Who should/could be a Bond actor?

113281329133013311333

Comments

  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    edited November 10 Posts: 957
    I could see Turner as Bond, although he wouldn't be my first choice. Elordi just strikes me as too odd to really nail Bond.

    My first choice is still Leo Suter.

    MV5BZDI5NmY2OWUtZmRhZS00MTEwLWE2NmItZTQ0ZGJmYjVkZDVjXkEyXkFqcGc@.jpg


    808e11207864f3365b1f69b31ce97aeadd8f8e82-2700x1134.jpg?auto=format&crop=entropy&fit=crop&h=1134&q=80&w=2016



  • Posts: 2,537
    I could see Turner as Bond, although he wouldn't be my first choice. Elordi just strikes me as too odd to really nail Bond.

    My first choice is still Leo Suter.

    MV5BZDI5NmY2OWUtZmRhZS00MTEwLWE2NmItZTQ0ZGJmYjVkZDVjXkEyXkFqcGc@.jpg


    808e11207864f3365b1f69b31ce97aeadd8f8e82-2700x1134.jpg?auto=format&crop=entropy&fit=crop&h=1134&q=80&w=2016



    He looks like the guy of Cover up and Voyagers..
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,931
    I could see Turner as Bond, although he wouldn't be my first choice. Elordi just strikes me as too odd to really nail Bond.

    My first choice is still Leo Suter.

    MV5BZDI5NmY2OWUtZmRhZS00MTEwLWE2NmItZTQ0ZGJmYjVkZDVjXkEyXkFqcGc@.jpg


    808e11207864f3365b1f69b31ce97aeadd8f8e82-2700x1134.jpg?auto=format&crop=entropy&fit=crop&h=1134&q=80&w=2016



    Suter is my top choice for the role, but I do think he needs a Guy Richie film or a prime time BBC drama to show his potential as Bond.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe Edward Berger for Bond 27
    Posts: 9,415
    Suter is an airhead.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    edited November 10 Posts: 8,719
    Suter is an airhead.

    Oh please, I’ve watched several interviews and he is far from being an “ airhead “ .


  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    Posts: 957
    He's great in the Lynley series, heres a trailer:

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=cvTiXqTvwVg&t=39s


    Tell me he doesn't look like Bond here?


    Leo-Suter-in-Lynley-BBC-Studios.jpg?w=1888&h=1061&crop=1


    lynley-leo-suter-sofia-barclay-1014x676.jpg

  • Posts: 6,352
    I need to watch it fully, but from what I've heard from a mate who's watched it and clips I'm still very sceptical about how good a screen actor he is. He's not an 'airhead' for what it's worth (in fact he seems like a nice chap and quite smart). But honestly, I'm not convinced he's up to playing Bond onscreen, and doesn't quite have the right presence. Absolutely happy to be proven wrong though.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,719
    007HallY wrote: »
    I need to watch it fully, but from what I've heard from a mate who's watched it and clips I'm still very sceptical about how good a screen actor he is. He's not an 'airhead' for what it's worth (in fact he seems like a nice chap and quite smart). But honestly, I'm not convinced he's up to playing Bond onscreen, and doesn't quite have the right presence. Absolutely happy to be proven wrong though.

    I think he has tremendous potential but I’m absolutely aware that he could fall flat during the casting process including screentests.
  • edited November 10 Posts: 6,352
    talos7 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    I need to watch it fully, but from what I've heard from a mate who's watched it and clips I'm still very sceptical about how good a screen actor he is. He's not an 'airhead' for what it's worth (in fact he seems like a nice chap and quite smart). But honestly, I'm not convinced he's up to playing Bond onscreen, and doesn't quite have the right presence. Absolutely happy to be proven wrong though.

    I think he has tremendous potential but I’m absolutely aware that he could fall flat during the casting process including screentests.

    Oh yeah. I mean, this is out of our perception entirely. Personally, I just don't see enough there to fill the big screen as Bond, or even a lot of other roles, but as I said I'm willing to be proven wrong, and would be happy if it came in exchange of a James Bond I enjoy. I'll certainly be looking out for the next couple of films he's in.

    His voice is very good though, and I genuinely believe he'd be good in a video game or audio adaptation. A bit like how I don't think Toby Stephens would have been the best option for Bond but excelled in that area.
  • Posts: 16,226
    007HallY wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    I need to watch it fully, but from what I've heard from a mate who's watched it and clips I'm still very sceptical about how good a screen actor he is. He's not an 'airhead' for what it's worth (in fact he seems like a nice chap and quite smart). But honestly, I'm not convinced he's up to playing Bond onscreen, and doesn't quite have the right presence. Absolutely happy to be proven wrong though.

    I think he has tremendous potential but I’m absolutely aware that he could fall flat during the casting process including screentests.

    Oh yeah. I mean, this is out of our perception entirely. Personally, I just don't see enough there to fill the big screen as Bond, or even a lot of other roles, but as I said I'm willing to be proven wrong, and would be happy if it came in exchange of a James Bond I enjoy. I'll certainly be looking out for the next couple of films he's in.

    His voice is very good though, and I genuinely believe he'd be good in a video game or audio adaptation. A bit like how I don't think Toby Stephens would have been the best option for Bond but excelled in that area.

    Nowadays Toby Stephens would make a great Bond villain. He looks far more menacing mature than he was in DAD. He'd make a great Drax now, ironically enough.
    He's great in the Lynley series, heres a trailer:

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=cvTiXqTvwVg&t=39s


    Tell me he doesn't look like Bond here?


    Leo-Suter-in-Lynley-BBC-Studios.jpg?w=1888&h=1061&crop=1


    lynley-leo-suter-sofia-barclay-1014x676.jpg

    He has the looks. I don't think it's enough but who knows. Lynley might be his Remington Steele.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,719
    Needs a better haircut! 😂

    In his defense, this one suits the character of Lynley
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 795
    Suter really has Bond in him those photos.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited November 11 Posts: 3,400
    Suter has the height, the physique and the voice and Vikings Valhalla showed that he's adept at the physical, action stuff. He absolutely should be in there for a screentest. The one and only thing that gives me pause about Suter is that he just looks so darn nice and pleasant without the beard. I always liked Viv Michel's initial impression of Bond in TSWLM, where he actually looks dangerous and for a moment she's not sure if he's a villain or the guy who's going to save her from the villains. Connery, Dalton and Craig all projected that. Someone like Jason Isaacs would've had it too and it's something I'd like to see carried over with the new guy. Still, it's a small element and Brosnan and Sir Rog were successful Bonds without it, so I guess it's a 'desirable' not an 'essential.' Anyway, yes, agreed - Suter definitely deserves to be in the mix.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,719
    I hope several actors run a rigorous casting gauntlet, one that test for every aspect of the character; with one clearly rising to the top.

  • edited November 12 Posts: 167
    Who play Bond ?
    Lots of choices but it depend on what the studio wants to do with Bond.
    Cavill was excellent in Mission impossible as the bad guy, Aaron Taylor Johnson was good in Bullet Train.,again a bad guy, Hardy, Stevens, Norton, Turner,even rumours the guy who playing the new Frankenstein monster .
    There are other possibles Ed Skrein, Nicholas Hoult but my choice would be Mathew Goode
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 795
    talos7 wrote: »
    I hope several actors run a rigorous casting gauntlet, one that test for every aspect of the character; with one clearly rising to the top.

    I hope many rises on top in screentests.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,719
    MSL49 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    I hope several actors run a rigorous casting gauntlet, one that test for every aspect of the character; with one clearly rising to the top.

    I hope many rises on top in screentests.

    But, “ in the end, there can be only one “
  • Posts: 1,782
    talos7 wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    I hope several actors run a rigorous casting gauntlet, one that test for every aspect of the character; with one clearly rising to the top.

    I hope many rises on top in screentests.

    But, “ in the end, there can be only one “

    That might favor Cavill, if the planned Highlander film gets made...(he's cast in the protagonist part, and Dave Bautista as the primary antagonist <-- tough to replace Clancy Brown in that part !
  • Posts: 319
    At least there's the safe choice.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,719
    Not a shot it’ll be Cavill…
  • Posts: 319
    No, the real safe choice.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 14,874
    chron.png
    'A Texan should not play James Bond': Actor
    shuts down 007 rumor
    A James Bond from Texas just does not make any sense whatsoever.
    By Jamil David, Culture ReporterAug 21, 2025
    https://www.chron.com/culture/tv/article/glen-powell-james-bond-role-cast-20827428.php

    The iconic James Bond franchise is in a transitional period. Amazon recently purchased the franchise from longtime caretakers of the intellectual property, the Broccoli family (yes, Broccoli). But now, the company is seeking its new agent 007 for the next iteration of the classic character. There are rumours of outside-the-box thinking around the next Bond—the first woman Bond, or first Bond as a person of color, or even a Bond born in Austin, Texas. Yes, for some reason, Glen Powell was asked if he wanted to play the British icon.

    [MORE]
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,622
    Click bait at it’s worst @RichardTheBruce

    Powell might be an interesting choice for Felix Leiter. But he may overshadow the actor playing Bond.
    I’m not sure he’s that good an actor. He’s very likeable. But I feel he may have limited range.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 795
    Is out there actor like Cavill who impressed his screentest and almost get the role at age of 22?
  • Posts: 6,352
    Cavill's screen-test is very interesting in hindsight, but I don't think it's quite the knock out (or indeed the failure) that some may see it as. I suspect he was directed by whoever was conducting the audition to play the scene in slightly different ways each time (ie. 'ok, let's do another Henry, but this time you really have less time for Onnatop and don't trust her' etc). His tape feels different to the others in that way, who play it similarly each take with much more minor adjustments.

    They obviously saw something in him, and it's impressive that any 22 year old could get that far with Bond. But I can very much see why they went with Craig. Other than being the superior actor I think they just had someone who understood what their approach to the role would be and could convey it. I think that'll be the case this time round with whoever gets the role.
  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    edited November 13 Posts: 957
    I would happily take Cavill taking on the role in 2018/19 or so than getting No Time To Die and Amazon.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 795
    007HallY wrote: »
    Cavill's screen-test is very interesting in hindsight, but I don't think it's quite the knock out (or indeed the failure) that some may see it as. I suspect he was directed by whoever was conducting the audition to play the scene in slightly different ways each time (ie. 'ok, let's do another Henry, but this time you really have less time for Onnatop and don't trust her' etc). His tape feels different to the others in that way, who play it similarly each take with much more minor adjustments.

    They obviously saw something in him, and it's impressive that any 22 year old could get that far with Bond. But I can very much see why they went with Craig. Other than being the superior actor I think they just had someone who understood what their approach to the role would be and could convey it. I think that'll be the case this time round with whoever gets the role.

    Can you guess why he got "easier" time in audition and others didnt?
  • Posts: 6,352
    MSL49 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Cavill's screen-test is very interesting in hindsight, but I don't think it's quite the knock out (or indeed the failure) that some may see it as. I suspect he was directed by whoever was conducting the audition to play the scene in slightly different ways each time (ie. 'ok, let's do another Henry, but this time you really have less time for Onnatop and don't trust her' etc). His tape feels different to the others in that way, who play it similarly each take with much more minor adjustments.

    They obviously saw something in him, and it's impressive that any 22 year old could get that far with Bond. But I can very much see why they went with Craig. Other than being the superior actor I think they just had someone who understood what their approach to the role would be and could convey it. I think that'll be the case this time round with whoever gets the role.

    Can you guess why he got "easier" time in audition and others didnt?

    There’s also the possibility that he adjusted the performance himself with each take rather than being directed. But either can happen. I guess they just saw something in him whatever way - albeit something that was a bit underdeveloped.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    edited 1:04pm Posts: 1,160
    On an other site I saw someone (I assume with connections in the industry) say that they’d heard he’s not a natural actor but is cooperative and works hard. It wouldn’t surprise me if one of the things Campbell liked about him was he willingness to take direction. He was pretty young back then.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,719
    On an other site I saw someone (I assume with connections in the industry) say that they’d heard he’s not a natural actor but is cooperative and works hard. It wouldn’t surprise me if one of the things Campbell liked about him was he willingness to take direction. He was pretty young back then.

    This is my problem with Cavill; I can always sense that he is "acting" and contemplating every word before it comes out of his mouth.
Sign In or Register to comment.