Z is For sleep: your WORST movie EVER

15678911»

Comments

  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 17,727
    TripAces wrote: »
    One of the few films I literally walked out on. I don't know what was dumber: the film or me buying a ticket to see it.

    512lS2JOIxL._AC_.jpg

    I heard it was written and directed by dummies. ;)
  • Posts: 6,682
    Haha, Kim Cattrall was really stiff in this role.
  • Posts: 1,394
    For me it’s a toss up between The Force Awakens and Terminator Dark Fate.

    Both are horrible films that destroy the mythology of everything that came before them in the name of woke feminism.
  • RoadphillRoadphill United Kingdom
    Posts: 984
    Tough one, this.
    Are we talking the ironically bad films, such as the Syfy Channel guff, or the genuine big budget efforts that ended up being turkey's?

    I will go with the latter. Two spring to mind. Batman and Robin, also Alien Covenant..
  • edited July 2021 Posts: 631
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Exorcist 2 is an unintended comedic gem, a laughoutloud fun fest full of hillarious nonsense.

    Yes Exorcist 2 is hilariously awful. It’s got tapdancing. It’s got James Earl Jones dressed up in a giant locust outfit. And it’s got Richard Burton trying to put out a fire by hitting it with a crutch.

    I have seen worse films though. The two films at the absolute bottom of the pile for me are The Blood of Fu Manchu which is a James Franco film with Christopher Lee, and Hellraiser 9 which I think might be properly titled Hellraiser Judgement (but I get them mixed up). Hellraiser 9 is not even an hour long, I think. But it’s horrid. I quite like all the other Hellraisers (there are ten of them).
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,382
    Roadphill wrote: »
    Tough one, this.
    Are we talking the ironically bad films, such as the Syfy Channel guff, or the genuine big budget efforts that ended up being turkey's?

    I will go with the latter. Two spring to mind. Batman and Robin, also Alien Covenant..

    I wouldn't count stuff like Sharknado.

    With that bring said. Trolls.

    Having kids means watching animated films and I' enjoy most of what Disney puts out, but I could not stand Trolls or its sequel. I had to leave every time it was on. That bad.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,548
    mattjoes wrote: »
    Haha, Kim Cattrall was really stiff in this role.

    :))
  • Posts: 1,637
    Mannequin was okay , dont understand the hate
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited July 2021 Posts: 23,448
    I wonder how we have to interpret "movie" in this thread. Most examples given are technically competent, perfectly watchable films. They suck because they shouldn't have been bad considering their budget, star power, ... They are a major disappointment, more than anything else. But the "worst" movies out there?

    Okay, let's talk about the thousands of films that somehow get released every year but stay below everybody's radar. The kind of films that beg for some pirate site to "promote" them lest they disappear in dark obscurity. The kind of films that don't even warrant their own Wikipedia page and are barely recognised by IMDB. The kind of films that feel like no one involved understands photography, editing, storytelling, acting, ... Usually, not a single name in the cast and crew will ring a bell, not now nor ever.

    Watch "The Haunting of Margam Castle". It's got Caroline Monroe in a bit part. Pay attention to the sound mix, the acting, the story, .... Then try to make the case that Batman & Robin is the worst movie ever. And "Margam Castle" isn't even the worst crap I've sat through so far.

    I'm saying that if there's a sewer for films, the likes of Batman & Robin aren't even close to it. I'm saying that this sewer is clogged, day after day, by the most amateurish productions that somehow manage to secure a legit release. I'm not saying that every cheap student film or amateur job is necessarily bad. I've seen good stuff amongst crowdfunded films and the stuff that some folks just post on Youtube. But while I can agree that some big Hollywood productions deserve our anger because millions of dollars feel wasted on something that simply doesn't hold up, the "worst" movie out there has to be looked for in an entirely different lump of dog poop. ;-)
  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    Posts: 1,664
    Batman and Robin is great! It's wonderful campy fun and it's hilarious--intentionally so.

    They clearly set out to make a highly entertaining, tongue-in-cheek comic book movie, and for the life of me I can't see why anyone thinks they failed. I also can't figure out why the loathsome Batman Forever gets such a pass...
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,448
    Batman & Robin is a hyper-commercialised, dreadfully campy and at times insulting Batman flick. If I have to say anything positive, it's that this film is an (unintentional?) tribute to Batman '66. But I've always liked the crazy kaleidoscopic look of the film and the deliberate overacting by the likes of Arnold and Uma. I think we can all agree that B&R wasn't a particularly flattering addition to the pantheon of Batman films; in fact, the animated features were doing things so much better already.

    But... the worst film ever? Trust me, there's movie hell, and B&R isn't in it. ;-)
  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    Posts: 1,664
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Batman & Robin is a hyper-commercialised, dreadfully campy and at times insulting Batman flick. If I have to say anything positive, it's that this film is an (unintentional?) tribute to Batman '66. But I've always liked the crazy kaleidoscopic look of the film and the deliberate overacting by the likes of Arnold and Uma. I think we can all agree that B&R wasn't a particularly flattering addition to the pantheon of Batman films; in fact, the animated features were doing things so much better already.

    But... the worst film ever? Trust me, there's movie hell, and B&R isn't in it. ;-)

    I do see it as a Batman 66 kind of thing. George Clooney nailed it. And Batman 66 is probably my favorite Batman thing, alongside Nolan's movies. No Killing Joke-type stuff for me please! But I'm obviously not a big Batman guy...
  • Posts: 6,682
    I can't stand those damned Bond films. Please don't even mention them.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,518
    I’m no critic of films; even the bad ones, I’ve had a good time watching them at least.

    Having said that, The Dark Tower. What a crime against some amazing source material.
  • edited September 2021 Posts: 6,665
    For me it's still KOTKS, it made me lost my until then undying faith in Spielberg.

    Oh, and DAD, which I often refer to as DUD, nuff said.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,448
    Univex wrote: »
    For me it's still KOTKS, it made me lost my until then undying faith in Spielberg.

    Oh, and DAD, which I often refer to as DUD, nuff said.

    The only Spielberg film to truly bore me out of my skull is The BFG. Compared to that film, I think KOTKS is an amazingly entertaining adventure film.

    But I still have faith in Spielberg. (Please give us another Tintin, Steven.)
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 23,104
    I caught 20 minutes of The BFG on Tv at the weekend, it looked pretty bad in the same league as Jack the Giant Slayer.

    The first film that comes to mind as an utter snooze fest is The Thin Red Line, that was an absolute chore to get through.

    Captain Marvel has no redeemable qualities.
  • j_w_pepperj_w_pepper Born on the bayou. I can still hear my old hound dog barkin'.
    Posts: 8,656
    I caught 20 minutes of The BFG on Tv at the weekend, it looked pretty bad in the same league as Jack the Giant Slayer.

    My wife and I watched The BFG a couple of years ago, after it had sitten on our shelf for another couple of years or so, and were quite pleasantly surprised. It deserves a re-watch one of these days.

    I've been wondering what "KOTKS" was supposed to be, until I discovered that someone obviously misspelled "Crystal". And by the way, considering the premise of showing Indiana Jones twenty years or so after the previous episodes, I consider Crystal Skull another brilliant Spielberg movie. I find the premise of having another instalment with an 80-something Harrison Ford far more challenging.

    I think the only Spielberg films I have still been pushing back for the simple fear of (them or me) being too sentimental are Always, The Color Purple, and War Horse. Though I don't even doubt their brilliance in utilizing that sentimentality, either.
  • j_w_pepperj_w_pepper Born on the bayou. I can still hear my old hound dog barkin'.
    Posts: 8,656
    j_w_pepper wrote: »
    I caught 20 minutes of The BFG on Tv at the weekend, it looked pretty bad in the same league as Jack the Giant Slayer.

    My wife and I watched The BFG a couple of years ago, after it had sitten on our shelf for another couple of years or so, and were quite pleasantly surprised. It deserves a re-watch one of these days.

    I've been wondering what "KOTKS" was supposed to be, until I discovered that someone obviously misspelled "Crystal". And by the way, considering the premise of showing Indiana Jones twenty years or so after the previous episodes, I consider Crystal Skull another brilliant Spielberg movie. I find the premise of having another instalment with an 80-something Harrison Ford far more challenging.

    I think the only Spielberg films I have still been pushing back for the simple fear of (them or me) being too sentimental are Always, The Color Purple, and War Horse. Though I don't even doubt their brilliance in utilizing that sentimentality, either.

    Oh yes, and I just only realised I wrote this on a thread supposedly dealing with my "worst movie ever", plus the obvious notion that it would have to be terminally broing "Z"). Even if Spielberg recorded a fart of his on video, it wouldn't be anywhere near being "the worst movie ever", but still worth watching and entertaining.
  • Posts: 6,665
    Well, that was me, misspelling Crystal :) Sorry about that.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 23,448
    Univex wrote: »
    Well, that was me, misspelling Crystal :) Sorry about that.

    That's okay. I just copied it myself.
  • Posts: 6,665
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    Well, that was me, misspelling Crystal :) Sorry about that.

    That's okay. I just copied it myself.

    In all fairness, they were initials, and I also deliberately write DUD once in a while, when the ptsd related issue is steady ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.