Did you notice the M:I influence in SF?

2»

Comments

  • To be honest, I don't think it's the central part of the plot - it just nudges the film to Turkey.

    Dalton's movie had a spy/data/important letter/list plot, so do a lot of other spy genre films. Earliest I can think of is the 39 steps...come to think of it there's a Sherlock Holmes story that uses this plot device as well.

    What makes it interesting in Skyfall is that Bond gets the sharp end of it from his mother, who's protecting her rep.

    I was watching MI4 last night, great action movie and did I give a stuff about the launch codes? No. I enjoyed watching a gay alien believer jump off the world's tallest building. Awesome.

  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    To be honest, I don't think it's the central part of the plot - it just nudges the film to Turkey.

    Dalton's movie had a spy/data/important letter/list plot, so do a lot of other spy genre films. Earliest I can think of is the 39 steps...come to think of it there's a Sherlock Holmes story that uses this plot device as well.

    What makes it interesting in Skyfall is that Bond gets the sharp end of it from his mother, who's protecting her rep.

    I was watching MI4 last night, great action movie and did I give a stuff about the launch codes? No. I enjoyed watching a gay alien believer jump off the world's tallest building. Awesome.
    The story is The Second Stain.
  • Lancaster007Lancaster007 Shrublands Health Clinic, England
    Posts: 1,874
    To be honest, I don't think it's the central part of the plot - it just nudges the film to Turkey.

    Dalton's movie had a spy/data/important letter/list plot, so do a lot of other spy genre films. Earliest I can think of is the 39 steps...come to think of it there's a Sherlock Holmes story that uses this plot device as well.

    What makes it interesting in Skyfall is that Bond gets the sharp end of it from his mother, who's protecting her rep.

    I was watching MI4 last night, great action movie and did I give a stuff about the launch codes? No. I enjoyed watching a gay alien believer jump off the world's tallest building. Awesome.

    Are you saying Tom is gay? or believes in 'gay aliens'! I too watched M:I4 recently, I hate heights and that scene was really hard to watch (shudder), have you seen the special features where he's running around the building like a loon? Just don't know how he does it…scare me sh*tless!
  • Posts: 14,842
    Like Risico said, it is a MacGuffen, and it was not even new when MI was released. The villain's scheme in Quantum of Solace was very similar to the one in Chinatown, Once Upon a Time in the West and Jean de Florette/Manon des Sources. Nobody complained. Same premisses do not mean same interpretation and development.
  • Posts: 11,425
    Isn't there a theory there that are only x number of basic stories in the world and every tale ever told is some kind of take on these?
  • Are you saying Tom is gay? or believes in 'gay aliens'!

    Not sure if he's gay but he does believe in aliens.
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    edited August 2012 Posts: 4,450
    I have seen now 4 of the 23 episodes of Nikita Season 2 (Season 1 starts in 2010, 2011 in some country's and that's earlier then Mission Impossiblf 4) and this series also go about a blackbox. Nikita focus more on getting the boxes before the ''villian'' get it, she whant to destroy it.. Bond get a litle bit the same but then as mission by M.

    Who have seen those episodes knowns what happend in time both try to get it, this element is the only i think Bond possible going to have mixed with M in specialy. Information what not realy be a problem to know already if not going to be more then this. There is enough left behind to wait on for the cinema.


    I stay on my point the redline in Skyfall and DC his 2 other movies (or 1) and mabey more going about Yesterday is history, Today is a memory, but what it be tomorrow ? The Lies of yesterday are the future of tomorrow. (Based on the TMND teaser and plot.)

    I get the Twine feeling too, but the TMND feeling is bigger and mix those 2 together and we get Skyfall, but Skyfall possible going to cros the line more then Casino Royale.

    My biggest quistion about Skyfall be or i must anser the quistion with No on what Chris Cornell sings in some part of the lyrics. Eon whant created a mirror again like there did with TMND back in 1997.
  • Monsieur_AubergineMonsieur_Aubergine Top of the Eiffel Tower with a fly in my soup!
    Posts: 642
    Getafix wrote:
    Isn't there a theory there that are only x number of basic stories in the world and every tale ever told is some kind of take on these?

    Interesting point, I looked it up :-) :
    http://www.ipl.org/div/farq/plotFARQ.html
  • Getafix wrote:
    Isn't there a theory there that are only x number of basic stories in the world and every tale ever told is some kind of take on these?

    Pretty much agree. Stories have been around for thousands of years, everything which follows has an influence. I'm currently writing a novel, it's my original story with original characters but I have been influenced by my own life experiences and countless other novels and movies. Bond maybe seen as recently being influenced by movies such as Bourne and MI but the reality is a lot of these other fictional spy characters wouldn't have even existed unless their creators were influenced by Bond.
  • You know, I don't actually think the lost drive plays as big a role in the movie as the trailer suggests.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    Lektor, ATAC, Faberge eggs, nuclear submarines, Ark of the covenant, NOC list - whatever.

    As long as the action, characters, twists and turns along the way are up to scratch, precisely what they are chasing exactly is of negligible importance.

  • Posts: 7,653
    Are you saying Tom is gay? or believes in 'gay aliens'!

    Not sure if he's gay but he does believe in aliens.

    Not so gay, as in happy, now that his younger trophy wife an daughter have left him.

  • Posts: 11,425
    Just watched a bit of Raiders on BBC3. Classic film making and (Ibelieve) quite heavily influenced by Bond. A shame Spielberg never got that chance to direct a Bond. In his 80s prime he would have made a good match. I wonder if his influence isn't actually quite evident in the John Glen films.
  • SaintMark wrote:
    Are you saying Tom is gay? or believes in 'gay aliens'!

    Not sure if he's gay but he does believe in aliens.

    Not so gay, as in happy, now that his younger trophy wife an daughter have left him.


    This couple seem to have it all.  Perfect family, magazine covers, and a fan following that would follow them into the pits of hell.  They seem to be perfect, but the story doesn't about them.  See the man used to be married to a beautiful actress who believed that they were in it for the long haul.  She had no idea that her PR and his PR had arranged for them to be the Hollywood "it" couple.  The reason?  He liked boys and she had no idea.  And the PR teams knew that the two of them together would be an explosion of epic proportions.  He begged her for a family to help keep his image, but she wanted to enjoy being a newly wed without kids to worry about.  Plus she still liked to have some fun, the herbal kind.  And she knew when she became a mom she would have to grow up and she wasn't ready.

     He got bored being a loving husband began hooking up with his best guy friend. She finally caught on and he told her that if she wanted to keep her status she would go along with it.  She actually considered it, but because she loved him and thought she could change him.  HA, don't they all.  So she agreed and they went on a vacation, but he couldn't stop from the boy loving and once she found out that his "buddy" was also near by, she was done. He was worried that she would spill, so not only did he leave her, he spun a whole new story so that even if she did out him, it would appear to be out of vengeance.

     Now he is off, living a Hollywood dream with another beard, one that is so into the Hollywood game that she should crowned as Queen.  Funny thing is though, she has him so whipped that he no longer even talks to the guy that used to be his best friend because while filming their last movie together, she heard all about their trailer hook-ups between scenes..



    No more TC gossip I promise but I had to get this outta my system.
  • Posts: 14,842
    Lektor, ATAC, Faberge eggs, nuclear submarines, Ark of the covenant, NOC list - whatever.

    As long as the action, characters, twists and turns along the way are up to scratch, precisely what they are chasing exactly is of negligible importance.

    Agreed. And that is the essence of a MacGuffen.

    There is at least another element of Skyfall that are not new: the hero faking his death is at least as old as Sherlock Holmes (but it predates Holmes in various forms).

  • Getafix wrote:
    Just watched a bit of Raiders on BBC3. Classic film making and (Ibelieve) quite heavily influenced by Bond. A shame Spielberg never got that chance to direct a Bond. In his 80s prime he would have made a good match. I wonder if his influence isn't actually quite evident in the John Glen films.

    Spielberg and Moore or Dalton teaming up for a Bond film in the 80s would've been great. Pretty stupid of Cubby to turn him down.
  • Posts: 11,425
    Yes you could have seen him working well with Moore or Dalton. Thinking about it though I feel the Glen movies do have a fair few Spielbergian touches and their mix of humour and high drama is very SS.
  • Getafix wrote:
    Yes you could have seen him working well with Moore or Dalton. Thinking about it though I feel the Glen movies do have a fair few Spielbergian touches and their mix of humour and high drama is very SS.

    That's true, and Glen is my favourite Bond director, but I think it would've been even better if we got those Spielberg touches from Spielberg.

    Since SF was the 50th anniversary and everything I actually thought he could've been good this year, great award winning director, Bond fan, big name bound to make more money, why not? Seems like a much better fit than Mendes (before I get the positive only crowd on me I do think he'll do a good job with SF). He'd probably not be up for it though, he's huge now.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    Getafix wrote:
    Yes you could have seen him working well with Moore or Dalton. Thinking about it though I feel the Glen movies do have a fair few Spielbergian touches and their mix of humour and high drama is very SS.

    That's true, and Glen is my favourite Bond director, but I think it would've been even better if we got those Spielberg touches from Spielberg.

    Since SF was the 50th anniversary and everything I actually thought he could've been good this year, great award winning director, Bond fan, big name bound to make more money, why not? Seems like a much better fit than Mendes (before I get the positive only crowd on me I do think he'll do a good job with SF). He'd probably not be up for it though, he's huge now.


    Well it depends which Spielberg we would be getting as I dont think the inventive, masterful action director of Raiders is with us anymore. He has matured into someone who can make either serious and interesting films (Schindlers, Minority Report, Munich) or poor imitations of the stuff he used to make at his 80s peak but laden with a worrying amount of CGI (Indy IV, Tintin).

    Now get me the bloke who did Munich and we could be talking a very good, gritty Daniel Craig Bond (although it goes without saying as usual that P & W would need to be axed) but I dont want another Indy IV which was basically the DAD of the Indy series.

    Its all immaterial as no way he will do it and no way EON would give him the control he required. John Williams doing the music could be interesting though.
  • Posts: 3,333
    I always got the impression from the snippets of info on this Speilberg rumour that it was in the mid to early 70's that he approached Cubby to direct a Bond picture and not the 80's, putting the proposed collaboration on either TMWTGG or TSWLM. Let's not forget that Speilberg had already become an A-list director by 1975 when Jaws broke every worldwide BO record known to man, which would mean that the time that Cubby was in discussion with Speilberg would have been around Duel and possibly before Sugarland Express. I think if Speilberg had gotten his wish and made a Bond picture he would have moved on by the time the 80's came along.
  • RC7RC7
    edited August 2012 Posts: 10,512
    bondsum wrote:
    I always got the impression from the snippets of info on this Speilberg rumour that it was in the mid to early 70's that he approached Cubby to direct a Bond picture and not the 80's, putting the proposed collaboration on either TMWTGG or TSWLM. Let's not forget that Speilberg had already become an A-list director by 1975 when Jaws broke every worldwide BO record known to man, which would mean that the time that Cubby was in discussion with Speilberg would have been around Duel and possibly before Sugarland Express. I think if Speilberg had gotten his wish and made a Bond picture he would have moved on by the time the 80's came along.

    I think it was actually late 77/early 78. If I remember rightly Spielberg and Lucas holidayed together waiting for the BO of Close Encounters to come in. George had smashed it with SW. He said to George that he'd love to do Bond, to which George replied 'I have something better'. I guess it's fair to say Raiders is Spielberg's Bond.


  • Posts: 97
    Getafix wrote:
    Isn't there a theory there that are only x number of basic stories in the world and every tale ever told is some kind of take on these?

    Some people boil it down to just two:
    1. A man goes on a journey.
    2. A stranger comes to town.

    :)
  • Posts: 97
    Getafix wrote:
    Just watched a bit of Raiders on BBC3. Classic film making and (Ibelieve) quite heavily influenced by Bond. A shame Spielberg never got that chance to direct a Bond. In his 80s prime he would have made a good match. I wonder if his influence isn't actually quite evident in the John Glen films.

    I am SO happy Spielberg never got to direct a Bond movie. If he had, I doubt we'd have got Raiders of the Lost Ark! ;)
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,350
    Risico wrote:
    Getafix wrote:
    Isn't there a theory there that are only x number of basic stories in the world and every tale ever told is some kind of take on these?

    Some people boil it down to just two:
    1. A man goes on a journey.
    2. A stranger comes to town.

    :)

    There are only seven ways to tell a story. These are:

    Overcome a monster

    Rags to Riches

    A quest

    Voyage and return

    Comedy - usually a nightmarish comedy of errors

    Tragedy

    Rebirth
  • Posts: 1,052
    Sir Rog states in his Autobio that Spielberg told him at a party that he would love to direct a Bond film, when Rog told Cubby, he told him no way because he would want a cut of the profits, I think this was around the time of MR.
  • Posts: 3,333
    Thanks, ID, I've just found this bit of info. The director reveals he had two meetings with Broccoli about taking charge of the 007 franchise – but the producer insisted Spielberg was too inexperienced.

    Spielberg once recalled, “I had two meetings with Cubby. One before Jaws… and he said, ‘You’re not experienced enough to make one of my pictures.’ Then, after the success of Jaws, I met again with Cubby – this time over the telephone – and I said, ‘I’m ready to do a Bond picture. He said, ‘Well, you’re still not experienced enough to make one of these.’”

    Spielberg felt sure he’d landed his dream job when Broccoli contacted him a third time, but he was just after the director’s alien tones. Spielberg explains, “I remember that he called me one day after Close Encounters (Of The Third Kind) came out, and he said, ‘I’d like to use the five notes in Moonraker, but I need your permission, they tell me, to get the five notes released. We’re gonna do a little homage to Close Encounters when Roger Moore uses the buttons to get into this room.’ I immediately gave him permission.”
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    bondsum wrote:
    Thanks, ID, I've just found this bit of info. The director reveals he had two meetings with Broccoli about taking charge of the 007 franchise – but the producer insisted Spielberg was too inexperienced.

    Spielberg once recalled, “I had two meetings with Cubby. One before Jaws… and he said, ‘You’re not experienced enough to make one of my pictures.’ Then, after the success of Jaws, I met again with Cubby – this time over the telephone – and I said, ‘I’m ready to do a Bond picture. He said, ‘Well, you’re still not experienced enough to make one of these.’”

    Spielberg felt sure he’d landed his dream job when Broccoli contacted him a third time, but he was just after the director’s alien tones. Spielberg explains, “I remember that he called me one day after Close Encounters (Of The Third Kind) came out, and he said, ‘I’d like to use the five notes in Moonraker, but I need your permission, they tell me, to get the five notes released. We’re gonna do a little homage to Close Encounters when Roger Moore uses the buttons to get into this room.’ I immediately gave him permission.”

    Shows that Spielberg is a gent.
    I think after being knocked back a second time after Jaws had just obliterated TMWTGGs pitiful box office he wouldve been well within his rights to tell Cubby to shove those 5 notes up his arse.
  • edited August 2012 Posts: 11,425
    Getafix wrote:
    Yes you could have seen him working well with Moore or Dalton. Thinking about it though I feel the Glen movies do have a fair few Spielbergian touches and their mix of humour and high drama is very SS.

    That's true, and Glen is my favourite Bond director, but I think it would've been even better if we got those Spielberg touches from Spielberg.

    Since SF was the 50th anniversary and everything I actually thought he could've been good this year, great award winning director, Bond fan, big name bound to make more money, why not? Seems like a much better fit than Mendes (before I get the positive only crowd on me I do think he'll do a good job with SF). He'd probably not be up for it though, he's huge now.


    Well it depends which Spielberg we would be getting as I dont think the inventive, masterful action director of Raiders is with us anymore. He has matured into someone who can make either serious and interesting films (Schindlers, Minority Report, Munich) or poor imitations of the stuff he used to make at his 80s peak but laden with a worrying amount of CGI (Indy IV, Tintin).

    Now get me the bloke who did Munich and we could be talking a very good, gritty Daniel Craig Bond (although it goes without saying as usual that P & W would need to be axed) but I dont want another Indy IV which was basically the DAD of the Indy series.

    Its all immaterial as no way he will do it and no way EON would give him the control he required. John Williams doing the music could be interesting though.

    Completely agree and good assessment of late Spielberg. His 'kids movies' these days are painful to watch but he's developed a disconcerting habit of making very good 'serious' films. Minority Report is excellent and so is Munich. I think SL looks amazing but find the sentimentalisation of the holocaust slightly nauseating. Like you say, this style of film making would actually be more appropriate for Craig, whereas early Spielberg would have been ideal for Moore.
Sign In or Register to comment.