It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I can imagine the Bond26 WhatsApp Group:
Billion Dollar Babs: Hey Guys, just checking you all received my last message as no one replied to me... guys... guys....?!?!?!?!?!?!
There's no suggestion Knight will act as a producer on this is there? Or do you just mean they've all worked in that capacity previously?
It's obviously purely hypothetical, but I wouldn't be averse to Hardy as the villain at all. When he's in scenery-chewing mode he's pretty entertaining and I'll take a Steven Berkoff baddie over a slightly bland Rami Malek type any day of the week.
I phrased that badly. I meant the second part. He's not a producer on the film - or at least he isn't announced as one. I don't know how executive producer stuff exactly works. I think writers being credited as exec producers is more of a TV thing?
Anyway, my point was that he's an experienced producer and obviously the writer has a massive impact anyway. So I would assume he has a quite specific vision for certain things as does Villeneuve. Could lead to interesting developments, is all I'm saying.
"I added Neal and Robert to the group, so you have their numbers. They'll have to get going on the script soon, if you want to keep the timeline. So when are we doing a story briefing?"
"Anyone?"
Ah I see what you mean, yeah. He does seem someone who would have a pretty clear vision, yeah, which can't hurt when you're going for a relaunch.
Do we think that when he met Villeneuve there would have been an idea for a story or angle on the film discussed?
I would suspect that Pascal, Heyman and Villeneuve etc will have set out what they want the project to be, and that either Knight has agreed to write to their outline, or his outline broadly aligns with theirs and they'll mix ideas in a way that all parties are happy with.
Either way, given how previous Bond scripts have been developed, I would be surprised if Knight remains the only writer on the project.
Hopefully a release date is days away from dropping.
As much as I would love that, he is basically retired now. His last film work was in 2022. I'm not sure he has the appetite to take on a year long, $250m mega film anymore.
Also, as per MI6-HQ's report of the story, Knight will be writing up Villeneuve's story idea:
https://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/articles/bond-26-steven-knight-to-write-script?id=05380
I wonder where they got that from. I went through the press releases on Amazon's site, 007.com and the pieces on Deadline and Variety and that specific part is mentioned in none of them. The Deadline piece is the most detailed (and I think the one published before the press releases), but even that only says:
So Heyman/Pascal were meeting with potential writers and they went towards Knight, but Villeneuve had final sign off, but now Knight is writing an idea by Villeneuve?
So does that mean they signed Villeneuve on the promise that they would go ahead with his story idea and have since talked to people to find someone to write that? I guess that tracks, but I wonder where MI6-HQ got it from.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/writer-steven-knight-amazon-james-bond-denis-villeneuve-1236335639/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002gd9t
I also like they aren't afraid to throw the previous era under the bus with "better, stronger", if Mr high-and-mighty can't find any enthusiasm about the future of the franchise that made his career then why should the new guard show his films any more deference?
Respect is a two way street.
Will they pick the next James Bond according to who fits his script? Or have they already chosen, making it easier for him to visualize the character when writing?
Projecting much? :))
Nothing wrong with the previous era matey. IMO obviously and lots of others .Happens to be my favourite Bond era but doesn’t mean I diss other eras however camp they may have been. We tend to get the right Bond for the times we live in. Just hope that doesn’t mean we get a woke, Gen z (or whatever the term is) Bond.