It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I'm sorry, did you watch a different film?!
Brosnan's (script/line) delivery was better than Dalton's..?? @-)
How I often wished I could have said the same thing of Brosnan as Bond. Sadly, I too often found his 'acting' so wooden, it was like someone had thrown a chair onto the set.
Pretty much by his own admission Brosnan was overawed by the role and frankly didn't know what to do with the character. Hence you have the sense of a bloke turning up on set and just trying to 'look cool', rather than giving any thought to who/what Bond is.
Give me Dalton, with whatever his flaws were, any day of the week. As Bond at least.
But trying to defend his 'acting' is like trying to talk your way out of a watertight Nuremberg trial...
I know Brosnan sometimes overdid it too and I'm not going to pretend otherwise.
I was talking about Dalton though.
I think Dalton got it right more often than not though. I'm not claiming his performances are flawless, I just think he was very good in the role. My view has always been that he delivered one of the best debut performances in the series.
I agree with you actually that he got it right more often than not and that his debut performance in TLD is solid.
I think Brosnan did some good things in GE though. You'll probably disagree with me but I think he's very good here:
Anyway, I don't think it would have been as commercially successful as it turned out to be with Pierce "this guy was supposed to be Bond back in 87" Brosnan.
I have to say, I do enjoy GE a lot as it is and I think Brosnan was perfect in it. One thing is for sure though, if Dalton would have been in GE, no way the Eric Serra score, which I actually like, would have worked.
There's no denying Brosnan's financial success as Bond. As a fan though that is no compensation for a string of abysmal Bond movies.
I don't think it would have been the smash hit it finally became, but it would have served as a proper sendoff to Dalton, who I believe would have delivered an even better performance, being seasoned in the role and having a better direction/writing.
But if there wouldn't have been a hiatus and GE would have been Dalton fourth movie in 1993 then yes, I believe GE would have worked and would have been a success.
Now you seem to get a lot of people saying stuff like this:
http://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2014/apr/14/james-bond-pierce-brosnan-007-goldeneye
Could have been written by me.
There are people that still rate Brosnan. Some as the best of the series. Whether you, I, or anyone else agrees is irrelevant. It's fact.
There are people who consider George Clooney a great Batman and others who belief the earth is flat. It doesn't mean they're right.
Hence your comment about 'many if not all' isn't particularly well founded. People still buy his take and don't find him either lazy or smug.
What do you mean some were blind at the time? Blind to what?
That opinion is now much less so than it was at the time. From what I have read anyway. Of course, he still has his fans.....as I said, some are very vocal and some are strangely closet, but they are no doubt there in numbers. Not denying that. Even they won't make the 'best since Connery' comment so confidently any more though.....maybe a few.
Don't remember the new Connery angle, just the 'best since', which everyone gets. I'm sure many have downgraded him, people always need a scapegoat.
The same applies to Craig as well. Any comparisons to Connery at this time are premature. He needs his successor to do a few before his run can be looked at with the benefit of hindsight and some objectivity, imho.
Brosnan still has his fans, and they are numerous...., as does Moore and Dalton. However, he was on a pedestal of sorts for a time, and this is no longer the case.
"Pierce is absolutely right: the perfect 007. Born to play him, if you like, in the sense that he lights up the screen with a winning mixture of action, humour and romance. He's also a damned good actor and knows exactly what he's doing"
Campbell certainly spoke some bullshit when publicising Goldeneye!
Funny how he said "Tim Dalton, I felt, looked too angry and unrelaxed" and then gave us the more sombre CR. Makes you wonder which of the two styles of GE\Brosnan or CR\Craig he preferred. I'd suspect the latter and appreciate he was just towing the line back in 1995 but I've still never respected the man for so publicly denegrating Moore and Dalton in order to promote Brosnan.
I'd have liked a third Dalton film but six years was too large a gap to come back from and I'd have hated Dalton being in Goldeneye itself given how excruciatingly awful the dialogue was.
Brosnan being the perfect Bond? Delusion and publicity junket hyperbole from Campbell rather than any smidgen of truth.
The problem with Brosnan's performance is that he actually acted like he thought he was born - or had a god given right - to play the role but sadly he did nothing with it. So maybe Campbell's only direction to him was "perfect Pierce, you're just perfect".
I agree with you on the GE dialogue. I've always thought it was awful.
The things is that a good actor can make something even of the worst script, and I've always felt GE might have actually suited Dalton's scenery chewing tendency. He's shown especially more recently that he can camp it up with the best of them. I actually think he could have elevated the nonsense in GE to a different level.