EoN sells up - Amazon MGM to produce 007 going forwards (Steven Knight to Write)

1127128129130131133»

Comments

  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,975
    Thanks for the background. I'd forgotten.

    I'd love to see Bond meet a young Mathis.
  • 007HallY wrote: »
    One of my favourite quotes on these forums (I'm sorry as I have no idea who wrote it) is someone who replied to a post that said Thomas Doherty reminded them of Sean Connery. The reply went something like 'yes, but without the masculinity'.

    It was me. At the time I said that Doherty was like Sean Connery but with all of his masculinity removed. I still stand by that. Doherty exudes a very camp vibe both on and off screen.

  • Posts: 2,400
    The article doesn't mention the latest novels so I'm guessing there won't be SPECTRE this time.
  • edited 11:00am Posts: 380
    Not really a fan with the stuff about Bond's naval history; in fact I think the whole Bond in the Navy thing is probably one of the biggest misconceptions people have about the character.

    Bond wasn't actually a part of the Royal Navy; he was RNVR Special Branch (in other words, Naval Intelligence). In Thunderball, he is described as chocolate sailor; that is, a sailor who didn't do much sailing and just looked good in uniform. M says in YOLT that Bond's work pre and post war was in the same department, and his naval title was due to the secrecy of his work. In addition, he worked with M before the war in a gambling job where he first met Mathis. Any serious adaptation with Bond swabbing decks or manning submarines isn't as faithful as it claims.

    If any modern equivalent exists it'd probably be in the Intelligence division of the SBS or something like that where he would have a heavy connection to the spy side of things.

    I always assumed that literary Bond served in Fleming’s 30 Assault Unit or possibly the SOE during the war, where he learnt and became conditioned to kill in cold blood, and generally do the action aspect of being a 00. I understand that Fleming was always frustrated that he was not allowed to go on missions - so would be logical for his Bond alter ego to have been part of 30AU.

    I also seem to remember a 1960s promotional video where they claimed he fought in the marines in Berlin in the closing stage of the war aged 17 - I’ve looked but can’t find it on YouTube.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 628
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    My only question is Doherty good enough actor to play Bond?

    I guess he's good enough an actor, but that's not the point. It just depends on if he's right for the part.

    What you think is he right for the part?
  • Posts: 2,400
    007HallY wrote: »
    One of my favourite quotes on these forums (I'm sorry as I have no idea who wrote it) is someone who replied to a post that said Thomas Doherty reminded them of Sean Connery. The reply went something like 'yes, but without the masculinity'.

    It was me. At the time I said that Doherty was like Sean Connery but with all of his masculinity removed. I still stand by that. Doherty exudes a very camp vibe both on and off screen.


    Connery without his masculinity is like a car without wheels!
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 9,199
    It could be said that Denis Villeneuves early career is not dissimilar to the early Bond directors. Would he be considered a quintessential Bond director choice?
  • edited 12:10pm Posts: 5,989
    MSL49 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    My only question is Doherty good enough actor to play Bond?

    I guess he's good enough an actor, but that's not the point. It just depends on if he's right for the part.

    What you think is he right for the part?

    It's just an issue of what his strengths are what impression he gives off as an actor. I understand he comes off a bit camp in the above clip, but he actually can do sophisticated and even sexual going from what I've seen him in. It's just that Bond requires that raw, alpha male gravitas. That element of brutishness you could say. Doherty just doesn't quite have that in my opinion.
    007HallY wrote: »
    One of my favourite quotes on these forums (I'm sorry as I have no idea who wrote it) is someone who replied to a post that said Thomas Doherty reminded them of Sean Connery. The reply went something like 'yes, but without the masculinity'.

    It was me. At the time I said that Doherty was like Sean Connery but with all of his masculinity removed. I still stand by that. Doherty exudes a very camp vibe both on and off screen.


    In fairness, you could argue he's an actor at the end of the day, and how he approaches the character is what counts. But I don't think he's quite right even in that regard. I think going from The Invitation he'd actually make an interesting villain.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 628
    So Doherty is too "soft" for Bond?
  • Posts: 5,989
    MSL49 wrote: »
    So Doherty is too "soft" for Bond?

    I wouldn't say too soft (again, he's an actor at the end of the day, and I'm sure he's capable of conveying intensity). I just don't think he gives off Bond.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 628
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    So Doherty is too "soft" for Bond?

    I wouldn't say too soft (again, he's an actor at the end of the day, and I'm sure he's capable of conveying intensity). I just don't think he gives off Bond.

    What you mean by "gives off Bond"? Im not native english speaker.
  • Posts: 5,989
    MSL49 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    So Doherty is too "soft" for Bond?

    I wouldn't say too soft (again, he's an actor at the end of the day, and I'm sure he's capable of conveying intensity). I just don't think he gives off Bond.

    What you mean by "gives off Bond"? Im not native english speaker.

    It’s tricky to explain to be honest. He’s just… not quite right for the part in my opinion.
  • Posts: 4,454
    I always liked the idea of seeing Bond in his Royal Navy days - especially if it is contemporary. Those Royal Navy adverts that come on UK tv always made interesting fodder to be developed for a potential film...




    You can also explore stories like PTSD from life in the Navy and other interesting aspects of a younger Bond's development. He must have seen some dark things in the Navy. I also recently saw the film Disco Boy and that had a whole plot of the army going into a dangerous zone and a soldier having to carry out a killing and its impact on him and it was seriously interesting stuff and had a cool night vision scene which Denis Villeneuve already did something similar with Sicario. It is worth checking out Disco Boy alone because it is shot by the genius of Helene Louvart

    GNd0dRmW4AEy6LQ?format=jpg&name=large
    B3Fn9ON.png
    sA3mOUc.png
    XSlTNaa.png
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 628
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    So Doherty is too "soft" for Bond?

    I wouldn't say too soft (again, he's an actor at the end of the day, and I'm sure he's capable of conveying intensity). I just don't think he gives off Bond.

    What you mean by "gives off Bond"? Im not native english speaker.

    It’s tricky to explain to be honest. He’s just… not quite right for the part in my opinion.

    Ok there is something that say "no" to you.
  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    edited 6:14pm Posts: 910
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    So Doherty is too "soft" for Bond?

    I wouldn't say too soft (again, he's an actor at the end of the day, and I'm sure he's capable of conveying intensity). I just don't think he gives off Bond.

    What you mean by "gives off Bond"? Im not native english speaker.

    It’s tricky to explain to be honest. He’s just… not quite right for the part in my opinion.

    Say it.... It's not hard to explain. There's just a list of censored words you can't say on here.
  • CommanderRossCommanderRoss The bottom of a pitch lake in Eastern Trinidad, place called La Brea
    Posts: 8,930
    MSL49 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    So Doherty is too "soft" for Bond?

    I wouldn't say too soft (again, he's an actor at the end of the day, and I'm sure he's capable of conveying intensity). I just don't think he gives off Bond.

    What you mean by "gives off Bond"? Im not native english speaker.

    It’s tricky to explain to be honest. He’s just… not quite right for the part in my opinion.

    Ok there is something that say "no" to you.

    I'll try. Bond needs to radiate confidence. He's a military man, capable of keeping his own when everything turns against him. It's his stamina and willpower that can pull him through when others give up. Sure, in his early days Bond doesn't get it right all the time, he doesn't have the experience, but he had to fend for himself at an early age, constantly fighting for recognition. He's also freedom-oriented. As in, he is loyal to his country, to the mission, but does it in his own way.

    Doherty in no way exudes any of that. He looks like a pampered boy tbh. He's got a bit of a streak to him, and does look like a young connery. Just without the edge.


  • edited 10:37pm Posts: 5,989
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    MSL49 wrote: »
    So Doherty is too "soft" for Bond?

    I wouldn't say too soft (again, he's an actor at the end of the day, and I'm sure he's capable of conveying intensity). I just don't think he gives off Bond.

    What you mean by "gives off Bond"? Im not native english speaker.

    It’s tricky to explain to be honest. He’s just… not quite right for the part in my opinion.

    Say it.... It's not hard to explain. There's just a list of censored words you can't say on here.

    😂 ok….

    I’ve seen him in a couple of things and he’s not as camp as in the above video (like I said he’s an actor. All that matters is how he plays any part, and it’s often the case the actor can be very different to their characters).

    I’d say there’s something quite cold about the sophistication he conveys in The Invitation, which is great for the role but not for Bond. Same for I think High Fidelity. He doesn’t have Connery’s wryness or twinkle behind the eyes (and no, certainly not the same sense of alpha male charisma or that edge).
Sign In or Register to comment.