Avatar

Reporting For Duty

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

SIS_HQ

About

Username
SIS_HQ
Location
At the Vauxhall Headquarters
Joined
Visits
10,142
Last Active
Roles
Member
Location
At the Vauxhall Headquarters
Favourite Fleming Novel
Thunderball
Favourite Bond Film
On Her Majestys Secret Service
Favourite Bond Actor
-Classified-
Posts
4,097

Comments

  • DEKE_RIVERS wrote: » 007HallY wrote: » I mean, you could say loser in the sense that he essentially fails his mission by the end (but honestly, I think one of the most extraordinary things about SF is that everyone fails in some way by the end…
  • What I don't liked in Sanchez's mansion is this: So, I'd rather have Scaramanga's island, instead, plus, there are many amenities and places for me to explore.
  • He's not a loser in any of the films, what I've meant is incompetence and Bond pretty showed it in Goldfinger. I don't remember Bond being an incompetent one in Skyfall, if anything, he's an effective agent in that film, he's not even the reason …
  • LucknFate wrote: » CrabKey wrote: » @DEKE_RIVERS - What does that fresher approach look like? Not seeing much on this thread about where Bond 26 goes. For me, hiring Christopher Nolan is not an answer. I am interested in speculations about …
  • For me, the fact that Bond does nothing in the film at all, he's held captive in the third act and barely did nothing. He's pretty incompetent in this film as he led the Masterson sisters (Jill and Tilly) to death, then held captive by the villai…
  • #2 for me, I think it's an action packed and fun scene, but again, it's been a while since I've done that ranking, and it might've changed now, because on my recent viewings I found the boat chase to be a bit overlong (although not as dreadful as th…
  • The hand waving of tape in the end was a bit corny considering the grounded tone of the film, it's like the winking fish scene in LTK, just odd, it's not that much necessary, I guess. And I liked the style of the book with Spy vs. Spy kind of thi…
  • Well, I prefer Brosnan over Moore, so there's it. He just got stuck with weak materials to worked with. I think had he given a strong script, he could've unleashed his full potential. Yes, he had a wider range than Moore in terms of acting, I mea…
  • M_Blaise wrote: » I love Lazenby's Bond. He's not a refined or as mean as Connery but that just gives way for a more natural performance. The fact is to me is still embodies the role and all I see is James Bond. Obviously it helps that I've nev…
  • mtm wrote: » I actually struggle to think of many moments that do have more tension in the 007 series than the bomb bit. The laser table from GF is certainly up there of course. For me, possibly, here were those: * The centrifuge scene i…
  • Benny wrote: » If you don't feel anything when Bond faces off against Orlov in the train carriage, then you're watching a different film than me. Also the urgency when Bond defuses the bomb in OP, I know many people have a problem with Bond in th…
  • jetsetwilly wrote: » Oliver Reed was in the mould of another Robert Shaw. He would have made a great baddie. My 2 cents on Lazenby - great looking as Bond, great in the action scenes, terrible actor for most part, even though OHMSS is one of my…
  • George_Kaplan wrote: » Lazenby had swagger (though not the right sort for Bond), he was a good fighter, and I think he played the proposal scene and the ending very well. I give him the edge on Brosnan, but he's still second from the bottom for me…
  • 007ClassicBondFan wrote: » CrabKey wrote: » 007ClassicBondFan wrote: » Myself I prefer Moore as Bond to GL. I don’t have anything again Laz, but he just isn’t the strongest actor. Moore sometimes doesn’t deserve enough credit for the more …
  • For me Moore is what I consider the built in type of actor, in that he played the same, usual way all over again. That's for me, he basically played it with no effort, no genuinity, and not truly felt, his acting was just two dimensional, if one ma…
  • MajorDSmythe wrote: » Oliver Reed was a fine actor, but I can't picture him as Bond. Even if we set aside his notorious drinking sessions (so much that Lee Marvin, who liked a drink himself, confessed to not being able to keep up with Reed). Reed …
  • MakeshiftPython wrote: » ColonelAdamski wrote: » So would you be happy if James Bond could time-travel, and teleport, and have X-ray eyes? Because that's what you're saying, when you say "anything is possible". Yes... That’s how fictio…
  • echo wrote: » SIS_HQ wrote: » DarthDimi wrote: » 007HallY wrote: » SIS_HQ wrote: » talos7 wrote: » mtm wrote: » talos7 wrote: » A fully engaged Connery would have been outstanding. Did he ever voice any opinions about t…
  • 007HallY wrote: » We really lost some great pieces of film trivia by not having Reed as Bond. One can imagine the stories of actresses slapping Reed or Reed himself doing stupid things while drunk. They really got a good deal with Moore. Not on…
  • I liked Reed as a Bond villain, I personally don't find him attractive at all, I've seen him in Assassination Bureau trailers, and he's not handsome, he just didn't have the looks. I think he would've been an accurate version of Fleming's Largo o…
  • peter wrote: » @SIS_HQ --you know Oliver Reed? How old are you again?? I know Reed because he got connected with Bond, I'm a Bond fan, of course, I know him 😁. Although I haven't watched The Assassination Bureau, just seen some traile…
  • 007ClassicBondFan wrote: » To play the devil’s advocate here, I’ll say that a lot of issues brought up on here with regards to the casting of Lazenby and his performance could’ve been avoided entirely had they gone with someone like Oliver Reed, w…
  • mtm wrote: » 007HallY wrote: » DarthDimi wrote: » 007HallY wrote: » SIS_HQ wrote: » talos7 wrote: » mtm wrote: » talos7 wrote: » A fully engaged Connery would have been outstanding. Did he ever voice any opinions about …
  • 007HallY wrote: » SIS_HQ wrote: » 007HallY wrote: » DarthDimi wrote: » 007HallY wrote: » SIS_HQ wrote: » talos7 wrote: » mtm wrote: » talos7 wrote: » A fully engaged Connery would have been outstanding. Did he ever …
  • ColonelAdamski wrote: » SIS_HQ wrote: » Could you clarify it to me, maybe I could remember this statement? Thank you. Sorry, that was my fault. I've edited it now. 👍
  • Benny wrote: » peter wrote: » Yes, I don’t think Lazenby is the sharpest knife in the drawer. If Marty Scorsese, Kubrick, and Coppola were brought in to work with Lazenby, I don’t think they’d have brought out a better performance. Out of fru…
  • peter wrote: » Yes, I don’t think Lazenby is the sharpest knife in the drawer. If Marty Scorsese, Kubrick, and Coppola were brought in to work with Lazenby, I don’t think they’d have brought out a better performance. Out of frustration, I see the…
  • SIS_HQ wrote: » Would you have been satisfied if the "James Bond will return" line hadn't been added, and if Bond 26 was announced a few years later? Just an honest, neutral question, no trap. [/quote] I don't think I've said this statemen…
  • Benny wrote: » @SIS_HQ you have a knowledge and have seen movies that some of our older members probably haven’t seen. For a Filipino girl in her early twenties, is this common? They've interested me, that's why 😊