Who should/could be a Bond actor?

1133213331334133513361338»

Comments

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 19,699
    Yeah I don't think Dickinson is unknown at all, I find that a slightly curiously description. Not A list maybe, but he's a properly famous film actor.
  • edited November 25 Posts: 6,442
    I suppose that's the question - how unknown is 'unknown' supposedly by the standards of those making this next Bond film, and how much in practice is 'established' a good description by my standards?

    Like, I'd say if the next Bond were Solly McLeod, I would say that's an established, but lesser known actor (lesser known than Craig was prior to Bond I suppose, but established with a notable filmography behind and with some pretty big names in there). Is he an unknown by Amazon's standards? Probably. Go a bit further and I guess you could imagine if someone like, say, Jack O'Connell were the next Bond. That's a slightly older and very much established actor too, very comparable to Craig pre-Bond. Certainly not unknown and with one foot in the door with Hollywood, but not exactly Tom Cruise level of fame either. Is he an unknown by Amazon's standards? Perhaps. Both I think would be realistic possibilities, and both could be seen as 'lesser known' but still established actors.

    I don't think we're getting a Lazenby this time round, although even he put in the hours for the role. They need an actor with experience, commitment, and perhaps with enough maturity to handle this role (whatever age that is in practice). It's a big job. But at the same time it can't be an A-Lister or someone obvious without purpose.
  • Posts: 332
    Unknown means, no agent. Bottom of the barrel stuff
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 837
    007HallY wrote: »
    Since62 wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    That he has been too tall for his other roles? I’ve seen him in a few things and he seemed fine to me. Is anyone saying he’s too tall to play Heathcliff? I just don’t think it’s a problem.

    Yeah. He's fine. I don't know where I read it. But I read something about an insider at Amazon, saying Amazon have their eyes set on Elordi as James Bond. I don't know.

    I saw Elordi's newest film. OK, but, that hair and scars and very pale skin...will present quite a challenge to the makeup folks.

    Least his jawline’s passable 😉

    Anyway, the way I see it is it’d be an anticlimactic surprise if Elordi got it, despite how much he’s been touted. I’ve also said in the past it’s a role that might not actually benefit him in the long run. I’m not entirely convinced he’s the best choice either.

    I think in practice it’ll be an actor established but not at Elordi’s fame at the current time (which I think is in the realm of better known now). I don’t think they’ll be unknown in the strictest sense but not ‘Hollywood’ famous either. It may or may not be a surprise to us, but I think regular audiences will be surprised and hopefully intrigued. I think that’s what they’ll be going for. Elordi’s potentially a red herring when predicting the next Bond in that sense, a bit like rumours itd be High Jackman or Colin Farrell in 2005 (although I suspect they’ve considered him).

    I would have taked Jackman and Farrell in a heartbeat in 05.
  • Posts: 6,442
    Nothing wrong with either. But I think Craig was the better option.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    Posts: 1,172
    I’m starting to see praise for Josh O’Connor’s turn in Wake Up Dead Man on message boards from those who’ve already seen it. I'm guessing this will mean the talk here will turn to him for a bit as more people see the film (I’ll watch it when it hits Netflix at Christmas).
  • Callum Turner now the current favourite for Bond after surge in betting over the last 48 hours

    https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2025/11/28/telegraph-callum-turner-strongly-rumored-to-play-james-bond
  • Posts: 6,442
    Not sure how convinced I am by World of Reel, but I’ve always said Turner would make sense and I think is at the right level of fame. Not sure if it’ll be him in practice, but we’ll see.
  • weboffearweboffear Scotland
    Posts: 70
    absolutely no interest in seeing a Callum Turner Bond film
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,744
    He’s not a favorite, but not a deal breaker…
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited November 28 Posts: 19,699
    Agent7777 wrote: »
    Callum Turner now the current favourite for Bond after surge in betting over the last 48 hours

    https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2025/11/28/telegraph-callum-turner-strongly-rumored-to-play-james-bond

    That's interesting, isn't it. I think a similar thing happened with Craig didn't it? I remember it happened with Matt Smith when he became Dr Who: essentially because he told his mates and they all put bets on.
    Now, I think Turner's now big enough not to act unprofessionally like that so it could be something internal from a casting process, or it could just be that there's some Instagram post we haven't seen which has posted a clip of him saying 'James Bond' which has taken off (I think something like that is pretty likely to be honest).

    I'm with Talos7 though: not a favourite, but I'm not against him at all. And he's one of these who'd I'd say is at exactly the right level of fame: he's sort of doing okay and his profile is rising but hasn't quite found that way up to the next level just yet and is doing decent, but not amazing films. He was in that Variety issue too the other day, so is being looked at. Folks like Dickinson and O'Connor I would say are finding better projects and kind of have more to lose by doing Bond right now. He feels very possible to me.
  • Posts: 6,442
    My only question would be how Turner would fit into a film about Bond’s early naval days. He’s young, but not as young as that story would imply the new Bond is going to be.

    I suppose it’s all speculation though (not sure I like the sound of a Bond film being set in the 1950s though, and I think while Bond’s naval career can give us some good story choices, I think he’s far more interesting as 007. We’ll see what we get I suppose).
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,823
    I’ll eat my hat and give up my house if B26 is a period piece from the 50s or 60s. No way Amazon is doing that.
  • edited November 28 Posts: 6,442
    It's tricky to imagine for me just being completely cynical about it! It doesn't strike me as the most effective way of making the most successful Bond film possible (in fact I suspect it'd be quite a surprise for most audiences, and I'd argue most viewers see Bond films as being contemporary).

    Stranger things have happened I suppose. It seems to be all speculation at this point though.
  • Posts: 16,277
    talos7 wrote: »
    He’s not a favorite, but not a deal breaker…

    Same here. But I'm very skeptical about the news.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    edited November 28 Posts: 2,937
    I wouldn't be against Turner being cast, he wouldn't be my top choice, but I think he's a safe choice. I think he'd have to wear his hair a bit longer, because I don't he looks Bondian with short hair

    I don't like the idea of a period piece Bond film, each Bond short exist in modern day.
  • Posts: 464
    007HallY wrote: »
    My only question would be how Turner would fit into a film about Bond’s early naval days. He’s young, but not as young as that story would imply the new Bond is going to be.

    I suppose it’s all speculation though (not sure I like the sound of a Bond film being set in the 1950s though, and I think while Bond’s naval career can give us some good story choices, I think he’s far more interesting as 007. We’ll see what we get I suppose).

    But why is that a question when there's no reason to believe they're doing that?
  • edited 12:16am Posts: 6,442
    M_Blaise wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    My only question would be how Turner would fit into a film about Bond’s early naval days. He’s young, but not as young as that story would imply the new Bond is going to be.

    I suppose it’s all speculation though (not sure I like the sound of a Bond film being set in the 1950s though, and I think while Bond’s naval career can give us some good story choices, I think he’s far more interesting as 007. We’ll see what we get I suppose).

    But why is that a question when there's no reason to believe they're doing that?

    True. ;) I'm quite sceptical about the article/rumours in general, and even if Turner is being considered there's still a whole audition process to go.

    Anyway, for what it's worth I'd say out of all the rumoured actors that have been floated publicly since Amazon took over Bond, Turner makes the most sense to me. Tom Holland would feel like stunt casting, Harris Dickinson, while an extraordinary actor, I think would be a touch too broody and lack some of the edge that Bond needs. Honestly, I'd say the same about Jacob Elordi. There's Scott Rose Marsh I suppose, but having seen him act I'm not sure I'd hold my breath!

    I like Turner as an actor. I think he's a good age for Bond too, and as he's gotten older I feel he's gained more gravitas as an actor. He comes off as athletic and has good physicality, which is a plus. I think most women would find him good looking. I'd also say he comes off very well during interviews and genuinely seems pleasant and interesting (so essentially someone Amazon may well want as the face of their franchise). He's been around a while but isn't an A-lister. If he were cast it wouldn't necessarily be a surprise for us here, but it might well be for the average viewer who wouldn't automatically know who he is. I think there'd more benefits to him than downsides, but we'll see. I'd be happy if he were cast and would be interested to see what he does with the role.
  • Posts: 2,591
    They've released his new movie. I wouldn't be surprised if this is just a hoax.
Sign In or Register to comment.