Tell us all about your BONDATHON

1858688909193

Comments

  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    Yes the Russian airbase line was a cracker but it wasn’t the one I was trying to remember. It will come to me
  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    Posts: 1,664
    I've just started a Bondathon, and hope to actually finish it this time! My original aim was to start with my least favorite and go up to my favorite, in an attempt to learn to like some of the lower ones.

    I changed it though, as the prospect of not watching some of my favorites for a while put me off. So now I'm going (worst, best, second worst, second best, etc). Which for me means

    TWINE 24
    SP 1
    TND 23
    LTK 2
    GE 22
    TLD 3
    GF 21
    OP 4
    FRWL 20
    LALD 5
    DAD 19
    FYEO 6
    YOLT 18
    QOS 7
    CR 17
    OHMSS 8
    TSWLM 16
    MR 9
    TB 15
    DN 10
    SF 14
    TMWTGG 11
    AVTAK 13
    DAF 12

    Only done my least favorite, TWINE, and my favorite, SP, so far. But I've already had a breakthrough in that I enjoyed TWINE! It was previously the only Bond movie I didn't like. It may move up a couple places, but most important to me is that I now actually like all 24 Bond films. :-D After I've done a few more I may do a writeup.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    So, TLD is your second worst and LTK is your favourite?
  • ProfJoeButcherProfJoeButcher Bless your heart
    edited February 2021 Posts: 1,664
    NicNac wrote: »
    So, TLD is your second worst and LTK is your favourite?

    No, the number next to the film is the ranking. Spectre is my favorite and TWINE least. LTK is second favorite and TLD third.
  • Posts: 6,727
    NicNac wrote: »
    Yes the Russian airbase line was a cracker but it wasn’t the one I was trying to remember. It will come to me

    "Why didn't you learn the violin?"
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    NicNac wrote: »
    So, TLD is your second worst and LTK is your favourite?

    No, the number next to the film is the ranking. Spectre is my favorite and TWINE least. LTK is second favorite and TLD third.

    Good on you, coming out as a Spectre fan (although I think I've seen your comments about that before).
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    NicNac wrote: »
    Yes the Russian airbase line was a cracker but it wasn’t the one I was trying to remember. It will come to me

    "Why didn't you learn the violin?"

    I must run through the film in my head to remember when and why I laughed out loud. Only Bond fans can actually recreate a two hour film, scene by scene on their heads and miss nothing out. ;)
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    Licence To Kill

    After the terrific TLD, we get a grim story of revenge and retribution.

    Even though LTK always ends up bottom of my Bond ranking it isn't because I don't like it. I mean its better than a whole host of other action films and maybe 100 times better than Die Hard 5. Its like if you have 24 babies and you like 23 of them better....?

    Anyhow, my main problem is getting past the sadistic beating of Lupe, her beau's heart being cut out, the rape and murder of Della, Krest's exploding head, half chewed Felix, completely chewed Dario and so on.
    I'm not squeamish and the occasional gruesome killing in a Bond is always good fun, but here there are too many innocent people being hurt or killed in ways even Tarentino would be proud of. Della, especially, is a sad victim of this film's drive for realism. And even though we don't witness her fate we get to watch her fear and despair. I simply hate that scene with a passion.

    The villains are expertly played all round, the action is top notch as you would expect from John Glen. But some of what we expect from a Bond - sweeping music, great cinematography, light hearted moments, quotable dialogue etc are all missing, engulfed by the intensity of the story and the sheer tight lipped earnestness of Dalton's performance. Bond's gung ho assault on Sanchez's world of course destroyed the Chinese infiltration of Sanchez's business and ruined Pam's deal with Heller, and also got alot of people killed, including big, gentle Sharky. Still, it was worth it because chirpy widower Feliz Leiter is ready for a fishing trip with James just as soon as he's out of hospital. You've got to bury Della first you big dope. What's he like eh?

    Michael Wilson was striving to get Bond as far back to Fleming as possible, but by doing so he was risking losing his audience, because Film Bond and Book Bond are two entirely different creatures. And while we like Film Bond to have one foot in Book Bond's world, it really doesn't suite him to leap in both feet first. Cinema audiences have moved off in a different direction with their James Bond.

    Yet, a film so lacking in wit can produce a moment as good as the end of the PTS when Bond and Felix enter the church and bridesmaids pick up their parachutes like the train of a wedding dress. How we miss that level of clever visual humour over the next two hours.

    Funnily enough though, I enjoyed it more this time than the last dozen times. Maybe my expectations were low.


  • Posts: 6,727
    Pretty damning review NicNac.
    And each to his own and all that!
    For me, LTK has one of the strongest stories, a beginning, a middle and an end. It doesnt meander, or slow down like a lot of the Bond films
    It has one of THE best villains in Sanchez, a true equal to Bond, a rich supporting cast (ok, Lupe is wooden but my God, she is gorgeous!) And some of the best action set pieces since OHMSS!
    Yes, its more violent, but these were the 80's where it was competing with more violent movies (and Fleming could be quite nasty in his books), but it was also great to see elements from his books being used!
    And of course lets forget, its got Tim Dalton, who was simply sensational as 007! A lot people, fans, complained that it was too different from TLD but I love the fact it was a different beast and I have no doubt, his 3rd would have been different again! Alas, not to be!
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    @Mathis1 . Yes but that’s just me and I know I’m in the minority. Dalton is popular and LTK is much admired. I won’t change those perceptions but I’m just not on board with them.
    :)
  • Posts: 6,727
    NicNac wrote: »
    @Mathis1 . Yes but that’s just me and I know I’m in the minority. Dalton is popular and LTK is much admired. I won’t change those perceptions but I’m just not on board with them.
    :)

    Fair enough! Am enjoying your reviews though!
    Keep them coming
  • Posts: 1,394
    I always do a Bondathon in production order,never in order of preference or anything like that.

    Weirdly,i always do Star Warsathons in chronoligical order.I watch them in the order Lucas prefers ( Disney Star wars is not canon for me ).
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    GoldenEye
    A soft re-boot with many new faces in front of and behind the camera.

    New boy Pierce clearly has a few wobbly moments and struggles to hide his excitement at being the new Bond. However,when he gets it right he can do the dramatic bits (his scene with Judi Dench in M's office is spot on, and Brosnan matches Dench all the way), and he can do the comedy ( 'who's strangling the cat?'). Perhaps he rises to the challenge of sharing scenes with high calibre actors, but some of his work here really is top drawer.

    The problem is, other times he loses his grip a little and becomes far too self conscious of the fact he's playing Bond (the Moneypenny and Q scenes for example)

    Still, its not a bad start and the film itself is pretty good. Not over-burdened with action scenes - the action tends to blend into the plot rather than look like they were designed first and the plot developed to fit them (like For Your Eyes Only) - and fringe characters are allowed to develop. Comedy and drama are well blended and the script clearly and deliberately returns Bond to his hedonistic best.

    Best of all the casting is done carefully and thoughtfully. It did feel in the late 80s that Eon weren't always taking much care over the casting of some roles, but here it's almost note perfect and Judi Dench as the new M, starched, guarded, aware of her elevated place in a man's world, is the cherry on the cake.

    The film does have a sort of mechanical, cold feel to it but maybe that's deliberate, reflecting the world Bond is operating in (After all the same director gave us so much opulent warmth in Casino Royale). The music, the hardware, the set design all punctuate this.

    In 1995 Brosnan and GoldenEye were welcomed with open arms by critics and fans alike. Time (and Daniel Craig's appearence) has muted some of that enthusiasm, but despite the now healthy support of Dalton, and the ongoing respect and love for Craig, we must not lose sight of the fact that Brosnan brought 007 back from the brink. If nothing else, we should be grateful to him for that.

  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,482
    @NicNac well said mate. I really enjoyed reading your thoughts on Goldeneye
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    Tomorrow Never Dies
    Looking at Bond rankings across the forum I have soon become aware that You Only Live Twice is something of a guilty pleasure for me. And the same can be said for TND.

    All the criticisms I've read about it somehow don't register with me. Forged from the wreckage of a writers strike and rushed through post production at a galloping pace the fact we have anything of note is nothing short of a miracle.
    The director has managed to inject some classic Bond moments and typical Bond tropes into the story, and combined with new boy David Arnold bringing some lush orchestral melodies back to the series, we have two hours of pretty good fun, and it really does feel like a proper Bond film.

    Pierce Brosnan is excellent throughout (sue me!) He looks great, and he has ditched those moments of Roger Moore smirking which crept into his GoldenEye performance. He is now comfortable as Bond.

    The plot is a little thin it has to be said, and the film relies heavily on some huge action set pieces. It would have been nice to have a couple more dialogue scenes at the expense of a minute or two from the long, albeit well crafted bike chase. But I refuse to nit pick.

    highlights:
    Great PTS driven by the urgency of the approaching missile.
    Bond brushing up on his Danish
    Bond/M scene in the car
    Bond drinking vodka, and subsequent scene with Paris
    Dr Kaufman
    Car chase
    HALO jump
    Escape via the canvas poster of Carver
    Bond and Wai Lin in their little boat finding mutual ground.
    The music and locations.

    It dawned on me that the other big release in December 1997 was Titanic and both films end with a ship/boat sinking and the stars floating around on the debris. Fancy that.

    And, I had forgotten about the dedication at the end to Cubby, so when it came up and my wife said 'Oh, look!', I was momentarily far too choked to explain.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    The World Is Not Enough

    This film feels so muted. I'm not sure if its the flat action sequences or the use of muted colours - browns and dark blues - or the fact there are no Dr Kaufmans or Jack Wades to add a bit of zing. But, it lacks something.

    Pierce tries hard, the cast is actually very good, the plot is good, the music is good. Oh I dunno, something is definitely off.

    One moment always leaves me open mouthed and speechless.

    Renard - "She's worth fifty of me"
    M - "For once I agree with you".

    Say what? Electra has just massacred your MI6 team, murdered her father (one of your oldest friends), and supposedly murdered Bond. How can you still rate her so highly?

    Get a grip woman.

    I can see what Michael Apted was trying to achieve, but he really needed a better script to work with and a keener eye for action.

    A failure maybe, but a heroic failure. We certainly haven't hit an all time low..just yet.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    Die Another Day

    Nearly 20 years on this one still somehow remains a bit of a missed opportunity. At times frustratingly excellent (Bond and Raoul, the sword battle, some of the Havana scenes, the Hong Kong hotel scenes, the opening surfing sequence) in a way TWINE could only dream of.

    But then it sinks to such astonishing depths one can hardly credit it. And I don't mean the usual targets -eg Madonna who isn't that bad, and would be overlooked if it had been any other half decent actress. And Halle Berry is no better or worse than the majority of Bond girls.

    I mean the dreadful, toe-curlingly bad double- entendres and general wordplay Bond indulges in with all three girls, and of course the overload of bad CGI in the last half an hour. All of this kills the film dead in its tracks and this is such a shame.

    There is a pretty good car chase where the cars bounce around with balletic beauty, and when it ends with Bond saving Jinx the film feels like it has reached a reasonably satisfying conclusion. But we then have another climax on the plane and this is where we all start to really lose interest.

    And of course the rubbish theme song. I don't mind Madonna's cameo at all, but I will never forgive her the techno shite song she presented to the world. Luckily David Arnold did a sterling job with the rest of the score.

    The cast is hit and miss but what a shame we didn't have more of Emilio Echevarria as Raoul. Apparently they cut out some of his scenes, perhaps so they could squeeze the para surfing/tsunami sequence in? I certainly hope this isn't the case otherwise Lee Tamahori will answer for his crimes. Because I will find him... and I will kill him.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,418
    Good points Nackers.

    Though Berry... Sometimes she's quite pleasant. Then other times, her dialogue, and delivery of said dialogue is so woeful.

    But I always have fun with DAD. It has such a self awareness to it. Only recently did I see that.

    One thing that has always been true for me, is that I tend too prefer Tamahori's muscular direction as opposed to Apted's staid approach.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I'm the opposite with Madonna. I don't mind the Title Song, but her cameo is the first real catastrophe in the film, so far as I'm concerned (unless meeting Jinx, and Jinx's CGI dive come before that; then those would be first).

    Oh yes, Jinx and Bond’s smutty pick up lines come first.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,418
    Have a bit of empathy lads. It was Bond's first conquest after prison. Of course he'll be rusty.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    True enough :)
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    Casino Royale

    It's been a while but my Bondathon is back on track.

    Old Wives Tales, part 3
    Following on from my personal decision that some Bond opinions stick over the years and are blindly followed by everyone: So far I have mentioned...
    1. Connery looked bored in YOLT (No he didn't. Only the opinion is boring)
    2. No one was ready for a serious Bond in 1987 (absolute bullshit)
    And now, number 3.

    3. *cough* Timothy Dalton's performance paved the way for Craig's Bond.

    No! No it didn't. Dalton's Bond was edgy and sardonic. He probably didn't sleep well at night and hated his job (but he knew no one could do it better).
    Craig's Bond is more impulsive, cocky, egotistical. He uses people and suffers the consequences. He loves what he does and probably sleeps like a baby.

    Just because neither plays it for laughs doesn't mean they play it the same way. And when CR came along the general public had probably forgotten Dalton altogether.

    On to the film:
    The first thing that struck me is that Bond's pursuit of the bomb maker was well under control until Walker ballsed it up by getting himself clocked. So Bond had to improvise and as a result gets a right grilling from M. Didn't she realise that the fool was Walker, not Bond?

    Never mind. This film is a true epic in the 007 canon. Huge in scope and ambition and with a first rate cast it's hard not to be pulled in and thoroughly impressed by Martin Campbell's work.

    Craig is a revelation. If anything the impact of his performance has possibly lessened over time, and I feel the future may not be as kind to his interpretation of the role as, say, Connery's has been. But this can not detract from what was an astonishing debut.

    The scenery is gorgeous, the women beautiful and voluptuous, the sweeping score is wonderfully epic and the script intelligent.

    Does it have any down side?
    Well, yes it does. I don't think the love story was paced properly. They went from arguing and sniping over the buy in money, to declaring eternal love a day or so later. (side note: Leiter buys Bond back in and Vesper makes no comment about how or where Bond's $5 million came from. Was she not even slightly curious?) I think The Living Daylights was more convincing. Bond and Kara's story was paced beautifully and totally satisfying.

    Some moments were poorly explained during the film.
    i) I've never been happy with the moment Bond says 'Mathis' to himself in the restaurant. What triggered the realisation that Mathis was the villain? (even though ultimately he wasn't).
    ii) Who was the guy arrested for having two corpses in his car boot?
    iii) The arrest of the police chief ( played by MGW). Not explained very well through Mathis's dialogue.
    iv) Bond grabs a knife and pursues Le Chiffre. Why? What is he intending to do exactly?

    I'm not saying these moments are not explained at all. But on first viewing (and second) they remain quite ambiguous.

    But, Casino Royale continued the tradition of launching the new Bond actor with a right corker.


  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 6,758
    NicNac wrote: »
    Casino Royale
    Dalton's Bond was edgy and sardonic. He probably didn't sleep well at night and hated his job (but he knew no one could do it better).

    A good description why Tim is my favourite.

    Great review btw. I am enjoying these, even though we don't always agree.

  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    Cheers @GoldenGun . It wouldn’t do though if we always did agree ;)
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 12,914
    NicNac wrote: »
    Casino Royale

    Some moments were poorly explained during the film.
    i) I've never been happy with the moment Bond says 'Mathis' to himself in the restaurant. What triggered the realisation that Mathis was the villain? (even though ultimately he wasn't).

    From the first viewing and since, I see that as pretty much identical to the Fleming novel. And Bond didn't suspect Mathis to be a traitor in the restaurant.

    To that point Mathis isn't in question, the idea is introduced later by the villain Le Chiffre to serve his purposes. Also understanding it's unresolved within the film.


    Casino Royale, Ian Fleming, 1953.
    Chapter 14 - La Vie en Rose
    At four o'clock Bond was about to call for the bill when the maître d'hôtel appeared at their table and inquired for Miss Lynd. He handed her a note which she took and read hastily.

    'Oh, it's only Mathis,' she said. 'He says would I come to the entrance hall. He's got a message for you. Perhaps he's not in evening clothes or something. I won't be a minute. Then perhaps we could go home.'
    She gave him a strained smile. 'I'm afraid I don't feel very good company this evening. It's been rather a nerve-racking day. I'm so sorry.'

    Bond made a perfunctory reply and rose, pushing back the table. 'I'll get the bill,' he said, and watched her take the few steps to the entrance.

    He sat down and lit a cigarette. He felt flat. He suddenly realized that he was tired. The stuffiness of the room hit him as it had hit him in the Casino in the early hours of the previous day. Hecalled for the bill and took a last mouthful of champagne. It tasted bitter, as the first glass too many always does. He would have liked to have seen Mathis's cheerful face and heard his news, perhaps even a word of congratulation.

    Suddenly the note to Vesper seemed odd to him. It was not the way Mathis would do things. He would have asked them both to join him at the bar of the Casino or he would have joined them in the night-club, whatever his clothes. They would have laughed together and Mathis would have been excited. He had much to tell Bond, more than Bond had to tell him. The arrest of the Bulgarian, who had probably talked some more; the chase after the man with the stick; Le Chiffre's movements when he left the Casino.

    Bond shook himself. He hastily paid the bill, not waiting for the change. He pushed back his table and walked quickly through the entrance without acknowledging the good-nights of the maître d'hôtel and the doorman.

    He hurried through the gaming-room and looked carefully up and down the long entrance hall. He cursed and quickened his step. There were only one or two officials and two or three men and women in evening clothes getting their things at the vestiaire.

    No Vesper. No Mathis.

    He was almost running. He got to the entrance and looked along the steps to left and right down and amongst the few remaining cars.

    The commissionaire came towards him.

    'A taxi, monsieur?'

    Bond waved him aside and started down the steps, his eyes staring into the shadows, the night air cold on his sweating temples.

    He was half-way down when he heard a faint cry, then the slam of a door way to the right. With a harsh growl and stutter from the exhaust a beetle-browed Citroën shot out of the shadows into the light of the moon, its front wheel drive dry-skidding through the loose pebbles of the forecourt.

    Its tail rocked on its soft springs as if a violent struggle was taking place on the back seat.

    With a snarl it raced out to the wide entrance gate in a spray of gravel. A small black object shot out of an open rear window and thudded into a flower-bed. There was a scream of tortured rubber as the tyres caught the boulevard in a harsh left-handed turn, the deafening echo of a Citroën's exhaust in second gear, a crash into top, then a swiftly diminishing crackle as the car hared off between the shops on the main street towards the coast road.

    Bond knew he would find Vesper's evening bag among the flowers.

    He ran back with it across the gravel to the brightly-lit steps and scrabbled through its contents while the commissionaire hovered round him.

    The crumpled note was there amongst the usual feminine baggage.
    Can you come out to the entrance hall for a moment?
    I have news for your companion.

    RENÉ MATHIS

    Chapter 15 - Black Hare and the Grey Hound
    It was the crudest possible forgery.

    Bond leapt for the Bentley, blessing the impulse which had made him drive it over after dinner. With the choke full out, the engine answered at once to the starter and the roar drowned the faltering words of the commissionaire who jumped aside as the rear wheels whipped gravel at his piped trouser-legs.



  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    NicNac wrote: »
    Casino Royale

    Some moments were poorly explained during the film.
    i) I've never been happy with the moment Bond says 'Mathis' to himself in the restaurant. What triggered the realisation that Mathis was the villain? (even though ultimately he wasn't).

    From the first viewing and since, I see that as pretty much identical to the Fleming novel. And Bond didn't suspect Mathis to be a traitor in the restaurant.

    To that point Mathis isn't in question, the idea is introduced later by the villain Le Chiffre to serve his purposes. Also understanding it's unresolved within the film.


    Casino Royale, Ian Fleming, 1953.
    Chapter 14 - La Vie en Rose
    At four o'clock Bond was about to call for the bill when the maître d'hôtel appeared at their table and inquired for Miss Lynd. He handed her a note which she took and read hastily.

    'Oh, it's only Mathis,' she said. 'He says would I come to the entrance hall. He's got a message for you. Perhaps he's not in evening clothes or something. I won't be a minute. Then perhaps we could go home.'
    She gave him a strained smile. 'I'm afraid I don't feel very good company this evening. It's been rather a nerve-racking day. I'm so sorry.'

    Bond made a perfunctory reply and rose, pushing back the table. 'I'll get the bill,' he said, and watched her take the few steps to the entrance.

    He sat down and lit a cigarette. He felt flat. He suddenly realized that he was tired. The stuffiness of the room hit him as it had hit him in the Casino in the early hours of the previous day. Hecalled for the bill and took a last mouthful of champagne. It tasted bitter, as the first glass too many always does. He would have liked to have seen Mathis's cheerful face and heard his news, perhaps even a word of congratulation.

    Suddenly the note to Vesper seemed odd to him. It was not the way Mathis would do things. He would have asked them both to join him at the bar of the Casino or he would have joined them in the night-club, whatever his clothes. They would have laughed together and Mathis would have been excited. He had much to tell Bond, more than Bond had to tell him. The arrest of the Bulgarian, who had probably talked some more; the chase after the man with the stick; Le Chiffre's movements when he left the Casino.

    Bond shook himself. He hastily paid the bill, not waiting for the change. He pushed back his table and walked quickly through the entrance without acknowledging the good-nights of the maître d'hôtel and the doorman.

    He hurried through the gaming-room and looked carefully up and down the long entrance hall. He cursed and quickened his step. There were only one or two officials and two or three men and women in evening clothes getting their things at the vestiaire.

    No Vesper. No Mathis.

    He was almost running. He got to the entrance and looked along the steps to left and right down and amongst the few remaining cars.

    The commissionaire came towards him.

    'A taxi, monsieur?'

    Bond waved him aside and started down the steps, his eyes staring into the shadows, the night air cold on his sweating temples.

    He was half-way down when he heard a faint cry, then the slam of a door way to the right. With a harsh growl and stutter from the exhaust a beetle-browed Citroën shot out of the shadows into the light of the moon, its front wheel drive dry-skidding through the loose pebbles of the forecourt.

    Its tail rocked on its soft springs as if a violent struggle was taking place on the back seat.

    With a snarl it raced out to the wide entrance gate in a spray of gravel. A small black object shot out of an open rear window and thudded into a flower-bed. There was a scream of tortured rubber as the tyres caught the boulevard in a harsh left-handed turn, the deafening echo of a Citroën's exhaust in second gear, a crash into top, then a swiftly diminishing crackle as the car hared off between the shops on the main street towards the coast road.

    Bond knew he would find Vesper's evening bag among the flowers.

    He ran back with it across the gravel to the brightly-lit steps and scrabbled through its contents while the commissionaire hovered round him.

    The crumpled note was there amongst the usual feminine baggage.
    Can you come out to the entrance hall for a moment?
    I have news for your companion.

    RENÉ MATHIS

    Chapter 15 - Black Hare and the Grey Hound
    It was the crudest possible forgery.

    Bond leapt for the Bentley, blessing the impulse which had made him drive it over after dinner. With the choke full out, the engine answered at once to the starter and the roar drowned the faltering words of the commissionaire who jumped aside as the rear wheels whipped gravel at his piped trouser-legs.



    I remember seeing this scene in the cinema, and how I thought to myself that this was exactly how I had pictured it reading the book. It was a wonderful transfer from book to film.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,567
    NicNac wrote: »
    Casino Royale

    Some moments were poorly explained during the film.
    i) I've never been happy with the moment Bond says 'Mathis' to himself in the restaurant. What triggered the realisation that Mathis was the villain? (even though ultimately he wasn't).

    From the first viewing and since, I see that as pretty much identical to the Fleming novel. And Bond didn't suspect Mathis to be a traitor in the restaurant.

    To that point Mathis isn't in question, the idea is introduced later by the villain Le Chiffre to serve his purposes. Also understanding it's unresolved within the film.


    Casino Royale, Ian Fleming, 1953.
    Chapter 14 - La Vie en Rose
    At four o'clock Bond was about to call for the bill when the maître d'hôtel appeared at their table and inquired for Miss Lynd. He handed her a note which she took and read hastily.

    'Oh, it's only Mathis,' she said. 'He says would I come to the entrance hall. He's got a message for you. Perhaps he's not in evening clothes or something. I won't be a minute. Then perhaps we could go home.'
    She gave him a strained smile. 'I'm afraid I don't feel very good company this evening. It's been rather a nerve-racking day. I'm so sorry.'

    Bond made a perfunctory reply and rose, pushing back the table. 'I'll get the bill,' he said, and watched her take the few steps to the entrance.

    He sat down and lit a cigarette. He felt flat. He suddenly realized that he was tired. The stuffiness of the room hit him as it had hit him in the Casino in the early hours of the previous day. Hecalled for the bill and took a last mouthful of champagne. It tasted bitter, as the first glass too many always does. He would have liked to have seen Mathis's cheerful face and heard his news, perhaps even a word of congratulation.

    Suddenly the note to Vesper seemed odd to him. It was not the way Mathis would do things. He would have asked them both to join him at the bar of the Casino or he would have joined them in the night-club, whatever his clothes. They would have laughed together and Mathis would have been excited. He had much to tell Bond, more than Bond had to tell him. The arrest of the Bulgarian, who had probably talked some more; the chase after the man with the stick; Le Chiffre's movements when he left the Casino.

    Bond shook himself. He hastily paid the bill, not waiting for the change. He pushed back his table and walked quickly through the entrance without acknowledging the good-nights of the maître d'hôtel and the doorman.

    He hurried through the gaming-room and looked carefully up and down the long entrance hall. He cursed and quickened his step. There were only one or two officials and two or three men and women in evening clothes getting their things at the vestiaire.

    No Vesper. No Mathis.

    He was almost running. He got to the entrance and looked along the steps to left and right down and amongst the few remaining cars.

    The commissionaire came towards him.

    'A taxi, monsieur?'

    Bond waved him aside and started down the steps, his eyes staring into the shadows, the night air cold on his sweating temples.

    He was half-way down when he heard a faint cry, then the slam of a door way to the right. With a harsh growl and stutter from the exhaust a beetle-browed Citroën shot out of the shadows into the light of the moon, its front wheel drive dry-skidding through the loose pebbles of the forecourt.

    Its tail rocked on its soft springs as if a violent struggle was taking place on the back seat.

    With a snarl it raced out to the wide entrance gate in a spray of gravel. A small black object shot out of an open rear window and thudded into a flower-bed. There was a scream of tortured rubber as the tyres caught the boulevard in a harsh left-handed turn, the deafening echo of a Citroën's exhaust in second gear, a crash into top, then a swiftly diminishing crackle as the car hared off between the shops on the main street towards the coast road.

    Bond knew he would find Vesper's evening bag among the flowers.

    He ran back with it across the gravel to the brightly-lit steps and scrabbled through its contents while the commissionaire hovered round him.

    The crumpled note was there amongst the usual feminine baggage.
    Can you come out to the entrance hall for a moment?
    I have news for your companion.

    RENÉ MATHIS

    Chapter 15 - Black Hare and the Grey Hound
    It was the crudest possible forgery.

    Bond leapt for the Bentley, blessing the impulse which had made him drive it over after dinner. With the choke full out, the engine answered at once to the starter and the roar drowned the faltering words of the commissionaire who jumped aside as the rear wheels whipped gravel at his piped trouser-legs.



    So, Bond considers the idea that Mathis sends a note as suspicious, and from there works out that Mathis probably tipped Le Chiffre off?

    I can buy that, but the film didn't exactly put it across very well. Does he mention his reasoning about the note later in the film? I can't recall it happening.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    edited April 2021 Posts: 12,914
    NicNac wrote: »

    So, Bond considers the idea that Mathis sends a note as suspicious, and from there works out that Mathis probably tipped Le Chiffre off?

    I can buy that, but the film didn't exactly put it across very well. Does he mention his reasoning about the note later in the film? I can't recall it happening.
    Not exactly. To me Rene Mathis is as pure as newfallen snow, there's no questioning his loyalty. (Bond simply realizes it's not how Mathis would react to events--he would celebrate the victory with them. His absence is out of character, something is up. )

    Only later Le Chiffre introduces doubt with his "I'm afraid your friend Mathis..." comment, that's allowed to linger and is not resolved until QOS. Before that moment, nothing suggests Mathis is on the bad side.

    It seems the filmmakers decided some elements/items would heighten the drama plus link and continue in future missions. Plus it plays out as a distraction from the real traitor. Here's more film dialog to assist memory.


    CR
    Mathis needs me.
    Good night.
    Congratulations again.

    Mathis.
    I'm afraid your friend Mathis
    is really...
    ...my friend Mathis.
    No.
    Not him.
    Not Mathis.
    No.
    I suppose M won't miss me
    for a couple of days.
    She'll be too busy sweating Mathis.

    Mathis?

    Remember I told you
    about Le Chiffre's tell?
    Well, Mathis told Le Chiffre.
    That's how he wiped me out.
    Same goes for the implant. Can't say
    I'm too sorry about losing that.

    I can't believe it.

    No, neither could I.
    I thought he had my back.
    But there you go, lesson learned.
    She left her cell phone.
    She must have known I'd check it.

    She knew you were you.
    Well, at least this clears Mathis.

    No.

    No?

    No.
    We just proved that she's guilty,
    not that he's innocent.
    It could've been a double blind.
    Keep sweating him.

    You don't trust anyone,
    do you, James?


    QOS
    Mathis.

    What do you want?
    Come to apologize?
    [Italian]
    This man had me imprisoned and tortured
    and you want to serve him fine wine?

    You only buy cheap wine.
    And since you were innocent,
    they bought you this villa.
    So, really, you owe him, don't you?


  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,418
    @NicNac, I've enjoyed reading your ruminations old boy. So far.

    Re. Mathis' note. I always interpreted that a note from Mathis was out of character for him. Surely he would join in the celebrations? And with Bond on high alert over Le Chriffre's last gambit, it made sense for Bond to smell a rat.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    edited May 2021 Posts: 7,567
    Quantum Of Solace

    I mainly intend to concentrate on the positives as the negatives go without saying.

    Over the years we have acknowledged the debt owed to John Barry for often lifting a less than great Bond film with a wonderful score. Maybe here we should offer the same courtesy to David Arnold.
    The film itself - short and punchy - feels quite frantic, and its hard to say which action scene is the best, because if I'm honest they all seem a little similar (with the honorable exception of the great Tosca sequence) thanks to the editing. So when the film quietens down and we have moments of calm Arnold's score floats around with an almost dream-like resonance. It helps accentuate these quiet, reflective moments. They act as punctuation marks to the frenetic activity which has gone before.

    There are other moments of excellence, like the whole Tosca sequence from Bond entering the building to the execution of Haines's bodyguard. For a few minutes the film doesn't put a foot wrong.

    Elsewhere we are either completely won over by an individual scene, like Bond's recruitment of Mathis, or signing into the Haiti hotel to a scene stealing performance from David Harbour as the odious Greg Beam. He is a terrific actor and here creates a complete, three dimensional character in roughly three or four short scenes. And he gets the best line in the film

    Leiter: You know who Greene is and you want to put us in bed with him.

    Beam : Yeah, you're right. We should just deal with nice people


    So good in fact a version of the same line crops up later when M is hauled in front of a Government official.

    Judi Dench gives her sixth outstanding Bond performance in a row, and we haven't even arrived at her greatest piece de resistance - Skyfall.

    We have two sacrificial lambs. Both are so moving for different reasons. Mathis because we have grown to know him over two films, and Fields because when M explains to Bond that she was just a filing clerk you feel his pang of regret and sorrow, because he simply didn't know. In one simple line M filled in some background to Fields and gave us a reason to mourn her. It was a jarring moment.

    Best of all is the closing confrontation between Bond, Yusef and Corrine. Every emotion is there on the faces of one character or the other. And when Bond dismisses Corrine and the realisation that everything she thought or believed in at that moment in time, was a lie, (but she also realises she is going to live), her heart breaking 'thank you' to Bond as she leaves is a quietly remarkable moment.

    But despite all of these positives this is still a Bond film in search of an identity. However surely Bond films already have an identity and shouldn't need to be scratting around for a different one? Casino Royale reminded us how opulent, and exotic and thrilling a Bond film should be, so for QOS to chicken out and look for inspiration elsewhere is something of an insult to the glorious film that went before it.

    And yet, the director got so much right, and showed us a few moments that suggested a different film, a better film, was somewhere in there. Somewhere amidst the mad, brain numbing action scenes with all the hand held camera work and crazy editing there is a really decent Bond movie trying to get out.

  • Posts: 6,682
    Fine observations there NicNac, and the exercise of looking at the positives in our least favorite films (I gather this is the case for you) is a good one.

    NicNac wrote: »
    So when the film quietens down and we have moments of calm Arnold's score floats around with an almost dream-like resonance. It helps accentuate these quiet, reflective moments. They act as punctuation marks to the frenetic activity which has gone before.
    I especially like this insight. In fact, the film creates quite an atmosphere, through both sounds and sights. It's ethereal, perhaps the most ethereal of all the films. Also, I enjoy its starkness when placed in contrast to CR's opulence.
Sign In or Register to comment.