mention that probably any Bond actor is keen on promoting his career outside of Bond, and even more so when there is a possibility he will not return as Bond.


    I´m not sure what to make of Johnson. He talks so reverently about the genre. Does that go onyl for this certain genre, or did he repent for what he supposedly did with Star Wars, or can we espect similar unrest now with the Whodunnit fandom (if there is such a thing) ;-)?


    ggl007 wrote: »
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7693841/Daniel-Craig-touted-return-film-series-director.html
    What a piece of nonsensical crap journalism.
  • boldfingerboldfinger
    edited November 2019 Posts: 5,767
    .

  • WalecsWalecs On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    Posts: 3,157
    boldfinger wrote: »
    did he repent for what he supposedly did with Star Wars?
    I hope he doesn't. Regardless of TLJ's flaws (and there are many) he's got the lore aspect totally right.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,554
    boldfinger wrote: »
    HildebrandRarity wrote: »
    I'd bet that Craig must have points on the box office for Knives Out. It's rather low budget, so to get such a cast, they offer points for the lead rather than a large fee. So, even if Craig isn't a producer, he has an interest in Knives Out getting a lot of attention, and revealing the trailer to No Time to Die could steal Knives Out's thunder. Sure, they'll mention NTTD, but not to the point that Knives Out is pushed to the side.
    Not to mention that probably any Bond actor is keen on promoting his career outside of Bond, and even more so when there is a possibility he will not return as Bond.


    I´m not sure what to make of Johnson. He talks so reverently about the genre. Does that go onyl for this certain genre, or did he repent for what he supposedly did with Star Wars, or can we espect similar unrest now with the Whodunnit fandom (if there is such a thing) ;-)?


    ggl007 wrote: »
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7693841/Daniel-Craig-touted-return-film-series-director.html
    What a piece of nonsensical crap journalism.

    Maybe so. BUT ... I have contended that DC has a future in this series as a producer. So I could see him do this.
  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    edited November 2019 Posts: 3,126
    ggl007 wrote: »
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7693841/Daniel-Craig-touted-return-film-series-director.html

    https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/nov/17/naomie-harris-interview-oxfam-james-bond-windrush-i-just-want-to-be-myself

    Yeah I can't defend this caroline Graham piece this time no way is he being a director this sounds like tabloid speculation. As for the other article Bond sounds like he is married a committed relationship is marriage.
  • boldfingerboldfinger
    Posts: 5,767
    TripAces wrote: »
    boldfinger wrote: »
    HildebrandRarity wrote: »
    I'd bet that Craig must have points on the box office for Knives Out. It's rather low budget, so to get such a cast, they offer points for the lead rather than a large fee. So, even if Craig isn't a producer, he has an interest in Knives Out getting a lot of attention, and revealing the trailer to No Time to Die could steal Knives Out's thunder. Sure, they'll mention NTTD, but not to the point that Knives Out is pushed to the side.
    Not to mention that probably any Bond actor is keen on promoting his career outside of Bond, and even more so when there is a possibility he will not return as Bond.


    I´m not sure what to make of Johnson. He talks so reverently about the genre. Does that go onyl for this certain genre, or did he repent for what he supposedly did with Star Wars, or can we espect similar unrest now with the Whodunnit fandom (if there is such a thing) ;-)?


    ggl007 wrote: »
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7693841/Daniel-Craig-touted-return-film-series-director.html
    What a piece of nonsensical crap journalism.

    Maybe so. BUT ... I have contended that DC has a future in this series as a producer. So I could see him do this.
    I´ll wait till I´ve seen NTTD before I form a definitive opinion on DC as producer. I´m not happy at all how the last two films turned out, but I have much better hopes for this one.

  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 3,018
    Holy moly! Ana De Armas in a GQ photo shoot, 2016


  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited November 2019 Posts: 8,077
    The distance beetween first trailer and release date is now way lower for Bond 25 than for either SP or SF.
  • Matt007Matt007
    Posts: 1,314
    So what. It’s no yardstick for quality. Casino and skyfall were successful because of great word of mouth. QOs and spectre both crashed and burned relative to their predecessors. The timetable for trailers means jack. I really don’t understand why anyone cares about it so much.
  • Tuck91Tuck91
    Posts: 1,680
    Spectre only did 300 or so million less than skyfall. Far from crash and burn.
  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    Posts: 3,126
    Really I could care less if there was a trailer rather be surprised.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    The distance beetween first trailer and release date is now way lower for Bond 25 than for either SP or SF.

    #crisis
  • MinionMinion Don't Hassle the Bond
    Posts: 1,165
    Matt007 wrote: »
    So what. It’s no yardstick for quality. Casino and skyfall were successful because of great word of mouth. QOs and spectre both crashed and burned relative to their predecessors. The timetable for trailers means jack. I really don’t understand why anyone cares about it so much.
    Impatience. That’s the only reason.
  • danielccdanielcc
    edited November 2019 Posts: 79
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Spectre only did 300 or so million less than skyfall. Far from crash and burn.

    And even that is not telling the truth.

    SP made just 228 m less global box office than SF.
    - Half of that difference comes from US market (!)
    - most of the rest comes from the UK

    On top of that, SP was released at a time of a very unfavorable EUR and GBP to USD Fx rate.
    So in fact SP sold similar number of tickets as SF, in some markets even more.

    Facts
  • Tuck91Tuck91
    Posts: 1,680
    Well there you go. No wonder we’re getting a spectre sequel.
  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    Posts: 3,126
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Well there you go. No wonder we’re getting a spectre sequel.

    Yeah it's a Spectre redo knew it all along.
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,506
    Maybe when DC is on the Colbert show he may give an indication as to when the trailer is coming out? That would certainly be welcome?
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,021
    I doubt a trailer will announced in any other manner than online.
  • HerrBondHerrBond Berlin
    Posts: 50
    and we do already have an indication when to expect the trailer to be coming out
  • Matt007Matt007
    edited November 2019 Posts: 1,314
    danielcc wrote: »
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Spectre only did 300 or so million less than skyfall. Far from crash and burn.

    And even that is not telling the truth.

    SP made just 228 m less global box office than SF.
    - Half of that difference comes from US market (!)
    - most of the rest comes from the UK

    On top of that, SP was released at a time of a very unfavorable EUR and GBP to USD Fx rate.
    So in fact SP sold similar number of tickets as SF, in some markets even more.

    Facts
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Spectre only did 300 or so million less than skyfall. Far from crash and burn.

    an unfavourable dollar and euro exchange rate doesn’t affect turnover and box office it affects profitability. Spectre was released 3 years after skyfall and did c.30% less business. I think that’s the biggest drop off film to film since licence to kill.

  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,554
    Matt007 wrote: »
    danielcc wrote: »
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Spectre only did 300 or so million less than skyfall. Far from crash and burn.

    And even that is not telling the truth.

    SP made just 228 m less global box office than SF.
    - Half of that difference comes from US market (!)
    - most of the rest comes from the UK

    On top of that, SP was released at a time of a very unfavorable EUR and GBP to USD Fx rate.
    So in fact SP sold similar number of tickets as SF, in some markets even more.

    Facts
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Spectre only did 300 or so million less than skyfall. Far from crash and burn.

    an unfavourable dollar and euro exchange rate doesn’t affect turnover and box office it affects profitability. Spectre was released 3 years after skyfall and did c.30% less business. I think that’s the biggest drop off film to film since licence to kill.
    Matt007 wrote: »
    danielcc wrote: »
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Spectre only did 300 or so million less than skyfall. Far from crash and burn.

    And even that is not telling the truth.

    SP made just 228 m less global box office than SF.
    - Half of that difference comes from US market (!)
    - most of the rest comes from the UK

    On top of that, SP was released at a time of a very unfavorable EUR and GBP to USD Fx rate.
    So in fact SP sold similar number of tickets as SF, in some markets even more.

    Facts
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Spectre only did 300 or so million less than skyfall. Far from crash and burn.

    an unfavourable dollar and euro exchange rate doesn’t affect turnover and box office it affects profitability. Spectre was released 3 years after skyfall and did c.30% less business. I think that’s the biggest drop off film to film since licence to kill.

    SP finished 2015 ranked #6 in worldwide BO. Skyfall: #2. I thank that is the proper way to look at it. Both films were successful.

    Let's move on.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,021
    Adjusted for inflation, SP is the fourth highest grossing Bond film of the franchise. Just behind GF (#3), TB (#2), and SF (#1). That's pretty noteworthy.
  • danielccdanielcc
    Posts: 79
    Matt007 wrote: »
    danielcc wrote: »
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Spectre only did 300 or so million less than skyfall. Far from crash and burn.

    And even that is not telling the truth.

    SP made just 228 m less global box office than SF.
    - Half of that difference comes from US market (!)
    - most of the rest comes from the UK

    On top of that, SP was released at a time of a very unfavorable EUR and GBP to USD Fx rate.
    So in fact SP sold similar number of tickets as SF, in some markets even more.

    Facts
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Spectre only did 300 or so million less than skyfall. Far from crash and burn.

    an unfavourable dollar and euro exchange rate doesn’t affect turnover and box office it affects profitability. Spectre was released 3 years after skyfall and did c.30% less business. I think that’s the biggest drop off film to film since licence to kill.

    I am afraid you didnt get my argument.
    With the exact same number of tickets sold, SP would have made less box office, as the local currency values of tickets sold gets translated in USD, and THAT is the problem that SP had
  • WalecsWalecs On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    Posts: 3,157
    I didn't know this. That's interesting. Also don't forget that SPECTRE had some major competition since many blockbusters came out in 2015 (new Jurassic Park movie and new Star Wars movie and I think a new Avengers movie as well?). As far as I remember The Dark Knight Rises was the only big blockbuster aside from Skyfall? I can't remember another.
Sign In or Register to comment.