No Time to Die production thread (MINOR SPOILERS ALLOWED)

16786796816836841213

Comments

  • GadgetManGadgetMan Lagos, Nigeria
    edited March 2020 Posts: 3,845
    mtm wrote: »
    GadgetMan wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Burgess wrote: »
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-8071965/James-Bond-film-No-Time-Die-released-three-weeks-EARLY-coronavirus.html

    “ James Bond film No Time To Die 'could be released three weeks EARLY due to coronavirus fears' following promo tour cancellation”

    Edit: I didn’t realize this was already linked in another thread.

    Is that even possible? I thought cinema release slots were very hard to mess with.

    I think back in 2015, Rogue Nation did something Similar to avoid competition with SP & The Force Awakens.

    Really, that close to release? I didn't know that.

    Yeah, not close....Rogue Nation was originally slated for December 25, 2015 before been moved to July 31, 2015...not the exact situation with NTTD now though.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,352
    Not quite the same situation one could say. [-(
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    edited March 2020 Posts: 2,941
    Fresh pictures, March 2nd. BTW, in case you all missed it, full interview (16 min) from MoMa if you go back one page or so.

    UTHH1oo.jpg
    PUJTfWy.jpg
    vK5rouC.jpg
    vpbD7BT.jpg
    HOxb1k3.jpg
    H3nY1NB.jpg
    bBhEjMR.jpg
    dYSrpu4.jpg

    Cake and Happy Birthday-song from the audience and host at the MoMa-interview

    29TtzBD.jpg
    kMiggpK.jpg
    crFu13w.jpg
    uv3HS1T.jpg
    wnUQ7I1.jpg
  • Posts: 5,808
    He looks fantastic. Keeping with the James Bond fitness and diet cycle?
  • MartinBondMartinBond Trying not to muck it up again
    Posts: 850
    - and doing a Sean Connery tribute by fastening both buttons on his jacket. Come on Danny, amateur mistake.
  • marketto007marketto007 Brazil
    Posts: 3,260
    BTS from Scotland:

  • Posts: 4,344
    It be wild if they moved the release date forward by 3 weeks.

    Though this story actually originated in The Sun…. I think MI6’s article preceded and encouraged The Sun article. Probably no story.

    The real story that no one is talking about currently is Mulan. That film cost $300 million and was made primarily for the Chinese market.

    Outside of China, the situation is not great but we are off Pandemic levels. The film industry is said to be healthy and this weekend’s Onward is on track for a big opening. So…………………..let’s wait and see.

    (I’d be most heartbroken if the premiere is cancelled)
  • MartinBondMartinBond Trying not to muck it up again
    Posts: 850
    Nice bookend to Casino Royale.

    31b808_7a1d95d9a03b4dd582be27662be192db~mv2_d_2877_1919_s_2.webp
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    edited March 2020 Posts: 3,352
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 2,941
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 8,381
  • Posts: 10,533
    What an awesome throwback to CR!
  • 00Dalton700Dalton7 Portsmouth
    Posts: 78
    I’m not disputing the flying glider is Cgi. And yes building a cock pit is by no means proof they have actual sized glider.

    However it look too well integrated into both the plane hanger set and in the water to not be anything but real.
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    edited March 2020 Posts: 2,541
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah it’s all very well to say they should do things for real, and something like Mission Impossible does the same: but they can’t crash two helicopters up a mountain for real!
    And how are the Bond folk supposed to film a totally new type of plane with scissor wings that turns into a submarine for real? :D

    Umm, they actually did shoot a real plane crash in SP something which i haven't seen any action film did that yet(even MI), as far as I know. Here you go at 1:04
  • Posts: 5,651
    Contraband wrote: »
    UTHH1oo.jpg

    I'll say it here. Daniel Craig for Bond26! Just do it in two years time with the same team.
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 2,941
    New pic with Ben


  • Posts: 5,651
    Is he using the Swatch? :)
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    Posts: 2,541
    That's more like it. Wonder what gadgets he has in store for bond this time.
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,748
    Craig looks so good. Easily could do another movie.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 938
    Univex wrote: »
    Contraband wrote: »
    UTHH1oo.jpg

    I'll say it here. Daniel Craig for Bond26! Just do it in two years time with the same team.

    +1
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 8,381
    Univex wrote: »
    Is he using the Swatch? :)

    Yes, Swatch released that shot last week when they showed the new one off.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 938
    antovolk wrote: »

    That's a great action shot of Bond.
    My only very minor complaint would be it's a shame the braces aren't white/silver, but I'll get over it. The wardrobe people in this film seem to like braces that stand out, which is a nice change I guess
  • Posts: 11,425
    Silver braces?
  • Posts: 478
    Any validity at all to the Daily Mail article about moving the release forward by 3 weeks?
  • Posts: 564
    Just bought my tickets. I actually got teared up when I clicked "Purchase." I don't think that's ever happened to me before. It's utterly ridiculous but I guess that's what happens when I wait five years for a new Bond movie!
  • FatherValentineFatherValentine England
    Posts: 712
    That banner looks great. - much more like it.
  • GatecrasherGatecrasher Classified
    Posts: 265
    I’m getting CR banner vibes with the new promo stuff from NTTD. Me likey.
  • edited March 2020 Posts: 5,767
    Getafix wrote: »
    I'm sure I will get over it. In general the film looks visually stunning and with not too much reliance on (noticeable) CGI.

    I think it was JJ Abrams on the first of the SW sequels that really pushed for full scale props and model work over CGI. I totally agree with that approach where possible. Almost always looks better IMO.
    Agreed. At the same time, that film shows some excellent CGI right away in the first few minutes, when an alien nurse is prominently in the frame.



    Getafix wrote: »
    Any way, I'm sure we can all agree that Bond should stay away from space and death spewing satellites for at least another 60 yrs.
    We sure don´t agree on that ;-).



    mtm wrote: »
    I don’t think there’s much option with that shot of the glider opening though: unless you’re going to spend millions of pounds developing a real working plane. JJ used CGI for the shots of the spaceships because they couldn’t afford to shoot in space for real!
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah it’s all very well to say they should do things for real, and something like Mission Impossible does the same: but they can’t crash two helicopters up a mountain for real!
    And how are the Bond folk supposed to film a totally new type of plane with scissor wings that turns into a submarine for real? :D
    I´m sure using models in the Fallout helicopter crash wouldn´t have looked less realistic ;-).
  • J_Bryce777J_Bryce777 San Francisco
    Posts: 78
    antovolk wrote: »

    Very nice. Looks cool but drawing with finger on trigger is how you shoot your thunderballs off, Bond.
Sign In or Register to comment.