Is THE SPY WHO LOVED ME Roger Moore's best film?

1246

Comments

  • Posts: 3,279
    jobo wrote: »
    Revelator wrote: »
    The Liparus climax is more complexly staged, with goals of overcoming Stromberg's army, advancing toward the heavily guarded command center, and finding a way to overcome its defence system. The Moonraker climax is a bunch of guys in spacesuits shooting each other with lasers. It's as brainless as the rest of the movie.

    The Moonraker love is surprising and a bit baffling, imo. I honestly can't see how the two films are comparable in quality in any department, aside from possibly score.

    I don't think they are that different. They are both very light hearted (silly in places), glamorous and completely OTT. There are some things I think MR does better. Drax is a significantly more satisfying villain, the score is far better and the locations are slightly more iconic and beautiful. Venice, Rio and the Iguazu waterfalls is a particularly impressive selection of locations and I have a personal soft spot for all of them.

    Yes I agree. TSWLM doesn't go as far as MR in silliness (double taking pigeons, gondolas, Jaws falling in love, etc.) but certain key scenes are far more memorable in MR -

    - the centrifuge scene (arguably one of the best scenes ever, probably the most Flemingesque moment, and the one time we genuinely feel scared for Bond in the Moore era)

    - the PTS

    - the cable car chase

    - the giant snake in the pond/lake

    - the dogs chasing in the forest

    - Bond shooting down the sniper out of the tree

    Add one of John Barry's best scores, and you can see why MR is highly thought of. For all its camp and silliness, there are genuinely serious moments too. I also think its Moore's best performance as Bond.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited March 2020 Posts: 8,042
    Revelator wrote: »
    The Moonraker love is surprising and a bit baffling, imo. I honestly can't see how the two films are comparable in quality in any department, aside from possibly score.

    I agree entirely. MR is a shameless but enervated attempt to re-combine the ingredients as TSWLM, but this time with Star Wars garnish. It's a pallid echo of what made its predecessor effective. Roger, at the top of his game in TSWLM, is sleepwalking. Barbara Bach's line-readings were inexpressive, but at least she was alive, which is more than I can say for Lois Chiles, that triumph of the mortician's art. Drax has some genuinely witty lines (an oasis in a desert of buffoonery), but otherwise he's as boring a villain as Stromberg. Ken Adam produced stunning sets for both films, but the Liparus set get the nod for its vastness. The Lotus gives TSWLM the edge in gadgets. Barry's "Space March" is lovely, but his score is otherwise a bid sedate, so Hamlisch's vulgar disco has matching merit.

    I agree. I love Barry's music and I'll adjust my previous comment to include Drax as a better villain, but I think that's about it. Moonraker is pretty naff otherwise, and I think Spy is the one that does most things better. I can't agree that there's too many serious moments in it, Corinne's death being the only one that immediately springs to mind - a legitimately great scene.

    Granted, I've been fairly vocal about the Moore era not being my favourite, so perhaps my opinion is not up to much in this case.
  • Posts: 7,502
    Revelator wrote: »
    The Moonraker love is surprising and a bit baffling, imo. I honestly can't see how the two films are comparable in quality in any department, aside from possibly score.

    I agree entirely. MR is a shameless but enervated attempt to re-combine the ingredients as TSWLM, but this time with Star Wars garnish. It's a pallid echo of what made its predecessor effective. Roger, at the top of his game in TSWLM, is sleepwalking. Barbara Bach's line-readings were inexpressive, but at least she was alive, which is more than I can say for Lois Chiles, that triumph of the mortician's art. Drax has some genuinely witty lines (an oasis in a desert of buffoonery), but otherwise he's as boring a villain as Stromberg. Ken Adam produced stunning sets for both films, but the Liparus set get the nod for its vastness. The Lotus gives TSWLM the edge in gadgets. Barry's "Space March" is lovely, but his score is otherwise a bid sedate, so Hamlisch's vulgar disco has matching merit.

    I agree. I love Barry's music and I'll adjust my previous comment to include Drax as a better villain, but I think that's about it. Moonraker is pretty naff otherwise, and I think Spy is the one that does most things better. I can't agree that there's too many serious moments in it, Corinne's death being the only one that immediately springs to mind - a legitimately great scene.

    Granted, I've been fairly vocal about the Moore era not being my favourite, so perhaps my opinion is not up to much in this case.


    Where are the serious moments in Spy then?

    Both films make it clear they don´t want to be taken too seriously, that we should not overthink, look for much meaning or sense, just relax and enjoy the adventure. So which of the two do I enjoy the most if I feel like switching my brain off for an afternoon? I´d say they are pretty much neck and neck.
  • Posts: 11,425
    STLCards3 wrote: »
    STLCards3 wrote: »
    Octopussy wrote: »
    Moonraker does everything that The Spy Who Loved Me introduced much better, IMO.

    I agree up until space lazers start firing. I love MR until the last 20 minutes.

    I think that is the general consensus by most fans

    Yes...it is.

    As someone else said before I think the space stuff is actually reasonably well done. It's Ken Adam's last Bond film. It actually looks quite good.
  • Posts: 2,896
    jobo wrote: »
    Where are the serious moments in Spy then?

    The long wait before Bond's parachute deploys, Anya reminding Bond his dead wife, Jaws's first couple of murders, Bond and Anya's confrontation after she learns what happened to her lover, the Liparus battle, removal of the timer from the nuke, the countdown to the subs firing, the execution of Stromberg.

    You are certainly right that neither film wants to be taken dead seriously, but MR takes on more outlandishness and silliness than any Bond film can handle without capsizing. The centrifuge scene and death of whats-her-name are excellent and sober scenes, but they're dealt with in the film's first third.

  • ThunderballThunderball playing Chemin de Fer in a casino, downing Vespers
    Posts: 776
    🤔 Hmm. Huge volcano base climax complete with ninjas, a monorail and a big rocket VS a big watery base where the interior layout, while looking pretty cool, doesn't quite seem to jive with the exterior, which looks like a Legion of Doom knockoff. Both feature some of Ken Adam's incredible designs in the Bond series. But man, gimme the volcano any day. It was Adam's Pièce de Résistance. Better villain too.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,042
    Revelator wrote: »
    jobo wrote: »
    Where are the serious moments in Spy then?

    The long wait before Bond's parachute deploys, Anya reminding Bond his dead wife, Jaws's first couple of murders, Bond and Anya's confrontation after she learns what happened to her lover, the Liparus battle, removal of the timer from the nuke, the countdown to the subs firing, the execution of Stromberg.

    You are certainly right that neither film wants to be taken dead seriously, but MR takes on more outlandishness and silliness than any Bond film can handle without capsizing. The centrifuge scene and death of whats-her-name are excellent and sober scenes, but they're dealt with in the film's first third.

    Fully agreed.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    jobo wrote: »
    Revelator wrote: »
    The Moonraker love is surprising and a bit baffling, imo. I honestly can't see how the two films are comparable in quality in any department, aside from possibly score.

    I agree entirely. MR is a shameless but enervated attempt to re-combine the ingredients as TSWLM, but this time with Star Wars garnish. It's a pallid echo of what made its predecessor effective. Roger, at the top of his game in TSWLM, is sleepwalking. Barbara Bach's line-readings were inexpressive, but at least she was alive, which is more than I can say for Lois Chiles, that triumph of the mortician's art. Drax has some genuinely witty lines (an oasis in a desert of buffoonery), but otherwise he's as boring a villain as Stromberg. Ken Adam produced stunning sets for both films, but the Liparus set get the nod for its vastness. The Lotus gives TSWLM the edge in gadgets. Barry's "Space March" is lovely, but his score is otherwise a bid sedate, so Hamlisch's vulgar disco has matching merit.

    I agree. I love Barry's music and I'll adjust my previous comment to include Drax as a better villain, but I think that's about it. Moonraker is pretty naff otherwise, and I think Spy is the one that does most things better. I can't agree that there's too many serious moments in it, Corinne's death being the only one that immediately springs to mind - a legitimately great scene.

    Granted, I've been fairly vocal about the Moore era not being my favourite, so perhaps my opinion is not up to much in this case.


    Where are the serious moments in Spy then?

    Both films make it clear they don´t want to be taken too seriously, that we should not overthink, look for much meaning or sense, just relax and enjoy the adventure. So which of the two do I enjoy the most if I feel like switching my brain off for an afternoon? I´d say they are pretty much neck and neck.

    The death of Fekesh? The shooting of Stromberg? The shark murder of Stromberg Secretary? The murder of the Scientists?
  • Posts: 14,846
    jobo wrote: »
    No, TSWLM is not Roger Moore´s best Bond. Here are some of the reasons why:

    Stromberg

    He is simply quite forgettable, a far cry from the iconic charisma that the best villains in the series had to offer. The character required a good performance and posed a challenge for whoever took it on. Stromberg is an absolute lunatic and the performance needed to match that. I want to see some crazyness, not a stone faced, tedius villain.

    Major Amasova

    I have seen people try to defend Barbara Bach´s performance. My reaction to that is always; "why do you even bother"? She is so clearly not up to it. Completely miscast in a role far too big for her. Being wooden is not the same as acting strong and coldly detached. However Bach is not the only problem. Such an on the surface strong, resourceful and potentially iconic character needed better work from the writers as well. We are only told she is an amazing and resourceful agent, we never see it. The only thing she is actually able to do is to tag along, barely surviving and letting Bond do the work for her, just like any other damsel in the series. Imagine her being on her own, would she have been even close to dispaching of Jaws and retrieving the microfilm without assistance? Of course not! I always find it amusing when she threatens Bond with his life. Why on earth would she be a threat to Bond?

    The score

    I am of the somewhat controversial opinion that Hamlich´s score is far more annoying and dated than Conti´s for FYEO. I admit the title song is good, but a good title song doesn´t make a great score alone. Some of the tracks make me imagine I am at a cheap night club in the seventies and take me out of the film. The score´s biggest sin however is to make fun of the film. There´s always a fine balance with the most fantastical and silly entries in the series like Spy is. It has to tread carefully not to go overboard into parodi and goof. The silly music was really not needed in that regard. It highlights the sensation that these scenes are tensionless and should not be taken serious at all. And I am not only talking about the Lawrence of Arabia theme music. There are several cues that are put on simply to make fun of the situation and those cheesy saxophone versions of the theme tune whenever Bond and Amasova interact are horrible.

    The tanker finale

    It drags. It just does. We might be touching on personal preferance here, as I think good action scenes in Bond are relatively short, compact and intense, and I much prefer these to the drawn out, overindulgent ones like this one. However I think I can make this claim from an objective standpoint as well. The tanker action, for all it´s amazing imagery, explotions and brawl is just a little bit boring. Yes, I know the set is epic and looks fantastic. But a set is not enough to make an action scene exciting, neither is an overflow of shooting and explotions. You have to create tension, and this scene has precious little of it. It feels like I am watching a bunch of people run around and making noise in a museum. It doesn´t help that the plot is so cliché.

    Jaws the buffoon

    Jaws is a memorable character and he has an amazing introduction. In the first couple of scenes we see him he is incredibly menacing and frightening and we get a sense of expectation and dread for when Bond has to confront him in person. However, very early on, the film makers decide to make fun of him, turn him into a buffoon that looks both clumsy and incompetent. It is a desicion I will never fully understand. I, for one, much prefer the threatening, scary Jaws to the clumsy, comic relief one.

    In conclusion there is quite alot to enjoy in this film. The sets look fantastic, so does the locations and any film with Roger Moore on top form is worth watching. However the film is after all more a selection of iconic imagery and gags rather than a well constructed film with tension. And wether you prefer Bond to be escapist fun or tight thrillers (I lean towards the latter but enjoy a bit of both worlds) a Bond film without necesarry tension is not a classic in my book.

    That's pretty much it for me. Also, I'm never keen on Bond movies laying a bit too heavily on scifi. And TSWLM was a tad too derivative, basically a rewritten YOLT.
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    edited March 2020 Posts: 2,541
    I would say MR is quite similar to over the top sci-fi bond films than TSWLM .

    In a sense YOLT- MR- DAD- SP had some great moments but failed as a whole. Still enjoyable though, depends on the mood.
  • Posts: 1,885
    The Liparus battle is pretty underwhelming and somewhat predictable. Here's guys firing machine guns on one side and the other doing the same. Toss a few grenades, never mind they could lead to damage to the tanker. Bond's skills to shoot and toss grenades exceeds those of the others.

    What was the point of the Stromberg guards in the jeep? Did these guys really think they were about to make a turning point in the battle by charging at their opponents? And nothing like a handy flame thrower to deal with any pesky intruders who may dare to attack the control room.

    That battle pales compared with YOLT's. Sure there are also machine guns, grenades and pistols, but accompanied by unforgettable shots of the ninjas descending from the top, the ninja swordsman going off, using throwing stars and other exotic weapons and Kissy actually contributing to the cause.

    Now I will give TSWLM more credit in how they have to get to the control room and then stop the attack. Good suspense there. With YOLT it's defeating one guy, climbing some stairs and reaching an exploder button, which Blofeld explained with the patience and manner of a preschool teacher.
  • Posts: 7,502
    BT3366 wrote: »
    The Liparus battle is pretty underwhelming and somewhat predictable. Here's guys firing machine guns on one side and the other doing the same. Toss a few grenades, never mind they could lead to damage to the tanker. Bond's skills to shoot and toss grenades exceeds those of the others.

    What was the point of the Stromberg guards in the jeep? Did these guys really think they were about to make a turning point in the battle by charging at their opponents? And nothing like a handy flame thrower to deal with any pesky intruders who may dare to attack the control room.

    That battle pales compared with YOLT's. Sure there are also machine guns, grenades and pistols, but accompanied by unforgettable shots of the ninjas descending from the top, the ninja swordsman going off, using throwing stars and other exotic weapons and Kissy actually contributing to the cause.

    Now I will give TSWLM more credit in how they have to get to the control room and then stop the attack. Good suspense there. With YOLT it's defeating one guy, climbing some stairs and reaching an exploder button, which Blofeld explained with the patience and manner of a preschool teacher.



    Good summary and I agree completely.

    I will add that the mere fact that this is so obviously a copy of the volcano battle in YOLT down to basically every tiny detail, makes it even more dreary, predictable and dull.
  • Posts: 4,026
    jobo wrote: »
    BT3366 wrote: »
    The Liparus battle is pretty underwhelming and somewhat predictable. Here's guys firing machine guns on one side and the other doing the same. Toss a few grenades, never mind they could lead to damage to the tanker. Bond's skills to shoot and toss grenades exceeds those of the others.

    What was the point of the Stromberg guards in the jeep? Did these guys really think they were about to make a turning point in the battle by charging at their opponents? And nothing like a handy flame thrower to deal with any pesky intruders who may dare to attack the control room.

    That battle pales compared with YOLT's. Sure there are also machine guns, grenades and pistols, but accompanied by unforgettable shots of the ninjas descending from the top, the ninja swordsman going off, using throwing stars and other exotic weapons and Kissy actually contributing to the cause.

    Now I will give TSWLM more credit in how they have to get to the control room and then stop the attack. Good suspense there. With YOLT it's defeating one guy, climbing some stairs and reaching an exploder button, which Blofeld explained with the patience and manner of a preschool teacher.



    Good summary and I agree completely.

    I will add that the mere fact that this is so obviously a copy of the volcano battle in YOLT down to basically every tiny detail, makes it even more dreary, predictable and dull.

    I wonder what made Lewis Gilbert copy some things from YOLT exactly, like Bond arriving at the prison cells on the monorail.
  • Posts: 631
    Nah, you’re all wrong. The Liparus battle is great. A proper 1970s-style war film battle. The best battle between OHMSS’s Piz Gloria battle and TLD’s battle on the airfield.
  • Posts: 230
    BT3366 wrote: »
    The Liparus battle is pretty underwhelming and somewhat predictable. Here's guys firing machine guns on one side and the other doing the same. Toss a few grenades, never mind they could lead to damage to the tanker. Bond's skills to shoot and toss grenades exceeds those of the others.

    What was the point of the Stromberg guards in the jeep? Did these guys really think they were about to make a turning point in the battle by charging at their opponents? And nothing like a handy flame thrower to deal with any pesky intruders who may dare to attack the control room.

    That battle pales compared with YOLT's. Sure there are also machine guns, grenades and pistols, but accompanied by unforgettable shots of the ninjas descending from the top, the ninja swordsman going off, using throwing stars and other exotic weapons and Kissy actually contributing to the cause.

    Now I will give TSWLM more credit in how they have to get to the control room and then stop the attack. Good suspense there. With YOLT it's defeating one guy, climbing some stairs and reaching an exploder button, which Blofeld explained with the patience and manner of a preschool teacher.

    Sure - I agree with that. It's the other hour and forty minutes of each movie that makes TSWLM >>>>>> YOLT.
  • OctopussyOctopussy Piz Gloria, Schilthorn, Switzerland.
    Posts: 1,081
    jobo wrote: »
    Revelator wrote: »
    The Liparus climax is more complexly staged, with goals of overcoming Stromberg's army, advancing toward the heavily guarded command center, and finding a way to overcome its defence system. The Moonraker climax is a bunch of guys in spacesuits shooting each other with lasers. It's as brainless as the rest of the movie.

    The Moonraker love is surprising and a bit baffling, imo. I honestly can't see how the two films are comparable in quality in any department, aside from possibly score.

    I don't think they are that different. They are both very light hearted (silly in places), glamorous and completely OTT. There are some things I think MR does better. Drax is a significantly more satisfying villain, the score is far better and the locations are slightly more iconic and beautiful. Venice, Rio and the Iguazu waterfalls is a particularly impressive selection of locations and I have a personal soft spot for all of them.

    Yes I agree. TSWLM doesn't go as far as MR in silliness (double taking pigeons, gondolas, Jaws falling in love, etc.) but certain key scenes are far more memorable in MR -

    - the centrifuge scene (arguably one of the best scenes ever, probably the most Flemingesque moment, and the one time we genuinely feel scared for Bond in the Moore era)

    - the PTS

    - the cable car chase

    - the giant snake in the pond/lake

    - the dogs chasing in the forest

    - Bond shooting down the sniper out of the tree

    Add one of John Barry's best scores, and you can see why MR is highly thought of. For all its camp and silliness, there are genuinely serious moments too. I also think its Moore's best performance as Bond.

    +1

    Wholeheartedly agree.
  • Posts: 4,400
    Was the Lotus considered too 'sporty' a sports car back in 1977 for Bond? I know many aren't keen on the Aston Martin Valhalla in NTTD for the same reasons.

    But at the same in the 1970s, Bond was associated with the Aston Martin DB5. The DB5 was always more elegant and sexy. The Espirit always struck me as being a more Playboy supercar. More in league with a Ferrari or a Lamborghini....

    I suppose it suited Roger's interpretation of the character. A little more flash, flamboyant and ostentatious. Also, it's white! For those reasons, I kinda love it. It almost feels like a car a hip-hop car would want these days.

    Plus it suits the Sardinian setting with those blue skies and oceans. It really brings to mind images of the jetset lifestyle of the 1970's.

    K02symXugtjH8kwMLB5QN0z9Y2HedYrhCb2ZoxIyDGst84GVlhADLDTrZhxBGUWh2KoJP_2TEA7lRZgkL2HXeZKvz5Q
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 15,017
    Was the Lotus considered too 'sporty' a sports car back in 1977 for Bond? I know many aren't keen on the Aston Martin Valhalla in NTTD for the same reasons.

    But at the same in the 1970s, Bond was associated with the Aston Martin DB5. The DB5 was always more elegant and sexy. The Espirit always struck me as being a more Playboy supercar. More in league with a Ferrari or a Lamborghini....

    I don't think it was, I might be wrong but Lotus hasn't ever really been a luxury brand like Aston or Ferrari, it's more of a racy one- five years before this they were selling road legal small racing cars in kit form that you build yourself. What really helped is that Lotus got Giugiaro to design the Esprit, and that made it pretty much the best and classiest-looking Lotus ever if you ask me. I think it made him seem more modern and up to date.

    BT3366 wrote: »
    The Liparus battle is pretty underwhelming and somewhat predictable.

    Isn't that a problem with all of the 'big battle' finales though?
  • BennyBenny In the shadowsAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 14,888
    The Lotus was cutting edge as a car in 1977. Not only that, but it worked so well when it converted to a submarine. The sleek low design worked in convincing the audience that it could possibly do this. It was a real wow factor when Bond drove the Lotus off the jetty. One of those iconic Bond moments.
    boq6elmi72zb.jpg
  • Posts: 1,885
    mtm wrote: »
    BT3366 wrote: »
    The Liparus battle is pretty underwhelming and somewhat predictable.

    Isn't that a problem with all of the 'big battle' finales though?

    True, but a lot of my comparison in this case was directly with YOLT's, which has more than just guys firing guns and tossing grenades. It's got the spectacular sight of the ninjas sliding down from the top; the ninjas with the swords, especially the guy who acts like a whirlwind knocking off the various guards; ninja throwing stars; a rocket launching pad in the background; and it's in a volcano, so the setting really adds to it all. To top it off, the pace is much quicker, it really moves and gets to the end, whereas TSWLM's doesn't so much.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited June 2020 Posts: 15,017
    BT3366 wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    BT3366 wrote: »
    The Liparus battle is pretty underwhelming and somewhat predictable.

    Isn't that a problem with all of the 'big battle' finales though?

    True, but a lot of my comparison in this case was directly with YOLT's, which has more than just guys firing guns and tossing grenades. It's got the spectacular sight of the ninjas sliding down from the top; the ninjas with the swords, especially the guy who acts like a whirlwind knocking off the various guards; ninja throwing stars; a rocket launching pad in the background; and it's in a volcano, so the setting really adds to it all. To top it off, the pace is much quicker, it really moves and gets to the end, whereas TSWLM's doesn't so much.

    I must admit that stuff leaves me a bit cold in both. You could say that Spy's has a bit more plot to it: they have to free the crews, obtain the missile detonator, blow the shutters etc. But yeah, I think neither are my favourite moment of either film.

    I see folk wanting to see big battles at the end of more Bond films but I can really do without them.
  • Posts: 1,885
    There is a variation in TSWLM and it's different enough and leads to the real finale at Atlantis.

    It's funny, mtm. Whereas the big battle used to be the norm, now it has gone in the opposite direction of Bond and the girl against the villain and his minions for the finale, which made me long for a return to some of those instead.

    I think it's safe to say the best part of a Bond film is the ride getting to the finale rather than the finale itself. Although the Craig era at least has done away with the traditional clinch with the girl and the cringey line.

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited June 2020 Posts: 15,017
    Yeah I think something like LTK has the perfect big climax for a Bond film: a big, spectacular action scene culminating in a face-off. Hundreds of extras with machine guns shooting at each other don't really add much for my money.

    Or actually, another one which I think has a really satisfying action climax? A View To A Kill. Absolutely nothing wrong with a fight on a massive bridge if you ask me! :)
  • edited June 2020 Posts: 7,502
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah I think something like LTK has the perfect big climax for a Bond film: a big, spectacular action scene culminating in a face-off. Hundreds of extras with machine guns shooting at each other don't really add much for my money.

    Or actually, another one which I think has a really satisfying action climax? A View To A Kill. Absolutely nothing wrong with a fight on a massive bridge if you ask me! :)

    LTK has the best climax of all the films in my opinion. Absolutely brilliant action and suspense! I am also a fan of the ending in FRWL. The action might not be incredible in isolation, but the concept of Bond having to face of a selection of obstacles of different kinds, demonstrating different skills as he goes along, is intriguing to me. The finale in FYEO also appeals to me. The mountain climbing element is such a unique feature and incredibly suspensefull. I definitely prefer these climaxes to the 'army vs army' scenarios, or even worse, god forbid, 'Bond with machine gun vs army' which we see in the Brosnan era.
  • GadgetManGadgetMan Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 4,247
    I like TND's finale a lot, Bond doing his thing in slick fashion, with Wai Lin supporting him and Arnold giving Brosnan's Bond the Bond theme as he carries out his Naval Duty.
  • edited June 2020 Posts: 7,502
    GadgetMan wrote: »
    I like TND's finale a lot, Bond doing his thing in slick fashion, with Wai Lin supporting him and Arnold giving Brosnan's Bond the Bond theme as he carries out his Naval Duty.


    I'll resort to this, Norwegian saying: "Tastes are a like your bottom: They're split." ;))

    The finale in TND is by far my least favorite. It's absolutely horrible! #-o
  • GadgetManGadgetMan Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 4,247
    jobo wrote: »
    GadgetMan wrote: »
    I like TND's finale a lot, Bond doing his thing in slick fashion, with Wai Lin supporting him and Arnold giving Brosnan's Bond the Bond theme as he carries out his Naval Duty.


    I'll resort to this, Norwegian saying: "Tastes are a like your bottom: They're split." ;))

    The finale in TND is by far my least favorite. It's absolutely horrible! #-o

    Yeah, I get that. The stakes aren't that high....But it's just Bondian fun for me though.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited June 2020 Posts: 15,017
    jobo wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah I think something like LTK has the perfect big climax for a Bond film: a big, spectacular action scene culminating in a face-off. Hundreds of extras with machine guns shooting at each other don't really add much for my money.

    Or actually, another one which I think has a really satisfying action climax? A View To A Kill. Absolutely nothing wrong with a fight on a massive bridge if you ask me! :)

    LTK has the best climax of all the films in my opinion. Absolutely brilliant action and suspense!

    Yeah, it's not my favourite movie but I can't argue with the ending at all. If I had to pick a fault it's maybe that Sanchez's end comes a bit quickly, but otherwise it's an amazing climax. It might well be the best one for my money too, I can't think of another one which tops it. Skyfall, perhaps: the whole film builds to it and it's gripping stuff.
    jobo wrote: »
    I am also a fan of the ending in FRWL. The action might not be incredible in isolation, but the concept of Bond having to face of a selection of obstacles of different kinds, demonstrating different skills as he goes along, is intriguing to me.

    Yeah I like that a lot, even if perhaps it feels like the defeat of Grant is the most important part. But it's all great, you're right.
    jobo wrote: »
    The finale in FYEO also appeals to me. The mountain climbing element is such a unique feature and incredibly suspensefull. I definitely prefer these climaxes to the 'army vs army' scenarios, or even worse, god forbid, 'Bond with machine gun vs army' which we see in the Brosnan era.

    Yes, agreed.
    I guess, funnily enough, the last time we get a 'army vs army' ending is actually Tomorrow Never Dies: it's just that in this one Bond's allies never get out of their (model) boats!
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited June 2020 Posts: 8,042
    GadgetMan wrote: »
    I like TND's finale a lot, Bond doing his thing in slick fashion, with Wai Lin supporting him and Arnold giving Brosnan's Bond the Bond theme as he carries out his Naval Duty.

    I have a soft spot for it. Many refer to it as 'Machine Gun Bond' but it never impacts my enjoyment of it. It's a well-crafted sequence and to be honest, the bullets firing around are no less indulgent than similar sequences in similar Bond films like TSWLM and YOLT. Bond was an officer in the armed forces, after all. It works as an occasional tangent.

    I rewatched TSWLM at the weekend and it certainly is Roger's best. I love his performances in his previous two films, but this feels like a natural peak for him. He was at his most comfortable here, and the film goes all out in its excesses and it is a blast to watch.
  • GadgetManGadgetMan Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 4,247
    GadgetMan wrote: »
    I like TND's finale a lot, Bond doing his thing in slick fashion, with Wai Lin supporting him and Arnold giving Brosnan's Bond the Bond theme as he carries out his Naval Duty.

    I have a soft spot for it. Many refer to it as 'Machine Gun Bond' but it never impacts my enjoyment of it. It's a well-crafted sequence and to be honest, the bullets firing around are no less indulgent than similar sequences in similar Bond films like TSWLM and YOLT. Bond was an officer in the armed forces, after all. It works as an occasional tangent.

    I rewatched TSWLM at the weekend and it certainly is Roger's best. I love his performances in his previous two films, but this feels like a natural peak for him. He was at his most comfortable here, and the film goes all out in its excesses and it is a blast to watch.

    Yeah, TND has Picturesque Bondian stuffs....The female Countdown voice also adds a bit of a Sci-fi feel to it.

    Definitely, TSWLM is Moore's Best, there is a more 'Man On A Mission' Demeanour in his performance.
Sign In or Register to comment.