It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
He can be Sir James, who plays Debussy, stutters, has a nephew named Jimmy, and is received by Moneypenny's daughter at the office. 😁
Yes. Me too. Maybe that's even the reason Knight was picked...because of SAS heroes...to balance it with Villeneuve's very serious style.
Yeah. True. I can imagine a bit of fantasy in Villeneuve's Bond, even if Bond Villeneuve is a serious director. We can see that in all his science fiction films, the films still didn't lose focus.
I can imagine it being a sort of LTK to GE type situation. LTK is this more stripped back, revenge driven story, while GE is more a reinvention of those classic Bond tropes with a bigger scale and polished visuals, not to mention it’s a touch more outlandish in many ways. But I’d argue that GE has a lot in there that’s just as gritty, and honestly even a touch more violent and dark than LTK (ie. the Bond/Travelyan brawl, Onnatop mowing down everyone at Sevenaya with a machine gun, orgasming whenever she crushes anyone with her thighs, her dying by getting her spine crushed, Travelyan’s double death via fall/being crushed, and in general the film’s darker cinematography gives it a more foreboding atmosphere than LTK). It’s just presented within a different adventure - and honestly the outlandishness of characters like Onnatop gives what she does more of a shock factor - and with a different lead. But I don’t think that film would have turned out the way it did without LTK.
In that sense I don’t think it’s as much about which film will be ‘lighter’, but what exactly they’ll do with the story and characters.
Funnily enough he's already a spy: he was set up to play the young version of Henry Cavill's Argylle character in the last scene of that movie, but I guess that's unlikely to happen.
Isn’t he only 22 years old; that might be a tad too young
This IS so true. Having worked on shows that have pre-existing fandoms there is nothing worse than trying to please everyone. It can't be done. Just enjoy the ride.